SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Greenhouse Gas Deal a Good Step, But Not Nearly Enough: Scientists
While leaders in U.S. and EU tout agreement signed by nearly 200 countries to limit HFCs, scientists warn the deal won't limit global warming as much as politicians are promising
Oct 16, 2016
An international agreement to limit hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs) is a significant step forward in the effort to slow global warming, several leading climate scientists say, but it will fall far short of politicians' lofty promises.
Government leaders have touted the deal as a method to reduce global temperatures by as much as 0.5deg Celsius by 2100, citing research that showed the emission from air conditioners trapped thousands of times more heat in the atmosphere than carbon dioxide.
"Agreeing a deal to phase down the use of HFCs is the single most important step we can take to limit the warming of the planet," U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry said Thursday from Kigali, Rwanda, where the deal was reached early Saturday.
Indeed, the Paris climate accord calls for warming to be limited to 1.5o Celsius, and so a reduction of 0.5deg would be an enormous step toward meeting that goal.
But "[e]ager to declare a victory, governments glossed over many uncertainties about HFCs," Reuters reports.
"Some more recent research indicates HFCs may be less powerful in trapping heat than once feared," Michiel Schaeffer of Climate Analytics told the wire service. Climate Analytics is a European research organization that projects warming based on governments' climate pledges.
"My guesstimate would be around 0.2 degree Celsius (0.36F) by 2100" of avoided warming as a result of the agreement, Schaeffer told Reuters.
Reuters adds:
Guus Velders, an author of the widely quoted 2013 study of HFCs and warming, said his calculations of the impact of the Kigali accord show HFCs are now likely to stoke only 0.06C (0.1F) of warming this century, down from a range of 0.3C to 0.5C with no action.
Andrew Jones of Climate Interactive, a U.S. based think-tank that builds climate simulations, also said that while the HCF agreement was a significant step, "it's in no way a silver bullet."
Climate Interactive currently predicts that the Paris accord will lead to a staggering 3.5oC of warming by the end of this century. Jones told Reuters that he will not reduce that prediction by 0.5oC as a result of the HFC deal.
Small island nations had pushed particularly hard for quick international action to limit HFCs, as they are already suffering from rising sea levels caused by climate change--and leaders acknowledged that while the agreement isn't perfect, is still a "good deal."
"It may not be entirely what the islands wanted, but it is a good deal," the minister-in-assistance to the president of the Marshall Islands, Mattlan Zackhras, told the Guardian. "We all know we must go further, and we will go further."
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
An international agreement to limit hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs) is a significant step forward in the effort to slow global warming, several leading climate scientists say, but it will fall far short of politicians' lofty promises.
Government leaders have touted the deal as a method to reduce global temperatures by as much as 0.5deg Celsius by 2100, citing research that showed the emission from air conditioners trapped thousands of times more heat in the atmosphere than carbon dioxide.
"Agreeing a deal to phase down the use of HFCs is the single most important step we can take to limit the warming of the planet," U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry said Thursday from Kigali, Rwanda, where the deal was reached early Saturday.
Indeed, the Paris climate accord calls for warming to be limited to 1.5o Celsius, and so a reduction of 0.5deg would be an enormous step toward meeting that goal.
But "[e]ager to declare a victory, governments glossed over many uncertainties about HFCs," Reuters reports.
"Some more recent research indicates HFCs may be less powerful in trapping heat than once feared," Michiel Schaeffer of Climate Analytics told the wire service. Climate Analytics is a European research organization that projects warming based on governments' climate pledges.
"My guesstimate would be around 0.2 degree Celsius (0.36F) by 2100" of avoided warming as a result of the agreement, Schaeffer told Reuters.
Reuters adds:
Guus Velders, an author of the widely quoted 2013 study of HFCs and warming, said his calculations of the impact of the Kigali accord show HFCs are now likely to stoke only 0.06C (0.1F) of warming this century, down from a range of 0.3C to 0.5C with no action.
Andrew Jones of Climate Interactive, a U.S. based think-tank that builds climate simulations, also said that while the HCF agreement was a significant step, "it's in no way a silver bullet."
Climate Interactive currently predicts that the Paris accord will lead to a staggering 3.5oC of warming by the end of this century. Jones told Reuters that he will not reduce that prediction by 0.5oC as a result of the HFC deal.
Small island nations had pushed particularly hard for quick international action to limit HFCs, as they are already suffering from rising sea levels caused by climate change--and leaders acknowledged that while the agreement isn't perfect, is still a "good deal."
"It may not be entirely what the islands wanted, but it is a good deal," the minister-in-assistance to the president of the Marshall Islands, Mattlan Zackhras, told the Guardian. "We all know we must go further, and we will go further."
An international agreement to limit hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs) is a significant step forward in the effort to slow global warming, several leading climate scientists say, but it will fall far short of politicians' lofty promises.
Government leaders have touted the deal as a method to reduce global temperatures by as much as 0.5deg Celsius by 2100, citing research that showed the emission from air conditioners trapped thousands of times more heat in the atmosphere than carbon dioxide.
"Agreeing a deal to phase down the use of HFCs is the single most important step we can take to limit the warming of the planet," U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry said Thursday from Kigali, Rwanda, where the deal was reached early Saturday.
Indeed, the Paris climate accord calls for warming to be limited to 1.5o Celsius, and so a reduction of 0.5deg would be an enormous step toward meeting that goal.
But "[e]ager to declare a victory, governments glossed over many uncertainties about HFCs," Reuters reports.
"Some more recent research indicates HFCs may be less powerful in trapping heat than once feared," Michiel Schaeffer of Climate Analytics told the wire service. Climate Analytics is a European research organization that projects warming based on governments' climate pledges.
"My guesstimate would be around 0.2 degree Celsius (0.36F) by 2100" of avoided warming as a result of the agreement, Schaeffer told Reuters.
Reuters adds:
Guus Velders, an author of the widely quoted 2013 study of HFCs and warming, said his calculations of the impact of the Kigali accord show HFCs are now likely to stoke only 0.06C (0.1F) of warming this century, down from a range of 0.3C to 0.5C with no action.
Andrew Jones of Climate Interactive, a U.S. based think-tank that builds climate simulations, also said that while the HCF agreement was a significant step, "it's in no way a silver bullet."
Climate Interactive currently predicts that the Paris accord will lead to a staggering 3.5oC of warming by the end of this century. Jones told Reuters that he will not reduce that prediction by 0.5oC as a result of the HFC deal.
Small island nations had pushed particularly hard for quick international action to limit HFCs, as they are already suffering from rising sea levels caused by climate change--and leaders acknowledged that while the agreement isn't perfect, is still a "good deal."
"It may not be entirely what the islands wanted, but it is a good deal," the minister-in-assistance to the president of the Marshall Islands, Mattlan Zackhras, told the Guardian. "We all know we must go further, and we will go further."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.