SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
A Pakistani motorcyclist rides past a parked truck carrying NATO supplies on the outskirts of Peshawar. Pakistan shut down the main land route for NATO supplies into Afghanistan Thursday, accusing the alliance's helicopters of killing Pakistani soldiers in a fourth cross-border attack this week. (AFP/A. Majeed)
Pakistan Cuts Off NATO Supply Route
Lorries prevented from crossing into Afghanistan in apparent retaliation for recent deadly cross-border NATO raid.
Sep 30, 2010
Pakistan has blocked a vital supply route for international forces in Afghanistan in apparent retaliation for an alleged cross-border helicopter raid by NATO troops that killed three Pakistani frontier soldiers.
Over the weekend, NATO helicopters fired on targets in Pakistan at least two times, killing several suspected fighters they allegedly pursued over the border from Afghanistan.
Pakistan's government protested against the attacks, which came in a month during which there have been an unprecedented number of drone missile attacks in the country's northwest.
Pakistan also threatened to stop providing protection to NATO convoys if the military alliance's helicopters attacked targeted inside Pakistan again.
Kamal Hyder, Al Jazeera's correspondent in Islamabad, said on Thursday that there are reports of 100 NATO supply lorries already being held up at the Torkham border post in retaliation for the earlier cross-border NATO raids.
"A NATO convoy had been moving through Khyber Pass, but the trucks were turned back from entering the Khyber region," he said. "We are also told that the CIA chief [Leon Panetta] in Islamabad has been addressing this issue."
Our correspondent also said that the Pakistani government is making quite a big noise about it. Pakistan said that ISAF [the NATO-led force] and NATO must respect the mandate under which they are operating. They are expressing deep concerns that, despite the fact that [ISAF] knew where these positions were, they still went ahead."
Critical supply route
Khyber is on the main NATO supply route through Pakistan into Afghanistan, where more than 152,000 US international troops are fighting the Taliban.
This supply route is critical for non-military supplies for ISAF: it is reported that up to 250 vehicles a day cross the Pakistan border into Afghanistan as part of the NATO supply chain. Pakistan's relations with NATO are already strained over the intensifying drone attacks in the border regions.
Rehman Malik, the Pakistani interior minister, said of the border incident: "We will have to see whether we are allies or enemies."
A permanent stoppage of supply vehicles would place massive strains on NATO and hurt the Afghan war effort.
Speaking from Kabul, Sue Turton, Al Jazeera's correspondent, said on Thursday that NATO had launched an investigation into the reports.
"Initial reports said that [the ISAF helicopters] didn't encroach on Pakistani air space. NATO claims it carried out the attack on the Afghan side of the border. If they do want to cross the border, which coalition forces say they often do in self-defence, they usually get in touch with their Pakistani counterparts beforehand, if not during the operation," she said.
NATO has said previously that it has the right to self-defence. The multinational force has on at least one other occasion acknowledged mistakenly killing Pakistani security forces stationed close to the border.
The surge in suspected Taliban activity inside Afghanistan and apparent increased willingness by NATO to attack targets on the border, or just inside Pakistan, could be a sign the international forces are losing patience with Pakistan.
The country has long been accused of harboring Afghan Taliban fighters in its lawless tribal regions.
Source: Al Jazeera and agencies
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, The U.S. is on a fast track to authoritarianism like nothing I've ever seen. Meanwhile, corporate news outlets are utterly capitulating to Trump, twisting their coverage to avoid drawing his ire while lining up to stuff cash in his pockets. That's why I believe that Common Dreams is doing the best and most consequential reporting that we've ever done. Our small but mighty team is a progressive reporting powerhouse, covering the news every day that the corporate media never will. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. And to ignite change for the common good. Now here's the key piece that I want all our readers to understand: None of this would be possible without your financial support. That's not just some fundraising cliche. It's the absolute and literal truth. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. Will you donate now to help power the nonprofit, independent reporting of Common Dreams? Thank you for being a vital member of our community. Together, we can keep independent journalism alive when it’s needed most. - Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Pakistan has blocked a vital supply route for international forces in Afghanistan in apparent retaliation for an alleged cross-border helicopter raid by NATO troops that killed three Pakistani frontier soldiers.
Over the weekend, NATO helicopters fired on targets in Pakistan at least two times, killing several suspected fighters they allegedly pursued over the border from Afghanistan.
Pakistan's government protested against the attacks, which came in a month during which there have been an unprecedented number of drone missile attacks in the country's northwest.
Pakistan also threatened to stop providing protection to NATO convoys if the military alliance's helicopters attacked targeted inside Pakistan again.
Kamal Hyder, Al Jazeera's correspondent in Islamabad, said on Thursday that there are reports of 100 NATO supply lorries already being held up at the Torkham border post in retaliation for the earlier cross-border NATO raids.
