With No Oversight, US Army Amasses Biometric Data in Afghanistan
Soldiers use fingerprint and iris scans to collect vast amount of data with little oversight from Afghan government
The young man reluctantly proffered his eyeballs and fingertips to an American soldier wielding a hi-tech box resembling an outsize digital camera.
As the machine slowly gathered his biometric details, the man looked increasingly ill at ease. Was it because his herd of goats had started to wander off? Or because the device was revealing that he was in some way mixed up with the insurgency?
With each iris and fingertip scanned, the device gave the operator a steadily rising percentage chance that the goat herder was on an electronic "watch list" of suspects. Although it never reached 100%, it was enough for the man to be taken to the nearest US outpost for interrogation.
Since the Guardian witnessed that incident, which occurred near the southern city of Kandahar earlier this year, US soldiers have been dramatically increasing the vast database of biometric information collected from Afghans living in the most wartorn parts of southern and eastern Afghanistan.
The US army now has information on 800,000 people, while another database developed by the country's interior ministry has records on 250,000 people.
It is the sort of operation that would horrify civil liberties campaigners in the west, but there has been little public debate in Afghanistan. Kitted out with handheld devices that contain a camera to scan eyes and an electronic pad to take fingerprints, US soldiers have been collecting huge amounts of biometric data, with little oversight from the Afghan government.
The US hopes that Hamid Karzai, the Afghan president, can be persuaded to set up a much more ambitious national biometric ID system that would hold information on every Afghan citizen from the age of 16.
Although such a move would potentially be bad news for people's privacy, it would unquestionably make life harder for insurgents.
"It allows us to understand population shifts and movements, who wasn't there before and who might be a potential threat just because they are new to that area," said Craig Osborne, the colonel in charge of Task Force Biometrics.
Already the technology, which was originally introduced in US bases in the Balkans in the early 2000s, is helping to catch dozens of wanted suspects a week. Information collected in the field is checked against a central database containing hundreds of thousands of fingerprints found by US army forensics labs on materials touched by insurgents: weapons, sticky tape from homemade bombs, and even receipts for wire transfers of money used to pay for the rebel cause.
Hundreds of suspects have been identified and detained through such methods, according to data released by the US military last month.
The biometric survey is seen as an essential tool for implementing one of the key principles of counterinsurgency theory: that the population needs to be separated from insurgents.
In Vietnam, the Americans tried a physical separation by herding villagers into "strategic hamlets" where they were fenced off from the Viet Cong. Today's hi-tech biometric approach was used extensively in Iraq to keep insurgents out of sealed off neighbourhoods in Baghdad.
The strategy will be all the more effective if the Afghan government goes ahead with plans to introduce biometric ID cards for the entire adult population by 2013, which could also potentially help fight the rampant electoral fraud that flourished in the last two elections. Fraud has been possible largely due to the lack of a proper electoral roll or census and a reliance on easily forged, or fraudulently acquired, voting cards.
The ministry of interior is already working on the project and the Americans have started a programme where 1,000 student volunteers have collected biometric information citizens. They hope to have issued 1.7m cards by next May.
Urgent. It's never been this bad.
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission from the outset was simple. To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It’s never been this bad out there. And it’s never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed and doing some of its best and most important work, the threats we face are intensifying. Right now, with just four days to go in our Spring Campaign, we are not even halfway to our goal. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Can you make a gift right now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? There is no backup plan or rainy day fund. There is only you. —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
The young man reluctantly proffered his eyeballs and fingertips to an American soldier wielding a hi-tech box resembling an outsize digital camera.
As the machine slowly gathered his biometric details, the man looked increasingly ill at ease. Was it because his herd of goats had started to wander off? Or because the device was revealing that he was in some way mixed up with the insurgency?
With each iris and fingertip scanned, the device gave the operator a steadily rising percentage chance that the goat herder was on an electronic "watch list" of suspects. Although it never reached 100%, it was enough for the man to be taken to the nearest US outpost for interrogation.
Since the Guardian witnessed that incident, which occurred near the southern city of Kandahar earlier this year, US soldiers have been dramatically increasing the vast database of biometric information collected from Afghans living in the most wartorn parts of southern and eastern Afghanistan.
The US army now has information on 800,000 people, while another database developed by the country's interior ministry has records on 250,000 people.
It is the sort of operation that would horrify civil liberties campaigners in the west, but there has been little public debate in Afghanistan. Kitted out with handheld devices that contain a camera to scan eyes and an electronic pad to take fingerprints, US soldiers have been collecting huge amounts of biometric data, with little oversight from the Afghan government.
