SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
A protester holds up a sign featuring U.S. President Donald Trump as the puppeteer of British politicians Boris Johnson and Nigel Farage during a demonstration outside the Houses of Parliament on the second day of U.S. President Donald Trump's State Visit on June 4, 2019 in London, England. (Photo: Peter Summers/Getty Images)
Mission Accomplished for Far-Right Brexiteers? After Leaked Memos, UK Ambassador Who Called Trump 'Inept' Resigns
"We're on course to become the 51st state of Donald Trump's USA, with Boris Johnson as his consul," tweeted Guardian columnist Owen Jones
Jul 10, 2019
If there was a right-wing plot inside the U.K. government to force the ouster of British Ambassador to the U.S. Kim Darroch by leaking private diplomatic cables--as some journalists and commentators speculated--the effort achieved at least part of its desired outcome on Wednesday when Darroch announced his resignation.
After the leaked memos revealed that Darroch described U.S. President Donald Trump as "inept," "clumsy," and "incompetent," a number of British observers suggested the leaks may have been part of an attempt to clear the way for Prime Minister Theresa May's replacement to appoint a pro-Trump, pro-Brexit ambassador, such as right-wing Brexit Party leader Nigel Farage.
The favorite to succeed May, who plans to step down as soon as her replacement is appointed, is Boris Johnson.
Appearing to lend credence to the growing speculation, Farage quickly celebrated Darroch's resignation in a tweet on Wednesday:
\u201cThe right decision, time put in a non-Remainer who wants a trade deal with America.\u201d— Nigel Farage (@Nigel Farage) 1562756639
Trump predictably responded with fury to Darroch's private assessment of his White House, which he portrayed as "uniquely dysfunctional."
"I do not know the Ambassador, but he is not liked or well thought of within the U.S.," Trump tweeted on Monday, hours after the right-wing British tabloid Mail on Sunday reported on the cables. "We will no longer deal with him."
The Intercept's Robert Mackey wrote Tuesday that "the president's angry denunciation of the previously obscure diplomat... was so predictable, it looked to some observers like the intended outcome of a plot, hatched in London, to depose the ambassador in Washington by leaking his confidential briefing notes."
Mackey pointed to British observers who speculated that the cables were leaked to allow May's replacement to appoint a more pro-Trump diplomat, with Farage being one possible choice.
\u201cIt seems the deliberate leaking of Kim Darroch\u2019s email was aimed at undermining him, so the new unelected Tory PM can appoint a Trumpian patsy to Washington. I wonder who might have been behind such a thing. \ud83e\udd14\u201d— Ben Bradshaw (@Ben Bradshaw) 1562578415
\u201cPeople I trust, competent, well placed friends, suspect Kim Darroch is victim of a dark conspiracy and that Farage gets his job under Johnson. Can this actually be true? @BBCJonSopel said as much on the 10.\u201d— David Yelland (@David Yelland) 1562533828
Peter Ricketts, a former British ambassador to France, wrote in a column for The Guardian on Monday that "someone inside the British system deliberately amassed a stash of his assessments, then chose the moment of maximum impact to leak it."
"This was not a spontaneous decision to make public a single document: it required premeditation and therefore an agenda," wrote Ricketts.
In response to Darroch's resignation Wednesday, Guardian columnist Owen Jones tweeted: "We're on course to become the 51st state of Donald Trump's USA, with Boris Johnson as his consul. Taking back control indeed."
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, The U.S. is on a fast track to authoritarianism like nothing I've ever seen. Meanwhile, corporate news outlets are utterly capitulating to Trump, twisting their coverage to avoid drawing his ire while lining up to stuff cash in his pockets. That's why I believe that Common Dreams is doing the best and most consequential reporting that we've ever done. Our small but mighty team is a progressive reporting powerhouse, covering the news every day that the corporate media never will. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. And to ignite change for the common good. Now here's the key piece that I want all our readers to understand: None of this would be possible without your financial support. That's not just some fundraising cliche. It's the absolute and literal truth. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. Will you donate now to help power the nonprofit, independent reporting of Common Dreams? Thank you for being a vital member of our community. Together, we can keep independent journalism alive when it’s needed most. - Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
If there was a right-wing plot inside the U.K. government to force the ouster of British Ambassador to the U.S. Kim Darroch by leaking private diplomatic cables--as some journalists and commentators speculated--the effort achieved at least part of its desired outcome on Wednesday when Darroch announced his resignation.
After the leaked memos revealed that Darroch described U.S. President Donald Trump as "inept," "clumsy," and "incompetent," a number of British observers suggested the leaks may have been part of an attempt to clear the way for Prime Minister Theresa May's replacement to appoint a pro-Trump, pro-Brexit ambassador, such as right-wing Brexit Party leader Nigel Farage.
The favorite to succeed May, who plans to step down as soon as her replacement is appointed, is Boris Johnson.
