Tojo, Indonesia: A villager walks through a burnt forest. Forest management is key to climate talks because it is the biggest source of carbon credits and the biggest potential source of mitigation. (Photograph: Yusuf Ahmad/Reuters)
Jun 08, 2010
Rich countries led by Russia, Australia and the EU have been accused
of trying to cheat their way out of reducing their greenhouse gas
emissions by creating "dishonest" forestry accounting loopholes.
By
seeking to change the rules that govern the offsetting of emissions
from planting trees and ignoring those that are created by felling
them, these nations would give the impression that they were acting to
prevent climate change -
but a growing number of developing countries and environmental groups
say that in reality they would be undermining genuine cuts.
The
row surfaced at the resumption of the UN climate negotiations in
Bonn this week, but today became a major point of contention
between rich and poor nations. Diplomats from the G77, the Africa group
of countries, Pacific islands like Tuvalu and the coalition of
rainforest countries all demanded that the rich nations (so-called Annex
1 nations) make absolute reductions in emissions.
According
to the Climate
Action Network (CAN), a coalition of more than 500 environment and
development groups around the world, the revision of the land use, land use change and forestry (LULUCF) rules
would falsely exaggerate emission reductions.
"It's a
disgraceful scandal. It would be disastrous for the climate," said Sean
Cadman, a spokesman for CAN. "This is a massive loophole. All rich
countries except Switzerland are now trying to avoid the consequences of
increasing the harvesting of forestry. They want LULUCF to drive
ambition [to reduce emissions] down. But it will increase the gap
between the cuts pledged and those that are needed."
CAN
and developing countries calculate that loopholes could account for
nearly 400m tonnes of CO2, or nearly 5% of the global total. Russia,
which wants to massively increase its forestry to pre-Soviet collapse
levels, stands to avoid making nearly 200m tonnes of cuts.
Yesterday
it emerged that Annex 1 countries will only adopt the high end of their
targets if they can get the emissions loopholes that they are seeking.
Russia
said that without new forestry accounting methods it would only be able
to cut overall emissions by 15%, as opposed to the 30% conditional
pledge it made at Copenhagen.
Forest management is seen as
key to the climate talks because it is the biggest source of carbon
credits and the biggest potential source of mitigation. Developing
countries fear that if the rich countries succeed in changing the LULUCF
baseline rules, there will be less international demand for carbon
credits, which would reduce their potential income from a climate deal.
"This
is fraudulent accounting," said Melanie Coath, climate change officer
at RSPB. "We are seeing a shocking race to the bottom. The forests of Europe could be an important
part of the solution to climate change. Instead we are seeing them being
used to undermine the integrity of a global climate deal."
Friends
of the Earth's international climate campaigner, Asad Rehman, said:
"When it comes to forests rich countries can't see the wood for the
trees - they're doing everything to get out of cutting their emissions
first and fastest and putting the climate negotiations in danger."
Join Us: News for people demanding a better world
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. Join with us today! |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Rich countries led by Russia, Australia and the EU have been accused
of trying to cheat their way out of reducing their greenhouse gas
emissions by creating "dishonest" forestry accounting loopholes.
By
seeking to change the rules that govern the offsetting of emissions
from planting trees and ignoring those that are created by felling
them, these nations would give the impression that they were acting to
prevent climate change -
but a growing number of developing countries and environmental groups
say that in reality they would be undermining genuine cuts.
The
row surfaced at the resumption of the UN climate negotiations in
Bonn this week, but today became a major point of contention
between rich and poor nations. Diplomats from the G77, the Africa group
of countries, Pacific islands like Tuvalu and the coalition of
rainforest countries all demanded that the rich nations (so-called Annex
1 nations) make absolute reductions in emissions.
According
to the Climate
Action Network (CAN), a coalition of more than 500 environment and
development groups around the world, the revision of the land use, land use change and forestry (LULUCF) rules
would falsely exaggerate emission reductions.
"It's a
disgraceful scandal. It would be disastrous for the climate," said Sean
Cadman, a spokesman for CAN. "This is a massive loophole. All rich
countries except Switzerland are now trying to avoid the consequences of
increasing the harvesting of forestry. They want LULUCF to drive
ambition [to reduce emissions] down. But it will increase the gap
between the cuts pledged and those that are needed."
