Pakistani men protest against drone strikes (Photo: SS Mirza/AFP/Getty Images)
May 24, 2013
Pakistan officials criticized President Obama's speech on Thursday for not announcing an immediate moratorium on all drone strikes in the country, insisting that any drone attack on Pakistan's soil is illegal and constitutes an assault on Pakistan's sovereignty.
"The government of Pakistan has consistently maintained that the drone strikes are counter-productive, entail loss of innocent civilian lives, have human rights and humanitarian implications and violate the principles of national sovereignty, territorial integrity and international law," Pakistan's Ministry of Foreign Affairs said in a statement, while conceding that Obama's speech contained mention of some positive reforms.
In the speech, given at the National Defense University in Washington, Obama said some reforms to the drone program were needed, claiming the U.S. would not perform an assassination if a target can be "reasonably" captured; that strikes can only be used against targets that poses an "imminent" threat; and that drone strikes will increasingly be initiated by the the U.S. military rather than the CIA (even though the CIA will continue to operate drones in Pakistan).
However, Obama continued to defend the use of drones overall, framing their use as a necessary evil in the "global war on terror."
To many human rights groups, however, Obama's proclamations did not go nearly far enough in the right direction. As their comments indicate, the speech certainly did not put officials in Pakistan at ease.
According to The Bureau of Investigative Journalism, Pakistan has experienced hundreds of CIA drone attacks inside its borders that have killed up to 3,587 people since 2004, with up to 884 of them civilians.
"Obama has finally responded to the popular sentiment in this country, which is fiercely against the drones, and I think that shows a certain sensitivity," said Mushahid Hussain, chairman of the defense committee in Pakistan's Senate. "But for the people of Pakistan that is not good enough unless there is a cessation of drone attacks."
_______________________
An Unconstitutional Rampage
Trump and Musk are on an unconstitutional rampage, aiming for virtually every corner of the federal government. These two right-wing billionaires are targeting nurses, scientists, teachers, daycare providers, judges, veterans, air traffic controllers, and nuclear safety inspectors. No one is safe. The food stamps program, Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid are next. It’s an unprecedented disaster and a five-alarm fire, but there will be a reckoning. The people did not vote for this. The American people do not want this dystopian hellscape that hides behind claims of “efficiency.” Still, in reality, it is all a giveaway to corporate interests and the libertarian dreams of far-right oligarchs like Musk. Common Dreams is playing a vital role by reporting day and night on this orgy of corruption and greed, as well as what everyday people can do to organize and fight back. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover issues the corporate media never will, but we can only continue with our readers’ support. |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Jacob Chamberlain
Jacob Chamberlain is a former staff writer for Common Dreams. His website is www.jacobpchamberlain.com.
Pakistan officials criticized President Obama's speech on Thursday for not announcing an immediate moratorium on all drone strikes in the country, insisting that any drone attack on Pakistan's soil is illegal and constitutes an assault on Pakistan's sovereignty.
"The government of Pakistan has consistently maintained that the drone strikes are counter-productive, entail loss of innocent civilian lives, have human rights and humanitarian implications and violate the principles of national sovereignty, territorial integrity and international law," Pakistan's Ministry of Foreign Affairs said in a statement, while conceding that Obama's speech contained mention of some positive reforms.
In the speech, given at the National Defense University in Washington, Obama said some reforms to the drone program were needed, claiming the U.S. would not perform an assassination if a target can be "reasonably" captured; that strikes can only be used against targets that poses an "imminent" threat; and that drone strikes will increasingly be initiated by the the U.S. military rather than the CIA (even though the CIA will continue to operate drones in Pakistan).
However, Obama continued to defend the use of drones overall, framing their use as a necessary evil in the "global war on terror."
To many human rights groups, however, Obama's proclamations did not go nearly far enough in the right direction. As their comments indicate, the speech certainly did not put officials in Pakistan at ease.
According to The Bureau of Investigative Journalism, Pakistan has experienced hundreds of CIA drone attacks inside its borders that have killed up to 3,587 people since 2004, with up to 884 of them civilians.
"Obama has finally responded to the popular sentiment in this country, which is fiercely against the drones, and I think that shows a certain sensitivity," said Mushahid Hussain, chairman of the defense committee in Pakistan's Senate. "But for the people of Pakistan that is not good enough unless there is a cessation of drone attacks."
_______________________
Jacob Chamberlain
Jacob Chamberlain is a former staff writer for Common Dreams. His website is www.jacobpchamberlain.com.
Pakistan officials criticized President Obama's speech on Thursday for not announcing an immediate moratorium on all drone strikes in the country, insisting that any drone attack on Pakistan's soil is illegal and constitutes an assault on Pakistan's sovereignty.
"The government of Pakistan has consistently maintained that the drone strikes are counter-productive, entail loss of innocent civilian lives, have human rights and humanitarian implications and violate the principles of national sovereignty, territorial integrity and international law," Pakistan's Ministry of Foreign Affairs said in a statement, while conceding that Obama's speech contained mention of some positive reforms.
In the speech, given at the National Defense University in Washington, Obama said some reforms to the drone program were needed, claiming the U.S. would not perform an assassination if a target can be "reasonably" captured; that strikes can only be used against targets that poses an "imminent" threat; and that drone strikes will increasingly be initiated by the the U.S. military rather than the CIA (even though the CIA will continue to operate drones in Pakistan).
However, Obama continued to defend the use of drones overall, framing their use as a necessary evil in the "global war on terror."
To many human rights groups, however, Obama's proclamations did not go nearly far enough in the right direction. As their comments indicate, the speech certainly did not put officials in Pakistan at ease.
According to The Bureau of Investigative Journalism, Pakistan has experienced hundreds of CIA drone attacks inside its borders that have killed up to 3,587 people since 2004, with up to 884 of them civilians.
"Obama has finally responded to the popular sentiment in this country, which is fiercely against the drones, and I think that shows a certain sensitivity," said Mushahid Hussain, chairman of the defense committee in Pakistan's Senate. "But for the people of Pakistan that is not good enough unless there is a cessation of drone attacks."
_______________________
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.