

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.

The statement came after an article published Monday in the New York Times suggested that Obama plans to move more quickly on troop withdrawal from Afghanistan.
The US diplomat made it clear that, to the contrary, the US intends to continue its open-ended occupation. "The Afghans actually need us to stay," Dobbins alleged, according to Reuters. "Most Afghans want us to stay. And we have promised to stay."
"It is important to ask who wants the US to stay," Robert Naiman--policy director for Just Foreign Policy--told Common Dreams. "Is it Karzai, the parliament, a majority of the Afghan people? And what do they want troops to do? Detain Afghans? Carry out night raids? Conduct drone strikes?"
"As usual, helping Afghanistan is conflated with keeping thousands of troops there," Naiman added. "There's no reason those things should be conflated."
As the US-led war in Afghanistan--now the longest official war in US history--stretches through it's 12th summer, over 60,000 US troops remain, in addition to vast webs of US private contractors and US appointed Afghan military generals.
The Afghan civilian death toll remains alarmingly high, with drone attacks killing far more civilians than manned air crafts, stoking outrage across Afghanistan. Meanwhile, attacks on Afghan children are skyrocketing, the UN reports.
Over 2,000 U.S. service members have died in Afghanistan since the U.S.-led invasion in 2001, with an unknown number lost to suicides and high-risk behaviors as repeated deployments to Iraq and Afghanistan compound PTSD and other mental health problems.
Meanwhile, 'green on blue' attacks, in which members of Afghan forces kill US ones, continue across to define the US-Afghanistan relationship, signaling that resentment against the US occupation even extends to its Afghan military 'partners.'
The US has little to show for the open-ended war, with alleged 'peace talks' recently falling apart over purported Afghan objection to US negotiations with the Taliban.
_____________________
This country and this world are at a monumental crossroads. US voters have an opportunity to beat back the forces of fascism and confront the billionaires who are rigging the economy, our media system, and our democracy, making it increasingly impossible for ordinary people to get by. We’re not just talking about the election. We’re talking about what must be done once these fascist elements are vanquished from power. We need a bolder set of solutions than what either major party has so far been willing to offer and a working-class movement ready to fight like hell for it. Trump didn't emerge from nowhere. The conditions that fueled MAGA authoritarianism were created by decades of radical neoliberal economic policies and a corrupt political system dominated by corporate interests. They slashed taxes on the super-rich, promising that the benefits would trickle down. They said giveaways to the corporate titans would make life more affordable for the rest of us. It was all bullshit. And when a bitter, betrayed populace searches for someone to blame, right-wing demagogues have little trouble finding scapegoats. People know when they're being lied to, but you won't hear any of this from the corporate media. Only independent journalism—powered and funded by people who believe in building a better world—can deliver truly trustworthy daily news. If you share our vision, please contribute whatever you can to sustain our work. |

The statement came after an article published Monday in the New York Times suggested that Obama plans to move more quickly on troop withdrawal from Afghanistan.
The US diplomat made it clear that, to the contrary, the US intends to continue its open-ended occupation. "The Afghans actually need us to stay," Dobbins alleged, according to Reuters. "Most Afghans want us to stay. And we have promised to stay."
"It is important to ask who wants the US to stay," Robert Naiman--policy director for Just Foreign Policy--told Common Dreams. "Is it Karzai, the parliament, a majority of the Afghan people? And what do they want troops to do? Detain Afghans? Carry out night raids? Conduct drone strikes?"
"As usual, helping Afghanistan is conflated with keeping thousands of troops there," Naiman added. "There's no reason those things should be conflated."
As the US-led war in Afghanistan--now the longest official war in US history--stretches through it's 12th summer, over 60,000 US troops remain, in addition to vast webs of US private contractors and US appointed Afghan military generals.
The Afghan civilian death toll remains alarmingly high, with drone attacks killing far more civilians than manned air crafts, stoking outrage across Afghanistan. Meanwhile, attacks on Afghan children are skyrocketing, the UN reports.
Over 2,000 U.S. service members have died in Afghanistan since the U.S.-led invasion in 2001, with an unknown number lost to suicides and high-risk behaviors as repeated deployments to Iraq and Afghanistan compound PTSD and other mental health problems.
Meanwhile, 'green on blue' attacks, in which members of Afghan forces kill US ones, continue across to define the US-Afghanistan relationship, signaling that resentment against the US occupation even extends to its Afghan military 'partners.'
The US has little to show for the open-ended war, with alleged 'peace talks' recently falling apart over purported Afghan objection to US negotiations with the Taliban.
_____________________

The statement came after an article published Monday in the New York Times suggested that Obama plans to move more quickly on troop withdrawal from Afghanistan.
The US diplomat made it clear that, to the contrary, the US intends to continue its open-ended occupation. "The Afghans actually need us to stay," Dobbins alleged, according to Reuters. "Most Afghans want us to stay. And we have promised to stay."
"It is important to ask who wants the US to stay," Robert Naiman--policy director for Just Foreign Policy--told Common Dreams. "Is it Karzai, the parliament, a majority of the Afghan people? And what do they want troops to do? Detain Afghans? Carry out night raids? Conduct drone strikes?"
"As usual, helping Afghanistan is conflated with keeping thousands of troops there," Naiman added. "There's no reason those things should be conflated."
As the US-led war in Afghanistan--now the longest official war in US history--stretches through it's 12th summer, over 60,000 US troops remain, in addition to vast webs of US private contractors and US appointed Afghan military generals.
The Afghan civilian death toll remains alarmingly high, with drone attacks killing far more civilians than manned air crafts, stoking outrage across Afghanistan. Meanwhile, attacks on Afghan children are skyrocketing, the UN reports.
Over 2,000 U.S. service members have died in Afghanistan since the U.S.-led invasion in 2001, with an unknown number lost to suicides and high-risk behaviors as repeated deployments to Iraq and Afghanistan compound PTSD and other mental health problems.
Meanwhile, 'green on blue' attacks, in which members of Afghan forces kill US ones, continue across to define the US-Afghanistan relationship, signaling that resentment against the US occupation even extends to its Afghan military 'partners.'
The US has little to show for the open-ended war, with alleged 'peace talks' recently falling apart over purported Afghan objection to US negotiations with the Taliban.
_____________________