Appearing to lend credence to the growing speculation, Farage quickly celebrated Darroch's resignation in a tweet on Wednesday:
\u201cThe right decision, time put in a non-Remainer who wants a trade deal with America.\u201d— Nigel Farage (@Nigel Farage) 1562756639
Trump predictably responded with fury to Darroch's private assessment of his White House, which he portrayed as "uniquely dysfunctional."
"I do not know the Ambassador, but he is not liked or well thought of within the U.S.," Trump tweeted on Monday, hours after the right-wing British tabloid Mail on Sunday reported on the cables. "We will no longer deal with him."
The Intercept's Robert Mackey wrote Tuesday that "the president's angry denunciation of the previously obscure diplomat... was so predictable, it looked to some observers like the intended outcome of a plot, hatched in London, to depose the ambassador in Washington by leaking his confidential briefing notes."
Mackey pointed to British observers who speculated that the cables were leaked to allow May's replacement to appoint a more pro-Trump diplomat, with Farage being one possible choice.
\u201cIt seems the deliberate leaking of Kim Darroch\u2019s email was aimed at undermining him, so the new unelected Tory PM can appoint a Trumpian patsy to Washington. I wonder who might have been behind such a thing. \ud83e\udd14\u201d— Ben Bradshaw (@Ben Bradshaw) 1562578415
\u201cPeople I trust, competent, well placed friends, suspect Kim Darroch is victim of a dark conspiracy and that Farage gets his job under Johnson. Can this actually be true? @BBCJonSopel said as much on the 10.\u201d— David Yelland (@David Yelland) 1562533828
Peter Ricketts, a former British ambassador to France, wrote in a column for The Guardian on Monday that "someone inside the British system deliberately amassed a stash of his assessments, then chose the moment of maximum impact to leak it."
"This was not a spontaneous decision to make public a single document: it required premeditation and therefore an agenda," wrote Ricketts.
In response to Darroch's resignation Wednesday, Guardian columnist Owen Jones tweeted: "We're on course to become the 51st state of Donald Trump's USA, with Boris Johnson as his consul. Taking back control indeed."
If there was a right-wing plot inside the U.K. government to force the ouster of British Ambassador to the U.S. Kim Darroch by leaking private diplomatic cables--as some journalists and commentators speculated--the effort achieved at least part of its desired outcome on Wednesday when Darroch announced his resignation.
After the leaked memos revealed that Darroch described U.S. President Donald Trump as "inept," "clumsy," and "incompetent," a number of British observers suggested the leaks may have been part of an attempt to clear the way for Prime Minister Theresa May's replacement to appoint a pro-Trump, pro-Brexit ambassador, such as right-wing Brexit Party leader Nigel Farage.
The favorite to succeed May, who plans to step down as soon as her replacement is appointed, is Boris Johnson.
Appearing to lend credence to the growing speculation, Farage quickly celebrated Darroch's resignation in a tweet on Wednesday:
\u201cThe right decision, time put in a non-Remainer who wants a trade deal with America.\u201d— Nigel Farage (@Nigel Farage) 1562756639
Trump predictably responded with fury to Darroch's private assessment of his White House, which he portrayed as "uniquely dysfunctional."
"I do not know the Ambassador, but he is not liked or well thought of within the U.S.," Trump tweeted on Monday, hours after the right-wing British tabloid Mail on Sunday reported on the cables. "We will no longer deal with him."
The Intercept's Robert Mackey wrote Tuesday that "the president's angry denunciation of the previously obscure diplomat... was so predictable, it looked to some observers like the intended outcome of a plot, hatched in London, to depose the ambassador in Washington by leaking his confidential briefing notes."
Mackey pointed to British observers who speculated that the cables were leaked to allow May's replacement to appoint a more pro-Trump diplomat, with Farage being one possible choice.
\u201cIt seems the deliberate leaking of Kim Darroch\u2019s email was aimed at undermining him, so the new unelected Tory PM can appoint a Trumpian patsy to Washington. I wonder who might have been behind such a thing. \ud83e\udd14\u201d— Ben Bradshaw (@Ben Bradshaw) 1562578415
\u201cPeople I trust, competent, well placed friends, suspect Kim Darroch is victim of a dark conspiracy and that Farage gets his job under Johnson. Can this actually be true? @BBCJonSopel said as much on the 10.\u201d— David Yelland (@David Yelland) 1562533828
Peter Ricketts, a former British ambassador to France, wrote in a column for The Guardian on Monday that "someone inside the British system deliberately amassed a stash of his assessments, then chose the moment of maximum impact to leak it."
"This was not a spontaneous decision to make public a single document: it required premeditation and therefore an agenda," wrote Ricketts.
In response to Darroch's resignation Wednesday, Guardian columnist Owen Jones tweeted: "We're on course to become the 51st state of Donald Trump's USA, with Boris Johnson as his consul. Taking back control indeed."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.