SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Offsets Are a CROC
If you do something good for the environment, does it make any sense
that you should then be entitled to do something bad to the environment?
Of
course it doesn't. And yet that is basically what corporate polluters
are pushing for as climate legislation makes its way through Congress.
Rather than making required pollution cuts, they want to use "carbon
offsets," which would essentially allow them to continue their dirty,
polluting business as usual while outsourcing green jobs and cleaner
skies elsewhere...mostly overseas!
Sep 17, 2009
If you do something good for the environment, does it make any sense
that you should then be entitled to do something bad to the environment?
Of
course it doesn't. And yet that is basically what corporate polluters
are pushing for as climate legislation makes its way through Congress.
Rather than making required pollution cuts, they want to use "carbon
offsets," which would essentially allow them to continue their dirty,
polluting business as usual while outsourcing green jobs and cleaner
skies elsewhere...mostly overseas!
Amazingly, despite the fact
that offsets could totally undermine our efforts to combat global
warming -letting polluters increase greenhouse gas emissions for years
to come - there is now a group out there advocating carbon offsets be
made available to individuals, so that regular folks can also be
entitled to do something bad to the environment if they do something
good for it. The group is called the Carbon Regulatory Offset Committee (CROC). Check out this video from their charismatic spokesman, Carl Cordova:
Offsets
work like this: rather than making required emissions reductions,
polluters outsource their obligations - paying others to protect
forests overseas, for instance. The flaws in this scheme are manifold.
Aside from allowing polluters to evade their responsibility to reduce
their emissions as quickly as possible in order to prevent runaway
global warming, offsets are difficult to measure and verify.
How
much forest, a living ecosystem that is constantly changing, do you
have to protect to equal a ton of carbon? How do you make sure it gets
protected over the long-term? If it burns in a totally natural forest
fire, does it still count as an offset? Most importantly, how do you
make sure the same amount of deforestation doesn't just happen
somewhere else instead?
You really need to check out TheCROC.org to appreciate just how insane offsets are.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
© 2023 Greenpeace
If you do something good for the environment, does it make any sense
that you should then be entitled to do something bad to the environment?
Of
course it doesn't. And yet that is basically what corporate polluters
are pushing for as climate legislation makes its way through Congress.
Rather than making required pollution cuts, they want to use "carbon
offsets," which would essentially allow them to continue their dirty,
polluting business as usual while outsourcing green jobs and cleaner
skies elsewhere...mostly overseas!
Amazingly, despite the fact
that offsets could totally undermine our efforts to combat global
warming -letting polluters increase greenhouse gas emissions for years
to come - there is now a group out there advocating carbon offsets be
made available to individuals, so that regular folks can also be
entitled to do something bad to the environment if they do something
good for it. The group is called the Carbon Regulatory Offset Committee (CROC). Check out this video from their charismatic spokesman, Carl Cordova:
Offsets
work like this: rather than making required emissions reductions,
polluters outsource their obligations - paying others to protect
forests overseas, for instance. The flaws in this scheme are manifold.
Aside from allowing polluters to evade their responsibility to reduce
their emissions as quickly as possible in order to prevent runaway
global warming, offsets are difficult to measure and verify.
How
much forest, a living ecosystem that is constantly changing, do you
have to protect to equal a ton of carbon? How do you make sure it gets
protected over the long-term? If it burns in a totally natural forest
fire, does it still count as an offset? Most importantly, how do you
make sure the same amount of deforestation doesn't just happen
somewhere else instead?
You really need to check out TheCROC.org to appreciate just how insane offsets are.
If you do something good for the environment, does it make any sense
that you should then be entitled to do something bad to the environment?
Of
course it doesn't. And yet that is basically what corporate polluters
are pushing for as climate legislation makes its way through Congress.
Rather than making required pollution cuts, they want to use "carbon
offsets," which would essentially allow them to continue their dirty,
polluting business as usual while outsourcing green jobs and cleaner
skies elsewhere...mostly overseas!
Amazingly, despite the fact
that offsets could totally undermine our efforts to combat global
warming -letting polluters increase greenhouse gas emissions for years
to come - there is now a group out there advocating carbon offsets be
made available to individuals, so that regular folks can also be
entitled to do something bad to the environment if they do something
good for it. The group is called the Carbon Regulatory Offset Committee (CROC). Check out this video from their charismatic spokesman, Carl Cordova:
Offsets
work like this: rather than making required emissions reductions,
polluters outsource their obligations - paying others to protect
forests overseas, for instance. The flaws in this scheme are manifold.
Aside from allowing polluters to evade their responsibility to reduce
their emissions as quickly as possible in order to prevent runaway
global warming, offsets are difficult to measure and verify.
How
much forest, a living ecosystem that is constantly changing, do you
have to protect to equal a ton of carbon? How do you make sure it gets
protected over the long-term? If it burns in a totally natural forest
fire, does it still count as an offset? Most importantly, how do you
make sure the same amount of deforestation doesn't just happen
somewhere else instead?
You really need to check out TheCROC.org to appreciate just how insane offsets are.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.