

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.

The RCPM report, citing recent protests by Greenpeace, says that recent bold actions by the group "highlight the need to be prepared for potential threats to the safety and security of offshore oil and gas platforms."
"Greenpeace is opposed to the development of Canada's Arctic region, as well as Canada's offshore petroleum industry." the report says. "Criminal activity by Green-peace activists typically consists of trespassing, mischief, and vandalism, and often requires a law enforcement response." And added: "Tactics employed by activist groups are intended to intimidate and have the potential to escalate to violence."
"In a rational world and society, the RCMP would investigate Enbridge, Shell and others that have a long history of violating human rights and safety in their rush to fill their pockets with enormous wealth; instead the RCMP suggests an environmental organization such as Greenpeace is a threat to peace." --Yossi Cadan, Greenpeace Canada
But Greenpeace, in an interview with the Vancouver Sun, says this is ridiculous, that they are and have always been non-violent and if any individuals or groups should be investigated or curtailed it's the oil and gas companies who are expanding their resource extraction projects to ever-more difficult -- and therefore more dangerous -- locations, such as the tar sands of Alberta and arctic water drilling operations.
Yossi Cadan, campaigns director for Greenpeace Canada, said while group members sometimes trespass on private property to make their point, the group shuns violence.
"In a rational world and society, the RCMP would investigate Enbridge, Shell and others that have a long history of violating human rights and safety in their rush to fill their pockets with enormous wealth; instead the RCMP suggests an environmental organization such as Greenpeace is a threat to peace.
"For 40 years Greenpeace has never behaved violently. We have a proven record of maintaining the highest degree of safety in all our activities. This accusation is reckless, we are not.
"We are taking direct actions, but it's never violent," he said, adding "safety is a No. 1 priority for us. There is a difference between breaking the law and criminal activities," Cadan added.
"It's true that the distance between the government policy and the environmental movement is growing, but I don't think that the movement is get-ting more radical."
It seems like anyone who disagrees with the government on subjects such as the Alberta oilsands "has become an enemy in many ways," he said.
Cadan accused the federal government of trying to avoid the real issues by publicly attacking opponents. "It's not going to work because we are going to continue and focus on the environmental issues."
On Tuesday, in what seemed like a direct rebuke to Canadian authorities, Greenpeace International executive director Kumi Naidoo tweeted:
# # #
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |

The RCPM report, citing recent protests by Greenpeace, says that recent bold actions by the group "highlight the need to be prepared for potential threats to the safety and security of offshore oil and gas platforms."
"Greenpeace is opposed to the development of Canada's Arctic region, as well as Canada's offshore petroleum industry." the report says. "Criminal activity by Green-peace activists typically consists of trespassing, mischief, and vandalism, and often requires a law enforcement response." And added: "Tactics employed by activist groups are intended to intimidate and have the potential to escalate to violence."
"In a rational world and society, the RCMP would investigate Enbridge, Shell and others that have a long history of violating human rights and safety in their rush to fill their pockets with enormous wealth; instead the RCMP suggests an environmental organization such as Greenpeace is a threat to peace." --Yossi Cadan, Greenpeace Canada
But Greenpeace, in an interview with the Vancouver Sun, says this is ridiculous, that they are and have always been non-violent and if any individuals or groups should be investigated or curtailed it's the oil and gas companies who are expanding their resource extraction projects to ever-more difficult -- and therefore more dangerous -- locations, such as the tar sands of Alberta and arctic water drilling operations.
Yossi Cadan, campaigns director for Greenpeace Canada, said while group members sometimes trespass on private property to make their point, the group shuns violence.
"In a rational world and society, the RCMP would investigate Enbridge, Shell and others that have a long history of violating human rights and safety in their rush to fill their pockets with enormous wealth; instead the RCMP suggests an environmental organization such as Greenpeace is a threat to peace.
"For 40 years Greenpeace has never behaved violently. We have a proven record of maintaining the highest degree of safety in all our activities. This accusation is reckless, we are not.
"We are taking direct actions, but it's never violent," he said, adding "safety is a No. 1 priority for us. There is a difference between breaking the law and criminal activities," Cadan added.
"It's true that the distance between the government policy and the environmental movement is growing, but I don't think that the movement is get-ting more radical."
It seems like anyone who disagrees with the government on subjects such as the Alberta oilsands "has become an enemy in many ways," he said.
Cadan accused the federal government of trying to avoid the real issues by publicly attacking opponents. "It's not going to work because we are going to continue and focus on the environmental issues."
On Tuesday, in what seemed like a direct rebuke to Canadian authorities, Greenpeace International executive director Kumi Naidoo tweeted:
# # #

The RCPM report, citing recent protests by Greenpeace, says that recent bold actions by the group "highlight the need to be prepared for potential threats to the safety and security of offshore oil and gas platforms."
"Greenpeace is opposed to the development of Canada's Arctic region, as well as Canada's offshore petroleum industry." the report says. "Criminal activity by Green-peace activists typically consists of trespassing, mischief, and vandalism, and often requires a law enforcement response." And added: "Tactics employed by activist groups are intended to intimidate and have the potential to escalate to violence."
"In a rational world and society, the RCMP would investigate Enbridge, Shell and others that have a long history of violating human rights and safety in their rush to fill their pockets with enormous wealth; instead the RCMP suggests an environmental organization such as Greenpeace is a threat to peace." --Yossi Cadan, Greenpeace Canada
But Greenpeace, in an interview with the Vancouver Sun, says this is ridiculous, that they are and have always been non-violent and if any individuals or groups should be investigated or curtailed it's the oil and gas companies who are expanding their resource extraction projects to ever-more difficult -- and therefore more dangerous -- locations, such as the tar sands of Alberta and arctic water drilling operations.
Yossi Cadan, campaigns director for Greenpeace Canada, said while group members sometimes trespass on private property to make their point, the group shuns violence.
"In a rational world and society, the RCMP would investigate Enbridge, Shell and others that have a long history of violating human rights and safety in their rush to fill their pockets with enormous wealth; instead the RCMP suggests an environmental organization such as Greenpeace is a threat to peace.
"For 40 years Greenpeace has never behaved violently. We have a proven record of maintaining the highest degree of safety in all our activities. This accusation is reckless, we are not.
"We are taking direct actions, but it's never violent," he said, adding "safety is a No. 1 priority for us. There is a difference between breaking the law and criminal activities," Cadan added.
"It's true that the distance between the government policy and the environmental movement is growing, but I don't think that the movement is get-ting more radical."
It seems like anyone who disagrees with the government on subjects such as the Alberta oilsands "has become an enemy in many ways," he said.
Cadan accused the federal government of trying to avoid the real issues by publicly attacking opponents. "It's not going to work because we are going to continue and focus on the environmental issues."
On Tuesday, in what seemed like a direct rebuke to Canadian authorities, Greenpeace International executive director Kumi Naidoo tweeted:
# # #