

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
Dear FCC Chairman Julius Genachowski,
I don't want to wake up six months from now and find that the Internet has changed forever.
In the past few weeks since a federal court decision jeopardized your ability to protect Internet users, nearly 250,000 people have signed petitions or sent messages urging you to protect the Internet by "reclassifying" broadband under Title II of the Communications Act.
Dear FCC Chairman Julius Genachowski,
I don't want to wake up six months from now and find that the Internet has changed forever.
In the past few weeks since a federal court decision jeopardized your ability to protect Internet users, nearly 250,000 people have signed petitions or sent messages urging you to protect the Internet by "reclassifying" broadband under Title II of the Communications Act.
And yes, we know what "reclassify" means. But does the FCC know what it means when this many people are speaking out about an incredibly nuanced, seemingly wonky issues? Let me tell you: It means that we care, deeply, about the future of the Internet.
I understand you're facing a nightmarish situation as chairman. All of your aspirations for protecting and expanding the Internet are now in jeopardy, thanks to the court ruling - not to mention the years of terrible decisions made by your predecessors before you even took up your post. But that's how it is.
Now you must gather the courage to reassert the FCC's authority over the Internet - and thus make sure we have Net Neutrality and that you can deliver on the crucial goals of the national broadband plan.
You're facing enormous pressure not to reclassify broadband. I know the telecommunications lobby has lined up what must feel like cannons aimed at you.
But you, Mr. Chairman, are ultimately responsible for protecting the most important communications platform of our time.
And we've got your back. Along with the hundreds of thousands of us cheering you on, you actually have an astounding number of supporters, from your own colleagues at the FCC to President Obama, who has already told you and the nation that he'll "take a back seat to no one" when it comes to Net Neutrality. This month, Sen. Jay Rockefeller (D-W.Va.), chairman of the Senate Commerce Committee, told you he would support strong FCC action to get the national broadband plan back on track.
Despite this support, you've continued to dodge questions about what course the agency will take, and have yet to commit to act in the public's interest. Today, Free Press - the organization I work for - launched a clock to publicly mark the time elapsed since the FCC left the Internet unprotected. The repercussions of inaction are tremendous, and if we lose the Internet now, we'll never get it back.
There is no acceptable compromise here. We need a Title II reclassification and we're all saying: Just do it.
Sincerely,
Megan Tady
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Dear FCC Chairman Julius Genachowski,
I don't want to wake up six months from now and find that the Internet has changed forever.
In the past few weeks since a federal court decision jeopardized your ability to protect Internet users, nearly 250,000 people have signed petitions or sent messages urging you to protect the Internet by "reclassifying" broadband under Title II of the Communications Act.
And yes, we know what "reclassify" means. But does the FCC know what it means when this many people are speaking out about an incredibly nuanced, seemingly wonky issues? Let me tell you: It means that we care, deeply, about the future of the Internet.
I understand you're facing a nightmarish situation as chairman. All of your aspirations for protecting and expanding the Internet are now in jeopardy, thanks to the court ruling - not to mention the years of terrible decisions made by your predecessors before you even took up your post. But that's how it is.
Now you must gather the courage to reassert the FCC's authority over the Internet - and thus make sure we have Net Neutrality and that you can deliver on the crucial goals of the national broadband plan.
You're facing enormous pressure not to reclassify broadband. I know the telecommunications lobby has lined up what must feel like cannons aimed at you.
But you, Mr. Chairman, are ultimately responsible for protecting the most important communications platform of our time.
And we've got your back. Along with the hundreds of thousands of us cheering you on, you actually have an astounding number of supporters, from your own colleagues at the FCC to President Obama, who has already told you and the nation that he'll "take a back seat to no one" when it comes to Net Neutrality. This month, Sen. Jay Rockefeller (D-W.Va.), chairman of the Senate Commerce Committee, told you he would support strong FCC action to get the national broadband plan back on track.
Despite this support, you've continued to dodge questions about what course the agency will take, and have yet to commit to act in the public's interest. Today, Free Press - the organization I work for - launched a clock to publicly mark the time elapsed since the FCC left the Internet unprotected. The repercussions of inaction are tremendous, and if we lose the Internet now, we'll never get it back.
There is no acceptable compromise here. We need a Title II reclassification and we're all saying: Just do it.
Sincerely,
Megan Tady
Dear FCC Chairman Julius Genachowski,
I don't want to wake up six months from now and find that the Internet has changed forever.
In the past few weeks since a federal court decision jeopardized your ability to protect Internet users, nearly 250,000 people have signed petitions or sent messages urging you to protect the Internet by "reclassifying" broadband under Title II of the Communications Act.
And yes, we know what "reclassify" means. But does the FCC know what it means when this many people are speaking out about an incredibly nuanced, seemingly wonky issues? Let me tell you: It means that we care, deeply, about the future of the Internet.
I understand you're facing a nightmarish situation as chairman. All of your aspirations for protecting and expanding the Internet are now in jeopardy, thanks to the court ruling - not to mention the years of terrible decisions made by your predecessors before you even took up your post. But that's how it is.
Now you must gather the courage to reassert the FCC's authority over the Internet - and thus make sure we have Net Neutrality and that you can deliver on the crucial goals of the national broadband plan.
You're facing enormous pressure not to reclassify broadband. I know the telecommunications lobby has lined up what must feel like cannons aimed at you.
But you, Mr. Chairman, are ultimately responsible for protecting the most important communications platform of our time.
And we've got your back. Along with the hundreds of thousands of us cheering you on, you actually have an astounding number of supporters, from your own colleagues at the FCC to President Obama, who has already told you and the nation that he'll "take a back seat to no one" when it comes to Net Neutrality. This month, Sen. Jay Rockefeller (D-W.Va.), chairman of the Senate Commerce Committee, told you he would support strong FCC action to get the national broadband plan back on track.
Despite this support, you've continued to dodge questions about what course the agency will take, and have yet to commit to act in the public's interest. Today, Free Press - the organization I work for - launched a clock to publicly mark the time elapsed since the FCC left the Internet unprotected. The repercussions of inaction are tremendous, and if we lose the Internet now, we'll never get it back.
There is no acceptable compromise here. We need a Title II reclassification and we're all saying: Just do it.
Sincerely,
Megan Tady