SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
In documents leaked by National Security Agency whistleblower Edward Snowden and reported on by the Guardian, "top secret payments" of at least PS100m (roughly $150m) over the past three years were made to the agency in exchange for the UK agency to "pull its weight" in regards to international surveillance.
According to Guardian reporters Nick Hopkins and Julian Borger:
Ministers have denied that GCHQ does the NSA's "dirty work," but in the documents GCHQ describes Britain's surveillance laws and regulatory regime as a "selling point" for the Americans.
Taking advantage of the UK's more lax surveillance restrictions and their ability to spy on US citizens, this international spy partnership has proved to be mutually beneficial for the two dragnet agencies.
In one cited instance, the GCHQ had "boasted" that it was able to supply "unique contributions" to the NSA during its investigation of an American citizen's attempted car bomb attack in Times Square in 2010.
"No other detail is provided," Hopkins and Borger write, "but it raises the possibility that GCHQ might have been spying on an American living in the US," which US law prohibits the NSA from doing.
Earlier it was revealed that the GCHQ--which Snowden had described as "worse than the NSA"--has amassed an infinite database of metadata through the tapping of transatlantic fiber-optic cables which "carry the world's phone calls and internet traffic."
According to GCHQ's "investment portfolios," the United States paid the agency PS17.2m ($26m) for that project in particular.
As the Guardian summarizes, other details revealed in the documents include:
One significant takeaway, according to the Guardian, is that the "GCHQ seems desperate to please its American benefactor." One of the documents cites the UK's biggest fear: "US perceptions of the ... partnership diminish, leading to loss of access, and/or reduction in investment ... to the UK."
The report continues:
The overriding necessity to keep on the right side of the US was revealed in a UK government paper that set out the views of GCHQ in the wake of the 2010 strategic defense and security review. The document was called: "GCHQ's international alliances and partnerships: helping to maintain Britain's standing and influence in the world." It said: "Our key partnership is with the US. We need to keep this relationship healthy. The relationship remains strong but is not sentimental. GCHQ must pull its weight and be seen to pull its weight."
_____________________
Trump and Musk are on an unconstitutional rampage, aiming for virtually every corner of the federal government. These two right-wing billionaires are targeting nurses, scientists, teachers, daycare providers, judges, veterans, air traffic controllers, and nuclear safety inspectors. No one is safe. The food stamps program, Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid are next. It’s an unprecedented disaster and a five-alarm fire, but there will be a reckoning. The people did not vote for this. The American people do not want this dystopian hellscape that hides behind claims of “efficiency.” Still, in reality, it is all a giveaway to corporate interests and the libertarian dreams of far-right oligarchs like Musk. Common Dreams is playing a vital role by reporting day and night on this orgy of corruption and greed, as well as what everyday people can do to organize and fight back. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover issues the corporate media never will, but we can only continue with our readers’ support. |
In documents leaked by National Security Agency whistleblower Edward Snowden and reported on by the Guardian, "top secret payments" of at least PS100m (roughly $150m) over the past three years were made to the agency in exchange for the UK agency to "pull its weight" in regards to international surveillance.
According to Guardian reporters Nick Hopkins and Julian Borger:
Ministers have denied that GCHQ does the NSA's "dirty work," but in the documents GCHQ describes Britain's surveillance laws and regulatory regime as a "selling point" for the Americans.
Taking advantage of the UK's more lax surveillance restrictions and their ability to spy on US citizens, this international spy partnership has proved to be mutually beneficial for the two dragnet agencies.
In one cited instance, the GCHQ had "boasted" that it was able to supply "unique contributions" to the NSA during its investigation of an American citizen's attempted car bomb attack in Times Square in 2010.
"No other detail is provided," Hopkins and Borger write, "but it raises the possibility that GCHQ might have been spying on an American living in the US," which US law prohibits the NSA from doing.
Earlier it was revealed that the GCHQ--which Snowden had described as "worse than the NSA"--has amassed an infinite database of metadata through the tapping of transatlantic fiber-optic cables which "carry the world's phone calls and internet traffic."
According to GCHQ's "investment portfolios," the United States paid the agency PS17.2m ($26m) for that project in particular.
As the Guardian summarizes, other details revealed in the documents include:
One significant takeaway, according to the Guardian, is that the "GCHQ seems desperate to please its American benefactor." One of the documents cites the UK's biggest fear: "US perceptions of the ... partnership diminish, leading to loss of access, and/or reduction in investment ... to the UK."
The report continues:
The overriding necessity to keep on the right side of the US was revealed in a UK government paper that set out the views of GCHQ in the wake of the 2010 strategic defense and security review. The document was called: "GCHQ's international alliances and partnerships: helping to maintain Britain's standing and influence in the world." It said: "Our key partnership is with the US. We need to keep this relationship healthy. The relationship remains strong but is not sentimental. GCHQ must pull its weight and be seen to pull its weight."
_____________________
In documents leaked by National Security Agency whistleblower Edward Snowden and reported on by the Guardian, "top secret payments" of at least PS100m (roughly $150m) over the past three years were made to the agency in exchange for the UK agency to "pull its weight" in regards to international surveillance.
According to Guardian reporters Nick Hopkins and Julian Borger:
Ministers have denied that GCHQ does the NSA's "dirty work," but in the documents GCHQ describes Britain's surveillance laws and regulatory regime as a "selling point" for the Americans.
Taking advantage of the UK's more lax surveillance restrictions and their ability to spy on US citizens, this international spy partnership has proved to be mutually beneficial for the two dragnet agencies.
In one cited instance, the GCHQ had "boasted" that it was able to supply "unique contributions" to the NSA during its investigation of an American citizen's attempted car bomb attack in Times Square in 2010.
"No other detail is provided," Hopkins and Borger write, "but it raises the possibility that GCHQ might have been spying on an American living in the US," which US law prohibits the NSA from doing.
Earlier it was revealed that the GCHQ--which Snowden had described as "worse than the NSA"--has amassed an infinite database of metadata through the tapping of transatlantic fiber-optic cables which "carry the world's phone calls and internet traffic."
According to GCHQ's "investment portfolios," the United States paid the agency PS17.2m ($26m) for that project in particular.
As the Guardian summarizes, other details revealed in the documents include:
One significant takeaway, according to the Guardian, is that the "GCHQ seems desperate to please its American benefactor." One of the documents cites the UK's biggest fear: "US perceptions of the ... partnership diminish, leading to loss of access, and/or reduction in investment ... to the UK."
The report continues:
The overriding necessity to keep on the right side of the US was revealed in a UK government paper that set out the views of GCHQ in the wake of the 2010 strategic defense and security review. The document was called: "GCHQ's international alliances and partnerships: helping to maintain Britain's standing and influence in the world." It said: "Our key partnership is with the US. We need to keep this relationship healthy. The relationship remains strong but is not sentimental. GCHQ must pull its weight and be seen to pull its weight."
_____________________