Germany Gets Some Nuclear Jolts
BERLIN - The faults at the nuclear plant at Kruemmel near Hamburg surfaced just three days after Chancellor Angela Merkel declared nuclear energy "indispensable" to Germany.
Merkel told the annual meeting of Atomforum, a group supporting nuclear energy Jul. 1 that if her ruling Christian Democratic Union (CDU) wins parliamentary elections in September, the new government would reverse the phase-out of nuclear power.
The phase-out was decided in 2000 by the former coalition government of the Social Democratic Party (SPD) and the Greens.
BERLIN - The faults at the nuclear plant at Kruemmel near Hamburg surfaced just three days after Chancellor Angela Merkel declared nuclear energy "indispensable" to Germany.
Merkel told the annual meeting of Atomforum, a group supporting nuclear energy Jul. 1 that if her ruling Christian Democratic Union (CDU) wins parliamentary elections in September, the new government would reverse the phase-out of nuclear power.
The phase-out was decided in 2000 by the former coalition government of the Social Democratic Party (SPD) and the Greens.
On Jul. 4 the Kruemmel plant, less than 30 kilometres south of Hamburg, shut down following major technical defects. Hamburg, with a population of two million, suffered an hour-long electricity blackout and water shortages.
The operator of the facility, the Swedish energy giant Vatenfall, said first that it had "forgotten to install a valve" in the reactor. By Jul. 7, Vatenfall admitted that there had been several major faults.
Two transformers had failed, leading to automatic shutdown. Several nuclear fuel rods - the tubes that contain highly radioactive enriched uranium ceramic pellets - were found defective. Kruemmel has about 80,000 nuclear fuel rods.
Tuomo Hattaka, head of Vatenfall Europe, apologised for the accidents. "We are really sorry," Hattaka said, and promised "a thorough investigation." The technical head of Kruemmel was sacked.
The nuclear plant had been in production just three days, after going through a year-long technical overhaul at a cost of 420 million dollars. Kruemmel was shut down in July 2008 following a fire in one of the two transformers.
Vatenfall spokesperson Barbara Meyer Bukow said last month after the repairs were completed that "Kruemmel's safety mechanism satisfies the newest standards. We have carried out a meticulous modernisation of the plant."
But a report in the German weekly Der Spiegel published Jul. 13 quoted a worker as saying that the reactor did not respect "elementary rules" of nuclear power technology. Another worker said that "large, sharp metal cuttings" foreign to the plant were found in the cooling water surrounding the nuclear fuel rods.
Hattaka said that the automatic shutdown of the plant demonstrated that "our safety mechanisms function."
The latest faults at Kruemmel come as an inopportune reminder to the ruling party of the technical fragility of nuclear power.
According to a 2002 timetable, all 17 nuclear reactors in Germany would be shut down by 2021. Two reactors have been shut down already, and another eight - including Kruemmel and Brunsbuettel, a nuclear reactor shut down since June 2007 after a technical defect - are to close by 2014.
The four operators of the facilities, the energy giants Vatenfall, RWE, E.on, and EnBW, have been asking for renewal of operation permits for the 17 nuclear power reactors. The CDU and its likely government coalition partner after the next election, the Liberal Democratic Party (FDP), support these calls.
But the faults at Kruemmel have given the SPD and Green parties new fuel for arguing the phase-out of nuclear power. Sigmar Gabriel, federal minister for the environment from the SPD, presently a coalition partner, has called Kruemmel "a monster, which should be shut down for ever."
Gabriel said the debate on the phasing out of nuclear power "will be the defining theme of the election campaign" during the next two months.
"Kruemmel must be shut down definitively," Mathias Edler, nuclear power expert at the environmental organisation Greenpeace told IPS. "The reactor uses very old technology, and in the middle of a region populated by millions of people."
Greenpeace has documented that at least 5,700 technical defects have hit German nuclear reactors since 1965.
An opinion poll carried out immediately after the last incident at Kruemmel showed that 72 percent of Germans support the shutdown of older reactors.
Lutz Metz, nuclear power expert at the Research Centre for Environmental Policy at the Free University of Berlin, says the operating companies have a clear interest in keeping these plants running. "Every single plant produces a net daily profit of at least one million euros," Metz told IPS.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
BERLIN - The faults at the nuclear plant at Kruemmel near Hamburg surfaced just three days after Chancellor Angela Merkel declared nuclear energy "indispensable" to Germany.
Merkel told the annual meeting of Atomforum, a group supporting nuclear energy Jul. 1 that if her ruling Christian Democratic Union (CDU) wins parliamentary elections in September, the new government would reverse the phase-out of nuclear power.
The phase-out was decided in 2000 by the former coalition government of the Social Democratic Party (SPD) and the Greens.
On Jul. 4 the Kruemmel plant, less than 30 kilometres south of Hamburg, shut down following major technical defects. Hamburg, with a population of two million, suffered an hour-long electricity blackout and water shortages.
The operator of the facility, the Swedish energy giant Vatenfall, said first that it had "forgotten to install a valve" in the reactor. By Jul. 7, Vatenfall admitted that there had been several major faults.
Two transformers had failed, leading to automatic shutdown. Several nuclear fuel rods - the tubes that contain highly radioactive enriched uranium ceramic pellets - were found defective. Kruemmel has about 80,000 nuclear fuel rods.
Tuomo Hattaka, head of Vatenfall Europe, apologised for the accidents. "We are really sorry," Hattaka said, and promised "a thorough investigation." The technical head of Kruemmel was sacked.
The nuclear plant had been in production just three days, after going through a year-long technical overhaul at a cost of 420 million dollars. Kruemmel was shut down in July 2008 following a fire in one of the two transformers.
