

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
The US Supreme Court today delivered its much anticipated ruling on the health care reform law, a decision with far-reaching legal and political implications in the months, and years, ahead.

In a 5-4 vote, with conservative Chief Justice Roberts voting with more liberal justices Kagan, Ginsburg, Breyer and Sotomayor, the court has upheld the law in its entirety. Justices Alito, Scalia, Thomas, and Kennedy dissented.
The opinions for the health care cases are available here (pdf).
UPDATE (2:35 pm): Filmmaker Michael Moore lauded the decision, but reminded Americans that much more work remains. "Let's not forget," he said, "we still don't have true universal health care - 26 million Americans will still NOT be covered under the Obama law. With this victory, we must now keep moving the ball down the field until we have Medicare for All."
UPDATE (11:46 am): Senator Bernie Sanders: Statement on Supreme Court Health Care Ruling
"In my view, while the Affordable Care Act is an important step in the right direction and I am glad that the Supreme Court upheld it, we ultimately need to do better. If we are serious about providing high-quality, affordable healthcare as a right, not a privilege, the real solution to America's health care crisis is a Medicare-for-all, single-payer system. Until then, we will remain the only major nation that does not provide health care for every man, woman and child as a right of citizenship."
UPDATE (11:40 am): Physicians for a National Health Program: 'Health Law Upheld, but Health Needs Still Unmet'
"Although the Supreme Court has upheld the Affordable Care Act (ACA), the unfortunate reality is that the law, despite its modest benefits, is not a remedy to our health care crisis: (1) it will not achieve universal coverage, as it leaves at least 26 million uninsured, (2) it will not make health care affordable to Americans with insurance, because of high co-pays and gaps in coverage that leave patients vulnerable to financial ruin in the event of serious illness, and (3) it will not control costs. [...]
Research shows the savings in administrative costs alone under a single-payer plan would amount to $400 billion annually, enough to provide quality coverage to everyone with no overall increase in U.S. health spending."
UPDATE (10:32 am): SCOTUS Blog's Amy Howe writes:
"In Plain English: The Affordable Care Act, including its individual mandate that virtually all Americans buy health insurance, is constitutional. There were not five votes to uphold it on the ground that Congress could use its power to regulate commerce between the states to require everyone to buy health insurance. However, five Justices agreed that the penalty that someone must pay if he refuses to buy insurance is a kind of tax that Congress can impose using its taxing power. That is all that matters. Because the mandate survives, the Court did not need to decide what other parts of the statute were constitutional, except for a provision that required states to comply with new eligibility requirements for Medicaid or risk losing their funding. On that question, the Court held that the provision is constitutional as long as states would only lose new funds if they didn't comply with the new requirements, rather than all of their funding."
UPDATE (10:14 am): The individual insurance mandate has been upheld by the US Supreme Court. According to an initial reading by analysts at SCOTUS Blog: "The Bottom line: the entire ACA (Affordable Care Act) is upheld, with the exception that the federal government's power to terminate states' Medicaid funds is narrowly read."
* * *
Common Dreams Twitter News Feed:
* * *
For an oversight of the health care law challenges that were before the court read the SCOTUS Blog's Guide to Health Care Ruling by Lyle Denniston or the Center for Media and Democracy's Tips for Courtwatchers with insurance industry-whistleblower Wendell Potter.
###
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |

