SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Green Groups Sue US over Approval of Shell's Arctic Drilling Spill Plans
A coalition of conservation organizations filed a lawsuit in Alaska federal court on Tuesday challenging the US government's approval of Shell Oil Company's plan to drill for oil in the Arctic.
Jul 11, 2012
A coalition of conservation organizations filed a lawsuit in Alaska federal court on Tuesday challenging the US government's approval of Shell Oil Company's plan to drill for oil in the Arctic.
The environmental coalition -- which includes the Alaska Wilderness League, Center for Biological Diversity, Greenpeace Inc., National Audubon Society, Natural Resources Defense Council, Ocean Conservancy, Oceana, Pacific Environment, Resisting Environmental Destruction on Indigenous Lands and the Sierra Club -- says the spill response plans presented by Shell are not nearly adequate and their lawsuit directly challenges the responsibility of the government's Bureau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement (BSEE) and the Dept. of the Interior.
The lawsuit alleges the government violated environmental law, the Clean Water Act and the Endangered Species Act in approving spill plans for the Beaufort and Chukchi seas.
In a statement, the group notes that less than two years after the Deepwater Horizon spill in the Gulf of Mexico, Interior Secretary Salazar recently brushed aside concerns about Shell's spill response capabilities, stating recently that 'there is not going to be an oil spill.'
"We have been forced to court to make sure the Arctic Ocean is protected and Shell is prepared, as mandated by law," the group said. "BSEE rubber-stamped plans that rely on unbelievable assumptions, include equipment that has never been tested in Arctic conditions, and ignore the very real possibility that a spill could continue through the winter."
In the harsh weather and icy conditions of the Beaufort and Chuchki Sea -- where the drilling is scheduled to begin in the coming weeks -- a large-scale oil spill clean up would be impossible, the coalition argues. "There have been no tests of spill response equipment in US Arctic waters since 2000 and those equipment tests were a failure. Today, Shell relies on much of that same equipment, and bases its plans on the assumption that it will clean up more than 90 percent of any spilled oil. Even in relatively favorable conditions, less than 10 percent of spilled oil was recovered after the Deepwater Horizon and Exxon Valdez spills."
Reporting by the Associated Press indicates that the lawsuit is unlikely to stop the exploratory drilling scheduled for this summer. But, according to attorney Michael Levine, "the case could prevent drilling in future seasons, if the coalition succeeds in getting the approvals set aside."
Read the official complaint here.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
alaskaarcticcenter for biological diversityclean water actdeepwater horizonearthjusticeendangered species actgreenpeacesierra club
A coalition of conservation organizations filed a lawsuit in Alaska federal court on Tuesday challenging the US government's approval of Shell Oil Company's plan to drill for oil in the Arctic.
The environmental coalition -- which includes the Alaska Wilderness League, Center for Biological Diversity, Greenpeace Inc., National Audubon Society, Natural Resources Defense Council, Ocean Conservancy, Oceana, Pacific Environment, Resisting Environmental Destruction on Indigenous Lands and the Sierra Club -- says the spill response plans presented by Shell are not nearly adequate and their lawsuit directly challenges the responsibility of the government's Bureau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement (BSEE) and the Dept. of the Interior.
The lawsuit alleges the government violated environmental law, the Clean Water Act and the Endangered Species Act in approving spill plans for the Beaufort and Chukchi seas.
In a statement, the group notes that less than two years after the Deepwater Horizon spill in the Gulf of Mexico, Interior Secretary Salazar recently brushed aside concerns about Shell's spill response capabilities, stating recently that 'there is not going to be an oil spill.'
"We have been forced to court to make sure the Arctic Ocean is protected and Shell is prepared, as mandated by law," the group said. "BSEE rubber-stamped plans that rely on unbelievable assumptions, include equipment that has never been tested in Arctic conditions, and ignore the very real possibility that a spill could continue through the winter."
In the harsh weather and icy conditions of the Beaufort and Chuchki Sea -- where the drilling is scheduled to begin in the coming weeks -- a large-scale oil spill clean up would be impossible, the coalition argues. "There have been no tests of spill response equipment in US Arctic waters since 2000 and those equipment tests were a failure. Today, Shell relies on much of that same equipment, and bases its plans on the assumption that it will clean up more than 90 percent of any spilled oil. Even in relatively favorable conditions, less than 10 percent of spilled oil was recovered after the Deepwater Horizon and Exxon Valdez spills."
Reporting by the Associated Press indicates that the lawsuit is unlikely to stop the exploratory drilling scheduled for this summer. But, according to attorney Michael Levine, "the case could prevent drilling in future seasons, if the coalition succeeds in getting the approvals set aside."
Read the official complaint here.
A coalition of conservation organizations filed a lawsuit in Alaska federal court on Tuesday challenging the US government's approval of Shell Oil Company's plan to drill for oil in the Arctic.
The environmental coalition -- which includes the Alaska Wilderness League, Center for Biological Diversity, Greenpeace Inc., National Audubon Society, Natural Resources Defense Council, Ocean Conservancy, Oceana, Pacific Environment, Resisting Environmental Destruction on Indigenous Lands and the Sierra Club -- says the spill response plans presented by Shell are not nearly adequate and their lawsuit directly challenges the responsibility of the government's Bureau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement (BSEE) and the Dept. of the Interior.
The lawsuit alleges the government violated environmental law, the Clean Water Act and the Endangered Species Act in approving spill plans for the Beaufort and Chukchi seas.
In a statement, the group notes that less than two years after the Deepwater Horizon spill in the Gulf of Mexico, Interior Secretary Salazar recently brushed aside concerns about Shell's spill response capabilities, stating recently that 'there is not going to be an oil spill.'
"We have been forced to court to make sure the Arctic Ocean is protected and Shell is prepared, as mandated by law," the group said. "BSEE rubber-stamped plans that rely on unbelievable assumptions, include equipment that has never been tested in Arctic conditions, and ignore the very real possibility that a spill could continue through the winter."
In the harsh weather and icy conditions of the Beaufort and Chuchki Sea -- where the drilling is scheduled to begin in the coming weeks -- a large-scale oil spill clean up would be impossible, the coalition argues. "There have been no tests of spill response equipment in US Arctic waters since 2000 and those equipment tests were a failure. Today, Shell relies on much of that same equipment, and bases its plans on the assumption that it will clean up more than 90 percent of any spilled oil. Even in relatively favorable conditions, less than 10 percent of spilled oil was recovered after the Deepwater Horizon and Exxon Valdez spills."
Reporting by the Associated Press indicates that the lawsuit is unlikely to stop the exploratory drilling scheduled for this summer. But, according to attorney Michael Levine, "the case could prevent drilling in future seasons, if the coalition succeeds in getting the approvals set aside."
Read the official complaint here.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.