

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.

ConocoPhillips announced Wednesday that it was putting its Arctic drilling plans for 2014 on hold, news environmental groups cheered as they continue to campaign to save the region from the pursuit of fossil fuels.
"Another oil company shelving its plans to drill in the Arctic Ocean is good for the whales, polar bears and communities that depend on a healthy ocean," said Rebecca Noblin, Alaska director at the Center for Biological Diversity.
"There's no safe way to drill for oil in the remote and harsh Arctic environment, so we're enthusiastic about ConocoPhillips' decision to abandon its 2014 drilling plans," stated Noblin.
ConocoPhillips' announcement follows Norwegian company Statoil's news last month that it might completely abandon its plans for Arctic drilling after initially saying it would hold off until 2015.
"There's no safe way to drill for oil in the remote and harsh Arctic environment, so we're enthusiastic about ConocoPhillips' decision to abandon its 2014 drilling plans." -- Rebecca Noblin, Center for Biological Diversity Shell is also on the growing list of oil firms halting Arctic drilling plans; in February, it announced it was suspending its 2013 Arctic drilling program following a mishap-laden year.
Welcoming ConocoPhillips' decision, on Thursday ocean conservation group Oceana stated that Shell's attempts at Arctic drilling highlight the dangers inherent in drilling in the fragile region:
The Arctic is a remote and harsh place, which makes it an exceptionally difficult environment to conduct industrial activity. Shell demonstrated that in spades last year with countless mishaps and violations, that culminated in the grounding of the Kulluk drill rig and landed both of Shell's Arctic drilling vessels in dry dock for major repairs. Existing technology, regulations and plans are not sufficient for protecting Arctic ecosystems and opportunities for subsistence, especially in the event of a major oil spill.
Greenpeace cheered the three announcements of halts in Arctic drilling plans, saying on Thursday it was
fantastic news for the Arctic environment and the nearly 3 million strong global movement demanding a total ban on oil drilling and industrial fishing in this fragile region. Although Statoil, ConocoPhillips and all oil companies should commit to no Arctic drilling ever, any setback the oil industry suffers in their plans to exploit the Arctic is one step closer to making it permanent.
* * *
_________________________
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |

ConocoPhillips announced Wednesday that it was putting its Arctic drilling plans for 2014 on hold, news environmental groups cheered as they continue to campaign to save the region from the pursuit of fossil fuels.
"Another oil company shelving its plans to drill in the Arctic Ocean is good for the whales, polar bears and communities that depend on a healthy ocean," said Rebecca Noblin, Alaska director at the Center for Biological Diversity.
"There's no safe way to drill for oil in the remote and harsh Arctic environment, so we're enthusiastic about ConocoPhillips' decision to abandon its 2014 drilling plans," stated Noblin.
ConocoPhillips' announcement follows Norwegian company Statoil's news last month that it might completely abandon its plans for Arctic drilling after initially saying it would hold off until 2015.
"There's no safe way to drill for oil in the remote and harsh Arctic environment, so we're enthusiastic about ConocoPhillips' decision to abandon its 2014 drilling plans." -- Rebecca Noblin, Center for Biological Diversity Shell is also on the growing list of oil firms halting Arctic drilling plans; in February, it announced it was suspending its 2013 Arctic drilling program following a mishap-laden year.
Welcoming ConocoPhillips' decision, on Thursday ocean conservation group Oceana stated that Shell's attempts at Arctic drilling highlight the dangers inherent in drilling in the fragile region:
The Arctic is a remote and harsh place, which makes it an exceptionally difficult environment to conduct industrial activity. Shell demonstrated that in spades last year with countless mishaps and violations, that culminated in the grounding of the Kulluk drill rig and landed both of Shell's Arctic drilling vessels in dry dock for major repairs. Existing technology, regulations and plans are not sufficient for protecting Arctic ecosystems and opportunities for subsistence, especially in the event of a major oil spill.
Greenpeace cheered the three announcements of halts in Arctic drilling plans, saying on Thursday it was
fantastic news for the Arctic environment and the nearly 3 million strong global movement demanding a total ban on oil drilling and industrial fishing in this fragile region. Although Statoil, ConocoPhillips and all oil companies should commit to no Arctic drilling ever, any setback the oil industry suffers in their plans to exploit the Arctic is one step closer to making it permanent.
* * *
_________________________

ConocoPhillips announced Wednesday that it was putting its Arctic drilling plans for 2014 on hold, news environmental groups cheered as they continue to campaign to save the region from the pursuit of fossil fuels.
"Another oil company shelving its plans to drill in the Arctic Ocean is good for the whales, polar bears and communities that depend on a healthy ocean," said Rebecca Noblin, Alaska director at the Center for Biological Diversity.
"There's no safe way to drill for oil in the remote and harsh Arctic environment, so we're enthusiastic about ConocoPhillips' decision to abandon its 2014 drilling plans," stated Noblin.
ConocoPhillips' announcement follows Norwegian company Statoil's news last month that it might completely abandon its plans for Arctic drilling after initially saying it would hold off until 2015.
"There's no safe way to drill for oil in the remote and harsh Arctic environment, so we're enthusiastic about ConocoPhillips' decision to abandon its 2014 drilling plans." -- Rebecca Noblin, Center for Biological Diversity Shell is also on the growing list of oil firms halting Arctic drilling plans; in February, it announced it was suspending its 2013 Arctic drilling program following a mishap-laden year.
Welcoming ConocoPhillips' decision, on Thursday ocean conservation group Oceana stated that Shell's attempts at Arctic drilling highlight the dangers inherent in drilling in the fragile region:
The Arctic is a remote and harsh place, which makes it an exceptionally difficult environment to conduct industrial activity. Shell demonstrated that in spades last year with countless mishaps and violations, that culminated in the grounding of the Kulluk drill rig and landed both of Shell's Arctic drilling vessels in dry dock for major repairs. Existing technology, regulations and plans are not sufficient for protecting Arctic ecosystems and opportunities for subsistence, especially in the event of a major oil spill.
Greenpeace cheered the three announcements of halts in Arctic drilling plans, saying on Thursday it was
fantastic news for the Arctic environment and the nearly 3 million strong global movement demanding a total ban on oil drilling and industrial fishing in this fragile region. Although Statoil, ConocoPhillips and all oil companies should commit to no Arctic drilling ever, any setback the oil industry suffers in their plans to exploit the Arctic is one step closer to making it permanent.
* * *
_________________________