SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Trump's Shadow Cabinet Will Allow His "Tentacles" to Control All Agencies
Aides who do not have to be confirmed by Senate will have power to sign off on major policy decisions
Jan 24, 2017
The Trump administration is giving its top aides a channel from the president's ear to major federal agencies, creating a so-called "shadow cabinet" that will help the White House control policy despite promising to give department secretaries "unusual autonomy," Politico reports.
Chosen aides will be given the title of "senior adviser" in various bureaus, and have already been responsible for some of the hiring decisions and crafting policy before all of President Donald Trump's nominees have even completed their confirmation processes. The liaisons will also be expected to sign off on major decisions.
"Having senior advisers reporting to both the agency chiefs and the White House could spur early tensions and create conflicts with that pledge of autonomy," Politico's Josh Dawsey and Nancy Cook write Tuesday.
A person familiar with the arrangement said, "They want to keep kind of a West Wing-infused attachment to the agencies. There will be tentacles from the White House to these agencies. ... The effort is to demonstrate that all points lead back to certain people," such as Trump's son-in-law, Jared Kushner, who was sworn in as a senior adviser without having to go through the nomination process, or White House chief of staff Reince Priebus.
Another insider said the Trump team wanted a "real strong line at the agencies to have someone monitoring and directing what they're doing."
That's a break from historic policy, which usually allows big decisions to be made by cabinet secretaries, and contradicts the Trump administration's separate pledge to give them wide latitude.
And it's notable in light of several of Trump's nominees breaking with the president during confirmation hearings on top issues from Russia to climate change.
"What's different about the Trump hierarchy is the power these advisers are likely to have, according to people familiar with it. [Former President Barack] Obama's liaisons were often less powerful, while Trump's will connect directly to senior White House officials such as Kushner and Rick Dearborn, Trump's deputy chief of staff for policy," Dawsey and Cook write.
Tevi Troy, a former White House aide and deputy secretary at Health and Human Services under President George W. Bush, pointed out to Politico that senior advisers are unlikely to face subpoenas in the event of a "mishap."
Ethics experts sounded alarm bells over the shadow cabinet earlier this month.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Nadia Prupis
Nadia Prupis is a former Common Dreams staff writer. She wrote on media policy for Truthout.org and has been published in New America Media and AlterNet. She graduated from UC Santa Barbara with a BA in English in 2008.
The Trump administration is giving its top aides a channel from the president's ear to major federal agencies, creating a so-called "shadow cabinet" that will help the White House control policy despite promising to give department secretaries "unusual autonomy," Politico reports.
Chosen aides will be given the title of "senior adviser" in various bureaus, and have already been responsible for some of the hiring decisions and crafting policy before all of President Donald Trump's nominees have even completed their confirmation processes. The liaisons will also be expected to sign off on major decisions.
"Having senior advisers reporting to both the agency chiefs and the White House could spur early tensions and create conflicts with that pledge of autonomy," Politico's Josh Dawsey and Nancy Cook write Tuesday.
A person familiar with the arrangement said, "They want to keep kind of a West Wing-infused attachment to the agencies. There will be tentacles from the White House to these agencies. ... The effort is to demonstrate that all points lead back to certain people," such as Trump's son-in-law, Jared Kushner, who was sworn in as a senior adviser without having to go through the nomination process, or White House chief of staff Reince Priebus.
Another insider said the Trump team wanted a "real strong line at the agencies to have someone monitoring and directing what they're doing."
That's a break from historic policy, which usually allows big decisions to be made by cabinet secretaries, and contradicts the Trump administration's separate pledge to give them wide latitude.
And it's notable in light of several of Trump's nominees breaking with the president during confirmation hearings on top issues from Russia to climate change.
"What's different about the Trump hierarchy is the power these advisers are likely to have, according to people familiar with it. [Former President Barack] Obama's liaisons were often less powerful, while Trump's will connect directly to senior White House officials such as Kushner and Rick Dearborn, Trump's deputy chief of staff for policy," Dawsey and Cook write.
Tevi Troy, a former White House aide and deputy secretary at Health and Human Services under President George W. Bush, pointed out to Politico that senior advisers are unlikely to face subpoenas in the event of a "mishap."
Ethics experts sounded alarm bells over the shadow cabinet earlier this month.
Nadia Prupis
Nadia Prupis is a former Common Dreams staff writer. She wrote on media policy for Truthout.org and has been published in New America Media and AlterNet. She graduated from UC Santa Barbara with a BA in English in 2008.
The Trump administration is giving its top aides a channel from the president's ear to major federal agencies, creating a so-called "shadow cabinet" that will help the White House control policy despite promising to give department secretaries "unusual autonomy," Politico reports.
Chosen aides will be given the title of "senior adviser" in various bureaus, and have already been responsible for some of the hiring decisions and crafting policy before all of President Donald Trump's nominees have even completed their confirmation processes. The liaisons will also be expected to sign off on major decisions.
"Having senior advisers reporting to both the agency chiefs and the White House could spur early tensions and create conflicts with that pledge of autonomy," Politico's Josh Dawsey and Nancy Cook write Tuesday.
A person familiar with the arrangement said, "They want to keep kind of a West Wing-infused attachment to the agencies. There will be tentacles from the White House to these agencies. ... The effort is to demonstrate that all points lead back to certain people," such as Trump's son-in-law, Jared Kushner, who was sworn in as a senior adviser without having to go through the nomination process, or White House chief of staff Reince Priebus.
Another insider said the Trump team wanted a "real strong line at the agencies to have someone monitoring and directing what they're doing."
That's a break from historic policy, which usually allows big decisions to be made by cabinet secretaries, and contradicts the Trump administration's separate pledge to give them wide latitude.
And it's notable in light of several of Trump's nominees breaking with the president during confirmation hearings on top issues from Russia to climate change.
"What's different about the Trump hierarchy is the power these advisers are likely to have, according to people familiar with it. [Former President Barack] Obama's liaisons were often less powerful, while Trump's will connect directly to senior White House officials such as Kushner and Rick Dearborn, Trump's deputy chief of staff for policy," Dawsey and Cook write.
Tevi Troy, a former White House aide and deputy secretary at Health and Human Services under President George W. Bush, pointed out to Politico that senior advisers are unlikely to face subpoenas in the event of a "mishap."
Ethics experts sounded alarm bells over the shadow cabinet earlier this month.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.