DOJ Agrees: North Carolina Counties Are Suppressing Black Voters
Statement of interest filed Monday in response to emergency lawsuit finds that GOP-led roll purging violates National Voter Registration Act
The U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) this week issued a statement of interest agreeing with civil rights advocates in North Carolina that the massive Republican-led purging of voter rolls in the state counts as a violation of federal law.
The statement, issued late Monday in response to the North Carolina NAACP's emergency lawsuit filed earlier that day, agreed with the plaintiffs that thousands of registrations had been wrongfully challenged in violation of the National Voter Registration Act (NVRA), which states that voters may not be removed from the rolls unless they have been absent for two or more cycles or given written confirmation that they have moved.
A Winston-Salem court is hearing the NAACP's case Wednesday. In issuing the statement, the DOJ could help provide the court with a framework for assessing the plaintiffs' claims that at least three counties--Beaufort, Cumberland, and Moore--had cancelled or rejected approximately 4,500 registrations, primarily affecting eligible black voters. The department occasionally files statements of interest to express its views on cases where it is not a party.

"The purge program at issue here rested on a mass mailing and the silence of voters largely unaware of the potential injury to their voting rights. A perfunctory administrative proceeding to consider evidence produced by a mass mailing does not turn an otherwise prohibited systematic process into an 'individualized' removal," the statement read.
The suit is asking that wrongfully canceled registrations be restored and that no more names are removed from the lists.
NAACP president Rev. William Barber II said Monday, "This is our Selma and we will not back down and allow this suppression to continue."
"The Tar Heel state is ground zero in the intentional, surgical efforts by Republicans to suppress the voice of voters," he said. "We're taking this emergency step to make sure not a single voters' voice is unlawfully taken away."
Urgent. It's never been this bad.
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission from the outset was simple. To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It’s never been this bad out there. And it’s never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed and doing some of its best and most important work, the threats we face are intensifying. Right now, with just two days to go in our Spring Campaign, we're falling short of our make-or-break goal. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Can you make a gift right now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? There is no backup plan or rainy day fund. There is only you. —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
The U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) this week issued a statement of interest agreeing with civil rights advocates in North Carolina that the massive Republican-led purging of voter rolls in the state counts as a violation of federal law.
The statement, issued late Monday in response to the North Carolina NAACP's emergency lawsuit filed earlier that day, agreed with the plaintiffs that thousands of registrations had been wrongfully challenged in violation of the National Voter Registration Act (NVRA), which states that voters may not be removed from the rolls unless they have been absent for two or more cycles or given written confirmation that they have moved.
A Winston-Salem court is hearing the NAACP's case Wednesday. In issuing the statement, the DOJ could help provide the court with a framework for assessing the plaintiffs' claims that at least three counties--Beaufort, Cumberland, and Moore--had cancelled or rejected approximately 4,500 registrations, primarily affecting eligible black voters. The department occasionally files statements of interest to express its views on cases where it is not a party.

"The purge program at issue here rested on a mass mailing and the silence of voters largely unaware of the potential injury to their voting rights. A perfunctory administrative proceeding to consider evidence produced by a mass mailing does not turn an otherwise prohibited systematic process into an 'individualized' removal," the statement read.
The suit is asking that wrongfully canceled registrations be restored and that no more names are removed from the lists.
NAACP president Rev. William Barber II said Monday, "This is our Selma and we will not back down and allow this suppression to continue."
"The Tar Heel state is ground zero in the intentional, surgical efforts by Republicans to suppress the voice of voters," he said. "We're taking this emergency step to make sure not a single voters' voice is unlawfully taken away."
The U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) this week issued a statement of interest agreeing with civil rights advocates in North Carolina that the massive Republican-led purging of voter rolls in the state counts as a violation of federal law.
The statement, issued late Monday in response to the North Carolina NAACP's emergency lawsuit filed earlier that day, agreed with the plaintiffs that thousands of registrations had been wrongfully challenged in violation of the National Voter Registration Act (NVRA), which states that voters may not be removed from the rolls unless they have been absent for two or more cycles or given written confirmation that they have moved.
A Winston-Salem court is hearing the NAACP's case Wednesday. In issuing the statement, the DOJ could help provide the court with a framework for assessing the plaintiffs' claims that at least three counties--Beaufort, Cumberland, and Moore--had cancelled or rejected approximately 4,500 registrations, primarily affecting eligible black voters. The department occasionally files statements of interest to express its views on cases where it is not a party.

"The purge program at issue here rested on a mass mailing and the silence of voters largely unaware of the potential injury to their voting rights. A perfunctory administrative proceeding to consider evidence produced by a mass mailing does not turn an otherwise prohibited systematic process into an 'individualized' removal," the statement read.
The suit is asking that wrongfully canceled registrations be restored and that no more names are removed from the lists.
NAACP president Rev. William Barber II said Monday, "This is our Selma and we will not back down and allow this suppression to continue."
"The Tar Heel state is ground zero in the intentional, surgical efforts by Republicans to suppress the voice of voters," he said. "We're taking this emergency step to make sure not a single voters' voice is unlawfully taken away."