In a 5-4 vote, with conservative Chief Justice Roberts voting with more liberal justices Kagan, Ginsburg, Breyer and Sotomayor, the court has upheld the law in its entirety. Justices Alito, Scalia, Thomas, and Kennedy dissented.
The opinions for the health care cases are available here (pdf).
UPDATE (2:35 pm): Filmmaker Michael Moore lauded the decision, but reminded Americans that much more work remains. "Let's not forget," he said, "we still don't have true universal health care - 26 million Americans will still NOT be covered under the Obama law. With this victory, we must now keep moving the ball down the field until we have Medicare for All."
UPDATE (11:46 am): Senator Bernie Sanders: Statement on Supreme Court Health Care Ruling
"In my view, while the Affordable Care Act is an important step in the right direction and I am glad that the Supreme Court upheld it, we ultimately need to do better. If we are serious about providing high-quality, affordable healthcare as a right, not a privilege, the real solution to America's health care crisis is a Medicare-for-all, single-payer system. Until then, we will remain the only major nation that does not provide health care for every man, woman and child as a right of citizenship."
UPDATE (11:40 am): Physicians for a National Health Program: 'Health Law Upheld, but Health Needs Still Unmet'
"Although the Supreme Court has upheld the Affordable Care Act (ACA), the unfortunate reality is that the law, despite its modest benefits, is not a remedy to our health care crisis: (1) it will not achieve universal coverage, as it leaves at least 26 million uninsured, (2) it will not make health care affordable to Americans with insurance, because of high co-pays and gaps in coverage that leave patients vulnerable to financial ruin in the event of serious illness, and (3) it will not control costs. [...]
Research shows the savings in administrative costs alone under a single-payer plan would amount to $400 billion annually, enough to provide quality coverage to everyone with no overall increase in U.S. health spending."
UPDATE (10:32 am): SCOTUS Blog's Amy Howe writes:
"In Plain English: The Affordable Care Act, including its individual mandate that virtually all Americans buy health insurance, is constitutional. There were not five votes to uphold it on the ground that Congress could use its power to regulate commerce between the states to require everyone to buy health insurance. However, five Justices agreed that the penalty that someone must pay if he refuses to buy insurance is a kind of tax that Congress can impose using its taxing power. That is all that matters. Because the mandate survives, the Court did not need to decide what other parts of the statute were constitutional, except for a provision that required states to comply with new eligibility requirements for Medicaid or risk losing their funding. On that question, the Court held that the provision is constitutional as long as states would only lose new funds if they didn't comply with the new requirements, rather than all of their funding."
UPDATE (10:14 am): The individual insurance mandate has been upheld by the US Supreme Court. According to an initial reading by analysts at SCOTUS Blog: "The Bottom line: the entire ACA (Affordable Care Act) is upheld, with the exception that the federal government's power to terminate states' Medicaid funds is narrowly read."
* * *
Common Dreams Twitter News Feed:
* * *
For an oversight of the health care law challenges that were before the court read the SCOTUS Blog's Guide to Health Care Ruling by Lyle Denniston or the Center for Media and Democracy's Tips for Courtwatchers with insurance industry-whistleblower Wendell Potter.
###

In a 5-4 vote, with conservative Chief Justice Roberts voting with more liberal justices Kagan, Ginsburg, Breyer and Sotomayor, the court has upheld the law in its entirety. Justices Alito, Scalia, Thomas, and Kennedy dissented.
The opinions for the health care cases are available here (pdf).
UPDATE (2:35 pm): Filmmaker Michael Moore lauded the decision, but reminded Americans that much more work remains. "Let's not forget," he said, "we still don't have true universal health care - 26 million Americans will still NOT be covered under the Obama law. With this victory, we must now keep moving the ball down the field until we have Medicare for All."
UPDATE (11:46 am): Senator Bernie Sanders: Statement on Supreme Court Health Care Ruling
"In my view, while the Affordable Care Act is an important step in the right direction and I am glad that the Supreme Court upheld it, we ultimately need to do better. If we are serious about providing high-quality, affordable healthcare as a right, not a privilege, the real solution to America's health care crisis is a Medicare-for-all, single-payer system. Until then, we will remain the only major nation that does not provide health care for every man, woman and child as a right of citizenship."
UPDATE (11:40 am): Physicians for a National Health Program: 'Health Law Upheld, but Health Needs Still Unmet'
"Although the Supreme Court has upheld the Affordable Care Act (ACA), the unfortunate reality is that the law, despite its modest benefits, is not a remedy to our health care crisis: (1) it will not achieve universal coverage, as it leaves at least 26 million uninsured, (2) it will not make health care affordable to Americans with insurance, because of high co-pays and gaps in coverage that leave patients vulnerable to financial ruin in the event of serious illness, and (3) it will not control costs. [...]
Research shows the savings in administrative costs alone under a single-payer plan would amount to $400 billion annually, enough to provide quality coverage to everyone with no overall increase in U.S. health spending."
UPDATE (10:32 am): SCOTUS Blog's Amy Howe writes:
"In Plain English: The Affordable Care Act, including its individual mandate that virtually all Americans buy health insurance, is constitutional. There were not five votes to uphold it on the ground that Congress could use its power to regulate commerce between the states to require everyone to buy health insurance. However, five Justices agreed that the penalty that someone must pay if he refuses to buy insurance is a kind of tax that Congress can impose using its taxing power. That is all that matters. Because the mandate survives, the Court did not need to decide what other parts of the statute were constitutional, except for a provision that required states to comply with new eligibility requirements for Medicaid or risk losing their funding. On that question, the Court held that the provision is constitutional as long as states would only lose new funds if they didn't comply with the new requirements, rather than all of their funding."
UPDATE (10:14 am): The individual insurance mandate has been upheld by the US Supreme Court. According to an initial reading by analysts at SCOTUS Blog: "The Bottom line: the entire ACA (Affordable Care Act) is upheld, with the exception that the federal government's power to terminate states' Medicaid funds is narrowly read."
* * *
Common Dreams Twitter News Feed:
* * *
For an oversight of the health care law challenges that were before the court read the SCOTUS Blog's Guide to Health Care Ruling by Lyle Denniston or the Center for Media and Democracy's Tips for Courtwatchers with insurance industry-whistleblower Wendell Potter.
###