SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
Though photographs and cell phone video were surfacing of dead bodies and the grisly aftermath of some kind of attack, few news outlets were able to independently verify details of what transpired. Reuters and Associated Press mostly put the numbers of victims in the hundreds, but said that the reports--and Free Syria Army's claim of nerve agents being deployed--could not be confirmed.
According to the New York Times:
The Syrian government vociferously denied mounting any chemical attack, and its ally, Russia, blamed Syrian rebels for launching a rocket with an unknown chemical agent that had caused civilian casualties, calling it a preplanned effort to accuse the government of President Bashar al-Assad of using chemical weapons. A team of weapons investigators sent by the United Nations arrived in the country on Sunday to begin looking into several other reports of chemical weapons.
The total death toll remained unclear, although though the images, along with testimonies provided by antigovernment activists and medical personnel, indicated at least scores of victims, including men, women and children. Some opposition estimates went as high as 1,000.
As the AP notes in its reporting, the presence of the UN chemical weapons investigative team in the country "raises questions about why the regime -- which called the claims of the attack Wednesday 'absolutely baseless' -- would use chemical agents at this time."
As Al-Jazeera recently reported:
Assad's government and the rebels fighting to topple him each say the other side has used chemical weapons during the 28-month conflict.
Assad had refused to allow a broader U.N. investigation into allegations of chemical use, including charges that have been leveled by the United States, Britain and France.
[Syria's Deputy Foreign Minister Faisal Mekdad] insisted that Syria "will never use chemical weapons against its people."
As the Security Council set to meet, Amnesty International was among those groups urging the Assad government to give UN investigators access to the alleged site of the chemical attack.
"The allegations of use of chemical weapons against Syrian civilians," which Amnesty International acknowledged it could also not verify independently, "underscore the urgent need for the United Nations team currently in Syria to have a full mandate and unimpeded access to all locations to investigate these and any other incidents of alleged use of chemical weapons."
"What would be the point of having a UN team of experts in the country if they are not allowed to access the sites of the alleged attacks, collect samples and investigate?"
The concern among those worried about the threat of Western military intervention, however, which they warn could spark an even wider regional war, remains focused on creating conditions where peace talks could take place. As the Free Syria Army is using the alleged use of chemical weapons as the latest opportunity to call for more arms or even the creation of a "no fly zone" over Syria, critics of that approach will be demanding that a full and proper investigation into what has happened take place.
________________________________________________
Dear Common Dreams reader, The U.S. is on a fast track to authoritarianism like nothing I've ever seen. Meanwhile, corporate news outlets are utterly capitulating to Trump, twisting their coverage to avoid drawing his ire while lining up to stuff cash in his pockets. That's why I believe that Common Dreams is doing the best and most consequential reporting that we've ever done. Our small but mighty team is a progressive reporting powerhouse, covering the news every day that the corporate media never will. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. And to ignite change for the common good. Now here's the key piece that I want all our readers to understand: None of this would be possible without your financial support. That's not just some fundraising cliche. It's the absolute and literal truth. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. Will you donate now to help power the nonprofit, independent reporting of Common Dreams? Thank you for being a vital member of our community. Together, we can keep independent journalism alive when it’s needed most. - Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Though photographs and cell phone video were surfacing of dead bodies and the grisly aftermath of some kind of attack, few news outlets were able to independently verify details of what transpired. Reuters and Associated Press mostly put the numbers of victims in the hundreds, but said that the reports--and Free Syria Army's claim of nerve agents being deployed--could not be confirmed.
According to the New York Times:
The Syrian government vociferously denied mounting any chemical attack, and its ally, Russia, blamed Syrian rebels for launching a rocket with an unknown chemical agent that had caused civilian casualties, calling it a preplanned effort to accuse the government of President Bashar al-Assad of using chemical weapons. A team of weapons investigators sent by the United Nations arrived in the country on Sunday to begin looking into several other reports of chemical weapons.
