Aug 11, 2010
UNITED NATIONS - When the
Israeli government gave its blessings to a U.N. panel
of inquiry probing the military attack on a flotilla of ships
carrying humanitarian aid to Gaza last May, there was
widespread speculation that Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon may
have struck a backdoor deal over its mandate.
Asked at a
press conference Monday whether he agreed to a
secret understanding that the panel will not interview
members of the Israeli security forces accused of killing
nine Turkish civilians on board that ship, the secretary-
general laboriously ducked the question.
When the question was pointedly repeated, Ban said: "No,
there was no such agreement behind the scenes."
But the Israeli government, quick to react to his statement,
has now threatened to withdraw its support from the U.N.
panel.
Mark Regev, the spokesman for the Israeli government, was
quoted as saying: "Israel will not cooperate with, and will
not participate in, a panel that demands to investigate
Israeli soldiers."
But he refused to confirm or deny whether there was a secret
agreement or an understanding for panel members to avoid
questioning Israeli security forces involved in the
shooting.
Nir Hefetz, a spokesman for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin
Netanyahu, was equally defiant when he said Israel would not
cooperate with any panel that would question its soldiers.
"Before Israel gave the green light to its participation in
the panel, we had discreet negotiations in order to ensure
that this commission would not harm the vital interests of
Israel," he added.
A London newspaper, however, quoted Israeli officials as
saying that Ban had reneged on "a secret deal" in which
Israel agreed to cooperate with the U.N. panel on condition
no member of the security forces would be questioned.
A domestic panel appointed by Israel also skirted this issue
when it held a similar inquiry last month. That panel was
also not permitted to question security forces that attacked
the ship.
Asked about the conflicting statements on the terms of
reference of the U.N. panel, the secretary-general's
spokesman Martin Nesirky told reporters Tuesday that
disclosing the mandate of the panel was "not normal
practice".
Responding to a question, he also said the panel will not
have any power to subpoena witnesses.
"It was not a criminal investigation and is not looking into
criminal responsibility," he said. "It will be for the panel
to decide how they work and what they ask for," he added.
On Tuesday, the four members of the panel formally met for
the first time: Geoffrey Palmer, the chairperson and a
former prime minister of New Zealand, Alvaro Uribe, vice
chair and former president of Colombia, along with the
Israeli and Turkish members, Joseph Ciechanover and Ozdem
Sanberk, respectively.
The meeting took place at the U.N. secretariat, following a
photo-op with the secretary-general.
The Security Council, following a meeting in late May,
issued a presidential statement in which it took note of a
proposal made by the secretary-general "on the need to have
a full investigation into the matter and it calls for a
prompt, impartial, credible and transparent investigation
conforming to international standards".
The U.N. panel was a result of that presidential statement
approving the secretary-general's proposal.
Speaking to reporters Monday, Ban said: "This is an
unprecedented Panel of Inquiry established under my
initiative, for the purpose of ensuring accountability,
which is very important."
He said it will be important, not only in finding out the
facts and circumstances of the attack on the flotilla, but
also for the future that no such tragic incident would
happen.
Ban said the panel's main work will be to review and examine
the report of the domestic investigations, and liaise with
domestic authorities. "And whatever is needed beyond that,
they will have to discuss among themselves, in close
coordination with the national government authorities, that
they can take their own future steps."
Ban said the panel will report to him - on "independent
facts and circumstances and context of the incident".
Asked whether the selection of Uribe as vice chair, despite
his ongoing disputes with Ecuador and Venezuela and his
country's human rights record, would affect the credibility
of the panel, Ban said it wouldn't.
"First of all, in having President Alvaro Uribe, I should
remind you that Colombia's bilateral relationships with
Venezuela or Ecuador or some other countries has not much to
do with the specific case of the flotilla panel," he said.
"But I believe, having known him as leader of Colombia, in
my capacity as secretary-general, for such a long time, I
have full confidence that he will be a good addition and he
will make a good contribution to this panel."
"That is what I made my own decision on," Ban said.
Join Us: News for people demanding a better world
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Thalif Deen
Thalif Deen has been covering the U.N. since the late 1970s. A former deputy news editor of the Sri Lanka Daily News, he was a senior editorial writer on the Hongkong daily, The Standard. He has been runner-up and cited twice for "excellence in U.N. reporting" at the annual awards presentation of the U.N. Correspondents Association (UNCA). A former military editor Middle East/Africa at Jane's Information Group in the U.S, a columnist for the Sri Lanka Sunday Times and a longtime U.N. correspondent for Asiaweek, Hongkong and Jane's Defence Weekly, London, he is a Fulbright scholar with a master's degree in journalism from Columbia University, New York.
