SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Giant oil rigs near Vancouver, Wash., on their way to Alaska's North Slope in July 2011. (Steven Lane/The Columbian, via Associated Press)
Green Groups Sue US over Approval of Shell's Arctic Drilling Spill Plans
A coalition of conservation organizations filed a lawsuit in Alaska federal court on Tuesday challenging the US government's approval of Shell Oil Company's plan to drill for oil in the Arctic.
Jul 11, 2012
A coalition of conservation organizations filed a lawsuit in Alaska federal court on Tuesday challenging the US government's approval of Shell Oil Company's plan to drill for oil in the Arctic.
The environmental coalition -- which includes the Alaska Wilderness League, Center for Biological Diversity, Greenpeace Inc., National Audubon Society, Natural Resources Defense Council, Ocean Conservancy, Oceana, Pacific Environment, Resisting Environmental Destruction on Indigenous Lands and the Sierra Club -- says the spill response plans presented by Shell are not nearly adequate and their lawsuit directly challenges the responsibility of the government's Bureau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement (BSEE) and the Dept. of the Interior.
The lawsuit alleges the government violated environmental law, the Clean Water Act and the Endangered Species Act in approving spill plans for the Beaufort and Chukchi seas.
In a statement, the group notes that less than two years after the Deepwater Horizon spill in the Gulf of Mexico, Interior Secretary Salazar recently brushed aside concerns about Shell's spill response capabilities, stating recently that 'there is not going to be an oil spill.'
"We have been forced to court to make sure the Arctic Ocean is protected and Shell is prepared, as mandated by law," the group said. "BSEE rubber-stamped plans that rely on unbelievable assumptions, include equipment that has never been tested in Arctic conditions, and ignore the very real possibility that a spill could continue through the winter."
In the harsh weather and icy conditions of the Beaufort and Chuchki Sea -- where the drilling is scheduled to begin in the coming weeks -- a large-scale oil spill clean up would be impossible, the coalition argues. "There have been no tests of spill response equipment in US Arctic waters since 2000 and those equipment tests were a failure. Today, Shell relies on much of that same equipment, and bases its plans on the assumption that it will clean up more than 90 percent of any spilled oil. Even in relatively favorable conditions, less than 10 percent of spilled oil was recovered after the Deepwater Horizon and Exxon Valdez spills."
Reporting by the Associated Press indicates that the lawsuit is unlikely to stop the exploratory drilling scheduled for this summer. But, according to attorney Michael Levine, "the case could prevent drilling in future seasons, if the coalition succeeds in getting the approvals set aside."
Read the official complaint here.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, The U.S. is on a fast track to authoritarianism like nothing I've ever seen. Meanwhile, corporate news outlets are utterly capitulating to Trump, twisting their coverage to avoid drawing his ire while lining up to stuff cash in his pockets. That's why I believe that Common Dreams is doing the best and most consequential reporting that we've ever done. Our small but mighty team is a progressive reporting powerhouse, covering the news every day that the corporate media never will. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. And to ignite change for the common good. Now here's the key piece that I want all our readers to understand: None of this would be possible without your financial support. That's not just some fundraising cliche. It's the absolute and literal truth. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. Will you donate now to help power the nonprofit, independent reporting of Common Dreams? Thank you for being a vital member of our community. Together, we can keep independent journalism alive when it’s needed most. - Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
alaskaarcticcenter for biological diversityclean water actdeepwater horizonearthjusticeendangered species actgreenpeacesierra club
A coalition of conservation organizations filed a lawsuit in Alaska federal court on Tuesday challenging the US government's approval of Shell Oil Company's plan to drill for oil in the Arctic.
The environmental coalition -- which includes the Alaska Wilderness League, Center for Biological Diversity, Greenpeace Inc., National Audubon Society, Natural Resources Defense Council, Ocean Conservancy, Oceana, Pacific Environment, Resisting Environmental Destruction on Indigenous Lands and the Sierra Club -- says the spill response plans presented by Shell are not nearly adequate and their lawsuit directly challenges the responsibility of the government's Bureau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement (BSEE) and the Dept. of the Interior.
