Jun 27, 2012
A panel discussion organized by the National Council on US-Arab Relations on Tuesday gathered experts to discuss the US-Yemen relationship. The message from experts, according to reporting by Inter Press Service, was that current US policy is not only short-sighted, but extremely dangerous.
A singular focus on defeating Al Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula (AQAP) was not only counter-productive, experts contend, but also another war in which victory will likely be impossible to claim. Yemen, one of the poorest countries in the world, and suffering from severe drought, a food crisis, and internal conflict should be the focus of development aid and conflict resolution, was the argument, not a destination for further destabilizing military campaigns.
IPS writes that the US "security-focused approach to Yemen has been epitomized by the Obama administration's ratcheting-up of drone strikes in Yemen over the past four months," but noted that many participating in the discussion argue that such strikes were simply making matters worse in Yemen.
"If you look at certain barometers, it seems that [the United States] is losing," said Gregory Johnsen, a Yemen scholar at Princeton University. "The more it tries, the more it is sucked deeper into this quicksand."
Johnsen was also a signator to an open letter (pdf) by policy analysts and Middle East experts sent to Obama on Monday urging the his administration to "Reevaluate (the) strategy of drone strikes with the recognition that this approach is generating significant anti-American sentiment and could strengthen the appeal of extremist groups."
The IPS report notes that on Monday, a US drone reportedly killed three AQAP members near the southern port of Aden and constituted the 24th drone assault (according to the Long War Journal) in Yemen this year.
# # #
Join Us: News for people demanding a better world
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
A panel discussion organized by the National Council on US-Arab Relations on Tuesday gathered experts to discuss the US-Yemen relationship. The message from experts, according to reporting by Inter Press Service, was that current US policy is not only short-sighted, but extremely dangerous.
A singular focus on defeating Al Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula (AQAP) was not only counter-productive, experts contend, but also another war in which victory will likely be impossible to claim. Yemen, one of the poorest countries in the world, and suffering from severe drought, a food crisis, and internal conflict should be the focus of development aid and conflict resolution, was the argument, not a destination for further destabilizing military campaigns.
IPS writes that the US "security-focused approach to Yemen has been epitomized by the Obama administration's ratcheting-up of drone strikes in Yemen over the past four months," but noted that many participating in the discussion argue that such strikes were simply making matters worse in Yemen.
"If you look at certain barometers, it seems that [the United States] is losing," said Gregory Johnsen, a Yemen scholar at Princeton University. "The more it tries, the more it is sucked deeper into this quicksand."
Johnsen was also a signator to an open letter (pdf) by policy analysts and Middle East experts sent to Obama on Monday urging the his administration to "Reevaluate (the) strategy of drone strikes with the recognition that this approach is generating significant anti-American sentiment and could strengthen the appeal of extremist groups."
The IPS report notes that on Monday, a US drone reportedly killed three AQAP members near the southern port of Aden and constituted the 24th drone assault (according to the Long War Journal) in Yemen this year.
# # #
A panel discussion organized by the National Council on US-Arab Relations on Tuesday gathered experts to discuss the US-Yemen relationship. The message from experts, according to reporting by Inter Press Service, was that current US policy is not only short-sighted, but extremely dangerous.
A singular focus on defeating Al Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula (AQAP) was not only counter-productive, experts contend, but also another war in which victory will likely be impossible to claim. Yemen, one of the poorest countries in the world, and suffering from severe drought, a food crisis, and internal conflict should be the focus of development aid and conflict resolution, was the argument, not a destination for further destabilizing military campaigns.
IPS writes that the US "security-focused approach to Yemen has been epitomized by the Obama administration's ratcheting-up of drone strikes in Yemen over the past four months," but noted that many participating in the discussion argue that such strikes were simply making matters worse in Yemen.
"If you look at certain barometers, it seems that [the United States] is losing," said Gregory Johnsen, a Yemen scholar at Princeton University. "The more it tries, the more it is sucked deeper into this quicksand."
Johnsen was also a signator to an open letter (pdf) by policy analysts and Middle East experts sent to Obama on Monday urging the his administration to "Reevaluate (the) strategy of drone strikes with the recognition that this approach is generating significant anti-American sentiment and could strengthen the appeal of extremist groups."
The IPS report notes that on Monday, a US drone reportedly killed three AQAP members near the southern port of Aden and constituted the 24th drone assault (according to the Long War Journal) in Yemen this year.
# # #
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.