

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.

In documents leaked by National Security Agency whistleblower Edward Snowden and reported on by the Guardian, "top secret payments" of at least PS100m (roughly $150m) over the past three years were made to the agency in exchange for the UK agency to "pull its weight" in regards to international surveillance.
According to Guardian reporters Nick Hopkins and Julian Borger:
Ministers have denied that GCHQ does the NSA's "dirty work," but in the documents GCHQ describes Britain's surveillance laws and regulatory regime as a "selling point" for the Americans.
Taking advantage of the UK's more lax surveillance restrictions and their ability to spy on US citizens, this international spy partnership has proved to be mutually beneficial for the two dragnet agencies.
In one cited instance, the GCHQ had "boasted" that it was able to supply "unique contributions" to the NSA during its investigation of an American citizen's attempted car bomb attack in Times Square in 2010.
"No other detail is provided," Hopkins and Borger write, "but it raises the possibility that GCHQ might have been spying on an American living in the US," which US law prohibits the NSA from doing.
Earlier it was revealed that the GCHQ--which Snowden had described as "worse than the NSA"--has amassed an infinite database of metadata through the tapping of transatlantic fiber-optic cables which "carry the world's phone calls and internet traffic."
According to GCHQ's "investment portfolios," the United States paid the agency PS17.2m ($26m) for that project in particular.
As the Guardian summarizes, other details revealed in the documents include:
One significant takeaway, according to the Guardian, is that the "GCHQ seems desperate to please its American benefactor." One of the documents cites the UK's biggest fear: "US perceptions of the ... partnership diminish, leading to loss of access, and/or reduction in investment ... to the UK."
The report continues:
The overriding necessity to keep on the right side of the US was revealed in a UK government paper that set out the views of GCHQ in the wake of the 2010 strategic defense and security review. The document was called: "GCHQ's international alliances and partnerships: helping to maintain Britain's standing and influence in the world." It said: "Our key partnership is with the US. We need to keep this relationship healthy. The relationship remains strong but is not sentimental. GCHQ must pull its weight and be seen to pull its weight."
_____________________
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |

In documents leaked by National Security Agency whistleblower Edward Snowden and reported on by the Guardian, "top secret payments" of at least PS100m (roughly $150m) over the past three years were made to the agency in exchange for the UK agency to "pull its weight" in regards to international surveillance.
According to Guardian reporters Nick Hopkins and Julian Borger:
Ministers have denied that GCHQ does the NSA's "dirty work," but in the documents GCHQ describes Britain's surveillance laws and regulatory regime as a "selling point" for the Americans.
Taking advantage of the UK's more lax surveillance restrictions and their ability to spy on US citizens, this international spy partnership has proved to be mutually beneficial for the two dragnet agencies.
In one cited instance, the GCHQ had "boasted" that it was able to supply "unique contributions" to the NSA during its investigation of an American citizen's attempted car bomb attack in Times Square in 2010.
"No other detail is provided," Hopkins and Borger write, "but it raises the possibility that GCHQ might have been spying on an American living in the US," which US law prohibits the NSA from doing.
Earlier it was revealed that the GCHQ--which Snowden had described as "worse than the NSA"--has amassed an infinite database of metadata through the tapping of transatlantic fiber-optic cables which "carry the world's phone calls and internet traffic."
According to GCHQ's "investment portfolios," the United States paid the agency PS17.2m ($26m) for that project in particular.
As the Guardian summarizes, other details revealed in the documents include:
One significant takeaway, according to the Guardian, is that the "GCHQ seems desperate to please its American benefactor." One of the documents cites the UK's biggest fear: "US perceptions of the ... partnership diminish, leading to loss of access, and/or reduction in investment ... to the UK."
The report continues:
The overriding necessity to keep on the right side of the US was revealed in a UK government paper that set out the views of GCHQ in the wake of the 2010 strategic defense and security review. The document was called: "GCHQ's international alliances and partnerships: helping to maintain Britain's standing and influence in the world." It said: "Our key partnership is with the US. We need to keep this relationship healthy. The relationship remains strong but is not sentimental. GCHQ must pull its weight and be seen to pull its weight."
_____________________

In documents leaked by National Security Agency whistleblower Edward Snowden and reported on by the Guardian, "top secret payments" of at least PS100m (roughly $150m) over the past three years were made to the agency in exchange for the UK agency to "pull its weight" in regards to international surveillance.
According to Guardian reporters Nick Hopkins and Julian Borger:
Ministers have denied that GCHQ does the NSA's "dirty work," but in the documents GCHQ describes Britain's surveillance laws and regulatory regime as a "selling point" for the Americans.
Taking advantage of the UK's more lax surveillance restrictions and their ability to spy on US citizens, this international spy partnership has proved to be mutually beneficial for the two dragnet agencies.
In one cited instance, the GCHQ had "boasted" that it was able to supply "unique contributions" to the NSA during its investigation of an American citizen's attempted car bomb attack in Times Square in 2010.
"No other detail is provided," Hopkins and Borger write, "but it raises the possibility that GCHQ might have been spying on an American living in the US," which US law prohibits the NSA from doing.
Earlier it was revealed that the GCHQ--which Snowden had described as "worse than the NSA"--has amassed an infinite database of metadata through the tapping of transatlantic fiber-optic cables which "carry the world's phone calls and internet traffic."
According to GCHQ's "investment portfolios," the United States paid the agency PS17.2m ($26m) for that project in particular.
As the Guardian summarizes, other details revealed in the documents include:
One significant takeaway, according to the Guardian, is that the "GCHQ seems desperate to please its American benefactor." One of the documents cites the UK's biggest fear: "US perceptions of the ... partnership diminish, leading to loss of access, and/or reduction in investment ... to the UK."
The report continues:
The overriding necessity to keep on the right side of the US was revealed in a UK government paper that set out the views of GCHQ in the wake of the 2010 strategic defense and security review. The document was called: "GCHQ's international alliances and partnerships: helping to maintain Britain's standing and influence in the world." It said: "Our key partnership is with the US. We need to keep this relationship healthy. The relationship remains strong but is not sentimental. GCHQ must pull its weight and be seen to pull its weight."
_____________________