SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Coal Stations Will Be 'Lightning Rod' for Global Dissent, Warns UK Watchdog's Head
New head of Sustainable Development Commission condemns 'clean coal' and Heathrow expansion plans
Aug 13, 2009
The new head of the UK government's official green watchdog has strongly criticised moves to build new coal-fired power stations in Britain and condemned the planned expansion of Heathrow.
In his first major interview since taking office, Will Day, the incoming chair of the Sustainable Development Commission
(SDC), told the Guardian that construction of new coal stations, such
as the planned Eon Kingsnorth facility in Kent, would provide a
"lightning rod" for international protest.
He dismissed industry and ministerial claims that new power stations such as Kingsnorth could be operated with limited impact on the environment by trapping and storing the carbon emissions underground. "Never use the words 'clean coal'," he said. "I do not believe clean coal exists."
Day also said that:
- It was "not an appropriate time" to build a third runway at Heathrow.
- Flights must be made more expensive to discourage people from flying to foreign holidays.
- Politicians must make unpopular decisions to tackle global warming
Day
stressed his views were personal and not those of the SDC, but their
uncompromising tone is likely to reassure green campaigners. Day, the
former chief executive of relief and development group Care
International, was appointed SDC chair following the departure of Jonathan Porritt, who was a regular and vocal critic of government efforts on the environment.
On
new coal power stations, Day said: "Science is unequivocal about the
impact of carbon on our environment. Every time scientists go back to
measure ice and water levels and those things it gets worse. We should
not be adding to that problem. And when someone says "oh no, it will be
carbon capture and storage
ready", well show me where it's working, seriously working. Show me how
it's going to be implemented on existing stock, let alone new stock."
He
added: "There is no such thing as a free lunch and we're not going to
get a free lunch around coal. So my view would be if the government
wants to provide a lightning rod for public disagreement or dissent
around coal, then start building a new coal-fired power station, and
the orang-utan costumes will be dusted off from around the planet and
people will come and say this is wrong. And two wrongs don't make a
right. People say "oh there is one a week opening in China". And? I
don't think that's a good enough reason."
Day said he disagreed with Ed Miliband, climate and energy secretary, on whether mass air travel could be preserved in a low-carbon world. Miliband told the Guardian last month:
"Where I disagree with other people on aviation is if you did 80% cuts
across the board, as some people have called for on aviation, you would
go back to 1974 levels of flying. I don't want to have a situation
where only rich people can afford to fly."
Day said: "Politicians
are there to make the hard decisions. And there are some really hard
decisions coming up. And they're hard because they're not the kind of
decisions that individuals particularly want to have taken. How many
short- to medium-haul flight holidays does anyone really need to have a
year? Ed Miliband interestingly said something like 'don't worry your
holiday flights are safe with me'. But we know that we need to be
encouraging and supporting, through a combination of stick and carrot,
some change to behaviours."
He added: "Part of the difficult
decision is going to be a rebalancing of what things cost. If we say we
must pay the true price of the impact of carbon on the environment. The
hard decision is do you price the impact of an aeroplane flying through
the air properly, really properly, and not a kind of PS1.20 carbon
offset. The objective is to reduce the amount of carbon put into the
upper atmosphere by planes by pricing it out."
He said: [Flights]
will continue but there will be fewer of them, and they will be
properly priced. And people will be able to make decisions based on
their decision to afford. They're not being told they cannot go on
holiday, they are being told this is what it costs."
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
The new head of the UK government's official green watchdog has strongly criticised moves to build new coal-fired power stations in Britain and condemned the planned expansion of Heathrow.
In his first major interview since taking office, Will Day, the incoming chair of the Sustainable Development Commission
(SDC), told the Guardian that construction of new coal stations, such
as the planned Eon Kingsnorth facility in Kent, would provide a
"lightning rod" for international protest.
He dismissed industry and ministerial claims that new power stations such as Kingsnorth could be operated with limited impact on the environment by trapping and storing the carbon emissions underground. "Never use the words 'clean coal'," he said. "I do not believe clean coal exists."
Day also said that:
- It was "not an appropriate time" to build a third runway at Heathrow.
- Flights must be made more expensive to discourage people from flying to foreign holidays.
- Politicians must make unpopular decisions to tackle global warming
Day
stressed his views were personal and not those of the SDC, but their
uncompromising tone is likely to reassure green campaigners. Day, the
former chief executive of relief and development group Care
International, was appointed SDC chair following the departure of Jonathan Porritt, who was a regular and vocal critic of government efforts on the environment.
On
new coal power stations, Day said: "Science is unequivocal about the
impact of carbon on our environment. Every time scientists go back to
measure ice and water levels and those things it gets worse. We should
not be adding to that problem. And when someone says "oh no, it will be
carbon capture and storage
ready", well show me where it's working, seriously working. Show me how
it's going to be implemented on existing stock, let alone new stock."