The total death toll remained unclear, although though the images, along with testimonies provided by antigovernment activists and medical personnel, indicated at least scores of victims, including men, women and children. Some opposition estimates went as high as 1,000.
As the AP notes in its reporting, the presence of the UN chemical weapons investigative team in the country "raises questions about why the regime -- which called the claims of the attack Wednesday 'absolutely baseless' -- would use chemical agents at this time."
As Al-Jazeera recently reported:
Assad's government and the rebels fighting to topple him each say the other side has used chemical weapons during the 28-month conflict.
Assad had refused to allow a broader U.N. investigation into allegations of chemical use, including charges that have been leveled by the United States, Britain and France.
[Syria's Deputy Foreign Minister Faisal Mekdad] insisted that Syria "will never use chemical weapons against its people."
As the Security Council set to meet, Amnesty International was among those groups urging the Assad government to give UN investigators access to the alleged site of the chemical attack.
"The allegations of use of chemical weapons against Syrian civilians," which Amnesty International acknowledged it could also not verify independently, "underscore the urgent need for the United Nations team currently in Syria to have a full mandate and unimpeded access to all locations to investigate these and any other incidents of alleged use of chemical weapons."
"What would be the point of having a UN team of experts in the country if they are not allowed to access the sites of the alleged attacks, collect samples and investigate?"
The concern among those worried about the threat of Western military intervention, however, which they warn could spark an even wider regional war, remains focused on creating conditions where peace talks could take place. As the Free Syria Army is using the alleged use of chemical weapons as the latest opportunity to call for more arms or even the creation of a "no fly zone" over Syria, critics of that approach will be demanding that a full and proper investigation into what has happened take place.
________________________________________________
Though photographs and cell phone video were surfacing of dead bodies and the grisly aftermath of some kind of attack, few news outlets were able to independently verify details of what transpired. Reuters and Associated Press mostly put the numbers of victims in the hundreds, but said that the reports--and Free Syria Army's claim of nerve agents being deployed--could not be confirmed.
According to the New York Times:
The Syrian government vociferously denied mounting any chemical attack, and its ally, Russia, blamed Syrian rebels for launching a rocket with an unknown chemical agent that had caused civilian casualties, calling it a preplanned effort to accuse the government of President Bashar al-Assad of using chemical weapons. A team of weapons investigators sent by the United Nations arrived in the country on Sunday to begin looking into several other reports of chemical weapons.
The total death toll remained unclear, although though the images, along with testimonies provided by antigovernment activists and medical personnel, indicated at least scores of victims, including men, women and children. Some opposition estimates went as high as 1,000.
As the AP notes in its reporting, the presence of the UN chemical weapons investigative team in the country "raises questions about why the regime -- which called the claims of the attack Wednesday 'absolutely baseless' -- would use chemical agents at this time."
As Al-Jazeera recently reported:
Assad's government and the rebels fighting to topple him each say the other side has used chemical weapons during the 28-month conflict.
Assad had refused to allow a broader U.N. investigation into allegations of chemical use, including charges that have been leveled by the United States, Britain and France.
[Syria's Deputy Foreign Minister Faisal Mekdad] insisted that Syria "will never use chemical weapons against its people."
As the Security Council set to meet, Amnesty International was among those groups urging the Assad government to give UN investigators access to the alleged site of the chemical attack.
"The allegations of use of chemical weapons against Syrian civilians," which Amnesty International acknowledged it could also not verify independently, "underscore the urgent need for the United Nations team currently in Syria to have a full mandate and unimpeded access to all locations to investigate these and any other incidents of alleged use of chemical weapons."
"What would be the point of having a UN team of experts in the country if they are not allowed to access the sites of the alleged attacks, collect samples and investigate?"
The concern among those worried about the threat of Western military intervention, however, which they warn could spark an even wider regional war, remains focused on creating conditions where peace talks could take place. As the Free Syria Army is using the alleged use of chemical weapons as the latest opportunity to call for more arms or even the creation of a "no fly zone" over Syria, critics of that approach will be demanding that a full and proper investigation into what has happened take place.
________________________________________________