UNITED NATIONS - When the
Israeli government gave its blessings to a U.N. panel
of inquiry probing the military attack on a flotilla of ships
carrying humanitarian aid to Gaza last May, there was
widespread speculation that Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon may
have struck a backdoor deal over its mandate.
Asked at a
press conference Monday whether he agreed to a
secret understanding that the panel will not interview
members of the Israeli security forces accused of killing
nine Turkish civilians on board that ship, the secretary-
general laboriously ducked the question.
When the question was pointedly repeated, Ban said: "No,
there was no such agreement behind the scenes."
But the Israeli government, quick to react to his statement,
has now threatened to withdraw its support from the U.N.
panel.
Mark Regev, the spokesman for the Israeli government, was
quoted as saying: "Israel will not cooperate with, and will
not participate in, a panel that demands to investigate
Israeli soldiers."
But he refused to confirm or deny whether there was a secret
agreement or an understanding for panel members to avoid
questioning Israeli security forces involved in the
shooting.
Nir Hefetz, a spokesman for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin
Netanyahu, was equally defiant when he said Israel would not
cooperate with any panel that would question its soldiers.
"Before Israel gave the green light to its participation in
the panel, we had discreet negotiations in order to ensure
that this commission would not harm the vital interests of
Israel," he added.
A London newspaper, however, quoted Israeli officials as
saying that Ban had reneged on "a secret deal" in which
Israel agreed to cooperate with the U.N. panel on condition
no member of the security forces would be questioned.
A domestic panel appointed by Israel also skirted this issue
when it held a similar inquiry last month. That panel was
also not permitted to question security forces that attacked
the ship.
Asked about the conflicting statements on the terms of
reference of the U.N. panel, the secretary-general's
spokesman Martin Nesirky told reporters Tuesday that
disclosing the mandate of the panel was "not normal
practice".
Responding to a question, he also said the panel will not
have any power to subpoena witnesses.
"It was not a criminal investigation and is not looking into
criminal responsibility," he said. "It will be for the panel
to decide how they work and what they ask for," he added.
On Tuesday, the four members of the panel formally met for
the first time: Geoffrey Palmer, the chairperson and a
former prime minister of New Zealand, Alvaro Uribe, vice
chair and former president of Colombia, along with the
Israeli and Turkish members, Joseph Ciechanover and Ozdem
Sanberk, respectively.
The meeting took place at the U.N. secretariat, following a
photo-op with the secretary-general.
The Security Council, following a meeting in late May,
issued a presidential statement in which it took note of a
proposal made by the secretary-general "on the need to have
a full investigation into the matter and it calls for a
prompt, impartial, credible and transparent investigation
conforming to international standards".
The U.N. panel was a result of that presidential statement
approving the secretary-general's proposal.
Speaking to reporters Monday, Ban said: "This is an
unprecedented Panel of Inquiry established under my
initiative, for the purpose of ensuring accountability,
which is very important."
He said it will be important, not only in finding out the
facts and circumstances of the attack on the flotilla, but
also for the future that no such tragic incident would
happen.
Ban said the panel's main work will be to review and examine
the report of the domestic investigations, and liaise with
domestic authorities. "And whatever is needed beyond that,
they will have to discuss among themselves, in close
coordination with the national government authorities, that
they can take their own future steps."
Ban said the panel will report to him - on "independent
facts and circumstances and context of the incident".
Asked whether the selection of Uribe as vice chair, despite
his ongoing disputes with Ecuador and Venezuela and his
country's human rights record, would affect the credibility
of the panel, Ban said it wouldn't.
"First of all, in having President Alvaro Uribe, I should
remind you that Colombia's bilateral relationships with
Venezuela or Ecuador or some other countries has not much to
do with the specific case of the flotilla panel," he said.
"But I believe, having known him as leader of Colombia, in
my capacity as secretary-general, for such a long time, I
have full confidence that he will be a good addition and he
will make a good contribution to this panel."
"That is what I made my own decision on," Ban said.
