

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
US Energy Secretary Ernest Moniz declared Sunday that 'coal is our future,' affirming skeptics' fears that, despite the rhetoric heralded in President Obama's climate policy speech last week, the US will continue to kow-tow to the interests of Big Coal.
The Energy Chief's statement appeared to backpedal on comments made by the president regarding "new rules to cut carbon emissions from US power plants and support renewable energy."
Despite these claims, Obama "expects fossil fuels, and coal specifically, to remain a significant contributor for some time," Moniz told Reuters Sunday while attending a nuclear security conference in Vienna, Austria.
From Reuters:
The way the U.S. administration is "looking at it is: what does it take for us to do to make coal part of a low carbon future," he said, adding this would include higher efficiency plants and new ways of utilizing coal.
It is "all about having, in fact, coal as part of that future," Moniz said. "I don't believe it is a 'war on coal'."
Moniz was responding directly to Big Coal interests who, following the President's speech, denounced his climate plan. Senator Joe Manchin (D- W. Va) responded to the speech by claiming that the Obama had "declared a war on coal."
However, environmentalists watching the speech anticipated little change in the administration's energy policy, despite the "flowery rhetoric."
"A sensible climate plan," said Damon Moglen, climate and energy program director of Friends of the Earth, "would include a renunciation of the president's 'all of the above' energy strategy, which promotes biofuels, so-called clean coal, natural gas and dirty and dangerous nuclear power."
"In order to address climate change," he continued, "the president needs to focus on the ambitious development of renewable energy, energy storage and efficiency technologies while setting us on a path which clearly leaves behind the fossil fuel-based energy economy of the 20th century."
Rather than moving away from fossil fuels, the Obama administration keeps "pinning its hopes [...] on developing new technologies to make coal cleaner," writes DeSmogBlog's Sharon Kelly.
"The plan in rough form, involves collecting carbon dioxide emitted by power plants and burying it, forever, underground," she adds. "If that sounds like a heck of a challenge, that's because it is."
During his speech, Obama resurrected the myth of 'clean coal' and Moniz echoed the falsehood of carbon capture and storage technology (CCS) when he announced an $8 billion loan guarantee program for projects to develop new "clean" technologies.
Despite the numerous and well-documented renunciations of CCS, Moniz--"whose support of the coal industry and faith in sequestration has been longstanding," writes Kelly--remains dangerously undaunted.
She continues:
Mr. Moniz will be in a uniquely influential position when it comes to confronting these problems. President Obama announced that he would rely on executive agencies instead of Congress, so Mr. Moniz's Energy Department will play a crucial role in determining precisely how Obama's strategy is administered.
_____________________
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
US Energy Secretary Ernest Moniz declared Sunday that 'coal is our future,' affirming skeptics' fears that, despite the rhetoric heralded in President Obama's climate policy speech last week, the US will continue to kow-tow to the interests of Big Coal.
The Energy Chief's statement appeared to backpedal on comments made by the president regarding "new rules to cut carbon emissions from US power plants and support renewable energy."
Despite these claims, Obama "expects fossil fuels, and coal specifically, to remain a significant contributor for some time," Moniz told Reuters Sunday while attending a nuclear security conference in Vienna, Austria.
From Reuters:
The way the U.S. administration is "looking at it is: what does it take for us to do to make coal part of a low carbon future," he said, adding this would include higher efficiency plants and new ways of utilizing coal.
It is "all about having, in fact, coal as part of that future," Moniz said. "I don't believe it is a 'war on coal'."
Moniz was responding directly to Big Coal interests who, following the President's speech, denounced his climate plan. Senator Joe Manchin (D- W. Va) responded to the speech by claiming that the Obama had "declared a war on coal."
However, environmentalists watching the speech anticipated little change in the administration's energy policy, despite the "flowery rhetoric."
"A sensible climate plan," said Damon Moglen, climate and energy program director of Friends of the Earth, "would include a renunciation of the president's 'all of the above' energy strategy, which promotes biofuels, so-called clean coal, natural gas and dirty and dangerous nuclear power."
