SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
The statement came after an article published Monday in the New York Times suggested that Obama plans to move more quickly on troop withdrawal from Afghanistan.
The US diplomat made it clear that, to the contrary, the US intends to continue its open-ended occupation. "The Afghans actually need us to stay," Dobbins alleged, according to Reuters. "Most Afghans want us to stay. And we have promised to stay."
"It is important to ask who wants the US to stay," Robert Naiman--policy director for Just Foreign Policy--told Common Dreams. "Is it Karzai, the parliament, a majority of the Afghan people? And what do they want troops to do? Detain Afghans? Carry out night raids? Conduct drone strikes?"
"As usual, helping Afghanistan is conflated with keeping thousands of troops there," Naiman added. "There's no reason those things should be conflated."
As the US-led war in Afghanistan--now the longest official war in US history--stretches through it's 12th summer, over 60,000 US troops remain, in addition to vast webs of US private contractors and US appointed Afghan military generals.
The Afghan civilian death toll remains alarmingly high, with drone attacks killing far more civilians than manned air crafts, stoking outrage across Afghanistan. Meanwhile, attacks on Afghan children are skyrocketing, the UN reports.
Over 2,000 U.S. service members have died in Afghanistan since the U.S.-led invasion in 2001, with an unknown number lost to suicides and high-risk behaviors as repeated deployments to Iraq and Afghanistan compound PTSD and other mental health problems.
Meanwhile, 'green on blue' attacks, in which members of Afghan forces kill US ones, continue across to define the US-Afghanistan relationship, signaling that resentment against the US occupation even extends to its Afghan military 'partners.'
The US has little to show for the open-ended war, with alleged 'peace talks' recently falling apart over purported Afghan objection to US negotiations with the Taliban.
_____________________
Dear Common Dreams reader, The U.S. is on a fast track to authoritarianism like nothing I've ever seen. Meanwhile, corporate news outlets are utterly capitulating to Trump, twisting their coverage to avoid drawing his ire while lining up to stuff cash in his pockets. That's why I believe that Common Dreams is doing the best and most consequential reporting that we've ever done. Our small but mighty team is a progressive reporting powerhouse, covering the news every day that the corporate media never will. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. And to ignite change for the common good. Now here's the key piece that I want all our readers to understand: None of this would be possible without your financial support. That's not just some fundraising cliche. It's the absolute and literal truth. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. Will you donate now to help power the nonprofit, independent reporting of Common Dreams? Thank you for being a vital member of our community. Together, we can keep independent journalism alive when it’s needed most. - Craig Brown, Co-founder |
The statement came after an article published Monday in the New York Times suggested that Obama plans to move more quickly on troop withdrawal from Afghanistan.
The US diplomat made it clear that, to the contrary, the US intends to continue its open-ended occupation. "The Afghans actually need us to stay," Dobbins alleged, according to Reuters. "Most Afghans want us to stay. And we have promised to stay."
"It is important to ask who wants the US to stay," Robert Naiman--policy director for Just Foreign Policy--told Common Dreams. "Is it Karzai, the parliament, a majority of the Afghan people? And what do they want troops to do? Detain Afghans? Carry out night raids? Conduct drone strikes?"
"As usual, helping Afghanistan is conflated with keeping thousands of troops there," Naiman added. "There's no reason those things should be conflated."
As the US-led war in Afghanistan--now the longest official war in US history--stretches through it's 12th summer, over 60,000 US troops remain, in addition to vast webs of US private contractors and US appointed Afghan military generals.
The Afghan civilian death toll remains alarmingly high, with drone attacks killing far more civilians than manned air crafts, stoking outrage across Afghanistan. Meanwhile, attacks on Afghan children are skyrocketing, the UN reports.
Over 2,000 U.S. service members have died in Afghanistan since the U.S.-led invasion in 2001, with an unknown number lost to suicides and high-risk behaviors as repeated deployments to Iraq and Afghanistan compound PTSD and other mental health problems.
Meanwhile, 'green on blue' attacks, in which members of Afghan forces kill US ones, continue across to define the US-Afghanistan relationship, signaling that resentment against the US occupation even extends to its Afghan military 'partners.'
The US has little to show for the open-ended war, with alleged 'peace talks' recently falling apart over purported Afghan objection to US negotiations with the Taliban.
_____________________
The statement came after an article published Monday in the New York Times suggested that Obama plans to move more quickly on troop withdrawal from Afghanistan.
The US diplomat made it clear that, to the contrary, the US intends to continue its open-ended occupation. "The Afghans actually need us to stay," Dobbins alleged, according to Reuters. "Most Afghans want us to stay. And we have promised to stay."
"It is important to ask who wants the US to stay," Robert Naiman--policy director for Just Foreign Policy--told Common Dreams. "Is it Karzai, the parliament, a majority of the Afghan people? And what do they want troops to do? Detain Afghans? Carry out night raids? Conduct drone strikes?"
"As usual, helping Afghanistan is conflated with keeping thousands of troops there," Naiman added. "There's no reason those things should be conflated."
As the US-led war in Afghanistan--now the longest official war in US history--stretches through it's 12th summer, over 60,000 US troops remain, in addition to vast webs of US private contractors and US appointed Afghan military generals.
The Afghan civilian death toll remains alarmingly high, with drone attacks killing far more civilians than manned air crafts, stoking outrage across Afghanistan. Meanwhile, attacks on Afghan children are skyrocketing, the UN reports.
Over 2,000 U.S. service members have died in Afghanistan since the U.S.-led invasion in 2001, with an unknown number lost to suicides and high-risk behaviors as repeated deployments to Iraq and Afghanistan compound PTSD and other mental health problems.
Meanwhile, 'green on blue' attacks, in which members of Afghan forces kill US ones, continue across to define the US-Afghanistan relationship, signaling that resentment against the US occupation even extends to its Afghan military 'partners.'
The US has little to show for the open-ended war, with alleged 'peace talks' recently falling apart over purported Afghan objection to US negotiations with the Taliban.
_____________________