CAN
and developing countries calculate that loopholes could account for
nearly 400m tonnes of CO2, or nearly 5% of the global total. Russia,
which wants to massively increase its forestry to pre-Soviet collapse
levels, stands to avoid making nearly 200m tonnes of cuts.
Yesterday
it emerged that Annex 1 countries will only adopt the high end of their
targets if they can get the emissions loopholes that they are seeking.
Russia
said that without new forestry accounting methods it would only be able
to cut overall emissions by 15%, as opposed to the 30% conditional
pledge it made at Copenhagen.
Forest management is seen as
key to the climate talks because it is the biggest source of carbon
credits and the biggest potential source of mitigation. Developing
countries fear that if the rich countries succeed in changing the LULUCF
baseline rules, there will be less international demand for carbon
credits, which would reduce their potential income from a climate deal.
"This
is fraudulent accounting," said Melanie Coath, climate change officer
at RSPB. "We are seeing a shocking race to the bottom. The forests of Europe could be an important
part of the solution to climate change. Instead we are seeing them being
used to undermine the integrity of a global climate deal."
Friends
of the Earth's international climate campaigner, Asad Rehman, said:
"When it comes to forests rich countries can't see the wood for the
trees - they're doing everything to get out of cutting their emissions
first and fastest and putting the climate negotiations in danger."
Rich countries led by Russia, Australia and the EU have been accused
of trying to cheat their way out of reducing their greenhouse gas
emissions by creating "dishonest" forestry accounting loopholes.
By
seeking to change the rules that govern the offsetting of emissions
from planting trees and ignoring those that are created by felling
them, these nations would give the impression that they were acting to
prevent climate change -
but a growing number of developing countries and environmental groups
say that in reality they would be undermining genuine cuts.
The
row surfaced at the resumption of the UN climate negotiations in
Bonn this week, but today became a major point of contention
between rich and poor nations. Diplomats from the G77, the Africa group
of countries, Pacific islands like Tuvalu and the coalition of
rainforest countries all demanded that the rich nations (so-called Annex
1 nations) make absolute reductions in emissions.
According
to the Climate
Action Network (CAN), a coalition of more than 500 environment and
development groups around the world, the revision of the land use, land use change and forestry (LULUCF) rules
would falsely exaggerate emission reductions.
"It's a
disgraceful scandal. It would be disastrous for the climate," said Sean
Cadman, a spokesman for CAN. "This is a massive loophole. All rich
countries except Switzerland are now trying to avoid the consequences of
increasing the harvesting of forestry. They want LULUCF to drive
ambition [to reduce emissions] down. But it will increase the gap
between the cuts pledged and those that are needed."
CAN
and developing countries calculate that loopholes could account for
nearly 400m tonnes of CO2, or nearly 5% of the global total. Russia,
which wants to massively increase its forestry to pre-Soviet collapse
levels, stands to avoid making nearly 200m tonnes of cuts.
Yesterday
it emerged that Annex 1 countries will only adopt the high end of their
targets if they can get the emissions loopholes that they are seeking.
Russia
said that without new forestry accounting methods it would only be able
to cut overall emissions by 15%, as opposed to the 30% conditional
pledge it made at Copenhagen.
Forest management is seen as
key to the climate talks because it is the biggest source of carbon
credits and the biggest potential source of mitigation. Developing
countries fear that if the rich countries succeed in changing the LULUCF
baseline rules, there will be less international demand for carbon
credits, which would reduce their potential income from a climate deal.
"This
is fraudulent accounting," said Melanie Coath, climate change officer
at RSPB. "We are seeing a shocking race to the bottom. The forests of Europe could be an important
part of the solution to climate change. Instead we are seeing them being
used to undermine the integrity of a global climate deal."
Friends
of the Earth's international climate campaigner, Asad Rehman, said:
"When it comes to forests rich countries can't see the wood for the
trees - they're doing everything to get out of cutting their emissions
first and fastest and putting the climate negotiations in danger."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.