

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
On Tuesday, progressive campaigners Roots Action launched an online petition calling for the revocation of President Obama's 2009 Nobel Peace Prize.
"President Obama has made perpetual war look more perpetual than ever," reads the petition, which the group plans to send to the Norwegian Nobel Committee. And continues: "Today, there are more U.S. troops in Afghanistan than when Obama took office. His presidency has widened the use of drones and other instruments of remote killing in several countries."
Human rights and peace advocates have long-contested the awarding of the esteemed peace prize to an individual who has been called "one of the most militarily aggressive American leaders in decades" for his escalation of a widespread killer-drone campaign, prolonged wars in the Middle East, and enablement of prisoner abuse and indefinite detention.
Leah Bolger, an anti-war activist and former president of Veterans for Peace, said that Obama's assault on international human rights and the rule of law has confirmed the worries of progressives by nullifying the status of what was once an esteemed prize.
"The Nobel Committee has deeply diminished the prize by awarding it to Obama in the first place," Bolger said. "It is now obvious that they made a serious mistake. The Committee needs to revoke the prize in order to restore its value."
And RootsAction co-founder Norman Solomon added, "If President Obama is to remain as a Nobel Peace Prize winner, then Bernie Madoff may as well be Financial Planner of the Year."
Visitors to the group's site can see a live tally as well as comments from those who have signed.
"It is incomprehensible that Obama has elevated drone attacks," reads an entry signed by a man named Randall Curtis. Addressing the prize committee directly, he continues, "This is not in keeping with the peaceful and honorable principles of our democracy, so it would be proactive for you to revoke this honor."
_____________________
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
On Tuesday, progressive campaigners Roots Action launched an online petition calling for the revocation of President Obama's 2009 Nobel Peace Prize.
"President Obama has made perpetual war look more perpetual than ever," reads the petition, which the group plans to send to the Norwegian Nobel Committee. And continues: "Today, there are more U.S. troops in Afghanistan than when Obama took office. His presidency has widened the use of drones and other instruments of remote killing in several countries."
Human rights and peace advocates have long-contested the awarding of the esteemed peace prize to an individual who has been called "one of the most militarily aggressive American leaders in decades" for his escalation of a widespread killer-drone campaign, prolonged wars in the Middle East, and enablement of prisoner abuse and indefinite detention.
Leah Bolger, an anti-war activist and former president of Veterans for Peace, said that Obama's assault on international human rights and the rule of law has confirmed the worries of progressives by nullifying the status of what was once an esteemed prize.
"The Nobel Committee has deeply diminished the prize by awarding it to Obama in the first place," Bolger said. "It is now obvious that they made a serious mistake. The Committee needs to revoke the prize in order to restore its value."
And RootsAction co-founder Norman Solomon added, "If President Obama is to remain as a Nobel Peace Prize winner, then Bernie Madoff may as well be Financial Planner of the Year."
Visitors to the group's site can see a live tally as well as comments from those who have signed.
"It is incomprehensible that Obama has elevated drone attacks," reads an entry signed by a man named Randall Curtis. Addressing the prize committee directly, he continues, "This is not in keeping with the peaceful and honorable principles of our democracy, so it would be proactive for you to revoke this honor."
_____________________
On Tuesday, progressive campaigners Roots Action launched an online petition calling for the revocation of President Obama's 2009 Nobel Peace Prize.
"President Obama has made perpetual war look more perpetual than ever," reads the petition, which the group plans to send to the Norwegian Nobel Committee. And continues: "Today, there are more U.S. troops in Afghanistan than when Obama took office. His presidency has widened the use of drones and other instruments of remote killing in several countries."
Human rights and peace advocates have long-contested the awarding of the esteemed peace prize to an individual who has been called "one of the most militarily aggressive American leaders in decades" for his escalation of a widespread killer-drone campaign, prolonged wars in the Middle East, and enablement of prisoner abuse and indefinite detention.
Leah Bolger, an anti-war activist and former president of Veterans for Peace, said that Obama's assault on international human rights and the rule of law has confirmed the worries of progressives by nullifying the status of what was once an esteemed prize.
"The Nobel Committee has deeply diminished the prize by awarding it to Obama in the first place," Bolger said. "It is now obvious that they made a serious mistake. The Committee needs to revoke the prize in order to restore its value."
And RootsAction co-founder Norman Solomon added, "If President Obama is to remain as a Nobel Peace Prize winner, then Bernie Madoff may as well be Financial Planner of the Year."
Visitors to the group's site can see a live tally as well as comments from those who have signed.
"It is incomprehensible that Obama has elevated drone attacks," reads an entry signed by a man named Randall Curtis. Addressing the prize committee directly, he continues, "This is not in keeping with the peaceful and honorable principles of our democracy, so it would be proactive for you to revoke this honor."
_____________________