University of NC Blocked from Enforcing 'Bathroom Bill' in Partial Win for LGBTQ Rights
The University of North Carolina may not enforce controversial law banning transgender people from bathrooms that match their gender identity while lawsuit challenging the legislation proceeds, U.S. judge rules
A U.S. judge on Friday ordered the University of North Carolina to allow transgender students and staff to use the bathroom that matches their gender identity, blocking enforcement of the state's controversial "bathroom bill" known as House Bill 2, while a lawsuit challenging the anti-LGBTQ legislation proceeds.
"Today, the tightness that I have felt in my chest every day since H.B. 2 passed has eased. But the fight is not over: we won't rest until this discriminatory law is defeated."
--Joaquin Carcano, lead plaintiff
"In granting the preliminary injunction, the court found that the challengers are likely to succeed in their argument that the law violates Title IX," the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), one of the groups that brought the motion seeking preliminary injunctive relief, wrote Friday.
Indeed, U.S. District Court Judge Thomas Schroeder wrote (pdf) in his decision that
[...] the court concludes that the individual transgender Plaintiffs have made a clear showing that (1) they are likely to succeed on their claim the Part I violates Title IX, as interpreted by theUnited States Department of Education ("DOE") under the standard articulated by the Fourth Circuit; (2) they will suffer irreparable harm in the absence of preliminary relief; (3) the balance of equities weighs in favor of an injunction; and (4) an injunction is in the public interest.
"Today is a great day for me and hopefully this is the start to chipping away at the injustice of H.B. 2 that is harming thousands of other transgender people who call North Carolina home," said Joaquin Carcano, lead plaintiff in the case, according to the ACLU.
"Today, the tightness that I have felt in my chest every day since H.B. 2 passed has eased," Carcano continued. "But the fight is not over: we won't rest until this discriminatory law is defeated."
The victory is a partial one, however, as it only applies to the North Carolina university system. "Most transgender people in North Carolina," Reuters notes, "will still be bound by the law adopted in March that requires them to use bathrooms in government buildings and public schools that correspond with the sex on their birth certificate."
LGBTQ rights activists and plaintiffs celebrated the decision nevertheless, as they took it to be a strong indication that their challenge to House Bill 2 will ultimately be successful.
"We're thrilled that the court ruled on the right side for our clients today and that our clients are one step closer to being free from the discrimination that this harmful law imposes on them simply because they are transgender," said Chris Brook, legal director of the ACLU of North Carolina, in a statement.
"We're confident justice will prevail in the larger case after the judge hears all the evidence at trial this fall so that all gay and transgender North Carolinians will be free from the harm of H.B. 2," Brook said.
Urgent. It's never been this bad.
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission from the outset was simple. To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It’s never been this bad out there. And it’s never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed and doing some of its best and most important work, the threats we face are intensifying. Right now, with just three days to go in our Spring Campaign, we're falling short of our make-or-break goal. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Can you make a gift right now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? There is no backup plan or rainy day fund. There is only you. —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
A U.S. judge on Friday ordered the University of North Carolina to allow transgender students and staff to use the bathroom that matches their gender identity, blocking enforcement of the state's controversial "bathroom bill" known as House Bill 2, while a lawsuit challenging the anti-LGBTQ legislation proceeds.
"Today, the tightness that I have felt in my chest every day since H.B. 2 passed has eased. But the fight is not over: we won't rest until this discriminatory law is defeated."
--Joaquin Carcano, lead plaintiff
"In granting the preliminary injunction, the court found that the challengers are likely to succeed in their argument that the law violates Title IX," the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), one of the groups that brought the motion seeking preliminary injunctive relief, wrote Friday.
Indeed, U.S. District Court Judge Thomas Schroeder wrote (pdf) in his decision that
[...] the court concludes that the individual transgender Plaintiffs have made a clear showing that (1) they are likely to succeed on their claim the Part I violates Title IX, as interpreted by theUnited States Department of Education ("DOE") under the standard articulated by the Fourth Circuit; (2) they will suffer irreparable harm in the absence of preliminary relief; (3) the balance of equities weighs in favor of an injunction; and (4) an injunction is in the public interest.
"Today is a great day for me and hopefully this is the start to chipping away at the injustice of H.B. 2 that is harming thousands of other transgender people who call North Carolina home," said Joaquin Carcano, lead plaintiff in the case, according to the ACLU.
"Today, the tightness that I have felt in my chest every day since H.B. 2 passed has eased," Carcano continued. "But the fight is not over: we won't rest until this discriminatory law is defeated."
The victory is a partial one, however, as it only applies to the North Carolina university system. "Most transgender people in North Carolina," Reuters notes, "will still be bound by the law adopted in March that requires them to use bathrooms in government buildings and public schools that correspond with the sex on their birth certificate."
LGBTQ rights activists and plaintiffs celebrated the decision nevertheless, as they took it to be a strong indication that their challenge to House Bill 2 will ultimately be successful.
"We're thrilled that the court ruled on the right side for our clients today and that our clients are one step closer to being free from the discrimination that this harmful law imposes on them simply because they are transgender," said Chris Brook, legal director of the ACLU of North Carolina, in a statement.
"We're confident justice will prevail in the larger case after the judge hears all the evidence at trial this fall so that all gay and transgender North Carolinians will be free from the harm of H.B. 2," Brook said.
A U.S. judge on Friday ordered the University of North Carolina to allow transgender students and staff to use the bathroom that matches their gender identity, blocking enforcement of the state's controversial "bathroom bill" known as House Bill 2, while a lawsuit challenging the anti-LGBTQ legislation proceeds.
"Today, the tightness that I have felt in my chest every day since H.B. 2 passed has eased. But the fight is not over: we won't rest until this discriminatory law is defeated."
--Joaquin Carcano, lead plaintiff
"In granting the preliminary injunction, the court found that the challengers are likely to succeed in their argument that the law violates Title IX," the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), one of the groups that brought the motion seeking preliminary injunctive relief, wrote Friday.
Indeed, U.S. District Court Judge Thomas Schroeder wrote (pdf) in his decision that
[...] the court concludes that the individual transgender Plaintiffs have made a clear showing that (1) they are likely to succeed on their claim the Part I violates Title IX, as interpreted by theUnited States Department of Education ("DOE") under the standard articulated by the Fourth Circuit; (2) they will suffer irreparable harm in the absence of preliminary relief; (3) the balance of equities weighs in favor of an injunction; and (4) an injunction is in the public interest.
"Today is a great day for me and hopefully this is the start to chipping away at the injustice of H.B. 2 that is harming thousands of other transgender people who call North Carolina home," said Joaquin Carcano, lead plaintiff in the case, according to the ACLU.
"Today, the tightness that I have felt in my chest every day since H.B. 2 passed has eased," Carcano continued. "But the fight is not over: we won't rest until this discriminatory law is defeated."
The victory is a partial one, however, as it only applies to the North Carolina university system. "Most transgender people in North Carolina," Reuters notes, "will still be bound by the law adopted in March that requires them to use bathrooms in government buildings and public schools that correspond with the sex on their birth certificate."
LGBTQ rights activists and plaintiffs celebrated the decision nevertheless, as they took it to be a strong indication that their challenge to House Bill 2 will ultimately be successful.
"We're thrilled that the court ruled on the right side for our clients today and that our clients are one step closer to being free from the discrimination that this harmful law imposes on them simply because they are transgender," said Chris Brook, legal director of the ACLU of North Carolina, in a statement.
"We're confident justice will prevail in the larger case after the judge hears all the evidence at trial this fall so that all gay and transgender North Carolinians will be free from the harm of H.B. 2," Brook said.