Wajid Shamsul Hasan says the use of drones by the US is weakening democracy and pushing people towards extremist groups. (Photograph: Oli Scarff/Getty Images)
Aug 03, 2012
In an interview with the Bureau of Investigative Journalism, one of Islamabad's most senior diplomats says that ongoing CIA drone strikes in Pakistan's tribal areas are weakening democracy, and risk pushing people towards, not away from, extremist groups.
As High Commissioner to London, Wajid Shamsul Hasan is one of Pakistan's top ambassadors. Now four years into his second stint in the post, Ambassador Hasan argues that US drone strikes risk significantly weakening Pakistan's democratic institutions and that the US prefers dealing 'one man' and not 'democratic institutions' when it comes to such matters.
"What has been the whole outcome of these drone attacks is that you have directly or indirectly contributed to destabilising or undermining the democratic government. Because people really make fun of the democratic government - when you pass a resolution against drone attacks in the parliament and nothing happens. The Americans don't listen to you, and they continue to violate your territory," he said.
Despite repeated government requests and eve-growing public protest, he says, the Pakistanis are too weak to halt the US superpower. "We cannot take on the only superpower, which is all-powerful in the world at the moment. You can't take them on. We are a small country, we are ill-equipped," he said.
Mr Hasan was also scathing about what he sees as the US's weak commitment towards democracy in Pakistan and Afghanistan. He also implies there are those in the US government who would still prefer to be dealing with a dictator:
"They talk in miles in support of democracy, but they move in inches. They say, 'We are fully for democracy, we want democracy, we support the Arab Spring, we are opposed to military interference in Egypt.' All of these things are very good. They are music to my ears. But when it comes to real politics they are different. [US Secretary of State] Hillary Clinton has really supported democracy. But she is one person. There are so many pillars of power in the United States, and they act differently."
"The United States if you look at Pakistan's 65 year history," Hasan said, "has always preferred to deal with one man rather than with institutions. They would never like a matter to go to the parliament, to be debated there, for issues to be accountable to the parliament and the people, they don't want that, they want one man."
# # #
Why Your Ongoing Support Is Essential
Donald Trump’s attacks on democracy, justice, and a free press are escalating — putting everything we stand for at risk. We believe a better world is possible, but we can’t get there without your support. Common Dreams stands apart. We answer only to you — our readers, activists, and changemakers — not to billionaires or corporations. Our independence allows us to cover the vital stories that others won’t, spotlighting movements for peace, equality, and human rights. Right now, our work faces unprecedented challenges. Misinformation is spreading, journalists are under attack, and financial pressures are mounting. As a reader-supported, nonprofit newsroom, your support is crucial to keep this journalism alive. Whatever you can give — $10, $25, or $100 — helps us stay strong and responsive when the world needs us most. Together, we’ll continue to build the independent, courageous journalism our movement relies on. Thank you for being part of this community. |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
In an interview with the Bureau of Investigative Journalism, one of Islamabad's most senior diplomats says that ongoing CIA drone strikes in Pakistan's tribal areas are weakening democracy, and risk pushing people towards, not away from, extremist groups.
As High Commissioner to London, Wajid Shamsul Hasan is one of Pakistan's top ambassadors. Now four years into his second stint in the post, Ambassador Hasan argues that US drone strikes risk significantly weakening Pakistan's democratic institutions and that the US prefers dealing 'one man' and not 'democratic institutions' when it comes to such matters.
"What has been the whole outcome of these drone attacks is that you have directly or indirectly contributed to destabilising or undermining the democratic government. Because people really make fun of the democratic government - when you pass a resolution against drone attacks in the parliament and nothing happens. The Americans don't listen to you, and they continue to violate your territory," he said.
Despite repeated government requests and eve-growing public protest, he says, the Pakistanis are too weak to halt the US superpower. "We cannot take on the only superpower, which is all-powerful in the world at the moment. You can't take them on. We are a small country, we are ill-equipped," he said.
Mr Hasan was also scathing about what he sees as the US's weak commitment towards democracy in Pakistan and Afghanistan. He also implies there are those in the US government who would still prefer to be dealing with a dictator:
"They talk in miles in support of democracy, but they move in inches. They say, 'We are fully for democracy, we want democracy, we support the Arab Spring, we are opposed to military interference in Egypt.' All of these things are very good. They are music to my ears. But when it comes to real politics they are different. [US Secretary of State] Hillary Clinton has really supported democracy. But she is one person. There are so many pillars of power in the United States, and they act differently."
"The United States if you look at Pakistan's 65 year history," Hasan said, "has always preferred to deal with one man rather than with institutions. They would never like a matter to go to the parliament, to be debated there, for issues to be accountable to the parliament and the people, they don't want that, they want one man."
# # #
In an interview with the Bureau of Investigative Journalism, one of Islamabad's most senior diplomats says that ongoing CIA drone strikes in Pakistan's tribal areas are weakening democracy, and risk pushing people towards, not away from, extremist groups.
As High Commissioner to London, Wajid Shamsul Hasan is one of Pakistan's top ambassadors. Now four years into his second stint in the post, Ambassador Hasan argues that US drone strikes risk significantly weakening Pakistan's democratic institutions and that the US prefers dealing 'one man' and not 'democratic institutions' when it comes to such matters.
"What has been the whole outcome of these drone attacks is that you have directly or indirectly contributed to destabilising or undermining the democratic government. Because people really make fun of the democratic government - when you pass a resolution against drone attacks in the parliament and nothing happens. The Americans don't listen to you, and they continue to violate your territory," he said.
Despite repeated government requests and eve-growing public protest, he says, the Pakistanis are too weak to halt the US superpower. "We cannot take on the only superpower, which is all-powerful in the world at the moment. You can't take them on. We are a small country, we are ill-equipped," he said.
Mr Hasan was also scathing about what he sees as the US's weak commitment towards democracy in Pakistan and Afghanistan. He also implies there are those in the US government who would still prefer to be dealing with a dictator:
"They talk in miles in support of democracy, but they move in inches. They say, 'We are fully for democracy, we want democracy, we support the Arab Spring, we are opposed to military interference in Egypt.' All of these things are very good. They are music to my ears. But when it comes to real politics they are different. [US Secretary of State] Hillary Clinton has really supported democracy. But she is one person. There are so many pillars of power in the United States, and they act differently."
"The United States if you look at Pakistan's 65 year history," Hasan said, "has always preferred to deal with one man rather than with institutions. They would never like a matter to go to the parliament, to be debated there, for issues to be accountable to the parliament and the people, they don't want that, they want one man."
# # #
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.