SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Standing Up for Free Speech Is Not a Threat to Free Speech
Last night, in Chicago, activists did the right thing for democracy
Mar 12, 2016
Of all the many disturbing things about Donald Trump, his glorification of political violence may be the worst. Again and again, he has encouraged his followers to respond to peaceful protests with brutal force. The Intercept (3/11/16) had a good compilation of Trump's encouragement of attacks against those who dare to speak out against him:
- "See, in the good old days this doesn't happen, because they used to treat them very, very rough. And when they protested once, you know, they would not do it again so easily.... They get away with murder because we've become weak."
- "I love the old days -- you know what they used to do to guys like that when they were in a place like this? They'd be carried out on a stretcher, folks."
- "You see, in the good old days, law enforcement acted a lot quicker than this, a lot quicker. In the good old days, they'd rip him out of that seat so fast. But today, everybody's politically correct. Our country's going to hell with being politically correct."
Rachel Maddow on MSNBC (3/11/16) presented a video compilation of Trump's routine incitement to violence:
And Trump's followers are clearly listening to their leader's exhortations. Slate publishes a running list of violent events at Trump rallies--including attacks on journalists as well as protesters. After one protester was punched, kicked and reportedly choked at a November 2015 rally in Birmingham, Alabama, Trump's response was, "Maybe he should have been roughed up, because it was absolutely disgusting what he was doing." One Trump supporter who viciously elbowed a African-American protester in the face--and was later indicted for the assault--boasted to Inside Edition (3/10/16), "The next time we see him, we might have to kill him."
The idea that a political movement should respond to criticism with violent attacks is not compatible with a democratic society. There's no incongruity in Ku Klux Klan leader David Duke's endorsement of Trump; what Trump is celebrating is the Klan's strategy of suppressing dissent through terror.
When peaceful protests are met with violence, as they have been again and again at Trump's mass meetings, protesters have a choice between giving in to intimidation and staying away, or showing up in numbers large enough so that they cannot be suppressed. Last night, in Chicago, activists made the latter choice. It was the right thing to do for democracy.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
© 2023 Fairness and Accuracy In Reporting (FAIR)
Jim Naureckas
Jim Naureckas is editor of FAIR (Fairness & Accuracy In Reporting). He is the co-author of "Way Things Aren't: Rush Limbaugh's Reign of Error." He was an investigative reporter for In These Times and managing editor of the Washington Report on the Hemisphere.
Of all the many disturbing things about Donald Trump, his glorification of political violence may be the worst. Again and again, he has encouraged his followers to respond to peaceful protests with brutal force. The Intercept (3/11/16) had a good compilation of Trump's encouragement of attacks against those who dare to speak out against him:
- "See, in the good old days this doesn't happen, because they used to treat them very, very rough. And when they protested once, you know, they would not do it again so easily.... They get away with murder because we've become weak."
- "I love the old days -- you know what they used to do to guys like that when they were in a place like this? They'd be carried out on a stretcher, folks."
- "You see, in the good old days, law enforcement acted a lot quicker than this, a lot quicker. In the good old days, they'd rip him out of that seat so fast. But today, everybody's politically correct. Our country's going to hell with being politically correct."
Rachel Maddow on MSNBC (3/11/16) presented a video compilation of Trump's routine incitement to violence:
And Trump's followers are clearly listening to their leader's exhortations. Slate publishes a running list of violent events at Trump rallies--including attacks on journalists as well as protesters. After one protester was punched, kicked and reportedly choked at a November 2015 rally in Birmingham, Alabama, Trump's response was, "Maybe he should have been roughed up, because it was absolutely disgusting what he was doing." One Trump supporter who viciously elbowed a African-American protester in the face--and was later indicted for the assault--boasted to Inside Edition (3/10/16), "The next time we see him, we might have to kill him."
The idea that a political movement should respond to criticism with violent attacks is not compatible with a democratic society. There's no incongruity in Ku Klux Klan leader David Duke's endorsement of Trump; what Trump is celebrating is the Klan's strategy of suppressing dissent through terror.
When peaceful protests are met with violence, as they have been again and again at Trump's mass meetings, protesters have a choice between giving in to intimidation and staying away, or showing up in numbers large enough so that they cannot be suppressed. Last night, in Chicago, activists made the latter choice. It was the right thing to do for democracy.
Jim Naureckas
Jim Naureckas is editor of FAIR (Fairness & Accuracy In Reporting). He is the co-author of "Way Things Aren't: Rush Limbaugh's Reign of Error." He was an investigative reporter for In These Times and managing editor of the Washington Report on the Hemisphere.
Of all the many disturbing things about Donald Trump, his glorification of political violence may be the worst. Again and again, he has encouraged his followers to respond to peaceful protests with brutal force. The Intercept (3/11/16) had a good compilation of Trump's encouragement of attacks against those who dare to speak out against him:
- "See, in the good old days this doesn't happen, because they used to treat them very, very rough. And when they protested once, you know, they would not do it again so easily.... They get away with murder because we've become weak."
- "I love the old days -- you know what they used to do to guys like that when they were in a place like this? They'd be carried out on a stretcher, folks."
- "You see, in the good old days, law enforcement acted a lot quicker than this, a lot quicker. In the good old days, they'd rip him out of that seat so fast. But today, everybody's politically correct. Our country's going to hell with being politically correct."
Rachel Maddow on MSNBC (3/11/16) presented a video compilation of Trump's routine incitement to violence:
And Trump's followers are clearly listening to their leader's exhortations. Slate publishes a running list of violent events at Trump rallies--including attacks on journalists as well as protesters. After one protester was punched, kicked and reportedly choked at a November 2015 rally in Birmingham, Alabama, Trump's response was, "Maybe he should have been roughed up, because it was absolutely disgusting what he was doing." One Trump supporter who viciously elbowed a African-American protester in the face--and was later indicted for the assault--boasted to Inside Edition (3/10/16), "The next time we see him, we might have to kill him."
The idea that a political movement should respond to criticism with violent attacks is not compatible with a democratic society. There's no incongruity in Ku Klux Klan leader David Duke's endorsement of Trump; what Trump is celebrating is the Klan's strategy of suppressing dissent through terror.
When peaceful protests are met with violence, as they have been again and again at Trump's mass meetings, protesters have a choice between giving in to intimidation and staying away, or showing up in numbers large enough so that they cannot be suppressed. Last night, in Chicago, activists made the latter choice. It was the right thing to do for democracy.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.