SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Navy Rear Adm. Ronny Jackson walks through the halls of Congress on April 19, 2018. Jackson is President Donald Trump's nominee to be the next secretary of Veterans Affairs, but his confirmation hearing scheduled for this week was delayed on Monday night. (Photo: Alex Brandon/AP)
Amid Allegations of Misconduct, Did Trump Just Throw His VA Nominee Under the Bus?
Concerns about Dr. Ronny Jackson have stemmed, at least in part, from observations shared by whistleblowers inside the White House that "suggest a pattern of behavior, not just one or two isolated incidents."
Apr 24, 2018
President Donald Trump's decision to appoint his personal White House physician to become the next head of the Veterans Department Department hit a wall of controversy on Tuesday after it was revealed a senate hearing that would be the first to review Dr. Ronny L. Jackson's nomination has been postponed indefinitely amid reported allegations that Jackson has a habit of drinking on the job, overprescribing medicines, and creating a "hostile" workplace environment for his colleagues.
According to the New York Times, "Officials familiar with the allegations against Dr. Jackson declined to offer precise details but said that they suggest a pattern of behavior, not just one or two isolated incidents."
Tracked down on Capitol Hill by MSNBC early Tuesday afternoon, Dr. Jackson did not take the opportunity to categorically deny the accusations against him, but said that he looks forward to the hearing and expressed regret it had been postponed:
Subsequently, Trump was asked about the controversy about Jackson during a press conference with French President Emmanuel Macron. Trump said he wasn't sure if Jackson would want to put himself through the ordeal, but ultimately suggested the decision was up to the nominee:
As the Huffington Post's Marina Fang put it, "Trump seemed to suggest that Jackson, his pick to succeed fired VA Secretary David Shulkin, should drop out."
Sens. Johnny Isakson (R-Ga.) and Jon Tester (D-Mont.), respectively the chair and ranking member of the Senate Veterans Affairs Committee, announced in a joint statement on Monday that a hearing scheduled for Wednesday of this week would be put on hold as a committee investigation seeks more information on Jackson. The two senators also issued a request directly to President Trump, via this letter (pdf), asking for the White House to share with the committee "any and all communications" related to any Jackson's job performance, including any complaints or documented infractions, going back to 2006.
CNN reports Tuesday that two whistleblowers spoke to the news outlet about what they witnessed while working inside the White House medical unit under Jackson, and that they had related these observations to the committee.
According to the Times:
Senators were keeping the details of their investigation underwraps but let it be known that the allegations are serious. Senator Mazie K. Hirono, Democrat of Hawaii and a member of the Veterans Affairs Committee, said she had heard enough from colleagues to have "deep concerns" about the nomination. "This is concerning even for a very ethically challenging White House," she said.
Asked if he still supported the nominee, Senator Mitch McConnell of Kentucky, the majority leader, offered only, "We're going to wait and see what Senator Isakson and the administration recommend."
As news of the possible allegations surface against Jackson overnight, the veterans advocacy group Vote Vets renewed its objections to Jackson's nomination on policy grounds, but said that if any of these accusation proved true, that would be an indictment of the president's own failure to adequately vet his choice:
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
President Donald Trump's decision to appoint his personal White House physician to become the next head of the Veterans Department Department hit a wall of controversy on Tuesday after it was revealed a senate hearing that would be the first to review Dr. Ronny L. Jackson's nomination has been postponed indefinitely amid reported allegations that Jackson has a habit of drinking on the job, overprescribing medicines, and creating a "hostile" workplace environment for his colleagues.
According to the New York Times, "Officials familiar with the allegations against Dr. Jackson declined to offer precise details but said that they suggest a pattern of behavior, not just one or two isolated incidents."
Tracked down on Capitol Hill by MSNBC early Tuesday afternoon, Dr. Jackson did not take the opportunity to categorically deny the accusations against him, but said that he looks forward to the hearing and expressed regret it had been postponed:
Subsequently, Trump was asked about the controversy about Jackson during a press conference with French President Emmanuel Macron. Trump said he wasn't sure if Jackson would want to put himself through the ordeal, but ultimately suggested the decision was up to the nominee:
As the Huffington Post's Marina Fang put it, "Trump seemed to suggest that Jackson, his pick to succeed fired VA Secretary David Shulkin, should drop out."