Vatenfall spokesperson Barbara Meyer Bukow said last month after the repairs were completed that "Kruemmel's safety mechanism satisfies the newest standards. We have carried out a meticulous modernisation of the plant."
But a report in the German weekly Der Spiegel published Jul. 13 quoted a worker as saying that the reactor did not respect "elementary rules" of nuclear power technology. Another worker said that "large, sharp metal cuttings" foreign to the plant were found in the cooling water surrounding the nuclear fuel rods.
Hattaka said that the automatic shutdown of the plant demonstrated that "our safety mechanisms function."
The latest faults at Kruemmel come as an inopportune reminder to the ruling party of the technical fragility of nuclear power.
According to a 2002 timetable, all 17 nuclear reactors in Germany would be shut down by 2021. Two reactors have been shut down already, and another eight - including Kruemmel and Brunsbuettel, a nuclear reactor shut down since June 2007 after a technical defect - are to close by 2014.
The four operators of the facilities, the energy giants Vatenfall, RWE, E.on, and EnBW, have been asking for renewal of operation permits for the 17 nuclear power reactors. The CDU and its likely government coalition partner after the next election, the Liberal Democratic Party (FDP), support these calls.
But the faults at Kruemmel have given the SPD and Green parties new fuel for arguing the phase-out of nuclear power. Sigmar Gabriel, federal minister for the environment from the SPD, presently a coalition partner, has called Kruemmel "a monster, which should be shut down for ever."
Gabriel said the debate on the phasing out of nuclear power "will be the defining theme of the election campaign" during the next two months.
"Kruemmel must be shut down definitively," Mathias Edler, nuclear power expert at the environmental organisation Greenpeace told IPS. "The reactor uses very old technology, and in the middle of a region populated by millions of people."
Greenpeace has documented that at least 5,700 technical defects have hit German nuclear reactors since 1965.
An opinion poll carried out immediately after the last incident at Kruemmel showed that 72 percent of Germans support the shutdown of older reactors.
Lutz Metz, nuclear power expert at the Research Centre for Environmental Policy at the Free University of Berlin, says the operating companies have a clear interest in keeping these plants running. "Every single plant produces a net daily profit of at least one million euros," Metz told IPS.
BERLIN - The faults at the nuclear plant at Kruemmel near Hamburg surfaced just three days after Chancellor Angela Merkel declared nuclear energy "indispensable" to Germany.
Merkel told the annual meeting of Atomforum, a group supporting nuclear energy Jul. 1 that if her ruling Christian Democratic Union (CDU) wins parliamentary elections in September, the new government would reverse the phase-out of nuclear power.
The phase-out was decided in 2000 by the former coalition government of the Social Democratic Party (SPD) and the Greens.
On Jul. 4 the Kruemmel plant, less than 30 kilometres south of Hamburg, shut down following major technical defects. Hamburg, with a population of two million, suffered an hour-long electricity blackout and water shortages.
The operator of the facility, the Swedish energy giant Vatenfall, said first that it had "forgotten to install a valve" in the reactor. By Jul. 7, Vatenfall admitted that there had been several major faults.
Two transformers had failed, leading to automatic shutdown. Several nuclear fuel rods - the tubes that contain highly radioactive enriched uranium ceramic pellets - were found defective. Kruemmel has about 80,000 nuclear fuel rods.
Tuomo Hattaka, head of Vatenfall Europe, apologised for the accidents. "We are really sorry," Hattaka said, and promised "a thorough investigation." The technical head of Kruemmel was sacked.
The nuclear plant had been in production just three days, after going through a year-long technical overhaul at a cost of 420 million dollars. Kruemmel was shut down in July 2008 following a fire in one of the two transformers.
Vatenfall spokesperson Barbara Meyer Bukow said last month after the repairs were completed that "Kruemmel's safety mechanism satisfies the newest standards. We have carried out a meticulous modernisation of the plant."
But a report in the German weekly Der Spiegel published Jul. 13 quoted a worker as saying that the reactor did not respect "elementary rules" of nuclear power technology. Another worker said that "large, sharp metal cuttings" foreign to the plant were found in the cooling water surrounding the nuclear fuel rods.
Hattaka said that the automatic shutdown of the plant demonstrated that "our safety mechanisms function."
The latest faults at Kruemmel come as an inopportune reminder to the ruling party of the technical fragility of nuclear power.
According to a 2002 timetable, all 17 nuclear reactors in Germany would be shut down by 2021. Two reactors have been shut down already, and another eight - including Kruemmel and Brunsbuettel, a nuclear reactor shut down since June 2007 after a technical defect - are to close by 2014.
The four operators of the facilities, the energy giants Vatenfall, RWE, E.on, and EnBW, have been asking for renewal of operation permits for the 17 nuclear power reactors. The CDU and its likely government coalition partner after the next election, the Liberal Democratic Party (FDP), support these calls.
But the faults at Kruemmel have given the SPD and Green parties new fuel for arguing the phase-out of nuclear power. Sigmar Gabriel, federal minister for the environment from the SPD, presently a coalition partner, has called Kruemmel "a monster, which should be shut down for ever."
Gabriel said the debate on the phasing out of nuclear power "will be the defining theme of the election campaign" during the next two months.
"Kruemmel must be shut down definitively," Mathias Edler, nuclear power expert at the environmental organisation Greenpeace told IPS. "The reactor uses very old technology, and in the middle of a region populated by millions of people."
Greenpeace has documented that at least 5,700 technical defects have hit German nuclear reactors since 1965.
An opinion poll carried out immediately after the last incident at Kruemmel showed that 72 percent of Germans support the shutdown of older reactors.
Lutz Metz, nuclear power expert at the Research Centre for Environmental Policy at the Free University of Berlin, says the operating companies have a clear interest in keeping these plants running. "Every single plant produces a net daily profit of at least one million euros," Metz told IPS.