Aug 21, 2013
Though photographs and cell phone video were surfacing of dead bodies and the grisly aftermath of some kind of attack, few news outlets were able to independently verify details of what transpired. Reuters and Associated Press mostly put the numbers of victims in the hundreds, but said that the reports--and Free Syria Army's claim of nerve agents being deployed--could not be confirmed.
According to the New York Times:
The Syrian government vociferously denied mounting any chemical attack, and its ally, Russia, blamed Syrian rebels for launching a rocket with an unknown chemical agent that had caused civilian casualties, calling it a preplanned effort to accuse the government of President Bashar al-Assad of using chemical weapons. A team of weapons investigators sent by the United Nations arrived in the country on Sunday to begin looking into several other reports of chemical weapons.
The total death toll remained unclear, although though the images, along with testimonies provided by antigovernment activists and medical personnel, indicated at least scores of victims, including men, women and children. Some opposition estimates went as high as 1,000.
As the AP notes in its reporting, the presence of the UN chemical weapons investigative team in the country "raises questions about why the regime -- which called the claims of the attack Wednesday 'absolutely baseless' -- would use chemical agents at this time."
As Al-Jazeera recently reported:
Assad's government and the rebels fighting to topple him each say the other side has used chemical weapons during the 28-month conflict.
Assad had refused to allow a broader U.N. investigation into allegations of chemical use, including charges that have been leveled by the United States, Britain and France.
[Syria's Deputy Foreign Minister Faisal Mekdad] insisted that Syria "will never use chemical weapons against its people."
As the Security Council set to meet, Amnesty International was among those groups urging the Assad government to give UN investigators access to the alleged site of the chemical attack.
"The allegations of use of chemical weapons against Syrian civilians," which Amnesty International acknowledged it could also not verify independently, "underscore the urgent need for the United Nations team currently in Syria to have a full mandate and unimpeded access to all locations to investigate these and any other incidents of alleged use of chemical weapons."
"What would be the point of having a UN team of experts in the country if they are not allowed to access the sites of the alleged attacks, collect samples and investigate?"
The concern among those worried about the threat of Western military intervention, however, which they warn could spark an even wider regional war, remains focused on creating conditions where peace talks could take place. As the Free Syria Army is using the alleged use of chemical weapons as the latest opportunity to call for more arms or even the creation of a "no fly zone" over Syria, critics of that approach will be demanding that a full and proper investigation into what has happened take place.
________________________________________________
Join Us: News for people demanding a better world
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Though photographs and cell phone video were surfacing of dead bodies and the grisly aftermath of some kind of attack, few news outlets were able to independently verify details of what transpired. Reuters and Associated Press mostly put the numbers of victims in the hundreds, but said that the reports--and Free Syria Army's claim of nerve agents being deployed--could not be confirmed.
According to the New York Times:
The Syrian government vociferously denied mounting any chemical attack, and its ally, Russia, blamed Syrian rebels for launching a rocket with an unknown chemical agent that had caused civilian casualties, calling it a preplanned effort to accuse the government of President Bashar al-Assad of using chemical weapons. A team of weapons investigators sent by the United Nations arrived in the country on Sunday to begin looking into several other reports of chemical weapons.
The total death toll remained unclear, although though the images, along with testimonies provided by antigovernment activists and medical personnel, indicated at least scores of victims, including men, women and children. Some opposition estimates went as high as 1,000.
As the AP notes in its reporting, the presence of the UN chemical weapons investigative team in the country "raises questions about why the regime -- which called the claims of the attack Wednesday 'absolutely baseless' -- would use chemical agents at this time."
As Al-Jazeera recently reported:
Assad's government and the rebels fighting to topple him each say the other side has used chemical weapons during the 28-month conflict.
Assad had refused to allow a broader U.N. investigation into allegations of chemical use, including charges that have been leveled by the United States, Britain and France.
[Syria's Deputy Foreign Minister Faisal Mekdad] insisted that Syria "will never use chemical weapons against its people."
As the Security Council set to meet, Amnesty International was among those groups urging the Assad government to give UN investigators access to the alleged site of the chemical attack.
"The allegations of use of chemical weapons against Syrian civilians," which Amnesty International acknowledged it could also not verify independently, "underscore the urgent need for the United Nations team currently in Syria to have a full mandate and unimpeded access to all locations to investigate these and any other incidents of alleged use of chemical weapons."
"What would be the point of having a UN team of experts in the country if they are not allowed to access the sites of the alleged attacks, collect samples and investigate?"
The concern among those worried about the threat of Western military intervention, however, which they warn could spark an even wider regional war, remains focused on creating conditions where peace talks could take place. As the Free Syria Army is using the alleged use of chemical weapons as the latest opportunity to call for more arms or even the creation of a "no fly zone" over Syria, critics of that approach will be demanding that a full and proper investigation into what has happened take place.
________________________________________________
Though photographs and cell phone video were surfacing of dead bodies and the grisly aftermath of some kind of attack, few news outlets were able to independently verify details of what transpired. Reuters and Associated Press mostly put the numbers of victims in the hundreds, but said that the reports--and Free Syria Army's claim of nerve agents being deployed--could not be confirmed.
According to the New York Times:
The Syrian government vociferously denied mounting any chemical attack, and its ally, Russia, blamed Syrian rebels for launching a rocket with an unknown chemical agent that had caused civilian casualties, calling it a preplanned effort to accuse the government of President Bashar al-Assad of using chemical weapons. A team of weapons investigators sent by the United Nations arrived in the country on Sunday to begin looking into several other reports of chemical weapons.
The total death toll remained unclear, although though the images, along with testimonies provided by antigovernment activists and medical personnel, indicated at least scores of victims, including men, women and children. Some opposition estimates went as high as 1,000.
As the AP notes in its reporting, the presence of the UN chemical weapons investigative team in the country "raises questions about why the regime -- which called the claims of the attack Wednesday 'absolutely baseless' -- would use chemical agents at this time."
As Al-Jazeera recently reported:
Assad's government and the rebels fighting to topple him each say the other side has used chemical weapons during the 28-month conflict.
Assad had refused to allow a broader U.N. investigation into allegations of chemical use, including charges that have been leveled by the United States, Britain and France.
[Syria's Deputy Foreign Minister Faisal Mekdad] insisted that Syria "will never use chemical weapons against its people."
As the Security Council set to meet, Amnesty International was among those groups urging the Assad government to give UN investigators access to the alleged site of the chemical attack.
"The allegations of use of chemical weapons against Syrian civilians," which Amnesty International acknowledged it could also not verify independently, "underscore the urgent need for the United Nations team currently in Syria to have a full mandate and unimpeded access to all locations to investigate these and any other incidents of alleged use of chemical weapons."
"What would be the point of having a UN team of experts in the country if they are not allowed to access the sites of the alleged attacks, collect samples and investigate?"
The concern among those worried about the threat of Western military intervention, however, which they warn could spark an even wider regional war, remains focused on creating conditions where peace talks could take place. As the Free Syria Army is using the alleged use of chemical weapons as the latest opportunity to call for more arms or even the creation of a "no fly zone" over Syria, critics of that approach will be demanding that a full and proper investigation into what has happened take place.
________________________________________________
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.