The US hopes that Hamid Karzai, the Afghan president, can be persuaded to set up a much more ambitious national biometric ID system that would hold information on every Afghan citizen from the age of 16.
Although such a move would potentially be bad news for people's privacy, it would unquestionably make life harder for insurgents.
"It allows us to understand population shifts and movements, who wasn't there before and who might be a potential threat just because they are new to that area," said Craig Osborne, the colonel in charge of Task Force Biometrics.
Already the technology, which was originally introduced in US bases in the Balkans in the early 2000s, is helping to catch dozens of wanted suspects a week. Information collected in the field is checked against a central database containing hundreds of thousands of fingerprints found by US army forensics labs on materials touched by insurgents: weapons, sticky tape from homemade bombs, and even receipts for wire transfers of money used to pay for the rebel cause.
Hundreds of suspects have been identified and detained through such methods, according to data released by the US military last month.
The biometric survey is seen as an essential tool for implementing one of the key principles of counterinsurgency theory: that the population needs to be separated from insurgents.
In Vietnam, the Americans tried a physical separation by herding villagers into "strategic hamlets" where they were fenced off from the Viet Cong. Today's hi-tech biometric approach was used extensively in Iraq to keep insurgents out of sealed off neighbourhoods in Baghdad.
The strategy will be all the more effective if the Afghan government goes ahead with plans to introduce biometric ID cards for the entire adult population by 2013, which could also potentially help fight the rampant electoral fraud that flourished in the last two elections. Fraud has been possible largely due to the lack of a proper electoral roll or census and a reliance on easily forged, or fraudulently acquired, voting cards.
The ministry of interior is already working on the project and the Americans have started a programme where 1,000 student volunteers have collected biometric information citizens. They hope to have issued 1.7m cards by next May.
The young man reluctantly proffered his eyeballs and fingertips to an American soldier wielding a hi-tech box resembling an outsize digital camera.
As the machine slowly gathered his biometric details, the man looked increasingly ill at ease. Was it because his herd of goats had started to wander off? Or because the device was revealing that he was in some way mixed up with the insurgency?
With each iris and fingertip scanned, the device gave the operator a steadily rising percentage chance that the goat herder was on an electronic "watch list" of suspects. Although it never reached 100%, it was enough for the man to be taken to the nearest US outpost for interrogation.
Since the Guardian witnessed that incident, which occurred near the southern city of Kandahar earlier this year, US soldiers have been dramatically increasing the vast database of biometric information collected from Afghans living in the most wartorn parts of southern and eastern Afghanistan.
The US army now has information on 800,000 people, while another database developed by the country's interior ministry has records on 250,000 people.
It is the sort of operation that would horrify civil liberties campaigners in the west, but there has been little public debate in Afghanistan. Kitted out with handheld devices that contain a camera to scan eyes and an electronic pad to take fingerprints, US soldiers have been collecting huge amounts of biometric data, with little oversight from the Afghan government.
The US hopes that Hamid Karzai, the Afghan president, can be persuaded to set up a much more ambitious national biometric ID system that would hold information on every Afghan citizen from the age of 16.
Although such a move would potentially be bad news for people's privacy, it would unquestionably make life harder for insurgents.
"It allows us to understand population shifts and movements, who wasn't there before and who might be a potential threat just because they are new to that area," said Craig Osborne, the colonel in charge of Task Force Biometrics.
Already the technology, which was originally introduced in US bases in the Balkans in the early 2000s, is helping to catch dozens of wanted suspects a week. Information collected in the field is checked against a central database containing hundreds of thousands of fingerprints found by US army forensics labs on materials touched by insurgents: weapons, sticky tape from homemade bombs, and even receipts for wire transfers of money used to pay for the rebel cause.
Hundreds of suspects have been identified and detained through such methods, according to data released by the US military last month.
The biometric survey is seen as an essential tool for implementing one of the key principles of counterinsurgency theory: that the population needs to be separated from insurgents.
In Vietnam, the Americans tried a physical separation by herding villagers into "strategic hamlets" where they were fenced off from the Viet Cong. Today's hi-tech biometric approach was used extensively in Iraq to keep insurgents out of sealed off neighbourhoods in Baghdad.
The strategy will be all the more effective if the Afghan government goes ahead with plans to introduce biometric ID cards for the entire adult population by 2013, which could also potentially help fight the rampant electoral fraud that flourished in the last two elections. Fraud has been possible largely due to the lack of a proper electoral roll or census and a reliance on easily forged, or fraudulently acquired, voting cards.
The ministry of interior is already working on the project and the Americans have started a programme where 1,000 student volunteers have collected biometric information citizens. They hope to have issued 1.7m cards by next May.