With CEO in Hot Seat, Wells Fargo Fallout Just Beginning
"Shouldn't WellsFargo CEO return $10 million in performance pay when said performance yields a $185 million fine?"
Fallout from the recent Wells Fargo fraud scandal has really just begun.
One day before its chief executive officer is expected to testify before the Senate Banking Committee, the banking giant "raised eyebrows," as CNN Money put it, when it admitted Monday that its top risk officer, who was charged with safeguarding its retail bank from illegal activities, had taken six-month leave of absence last June, amid the government investigation.
Now, with the spotlight on CEO John Stumpf, a new campaign is asking the public, "What questions should [committee member] Sen. Elizabeth Warren ask Stumpf?"
Given the scope of the scam--employees opened millions of unauthorized accounts--and disparity of punishment--5,300 low level employees were fired while the executives who oversaw the fraud were awarded massive bonuses--respondents had rich fodder for the lawmakers, which they shared with the hashtag #StumpStumpf.
Indeed, a number of former employees have come forward to explain that the unethical behavior was the consequence of unrealistic sales goals and other pressures from higher up. "They warned us about this type of behavior and said, 'You must report it,' but the reality was that people had to meet their goals," Khalid Taha, a former Wells Fargo personal banker, told the New York Times. "They needed a paycheck."
Meanwhile, customers have only begun to demand accountability. On Friday, a class action lawsuit was filed in U.S. District Court in Utah accusing Wells Fargo "of invasion of privacy, fraud, negligence, and breach of contract," according to a separate report by CNN Money. "The three plaintiffs are asking for compensation to cover damages related to identity theft, anxiety and emotional distress, and legal fees."
Also last week, activist investor Bartlett Naylor, a financial policy analyst for consumer advocacy group Public Citizen, filed a shareholder resolution calling on Wells Fargo's directors to study "whether the divestiture of all non-core banking business segments would enhance shareholder value"--in other words, whether the banking giant should be broken up.
"Rather than acknowledging a management breakdown," the resolution reads, "CEO John Stumpf blamed a minority of bad employees. He claimed there was no reason for the employees to commit the fraud. 'There was no incentive to do bad things,' Stumpf told the Wall Street Journal. Taking CEO Stumpf at his word, then, we believe he effectively argues that his firm is so large as to be unmanageable."
We are at a crossroads
This country and this world are at a monumental crossroads. In a few short weeks, US voters will have an opportunity to beat back the forces of fascism and confront the billionaires who are rigging the economy, our media system, and our democracy, making it increasingly impossible for ordinary people to get by. We’re not just talking about the election. We’re talking about what must be done once these fascist elements are vanquished from power. We need a bolder set of solutions than what either major party has so far been willing to offer and a working-class movement ready to fight like hell for it. Trump didn't emerge from nowhere. The conditions that fueled MAGA authoritarianism were created by decades of radical neoliberal economic policies and a corrupt political system dominated by corporate interests. They slashed taxes on the super-rich, promising that the benefits would trickle down. They said giveaways to the corporate titans would make life more affordable for the rest of us. It was all bullshit. And when a bitter, betrayed populace searches for someone to blame, right-wing demagogues have little trouble finding scapegoats. People know when they're being lied to, but you won't hear any of this from the corporate media. Only independent journalism—powered and funded by people who believe in building a better world—can deliver truly trustworthy daily news. Our Fall Campaign is underway, and we need your help. To power our newsroom through the rest of the year, we need to raise $125,000 by midnight on October 31. So if you share our vision, please contribute whatever you can to sustain our work. |
Fallout from the recent Wells Fargo fraud scandal has really just begun.
One day before its chief executive officer is expected to testify before the Senate Banking Committee, the banking giant "raised eyebrows," as CNN Money put it, when it admitted Monday that its top risk officer, who was charged with safeguarding its retail bank from illegal activities, had taken six-month leave of absence last June, amid the government investigation.
