SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Australia Pushes for Far-Reaching Ban on Geoengineering Scheme 'Ocean Fertilization'
'Ocean fertilization' does more harm than good, leaders warn
May 16, 2013
Australia is working on a legally binding ban on the controversial geoengineering technique known as ocean fertilization, Agence France-Presse reports Wednesday.
Ocean fertilization involves dumping iron into the ocean to fertilize plankton on the ocean floor--which, as the theory goes, would absorb carbon dioxide before it is released into the atmosphere.
However, iron dumping has drawn ire from environmentalists around the world, as it has been found to be responsible for "damaging toxic algae blooms, increasing ocean acidification, and depleting oxygen in deep waters," as The Age reports.
The Canadian Government was granted the tongue-in-cheek "Dodo Award" at the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) in 2012, for failing to to act when a rogue business team illegally dumped 100 tons of iron sulphate into the Pacific Ocean about 200 nautical miles west of the islands of Haida Gwaii, one of the world's most celebrated, diverse ecosystems.
As a legally binding ban on the process is yet to be developed, this week Australia joined with South Korea and Nigeria to push through an amendment to an international treaty on dumping-related ocean pollution--the London Protocol--that would legally ban iron dumping until more research is done.
"The amendment seeks to put mandatory regulation in place around the practice of ocean fertilization," said Australian Environment Minister Tony Burke.
"Adoption of Australia's proposed amendment would mean that the 42 parties to the London Protocol would take a precautionary approach while more research is undertaken," he said.
"It prohibits commercial ocean fertilization activities, while allowing for legitimate scientific research to identify potential benefits and ways to safely manage the process."
The amendment will be taken up at a treaty meeting in October.
_______________________
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Jacob Chamberlain
Jacob Chamberlain is a former staff writer for Common Dreams. He is the author of Migrant Justice in the Age of Removal. His website is www.jacobpchamberlain.com.
Australia is working on a legally binding ban on the controversial geoengineering technique known as ocean fertilization, Agence France-Presse reports Wednesday.
Ocean fertilization involves dumping iron into the ocean to fertilize plankton on the ocean floor--which, as the theory goes, would absorb carbon dioxide before it is released into the atmosphere.
However, iron dumping has drawn ire from environmentalists around the world, as it has been found to be responsible for "damaging toxic algae blooms, increasing ocean acidification, and depleting oxygen in deep waters," as The Age reports.
The Canadian Government was granted the tongue-in-cheek "Dodo Award" at the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) in 2012, for failing to to act when a rogue business team illegally dumped 100 tons of iron sulphate into the Pacific Ocean about 200 nautical miles west of the islands of Haida Gwaii, one of the world's most celebrated, diverse ecosystems.
As a legally binding ban on the process is yet to be developed, this week Australia joined with South Korea and Nigeria to push through an amendment to an international treaty on dumping-related ocean pollution--the London Protocol--that would legally ban iron dumping until more research is done.
"The amendment seeks to put mandatory regulation in place around the practice of ocean fertilization," said Australian Environment Minister Tony Burke.
"Adoption of Australia's proposed amendment would mean that the 42 parties to the London Protocol would take a precautionary approach while more research is undertaken," he said.
"It prohibits commercial ocean fertilization activities, while allowing for legitimate scientific research to identify potential benefits and ways to safely manage the process."
The amendment will be taken up at a treaty meeting in October.
_______________________
Jacob Chamberlain
Jacob Chamberlain is a former staff writer for Common Dreams. He is the author of Migrant Justice in the Age of Removal. His website is www.jacobpchamberlain.com.
Australia is working on a legally binding ban on the controversial geoengineering technique known as ocean fertilization, Agence France-Presse reports Wednesday.
Ocean fertilization involves dumping iron into the ocean to fertilize plankton on the ocean floor--which, as the theory goes, would absorb carbon dioxide before it is released into the atmosphere.
However, iron dumping has drawn ire from environmentalists around the world, as it has been found to be responsible for "damaging toxic algae blooms, increasing ocean acidification, and depleting oxygen in deep waters," as The Age reports.
The Canadian Government was granted the tongue-in-cheek "Dodo Award" at the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) in 2012, for failing to to act when a rogue business team illegally dumped 100 tons of iron sulphate into the Pacific Ocean about 200 nautical miles west of the islands of Haida Gwaii, one of the world's most celebrated, diverse ecosystems.
As a legally binding ban on the process is yet to be developed, this week Australia joined with South Korea and Nigeria to push through an amendment to an international treaty on dumping-related ocean pollution--the London Protocol--that would legally ban iron dumping until more research is done.
"The amendment seeks to put mandatory regulation in place around the practice of ocean fertilization," said Australian Environment Minister Tony Burke.
"Adoption of Australia's proposed amendment would mean that the 42 parties to the London Protocol would take a precautionary approach while more research is undertaken," he said.
"It prohibits commercial ocean fertilization activities, while allowing for legitimate scientific research to identify potential benefits and ways to safely manage the process."
The amendment will be taken up at a treaty meeting in October.
_______________________
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.
To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good.
News & Opinion
Trending
Common Dreams, Inc. Founded 1997. Registered 501(c3) Non-Profit
Privacy Policy