"A NATO convoy had been moving through Khyber Pass, but the trucks were turned back from entering the Khyber region," he said. "We are also told that the CIA chief [Leon Panetta] in Islamabad has been addressing this issue."
Our correspondent also said that the Pakistani government is making quite a big noise about it. Pakistan said that ISAF [the NATO-led force] and NATO must respect the mandate under which they are operating. They are expressing deep concerns that, despite the fact that [ISAF] knew where these positions were, they still went ahead."
Critical supply route
Khyber is on the main NATO supply route through Pakistan into Afghanistan, where more than 152,000 US international troops are fighting the Taliban.
This supply route is critical for non-military supplies for ISAF: it is reported that up to 250 vehicles a day cross the Pakistan border into Afghanistan as part of the NATO supply chain. Pakistan's relations with NATO are already strained over the intensifying drone attacks in the border regions.
Rehman Malik, the Pakistani interior minister, said of the border incident: "We will have to see whether we are allies or enemies."
A permanent stoppage of supply vehicles would place massive strains on NATO and hurt the Afghan war effort.
Speaking from Kabul, Sue Turton, Al Jazeera's correspondent, said on Thursday that NATO had launched an investigation into the reports.
"Initial reports said that [the ISAF helicopters] didn't encroach on Pakistani air space. NATO claims it carried out the attack on the Afghan side of the border. If they do want to cross the border, which coalition forces say they often do in self-defence, they usually get in touch with their Pakistani counterparts beforehand, if not during the operation," she said.
NATO has said previously that it has the right to self-defence. The multinational force has on at least one other occasion acknowledged mistakenly killing Pakistani security forces stationed close to the border.
The surge in suspected Taliban activity inside Afghanistan and apparent increased willingness by NATO to attack targets on the border, or just inside Pakistan, could be a sign the international forces are losing patience with Pakistan.
The country has long been accused of harboring Afghan Taliban fighters in its lawless tribal regions.
Source: Al Jazeera and agencies
Pakistan has blocked a vital supply route for international forces in Afghanistan in apparent retaliation for an alleged cross-border helicopter raid by NATO troops that killed three Pakistani frontier soldiers.
Over the weekend, NATO helicopters fired on targets in Pakistan at least two times, killing several suspected fighters they allegedly pursued over the border from Afghanistan.
Pakistan's government protested against the attacks, which came in a month during which there have been an unprecedented number of drone missile attacks in the country's northwest.
Pakistan also threatened to stop providing protection to NATO convoys if the military alliance's helicopters attacked targeted inside Pakistan again.
Kamal Hyder, Al Jazeera's correspondent in Islamabad, said on Thursday that there are reports of 100 NATO supply lorries already being held up at the Torkham border post in retaliation for the earlier cross-border NATO raids.
"A NATO convoy had been moving through Khyber Pass, but the trucks were turned back from entering the Khyber region," he said. "We are also told that the CIA chief [Leon Panetta] in Islamabad has been addressing this issue."
Our correspondent also said that the Pakistani government is making quite a big noise about it. Pakistan said that ISAF [the NATO-led force] and NATO must respect the mandate under which they are operating. They are expressing deep concerns that, despite the fact that [ISAF] knew where these positions were, they still went ahead."
Critical supply route
Khyber is on the main NATO supply route through Pakistan into Afghanistan, where more than 152,000 US international troops are fighting the Taliban.
This supply route is critical for non-military supplies for ISAF: it is reported that up to 250 vehicles a day cross the Pakistan border into Afghanistan as part of the NATO supply chain. Pakistan's relations with NATO are already strained over the intensifying drone attacks in the border regions.
Rehman Malik, the Pakistani interior minister, said of the border incident: "We will have to see whether we are allies or enemies."
A permanent stoppage of supply vehicles would place massive strains on NATO and hurt the Afghan war effort.
Speaking from Kabul, Sue Turton, Al Jazeera's correspondent, said on Thursday that NATO had launched an investigation into the reports.
"Initial reports said that [the ISAF helicopters] didn't encroach on Pakistani air space. NATO claims it carried out the attack on the Afghan side of the border. If they do want to cross the border, which coalition forces say they often do in self-defence, they usually get in touch with their Pakistani counterparts beforehand, if not during the operation," she said.
NATO has said previously that it has the right to self-defence. The multinational force has on at least one other occasion acknowledged mistakenly killing Pakistani security forces stationed close to the border.
The surge in suspected Taliban activity inside Afghanistan and apparent increased willingness by NATO to attack targets on the border, or just inside Pakistan, could be a sign the international forces are losing patience with Pakistan.
The country has long been accused of harboring Afghan Taliban fighters in its lawless tribal regions.
Source: Al Jazeera and agencies
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.