The lawsuit alleges the government violated environmental law, the Clean Water Act and the Endangered Species Act in approving spill plans for the Beaufort and Chukchi seas.
In a statement, the group notes that less than two years after the Deepwater Horizon spill in the Gulf of Mexico, Interior Secretary Salazar recently brushed aside concerns about Shell's spill response capabilities, stating recently that 'there is not going to be an oil spill.'
"We have been forced to court to make sure the Arctic Ocean is protected and Shell is prepared, as mandated by law," the group said. "BSEE rubber-stamped plans that rely on unbelievable assumptions, include equipment that has never been tested in Arctic conditions, and ignore the very real possibility that a spill could continue through the winter."
In the harsh weather and icy conditions of the Beaufort and Chuchki Sea -- where the drilling is scheduled to begin in the coming weeks -- a large-scale oil spill clean up would be impossible, the coalition argues. "There have been no tests of spill response equipment in US Arctic waters since 2000 and those equipment tests were a failure. Today, Shell relies on much of that same equipment, and bases its plans on the assumption that it will clean up more than 90 percent of any spilled oil. Even in relatively favorable conditions, less than 10 percent of spilled oil was recovered after the Deepwater Horizon and Exxon Valdez spills."
Reporting by the Associated Press indicates that the lawsuit is unlikely to stop the exploratory drilling scheduled for this summer. But, according to attorney Michael Levine, "the case could prevent drilling in future seasons, if the coalition succeeds in getting the approvals set aside."
Read the official complaint here.
A coalition of conservation organizations filed a lawsuit in Alaska federal court on Tuesday challenging the US government's approval of Shell Oil Company's plan to drill for oil in the Arctic.
The environmental coalition -- which includes the Alaska Wilderness League, Center for Biological Diversity, Greenpeace Inc., National Audubon Society, Natural Resources Defense Council, Ocean Conservancy, Oceana, Pacific Environment, Resisting Environmental Destruction on Indigenous Lands and the Sierra Club -- says the spill response plans presented by Shell are not nearly adequate and their lawsuit directly challenges the responsibility of the government's Bureau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement (BSEE) and the Dept. of the Interior.
The lawsuit alleges the government violated environmental law, the Clean Water Act and the Endangered Species Act in approving spill plans for the Beaufort and Chukchi seas.
In a statement, the group notes that less than two years after the Deepwater Horizon spill in the Gulf of Mexico, Interior Secretary Salazar recently brushed aside concerns about Shell's spill response capabilities, stating recently that 'there is not going to be an oil spill.'
"We have been forced to court to make sure the Arctic Ocean is protected and Shell is prepared, as mandated by law," the group said. "BSEE rubber-stamped plans that rely on unbelievable assumptions, include equipment that has never been tested in Arctic conditions, and ignore the very real possibility that a spill could continue through the winter."
In the harsh weather and icy conditions of the Beaufort and Chuchki Sea -- where the drilling is scheduled to begin in the coming weeks -- a large-scale oil spill clean up would be impossible, the coalition argues. "There have been no tests of spill response equipment in US Arctic waters since 2000 and those equipment tests were a failure. Today, Shell relies on much of that same equipment, and bases its plans on the assumption that it will clean up more than 90 percent of any spilled oil. Even in relatively favorable conditions, less than 10 percent of spilled oil was recovered after the Deepwater Horizon and Exxon Valdez spills."
Reporting by the Associated Press indicates that the lawsuit is unlikely to stop the exploratory drilling scheduled for this summer. But, according to attorney Michael Levine, "the case could prevent drilling in future seasons, if the coalition succeeds in getting the approvals set aside."
Read the official complaint here.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.