Now, with the spotlight on CEO John Stumpf, a new campaign is asking the public, "What questions should [committee member] Sen. Elizabeth Warren ask Stumpf?"
Given the scope of the scam--employees opened millions of unauthorized accounts--and disparity of punishment--5,300 low level employees were fired while the executives who oversaw the fraud were awarded massive bonuses--respondents had rich fodder for the lawmakers, which they shared with the hashtag #StumpStumpf.
Indeed, a number of former employees have come forward to explain that the unethical behavior was the consequence of unrealistic sales goals and other pressures from higher up. "They warned us about this type of behavior and said, 'You must report it,' but the reality was that people had to meet their goals," Khalid Taha, a former Wells Fargo personal banker, told the New York Times. "They needed a paycheck."
Meanwhile, customers have only begun to demand accountability. On Friday, a class action lawsuit was filed in U.S. District Court in Utah accusing Wells Fargo "of invasion of privacy, fraud, negligence, and breach of contract," according to a separate report by CNN Money. "The three plaintiffs are asking for compensation to cover damages related to identity theft, anxiety and emotional distress, and legal fees."
Also last week, activist investor Bartlett Naylor, a financial policy analyst for consumer advocacy group Public Citizen, filed a shareholder resolution calling on Wells Fargo's directors to study "whether the divestiture of all non-core banking business segments would enhance shareholder value"--in other words, whether the banking giant should be broken up.
"Rather than acknowledging a management breakdown," the resolution reads, "CEO John Stumpf blamed a minority of bad employees. He claimed there was no reason for the employees to commit the fraud. 'There was no incentive to do bad things,' Stumpf told the Wall Street Journal. Taking CEO Stumpf at his word, then, we believe he effectively argues that his firm is so large as to be unmanageable."
Fallout from the recent Wells Fargo fraud scandal has really just begun.
One day before its chief executive officer is expected to testify before the Senate Banking Committee, the banking giant "raised eyebrows," as CNN Money put it, when it admitted Monday that its top risk officer, who was charged with safeguarding its retail bank from illegal activities, had taken six-month leave of absence last June, amid the government investigation.
Now, with the spotlight on CEO John Stumpf, a new campaign is asking the public, "What questions should [committee member] Sen. Elizabeth Warren ask Stumpf?"
Given the scope of the scam--employees opened millions of unauthorized accounts--and disparity of punishment--5,300 low level employees were fired while the executives who oversaw the fraud were awarded massive bonuses--respondents had rich fodder for the lawmakers, which they shared with the hashtag #StumpStumpf.
Indeed, a number of former employees have come forward to explain that the unethical behavior was the consequence of unrealistic sales goals and other pressures from higher up. "They warned us about this type of behavior and said, 'You must report it,' but the reality was that people had to meet their goals," Khalid Taha, a former Wells Fargo personal banker, told the New York Times. "They needed a paycheck."
Meanwhile, customers have only begun to demand accountability. On Friday, a class action lawsuit was filed in U.S. District Court in Utah accusing Wells Fargo "of invasion of privacy, fraud, negligence, and breach of contract," according to a separate report by CNN Money. "The three plaintiffs are asking for compensation to cover damages related to identity theft, anxiety and emotional distress, and legal fees."
Also last week, activist investor Bartlett Naylor, a financial policy analyst for consumer advocacy group Public Citizen, filed a shareholder resolution calling on Wells Fargo's directors to study "whether the divestiture of all non-core banking business segments would enhance shareholder value"--in other words, whether the banking giant should be broken up.
"Rather than acknowledging a management breakdown," the resolution reads, "CEO John Stumpf blamed a minority of bad employees. He claimed there was no reason for the employees to commit the fraud. 'There was no incentive to do bad things,' Stumpf told the Wall Street Journal. Taking CEO Stumpf at his word, then, we believe he effectively argues that his firm is so large as to be unmanageable."