Sens. Johnny Isakson (R-Ga.) and Jon Tester (D-Mont.), respectively the chair and ranking member of the Senate Veterans Affairs Committee, announced in a joint statement on Monday that a hearing scheduled for Wednesday of this week would be put on hold as a committee investigation seeks more information on Jackson. The two senators also issued a request directly to President Trump, via this letter (pdf), asking for the White House to share with the committee "any and all communications" related to any Jackson's job performance, including any complaints or documented infractions, going back to 2006.
CNN reports Tuesday that two whistleblowers spoke to the news outlet about what they witnessed while working inside the White House medical unit under Jackson, and that they had related these observations to the committee.
According to the Times:
Senators were keeping the details of their investigation underwraps but let it be known that the allegations are serious. Senator Mazie K. Hirono, Democrat of Hawaii and a member of the Veterans Affairs Committee, said she had heard enough from colleagues to have "deep concerns" about the nomination. "This is concerning even for a very ethically challenging White House," she said.
Asked if he still supported the nominee, Senator Mitch McConnell of Kentucky, the majority leader, offered only, "We're going to wait and see what Senator Isakson and the administration recommend."
As news of the possible allegations surface against Jackson overnight, the veterans advocacy group Vote Vets renewed its objections to Jackson's nomination on policy grounds, but said that if any of these accusation proved true, that would be an indictment of the president's own failure to adequately vet his choice:
President Donald Trump's decision to appoint his personal White House physician to become the next head of the Veterans Department Department hit a wall of controversy on Tuesday after it was revealed a senate hearing that would be the first to review Dr. Ronny L. Jackson's nomination has been postponed indefinitely amid reported allegations that Jackson has a habit of drinking on the job, overprescribing medicines, and creating a "hostile" workplace environment for his colleagues.
According to the New York Times, "Officials familiar with the allegations against Dr. Jackson declined to offer precise details but said that they suggest a pattern of behavior, not just one or two isolated incidents."
Tracked down on Capitol Hill by MSNBC early Tuesday afternoon, Dr. Jackson did not take the opportunity to categorically deny the accusations against him, but said that he looks forward to the hearing and expressed regret it had been postponed:
Subsequently, Trump was asked about the controversy about Jackson during a press conference with French President Emmanuel Macron. Trump said he wasn't sure if Jackson would want to put himself through the ordeal, but ultimately suggested the decision was up to the nominee:
As the Huffington Post's Marina Fang put it, "Trump seemed to suggest that Jackson, his pick to succeed fired VA Secretary David Shulkin, should drop out."
Sens. Johnny Isakson (R-Ga.) and Jon Tester (D-Mont.), respectively the chair and ranking member of the Senate Veterans Affairs Committee, announced in a joint statement on Monday that a hearing scheduled for Wednesday of this week would be put on hold as a committee investigation seeks more information on Jackson. The two senators also issued a request directly to President Trump, via this letter (pdf), asking for the White House to share with the committee "any and all communications" related to any Jackson's job performance, including any complaints or documented infractions, going back to 2006.
CNN reports Tuesday that two whistleblowers spoke to the news outlet about what they witnessed while working inside the White House medical unit under Jackson, and that they had related these observations to the committee.
According to the Times:
Senators were keeping the details of their investigation underwraps but let it be known that the allegations are serious. Senator Mazie K. Hirono, Democrat of Hawaii and a member of the Veterans Affairs Committee, said she had heard enough from colleagues to have "deep concerns" about the nomination. "This is concerning even for a very ethically challenging White House," she said.
Asked if he still supported the nominee, Senator Mitch McConnell of Kentucky, the majority leader, offered only, "We're going to wait and see what Senator Isakson and the administration recommend."
As news of the possible allegations surface against Jackson overnight, the veterans advocacy group Vote Vets renewed its objections to Jackson's nomination on policy grounds, but said that if any of these accusation proved true, that would be an indictment of the president's own failure to adequately vet his choice:
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.