SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Opponents and supporters of fracking walk into the last of four public hearings on proposed gas drilling regulations in New York state on Nov. 30, 2011. (Spencer Platt/Getty Images)
Second NY Judge Rules: Towns Can Block Fracking
Feb 25, 2012
For the second time this week, New York state judges have rules that towns have the power to ban fracking despite a state regulation asserting they cannot.
Environmental groups celebrated the pair of decisions, which say "that ordinary citizens, and the local governments who listen to them, have power to determine the character of their communities for themselves," the group New York Water Rangers said in a release.
* * *
The Associated Press reports:
While only the state can set rules for oil and gas drilling in New York, local governments have the right to ban the industry from operating within their borders, a state court judge ruled Friday in the second opinion of its kind this week.
The ruling, seen as a victory for local "home rule" and a blow to the industry and gas lease-holding landowners, was handed up by State Supreme Court Judge Donald Cerio in Otsego County. He rejected the claim of a landowner who argued that the rural town of Middlefield's zoning ordinance enacted last year violated a 1981 state law that trumps local laws when it comes to regulating oil and gas drilling.
On Tuesday, Justice Phillip Rumsey came to the same conclusion in a lawsuit challenging a gas-drilling ban in the Tompkins County town of Dryden. The Middlefield law was challenged by Cooperstown Holstein, which has gas leases on about 380 acres in the town. The Dryden law was challenged by Denver-based Anschutz Exploration Corporation, which has spent more than $5 million leasing and developing 22,000 acres in that town. [...]
"We think it's a great decision," said Deborah Goldberg, an attorney for Earthjustice who argued in court in defense of the town's zoning law. "It's a very thorough analysis of the legislative history and the passage of the supercession clause. The court comes to the conclusion that it is perfectly possible to have the state regulate the method of gas drilling while localities retain the power to regulate land use through zoning and local laws."
If the decisions stand, it could be a major blow to the shale gas industry in New York. In towns across the southern half of the state, anti-drilling activists for four years have been pitted against industry supporters who say the economically stressed region desperately needs the jobs, taxes, and other financial benefits the industry has brought to Pennsylvania and other states in the Marcellus Shale region.
More than 50 New York communities have enacted gas-drilling bans at the urging of residents who have circulated petitions saying the potential benefits of development aren't enough to risk polluting water supplies, endangering public health, and transforming a rural landscape into an industrial one.
# # #
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, The U.S. is on a fast track to authoritarianism like nothing I've ever seen. Meanwhile, corporate news outlets are utterly capitulating to Trump, twisting their coverage to avoid drawing his ire while lining up to stuff cash in his pockets. That's why I believe that Common Dreams is doing the best and most consequential reporting that we've ever done. Our small but mighty team is a progressive reporting powerhouse, covering the news every day that the corporate media never will. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. And to ignite change for the common good. Now here's the key piece that I want all our readers to understand: None of this would be possible without your financial support. That's not just some fundraising cliche. It's the absolute and literal truth. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. Will you donate now to help power the nonprofit, independent reporting of Common Dreams? Thank you for being a vital member of our community. Together, we can keep independent journalism alive when it’s needed most. - Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
For the second time this week, New York state judges have rules that towns have the power to ban fracking despite a state regulation asserting they cannot.
Environmental groups celebrated the pair of decisions, which say "that ordinary citizens, and the local governments who listen to them, have power to determine the character of their communities for themselves," the group New York Water Rangers said in a release.
* * *
The Associated Press reports:
While only the state can set rules for oil and gas drilling in New York, local governments have the right to ban the industry from operating within their borders, a state court judge ruled Friday in the second opinion of its kind this week.
The ruling, seen as a victory for local "home rule" and a blow to the industry and gas lease-holding landowners, was handed up by State Supreme Court Judge Donald Cerio in Otsego County. He rejected the claim of a landowner who argued that the rural town of Middlefield's zoning ordinance enacted last year violated a 1981 state law that trumps local laws when it comes to regulating oil and gas drilling.
On Tuesday, Justice Phillip Rumsey came to the same conclusion in a lawsuit challenging a gas-drilling ban in the Tompkins County town of Dryden. The Middlefield law was challenged by Cooperstown Holstein, which has gas leases on about 380 acres in the town. The Dryden law was challenged by Denver-based Anschutz Exploration Corporation, which has spent more than $5 million leasing and developing 22,000 acres in that town. [...]
"We think it's a great decision," said Deborah Goldberg, an attorney for Earthjustice who argued in court in defense of the town's zoning law. "It's a very thorough analysis of the legislative history and the passage of the supercession clause. The court comes to the conclusion that it is perfectly possible to have the state regulate the method of gas drilling while localities retain the power to regulate land use through zoning and local laws."
If the decisions stand, it could be a major blow to the shale gas industry in New York. In towns across the southern half of the state, anti-drilling activists for four years have been pitted against industry supporters who say the economically stressed region desperately needs the jobs, taxes, and other financial benefits the industry has brought to Pennsylvania and other states in the Marcellus Shale region.
More than 50 New York communities have enacted gas-drilling bans at the urging of residents who have circulated petitions saying the potential benefits of development aren't enough to risk polluting water supplies, endangering public health, and transforming a rural landscape into an industrial one.
# # #
For the second time this week, New York state judges have rules that towns have the power to ban fracking despite a state regulation asserting they cannot.
Environmental groups celebrated the pair of decisions, which say "that ordinary citizens, and the local governments who listen to them, have power to determine the character of their communities for themselves," the group New York Water Rangers said in a release.
* * *
The Associated Press reports:
While only the state can set rules for oil and gas drilling in New York, local governments have the right to ban the industry from operating within their borders, a state court judge ruled Friday in the second opinion of its kind this week.
The ruling, seen as a victory for local "home rule" and a blow to the industry and gas lease-holding landowners, was handed up by State Supreme Court Judge Donald Cerio in Otsego County. He rejected the claim of a landowner who argued that the rural town of Middlefield's zoning ordinance enacted last year violated a 1981 state law that trumps local laws when it comes to regulating oil and gas drilling.
On Tuesday, Justice Phillip Rumsey came to the same conclusion in a lawsuit challenging a gas-drilling ban in the Tompkins County town of Dryden. The Middlefield law was challenged by Cooperstown Holstein, which has gas leases on about 380 acres in the town. The Dryden law was challenged by Denver-based Anschutz Exploration Corporation, which has spent more than $5 million leasing and developing 22,000 acres in that town. [...]
"We think it's a great decision," said Deborah Goldberg, an attorney for Earthjustice who argued in court in defense of the town's zoning law. "It's a very thorough analysis of the legislative history and the passage of the supercession clause. The court comes to the conclusion that it is perfectly possible to have the state regulate the method of gas drilling while localities retain the power to regulate land use through zoning and local laws."
If the decisions stand, it could be a major blow to the shale gas industry in New York. In towns across the southern half of the state, anti-drilling activists for four years have been pitted against industry supporters who say the economically stressed region desperately needs the jobs, taxes, and other financial benefits the industry has brought to Pennsylvania and other states in the Marcellus Shale region.
More than 50 New York communities have enacted gas-drilling bans at the urging of residents who have circulated petitions saying the potential benefits of development aren't enough to risk polluting water supplies, endangering public health, and transforming a rural landscape into an industrial one.
# # #
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.