

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
When NATO pushed to intervene on behalf of Libyan rebels against Muammar Gaddafi in 2011, it did so largely under the guise that by creating a 'no-fly zone' and offering air support to anti-Gaddafi forces, it would protect the lives of innocent Libyan civilians. Now, a year after the first NATO airstrikes took place in Libya, Amnesty International is demanding that the western military coalition take responsibility for the innocent, civilian lives caused by those strikes.
In a new report, Libya: The forgotten victims of NATO Strikes, Amnesty says that scores of Libyan civilians who were not involved in the fighting were killed and many more injured, most in their homes, as a result of NATO airstrikes. Amnesty International said that NATO has not conducted necessary investigations or even tried to establish contact with survivors and relatives of those killed.
"NATO officials repeatedly stressed their commitment to protecting civilians," said Donatella Rovera, Senior Crisis Response Adviser at Amnesty International. "They cannot now brush aside the deaths of scores of civilians with some vague statement of regret without properly investigating these deadly incidents."
The organization said that adequate investigations must be carried out and full reparation provided to victims and their families. Other groups, including from the United Nations, have previously pointed to civilian deaths, but NATO has said it no longer has a 'mandate' to operate in Libya, though it issued a statement saying it 'deeply regretted any harm.'
* * *
Amnesty's Report: Libya: Civilian Deaths from NATO Airstrikes Must Be Properly Investigated:

Investigations must look into whether civilian casualties resulted from violations of international law and if so those responsible must be brought to justice.
Amnesty International has documented 55 cases of named civilians, including 16 children and 14 women, killed in airstrikes in Tripoli, Zlitan, Majer, Sirte and Brega.
Many of the deaths occurred as a result of airstrikes on private homes where Amnesty International and others have found no evidence to indicate that the homes had been used for military purposes at the time they were attacked.
* * *
From Reuters:
Investigators for the U.N. Human Rights Council concluded earlier this month that NATO had caused civilian deaths but had taken extensive precautions to ensure civilians were not killed.
Amnesty agreed NATO had made significant efforts to minimize the risk of civilian casualties, through precision bombing and warning where strikes would occur.
However, the rights group said that did not absolve NATO from carrying out investigations into any deaths, or making reparations to victims or families of those killed.
Survivors and victims' relatives interviewed by Amnesty said they had never even been contacted by NATO. [...]
NATO's most recent response to Amnesty stated it "deeply regretted any harm" its air strikes had caused but said it no longer had a mandate to carry out any activities in Libya.
Two weeks ago, Russia criticized the U.N. investigators for failing to adequately probe civilian deaths caused by NATO during last year's uprising, saying children and journalists had been killed.
"In our view, during that (NATO) campaign many violations of the standard of international law and human rights were committed, including the most important right, the right to life," said Maria Khodynskaya-Golenishcheva, a diplomat at the Russian mission to the U.N. in Geneva.
Russia had criticized NATO action which it said should have been limited to protecting civilians and not helping the overthrow of Gaddafi.
# # #
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
When NATO pushed to intervene on behalf of Libyan rebels against Muammar Gaddafi in 2011, it did so largely under the guise that by creating a 'no-fly zone' and offering air support to anti-Gaddafi forces, it would protect the lives of innocent Libyan civilians. Now, a year after the first NATO airstrikes took place in Libya, Amnesty International is demanding that the western military coalition take responsibility for the innocent, civilian lives caused by those strikes.
In a new report, Libya: The forgotten victims of NATO Strikes, Amnesty says that scores of Libyan civilians who were not involved in the fighting were killed and many more injured, most in their homes, as a result of NATO airstrikes. Amnesty International said that NATO has not conducted necessary investigations or even tried to establish contact with survivors and relatives of those killed.
"NATO officials repeatedly stressed their commitment to protecting civilians," said Donatella Rovera, Senior Crisis Response Adviser at Amnesty International. "They cannot now brush aside the deaths of scores of civilians with some vague statement of regret without properly investigating these deadly incidents."
The organization said that adequate investigations must be carried out and full reparation provided to victims and their families. Other groups, including from the United Nations, have previously pointed to civilian deaths, but NATO has said it no longer has a 'mandate' to operate in Libya, though it issued a statement saying it 'deeply regretted any harm.'
* * *
Amnesty's Report: Libya: Civilian Deaths from NATO Airstrikes Must Be Properly Investigated:

Investigations must look into whether civilian casualties resulted from violations of international law and if so those responsible must be brought to justice.
Amnesty International has documented 55 cases of named civilians, including 16 children and 14 women, killed in airstrikes in Tripoli, Zlitan, Majer, Sirte and Brega.
Many of the deaths occurred as a result of airstrikes on private homes where Amnesty International and others have found no evidence to indicate that the homes had been used for military purposes at the time they were attacked.
* * *
From Reuters:
Investigators for the U.N. Human Rights Council concluded earlier this month that NATO had caused civilian deaths but had taken extensive precautions to ensure civilians were not killed.
Amnesty agreed NATO had made significant efforts to minimize the risk of civilian casualties, through precision bombing and warning where strikes would occur.
However, the rights group said that did not absolve NATO from carrying out investigations into any deaths, or making reparations to victims or families of those killed.
Survivors and victims' relatives interviewed by Amnesty said they had never even been contacted by NATO. [...]
NATO's most recent response to Amnesty stated it "deeply regretted any harm" its air strikes had caused but said it no longer had a mandate to carry out any activities in Libya.
Two weeks ago, Russia criticized the U.N. investigators for failing to adequately probe civilian deaths caused by NATO during last year's uprising, saying children and journalists had been killed.
"In our view, during that (NATO) campaign many violations of the standard of international law and human rights were committed, including the most important right, the right to life," said Maria Khodynskaya-Golenishcheva, a diplomat at the Russian mission to the U.N. in Geneva.
Russia had criticized NATO action which it said should have been limited to protecting civilians and not helping the overthrow of Gaddafi.
# # #
When NATO pushed to intervene on behalf of Libyan rebels against Muammar Gaddafi in 2011, it did so largely under the guise that by creating a 'no-fly zone' and offering air support to anti-Gaddafi forces, it would protect the lives of innocent Libyan civilians. Now, a year after the first NATO airstrikes took place in Libya, Amnesty International is demanding that the western military coalition take responsibility for the innocent, civilian lives caused by those strikes.
In a new report, Libya: The forgotten victims of NATO Strikes, Amnesty says that scores of Libyan civilians who were not involved in the fighting were killed and many more injured, most in their homes, as a result of NATO airstrikes. Amnesty International said that NATO has not conducted necessary investigations or even tried to establish contact with survivors and relatives of those killed.
"NATO officials repeatedly stressed their commitment to protecting civilians," said Donatella Rovera, Senior Crisis Response Adviser at Amnesty International. "They cannot now brush aside the deaths of scores of civilians with some vague statement of regret without properly investigating these deadly incidents."
The organization said that adequate investigations must be carried out and full reparation provided to victims and their families. Other groups, including from the United Nations, have previously pointed to civilian deaths, but NATO has said it no longer has a 'mandate' to operate in Libya, though it issued a statement saying it 'deeply regretted any harm.'
* * *
Amnesty's Report: Libya: Civilian Deaths from NATO Airstrikes Must Be Properly Investigated:

Investigations must look into whether civilian casualties resulted from violations of international law and if so those responsible must be brought to justice.
Amnesty International has documented 55 cases of named civilians, including 16 children and 14 women, killed in airstrikes in Tripoli, Zlitan, Majer, Sirte and Brega.
Many of the deaths occurred as a result of airstrikes on private homes where Amnesty International and others have found no evidence to indicate that the homes had been used for military purposes at the time they were attacked.
* * *
From Reuters:
Investigators for the U.N. Human Rights Council concluded earlier this month that NATO had caused civilian deaths but had taken extensive precautions to ensure civilians were not killed.
Amnesty agreed NATO had made significant efforts to minimize the risk of civilian casualties, through precision bombing and warning where strikes would occur.
However, the rights group said that did not absolve NATO from carrying out investigations into any deaths, or making reparations to victims or families of those killed.
Survivors and victims' relatives interviewed by Amnesty said they had never even been contacted by NATO. [...]
NATO's most recent response to Amnesty stated it "deeply regretted any harm" its air strikes had caused but said it no longer had a mandate to carry out any activities in Libya.
Two weeks ago, Russia criticized the U.N. investigators for failing to adequately probe civilian deaths caused by NATO during last year's uprising, saying children and journalists had been killed.
"In our view, during that (NATO) campaign many violations of the standard of international law and human rights were committed, including the most important right, the right to life," said Maria Khodynskaya-Golenishcheva, a diplomat at the Russian mission to the U.N. in Geneva.
Russia had criticized NATO action which it said should have been limited to protecting civilians and not helping the overthrow of Gaddafi.
# # #