Thalif Deen
Thalif Deen has been covering the U.N. since the late 1970s. A former deputy news editor of the Sri Lanka Daily News, he was a senior editorial writer on the Hongkong daily, The Standard. He has been runner-up and cited twice for "excellence in U.N. reporting" at the annual awards presentation of the U.N. Correspondents Association (UNCA). A former military editor Middle East/Africa at Jane's Information Group in the U.S, a columnist for the Sri Lanka Sunday Times and a longtime U.N. correspondent for Asiaweek, Hongkong and Jane's Defence Weekly, London, he is a Fulbright scholar with a master's degree in journalism from Columbia University, New York.
UNITED NATIONS - When the
Israeli government gave its blessings to a U.N. panel
of inquiry probing the military attack on a flotilla of ships
carrying humanitarian aid to Gaza last May, there was
widespread speculation that Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon may
have struck a backdoor deal over its mandate.
Asked at a
press conference Monday whether he agreed to a
secret understanding that the panel will not interview
members of the Israeli security forces accused of killing
nine Turkish civilians on board that ship, the secretary-
general laboriously ducked the question.
When the question was pointedly repeated, Ban said: "No,
there was no such agreement behind the scenes."
But the Israeli government, quick to react to his statement,
has now threatened to withdraw its support from the U.N.
panel.
Mark Regev, the spokesman for the Israeli government, was
quoted as saying: "Israel will not cooperate with, and will
not participate in, a panel that demands to investigate
Israeli soldiers."
But he refused to confirm or deny whether there was a secret
agreement or an understanding for panel members to avoid
questioning Israeli security forces involved in the
shooting.
Nir Hefetz, a spokesman for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin
Netanyahu, was equally defiant when he said Israel would not
cooperate with any panel that would question its soldiers.
"Before Israel gave the green light to its participation in
the panel, we had discreet negotiations in order to ensure
that this commission would not harm the vital interests of
Israel," he added.
A London newspaper, however, quoted Israeli officials as
saying that Ban had reneged on "a secret deal" in which
Israel agreed to cooperate with the U.N. panel on condition
no member of the security forces would be questioned.
A domestic panel appointed by Israel also skirted this issue
when it held a similar inquiry last month. That panel was
also not permitted to question security forces that attacked
the ship.
Asked about the conflicting statements on the terms of
reference of the U.N. panel, the secretary-general's
spokesman Martin Nesirky told reporters Tuesday that
disclosing the mandate of the panel was "not normal
practice".
Responding to a question, he also said the panel will not
have any power to subpoena witnesses.
"It was not a criminal investigation and is not looking into
criminal responsibility," he said. "It will be for the panel
to decide how they work and what they ask for," he added.
On Tuesday, the four members of the panel formally met for
the first time: Geoffrey Palmer, the chairperson and a
former prime minister of New Zealand, Alvaro Uribe, vice
chair and former president of Colombia, along with the
Israeli and Turkish members, Joseph Ciechanover and Ozdem
Sanberk, respectively.
The meeting took place at the U.N. secretariat, following a
photo-op with the secretary-general.
The Security Council, following a meeting in late May,
issued a presidential statement in which it took note of a
proposal made by the secretary-general "on the need to have
a full investigation into the matter and it calls for a
prompt, impartial, credible and transparent investigation
conforming to international standards".
The U.N. panel was a result of that presidential statement
approving the secretary-general's proposal.
Speaking to reporters Monday, Ban said: "This is an
unprecedented Panel of Inquiry established under my
initiative, for the purpose of ensuring accountability,
which is very important."
He said it will be important, not only in finding out the
facts and circumstances of the attack on the flotilla, but
also for the future that no such tragic incident would
happen.
Ban said the panel's main work will be to review and examine
the report of the domestic investigations, and liaise with
domestic authorities. "And whatever is needed beyond that,
they will have to discuss among themselves, in close
coordination with the national government authorities, that
they can take their own future steps."
Ban said the panel will report to him - on "independent
facts and circumstances and context of the incident".
Asked whether the selection of Uribe as vice chair, despite
his ongoing disputes with Ecuador and Venezuela and his
country's human rights record, would affect the credibility
of the panel, Ban said it wouldn't.
"First of all, in having President Alvaro Uribe, I should
remind you that Colombia's bilateral relationships with
Venezuela or Ecuador or some other countries has not much to
do with the specific case of the flotilla panel," he said.
"But I believe, having known him as leader of Colombia, in
my capacity as secretary-general, for such a long time, I
have full confidence that he will be a good addition and he
will make a good contribution to this panel."
"That is what I made my own decision on," Ban said.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.