Death penalty expert: "There is nothing about this system that the average American... would see as being fair." (photo credit: (c) Amnesty International/Christoph Koettl)
Apr 17, 2012
Guantanamo observers say the public has stopped paying attention to the military tribunals for detainees at Guantanamo, and if the policies for the tribunals had been enacted by George W. Bush rather than President Obama, Americans would be outraged.
Bryan Broyles, the Pentagon's deputy chief defense counsel at Guantanamo, told TPM that one aspect that should have Americans furious is allowing death penalty defendants to plead guilty yet still receive the death penalty. Broyles notes that this means the trials are "set up to give someone what appears to be a fair trial with a predetermined result."
Richard Kammen, a death penalty expert representing accused USS Cole attack plotter Abd al-Rahim al-Nashiri, told TPM there were "huge, huge problems" in the military commissions system.
* * *
TPMMuckraker: Guantanamo Lawyers: Obama Gets Away With Legal Moves Bush Wouldn't Have
More than two years after President Barack Obama blew his self-imposed deadline to shut down the extrajudicial prison at Guantanamo Bay, close observers and defense lawyers with clients making their way through the reformed military tribunal system say the public isn't paying attention.
"I think what you'll find is the interest in the process will never get back up again," Bryan Broyles, the Pentagon's deputy chief defense counsel at Guantanamo, told TPM. "It's fatigue and the thought that 'Well, it must be okay now because Obama said it's okay.'"
Broyles and other observers believe that some policy changes instituted under the Obama administration would have sparked outrage if President George W. Bush was still in the White House. One change he said should have been "extremely alarming" to the legal community: the rule allowing death penalty defendants to plead guilty and still receive the death penalty. [...]
[Richard Kammen, a death penalty expert representing accused USS Cole attack plotter Abd al-Rahim al-Nashiri] called the reforms instituted by the Obama administration in 2009 "quite superficial" and said there are "huge, huge problems" in the military commissions system.
"There is nothing about this system that the average American, if they were caught up in it, would see as being fair," Kammen said. "The Republicans have an interest in keeping this process going and the Democrats have an interest, to a certain extent, in not embarrassing Obama."
Join Us: News for people demanding a better world
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. Join with us today! |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Guantanamo observers say the public has stopped paying attention to the military tribunals for detainees at Guantanamo, and if the policies for the tribunals had been enacted by George W. Bush rather than President Obama, Americans would be outraged.
Bryan Broyles, the Pentagon's deputy chief defense counsel at Guantanamo, told TPM that one aspect that should have Americans furious is allowing death penalty defendants to plead guilty yet still receive the death penalty. Broyles notes that this means the trials are "set up to give someone what appears to be a fair trial with a predetermined result."
Richard Kammen, a death penalty expert representing accused USS Cole attack plotter Abd al-Rahim al-Nashiri, told TPM there were "huge, huge problems" in the military commissions system.
* * *
TPMMuckraker: Guantanamo Lawyers: Obama Gets Away With Legal Moves Bush Wouldn't Have
More than two years after President Barack Obama blew his self-imposed deadline to shut down the extrajudicial prison at Guantanamo Bay, close observers and defense lawyers with clients making their way through the reformed military tribunal system say the public isn't paying attention.
"I think what you'll find is the interest in the process will never get back up again," Bryan Broyles, the Pentagon's deputy chief defense counsel at Guantanamo, told TPM. "It's fatigue and the thought that 'Well, it must be okay now because Obama said it's okay.'"
Broyles and other observers believe that some policy changes instituted under the Obama administration would have sparked outrage if President George W. Bush was still in the White House. One change he said should have been "extremely alarming" to the legal community: the rule allowing death penalty defendants to plead guilty and still receive the death penalty. [...]
[Richard Kammen, a death penalty expert representing accused USS Cole attack plotter Abd al-Rahim al-Nashiri] called the reforms instituted by the Obama administration in 2009 "quite superficial" and said there are "huge, huge problems" in the military commissions system.
"There is nothing about this system that the average American, if they were caught up in it, would see as being fair," Kammen said. "The Republicans have an interest in keeping this process going and the Democrats have an interest, to a certain extent, in not embarrassing Obama."
Guantanamo observers say the public has stopped paying attention to the military tribunals for detainees at Guantanamo, and if the policies for the tribunals had been enacted by George W. Bush rather than President Obama, Americans would be outraged.
Bryan Broyles, the Pentagon's deputy chief defense counsel at Guantanamo, told TPM that one aspect that should have Americans furious is allowing death penalty defendants to plead guilty yet still receive the death penalty. Broyles notes that this means the trials are "set up to give someone what appears to be a fair trial with a predetermined result."
Richard Kammen, a death penalty expert representing accused USS Cole attack plotter Abd al-Rahim al-Nashiri, told TPM there were "huge, huge problems" in the military commissions system.
* * *
TPMMuckraker: Guantanamo Lawyers: Obama Gets Away With Legal Moves Bush Wouldn't Have
More than two years after President Barack Obama blew his self-imposed deadline to shut down the extrajudicial prison at Guantanamo Bay, close observers and defense lawyers with clients making their way through the reformed military tribunal system say the public isn't paying attention.
"I think what you'll find is the interest in the process will never get back up again," Bryan Broyles, the Pentagon's deputy chief defense counsel at Guantanamo, told TPM. "It's fatigue and the thought that 'Well, it must be okay now because Obama said it's okay.'"
Broyles and other observers believe that some policy changes instituted under the Obama administration would have sparked outrage if President George W. Bush was still in the White House. One change he said should have been "extremely alarming" to the legal community: the rule allowing death penalty defendants to plead guilty and still receive the death penalty. [...]
[Richard Kammen, a death penalty expert representing accused USS Cole attack plotter Abd al-Rahim al-Nashiri] called the reforms instituted by the Obama administration in 2009 "quite superficial" and said there are "huge, huge problems" in the military commissions system.
"There is nothing about this system that the average American, if they were caught up in it, would see as being fair," Kammen said. "The Republicans have an interest in keeping this process going and the Democrats have an interest, to a certain extent, in not embarrassing Obama."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.