SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Image taken on January 27, 2011 shows the sun rising in Indonesia's Wakatobi archipelago. Australia said it was pushing for a ban Thursday of any commercial use of a pioneering technique to reduce the impacts of climate change by "fertilizing" the world's oceans with iron, warning of significant risks. (Photo: AFP)
Australia Pushes for Far-Reaching Ban on Geoengineering Scheme 'Ocean Fertilization'
'Ocean fertilization' does more harm than good, leaders warn
May 16, 2013
Australia is working on a legally binding ban on the controversial geoengineering technique known as ocean fertilization, Agence France-Presse reports Wednesday.
Ocean fertilization involves dumping iron into the ocean to fertilize plankton on the ocean floor--which, as the theory goes, would absorb carbon dioxide before it is released into the atmosphere.
However, iron dumping has drawn ire from environmentalists around the world, as it has been found to be responsible for "damaging toxic algae blooms, increasing ocean acidification, and depleting oxygen in deep waters," as The Age reports.
The Canadian Government was granted the tongue-in-cheek "Dodo Award" at the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) in 2012, for failing to to act when a rogue business team illegally dumped 100 tons of iron sulphate into the Pacific Ocean about 200 nautical miles west of the islands of Haida Gwaii, one of the world's most celebrated, diverse ecosystems.
As a legally binding ban on the process is yet to be developed, this week Australia joined with South Korea and Nigeria to push through an amendment to an international treaty on dumping-related ocean pollution--the London Protocol--that would legally ban iron dumping until more research is done.
"The amendment seeks to put mandatory regulation in place around the practice of ocean fertilization," said Australian Environment Minister Tony Burke.
"Adoption of Australia's proposed amendment would mean that the 42 parties to the London Protocol would take a precautionary approach while more research is undertaken," he said.
"It prohibits commercial ocean fertilization activities, while allowing for legitimate scientific research to identify potential benefits and ways to safely manage the process."
The amendment will be taken up at a treaty meeting in October.
_______________________
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, The U.S. is on a fast track to authoritarianism like nothing I've ever seen. Meanwhile, corporate news outlets are utterly capitulating to Trump, twisting their coverage to avoid drawing his ire while lining up to stuff cash in his pockets. That's why I believe that Common Dreams is doing the best and most consequential reporting that we've ever done. Our small but mighty team is a progressive reporting powerhouse, covering the news every day that the corporate media never will. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. And to ignite change for the common good. Now here's the key piece that I want all our readers to understand: None of this would be possible without your financial support. That's not just some fundraising cliche. It's the absolute and literal truth. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. Will you donate now to help power the nonprofit, independent reporting of Common Dreams? Thank you for being a vital member of our community. Together, we can keep independent journalism alive when it’s needed most. - Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Jacob Chamberlain
Jacob Chamberlain is a former staff writer for Common Dreams. His website is www.jacobpchamberlain.com.
Australia is working on a legally binding ban on the controversial geoengineering technique known as ocean fertilization, Agence France-Presse reports Wednesday.
Ocean fertilization involves dumping iron into the ocean to fertilize plankton on the ocean floor--which, as the theory goes, would absorb carbon dioxide before it is released into the atmosphere.
However, iron dumping has drawn ire from environmentalists around the world, as it has been found to be responsible for "damaging toxic algae blooms, increasing ocean acidification, and depleting oxygen in deep waters," as The Age reports.
The Canadian Government was granted the tongue-in-cheek "Dodo Award" at the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) in 2012, for failing to to act when a rogue business team illegally dumped 100 tons of iron sulphate into the Pacific Ocean about 200 nautical miles west of the islands of Haida Gwaii, one of the world's most celebrated, diverse ecosystems.
As a legally binding ban on the process is yet to be developed, this week Australia joined with South Korea and Nigeria to push through an amendment to an international treaty on dumping-related ocean pollution--the London Protocol--that would legally ban iron dumping until more research is done.
"The amendment seeks to put mandatory regulation in place around the practice of ocean fertilization," said Australian Environment Minister Tony Burke.
"Adoption of Australia's proposed amendment would mean that the 42 parties to the London Protocol would take a precautionary approach while more research is undertaken," he said.
"It prohibits commercial ocean fertilization activities, while allowing for legitimate scientific research to identify potential benefits and ways to safely manage the process."
The amendment will be taken up at a treaty meeting in October.
_______________________
Jacob Chamberlain
Jacob Chamberlain is a former staff writer for Common Dreams. His website is www.jacobpchamberlain.com.
Australia is working on a legally binding ban on the controversial geoengineering technique known as ocean fertilization, Agence France-Presse reports Wednesday.
Ocean fertilization involves dumping iron into the ocean to fertilize plankton on the ocean floor--which, as the theory goes, would absorb carbon dioxide before it is released into the atmosphere.
However, iron dumping has drawn ire from environmentalists around the world, as it has been found to be responsible for "damaging toxic algae blooms, increasing ocean acidification, and depleting oxygen in deep waters," as The Age reports.
The Canadian Government was granted the tongue-in-cheek "Dodo Award" at the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) in 2012, for failing to to act when a rogue business team illegally dumped 100 tons of iron sulphate into the Pacific Ocean about 200 nautical miles west of the islands of Haida Gwaii, one of the world's most celebrated, diverse ecosystems.
As a legally binding ban on the process is yet to be developed, this week Australia joined with South Korea and Nigeria to push through an amendment to an international treaty on dumping-related ocean pollution--the London Protocol--that would legally ban iron dumping until more research is done.
"The amendment seeks to put mandatory regulation in place around the practice of ocean fertilization," said Australian Environment Minister Tony Burke.
"Adoption of Australia's proposed amendment would mean that the 42 parties to the London Protocol would take a precautionary approach while more research is undertaken," he said.
"It prohibits commercial ocean fertilization activities, while allowing for legitimate scientific research to identify potential benefits and ways to safely manage the process."
The amendment will be taken up at a treaty meeting in October.
_______________________
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.