"In order to address climate change," he continued, "the president needs to focus on the ambitious development of renewable energy, energy storage and efficiency technologies while setting us on a path which clearly leaves behind the fossil fuel-based energy economy of the 20th century."
Rather than moving away from fossil fuels, the Obama administration keeps "pinning its hopes [...] on developing new technologies to make coal cleaner," writes DeSmogBlog's Sharon Kelly.
"The plan in rough form, involves collecting carbon dioxide emitted by power plants and burying it, forever, underground," she adds. "If that sounds like a heck of a challenge, that's because it is."
During his speech, Obama resurrected the myth of 'clean coal' and Moniz echoed the falsehood of carbon capture and storage technology (CCS) when he announced an $8 billion loan guarantee program for projects to develop new "clean" technologies.
Despite the numerous and well-documented renunciations of CCS, Moniz--"whose support of the coal industry and faith in sequestration has been longstanding," writes Kelly--remains dangerously undaunted.
She continues:
Mr. Moniz will be in a uniquely influential position when it comes to confronting these problems. President Obama announced that he would rely on executive agencies instead of Congress, so Mr. Moniz's Energy Department will play a crucial role in determining precisely how Obama's strategy is administered.
_____________________
US Energy Secretary Ernest Moniz declared Sunday that 'coal is our future,' affirming skeptics' fears that, despite the rhetoric heralded in President Obama's climate policy speech last week, the US will continue to kow-tow to the interests of Big Coal.
The Energy Chief's statement appeared to backpedal on comments made by the president regarding "new rules to cut carbon emissions from US power plants and support renewable energy."
Despite these claims, Obama "expects fossil fuels, and coal specifically, to remain a significant contributor for some time," Moniz told Reuters Sunday while attending a nuclear security conference in Vienna, Austria.
From Reuters:
The way the U.S. administration is "looking at it is: what does it take for us to do to make coal part of a low carbon future," he said, adding this would include higher efficiency plants and new ways of utilizing coal.
It is "all about having, in fact, coal as part of that future," Moniz said. "I don't believe it is a 'war on coal'."
Moniz was responding directly to Big Coal interests who, following the President's speech, denounced his climate plan. Senator Joe Manchin (D- W. Va) responded to the speech by claiming that the Obama had "declared a war on coal."
However, environmentalists watching the speech anticipated little change in the administration's energy policy, despite the "flowery rhetoric."
"A sensible climate plan," said Damon Moglen, climate and energy program director of Friends of the Earth, "would include a renunciation of the president's 'all of the above' energy strategy, which promotes biofuels, so-called clean coal, natural gas and dirty and dangerous nuclear power."
"In order to address climate change," he continued, "the president needs to focus on the ambitious development of renewable energy, energy storage and efficiency technologies while setting us on a path which clearly leaves behind the fossil fuel-based energy economy of the 20th century."
Rather than moving away from fossil fuels, the Obama administration keeps "pinning its hopes [...] on developing new technologies to make coal cleaner," writes DeSmogBlog's Sharon Kelly.
"The plan in rough form, involves collecting carbon dioxide emitted by power plants and burying it, forever, underground," she adds. "If that sounds like a heck of a challenge, that's because it is."
During his speech, Obama resurrected the myth of 'clean coal' and Moniz echoed the falsehood of carbon capture and storage technology (CCS) when he announced an $8 billion loan guarantee program for projects to develop new "clean" technologies.
Despite the numerous and well-documented renunciations of CCS, Moniz--"whose support of the coal industry and faith in sequestration has been longstanding," writes Kelly--remains dangerously undaunted.
She continues:
Mr. Moniz will be in a uniquely influential position when it comes to confronting these problems. President Obama announced that he would rely on executive agencies instead of Congress, so Mr. Moniz's Energy Department will play a crucial role in determining precisely how Obama's strategy is administered.
_____________________