He
added: "There is no such thing as a free lunch and we're not going to
get a free lunch around coal. So my view would be if the government
wants to provide a lightning rod for public disagreement or dissent
around coal, then start building a new coal-fired power station, and
the orang-utan costumes will be dusted off from around the planet and
people will come and say this is wrong. And two wrongs don't make a
right. People say "oh there is one a week opening in China". And? I
don't think that's a good enough reason."
Day said he disagreed with Ed Miliband, climate and energy secretary, on whether mass air travel could be preserved in a low-carbon world. Miliband told the Guardian last month:
"Where I disagree with other people on aviation is if you did 80% cuts
across the board, as some people have called for on aviation, you would
go back to 1974 levels of flying. I don't want to have a situation
where only rich people can afford to fly."
Day said: "Politicians
are there to make the hard decisions. And there are some really hard
decisions coming up. And they're hard because they're not the kind of
decisions that individuals particularly want to have taken. How many
short- to medium-haul flight holidays does anyone really need to have a
year? Ed Miliband interestingly said something like 'don't worry your
holiday flights are safe with me'. But we know that we need to be
encouraging and supporting, through a combination of stick and carrot,
some change to behaviours."
He added: "Part of the difficult
decision is going to be a rebalancing of what things cost. If we say we
must pay the true price of the impact of carbon on the environment. The
hard decision is do you price the impact of an aeroplane flying through
the air properly, really properly, and not a kind of PS1.20 carbon
offset. The objective is to reduce the amount of carbon put into the
upper atmosphere by planes by pricing it out."
He said: [Flights]
will continue but there will be fewer of them, and they will be
properly priced. And people will be able to make decisions based on
their decision to afford. They're not being told they cannot go on
holiday, they are being told this is what it costs."
The new head of the UK government's official green watchdog has strongly criticised moves to build new coal-fired power stations in Britain and condemned the planned expansion of Heathrow.
In his first major interview since taking office, Will Day, the incoming chair of the Sustainable Development Commission
(SDC), told the Guardian that construction of new coal stations, such
as the planned Eon Kingsnorth facility in Kent, would provide a
"lightning rod" for international protest.
He dismissed industry and ministerial claims that new power stations such as Kingsnorth could be operated with limited impact on the environment by trapping and storing the carbon emissions underground. "Never use the words 'clean coal'," he said. "I do not believe clean coal exists."
Day also said that:
- It was "not an appropriate time" to build a third runway at Heathrow.
- Flights must be made more expensive to discourage people from flying to foreign holidays.
- Politicians must make unpopular decisions to tackle global warming
Day
stressed his views were personal and not those of the SDC, but their
uncompromising tone is likely to reassure green campaigners. Day, the
former chief executive of relief and development group Care
International, was appointed SDC chair following the departure of Jonathan Porritt, who was a regular and vocal critic of government efforts on the environment.
On
new coal power stations, Day said: "Science is unequivocal about the
impact of carbon on our environment. Every time scientists go back to
measure ice and water levels and those things it gets worse. We should
not be adding to that problem. And when someone says "oh no, it will be
carbon capture and storage
ready", well show me where it's working, seriously working. Show me how
it's going to be implemented on existing stock, let alone new stock."
He
added: "There is no such thing as a free lunch and we're not going to
get a free lunch around coal. So my view would be if the government
wants to provide a lightning rod for public disagreement or dissent
around coal, then start building a new coal-fired power station, and
the orang-utan costumes will be dusted off from around the planet and
people will come and say this is wrong. And two wrongs don't make a
right. People say "oh there is one a week opening in China". And? I
don't think that's a good enough reason."
Day said he disagreed with Ed Miliband, climate and energy secretary, on whether mass air travel could be preserved in a low-carbon world. Miliband told the Guardian last month:
"Where I disagree with other people on aviation is if you did 80% cuts
across the board, as some people have called for on aviation, you would
go back to 1974 levels of flying. I don't want to have a situation
where only rich people can afford to fly."
Day said: "Politicians
are there to make the hard decisions. And there are some really hard
decisions coming up. And they're hard because they're not the kind of
decisions that individuals particularly want to have taken. How many
short- to medium-haul flight holidays does anyone really need to have a
year? Ed Miliband interestingly said something like 'don't worry your
holiday flights are safe with me'. But we know that we need to be
encouraging and supporting, through a combination of stick and carrot,
some change to behaviours."
He added: "Part of the difficult
decision is going to be a rebalancing of what things cost. If we say we
must pay the true price of the impact of carbon on the environment. The
hard decision is do you price the impact of an aeroplane flying through
the air properly, really properly, and not a kind of PS1.20 carbon
offset. The objective is to reduce the amount of carbon put into the
upper atmosphere by planes by pricing it out."
He said: [Flights]
will continue but there will be fewer of them, and they will be
properly priced. And people will be able to make decisions based on
their decision to afford. They're not being told they cannot go on
holiday, they are being told this is what it costs."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.
To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good.
News & Opinion
Trending
Common Dreams, Inc. Founded 1997. Registered 501(c3) Non-Profit
Privacy Policy