(Photo: dailyagenda.org.)
Nov 12, 2012
Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., said Monday that if the lame-duck Congress can't agree on a tax deal by the end of the year, briefly going over the "fiscal cliff" is preferable to accepting a bad deal.
"Is it better to deal with this issue in the next session rather than accept a bad agreement in this session?" Sanders said during a press conference at his Burlington office. "Yes, it is."
The "fiscal cliff" refers to a package of severe tax increases and cuts to Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid set to automatically go into effect on Jan. 1.
Sanders said Republicans who support the plan are "way, way outside the mainstream," The Burlington Free Press reports.
"Obviously, I would prefer to not go over the fiscal cliff," Sanders said. "I hope we can reach an agreement now, but if we can't, we will reach it in the first few months of the next session." He said Congress could then address the "fiscal cliff" situation in "the first month or two of the new session without any damage whatsoever."
Sanders advocated for increasing taxes on the wealthy, closing corporate tax loopholes, cutting defense spending and tracking down individuals and companies that hide money in off-shore accounts.
He also said he hopes the Senate will change the filibuster rule that in many cases requires a 60-vote majority to pass legislation, according to The Republic.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, The U.S. is on a fast track to authoritarianism like nothing I've ever seen. Meanwhile, corporate news outlets are utterly capitulating to Trump, twisting their coverage to avoid drawing his ire while lining up to stuff cash in his pockets. That's why I believe that Common Dreams is doing the best and most consequential reporting that we've ever done. Our small but mighty team is a progressive reporting powerhouse, covering the news every day that the corporate media never will. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. And to ignite change for the common good. Now here's the key piece that I want all our readers to understand: None of this would be possible without your financial support. That's not just some fundraising cliche. It's the absolute and literal truth. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. Our Summer Campaign is now underway, and there’s never been a more urgent time for Common Dreams to be as vigilant as possible. Will you donate now to help power the nonprofit, independent reporting of Common Dreams? Thank you for being a vital member of our community. Together, we can keep independent journalism alive when it’s needed most. - Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., said Monday that if the lame-duck Congress can't agree on a tax deal by the end of the year, briefly going over the "fiscal cliff" is preferable to accepting a bad deal.
"Is it better to deal with this issue in the next session rather than accept a bad agreement in this session?" Sanders said during a press conference at his Burlington office. "Yes, it is."
The "fiscal cliff" refers to a package of severe tax increases and cuts to Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid set to automatically go into effect on Jan. 1.
Sanders said Republicans who support the plan are "way, way outside the mainstream," The Burlington Free Press reports.
"Obviously, I would prefer to not go over the fiscal cliff," Sanders said. "I hope we can reach an agreement now, but if we can't, we will reach it in the first few months of the next session." He said Congress could then address the "fiscal cliff" situation in "the first month or two of the new session without any damage whatsoever."
Sanders advocated for increasing taxes on the wealthy, closing corporate tax loopholes, cutting defense spending and tracking down individuals and companies that hide money in off-shore accounts.
He also said he hopes the Senate will change the filibuster rule that in many cases requires a 60-vote majority to pass legislation, according to The Republic.
Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., said Monday that if the lame-duck Congress can't agree on a tax deal by the end of the year, briefly going over the "fiscal cliff" is preferable to accepting a bad deal.
"Is it better to deal with this issue in the next session rather than accept a bad agreement in this session?" Sanders said during a press conference at his Burlington office. "Yes, it is."
The "fiscal cliff" refers to a package of severe tax increases and cuts to Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid set to automatically go into effect on Jan. 1.
Sanders said Republicans who support the plan are "way, way outside the mainstream," The Burlington Free Press reports.
"Obviously, I would prefer to not go over the fiscal cliff," Sanders said. "I hope we can reach an agreement now, but if we can't, we will reach it in the first few months of the next session." He said Congress could then address the "fiscal cliff" situation in "the first month or two of the new session without any damage whatsoever."
Sanders advocated for increasing taxes on the wealthy, closing corporate tax loopholes, cutting defense spending and tracking down individuals and companies that hide money in off-shore accounts.
He also said he hopes the Senate will change the filibuster rule that in many cases requires a 60-vote majority to pass legislation, according to The Republic.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.