New Lawsuit Wants to Know Why Bureau of Prisons Visited CIA Torture Site
ACLU challenges BOP stance that it has no records pertaining to visit to detention site Afghanistan between 2002 and 2004.
"What business did the Bureau of Prisons have with a torture site in Afghanistan?"
So asks Carl Takei, staff attorney at the ACLU's National Prison Project, as his organization on Thursday filed suit against the federal Bureau of Prisons (BOP) over documents related to a visit to a CIA detention site code named COBALT.
The ACLU had sought, under a Freedom of Information Act request, records of BOP visits to and involvement with the torture site, but the human rights and civil liberties organization's request was denied, with the BOP saying no such records could be found.
That's highly unlikely, ACLU says.
As the group states in its complaint, filed in the U.S. District Court in Washington, "It is not credible that BOP has no records pertaining to the visit of a team of its employees to a detention facility in Afghanistan between 2002 and 2004."
In fact, the bureau's involvement with the detention site was documented in the Senate Intelligence Committee's torture report, which was declassified in 2014, The suit states:
According to a senior interrogator quoted in the [Senate torture] report, one detainee [at COBALT] "as far as we could determine" had been chained to the wall in a standing position for 17 days. The CIA's chief of interrogations described COBALT as "the closest thing he has seen to a dungeon" and said that some of the detainees "literally looked like a dog that had been kenneled," shrinking away when their cell doors were opened. Another senior CIA official called the detention facility an "enhanced interrogation technique" in itself. At one point, the CIA Renditions Group concluded that COBALT's "baseline conditions" involved so much deprivation that any further deprivation would have limited impact on the agency's interrogations.
The Senate torture report states that given the CIA's lack of experience operating detention facilities, the agency decided to turn to Defendant DOJ--and, in particular, to the Federal Bureau of Prisons ("BOP")--to provide such specialized expertise.
It adds:
According to the Senate torture report, the BOP staff commented that they were "WOW'ed" by the profound sensory deprivation at COBALT. They told the CIA that in spite of this sensory deprivation, their collective assessment was that "the detainees were not being treated in humanely [sic]." Despite the use of buckets for human waste, they also concluded that the facility was "sanitary" and that guards "did not mistreat" the detainees.
"CIA officers remarked that the BOP's assistance improved day-to-day operations at COBALT and made it a 'more secure and safer working environment' for officers," the suit states.
"The bureau controls conditions for the 200,000 federal prisoners in the United States while teaching its methods to jails and state prisons around the country," Takei's statement continues. "We have to wonder why a team from that institution would give its approval to a place where prisoners are kept in solitary confinement in near-total darkness 24-7, shackled to the wall standing up, and with a bucket for human waste.
"We asked the Bureau of Prisons for any and all documents related to an official government trip taken halfway around the world, but they came up with nothing, not a single email," he continued. "Anyone who has traveled for work would agree that this is difficult to pull off without a paper trail, yet that's what the Bureau of Prisons would have us believe.
"This trip has been documented by the United States Senate. It's time to come clean," he stated.
Urgent. It's never been this bad.
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission from the outset was simple. To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It’s never been this bad out there. And it’s never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed and doing some of its best and most important work, the threats we face are intensifying. Right now, with just two days to go in our Spring Campaign, we're falling short of our make-or-break goal. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Can you make a gift right now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? There is no backup plan or rainy day fund. There is only you. —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
"What business did the Bureau of Prisons have with a torture site in Afghanistan?"
So asks Carl Takei, staff attorney at the ACLU's National Prison Project, as his organization on Thursday filed suit against the federal Bureau of Prisons (BOP) over documents related to a visit to a CIA detention site code named COBALT.
The ACLU had sought, under a Freedom of Information Act request, records of BOP visits to and involvement with the torture site, but the human rights and civil liberties organization's request was denied, with the BOP saying no such records could be found.
That's highly unlikely, ACLU says.
As the group states in its complaint, filed in the U.S. District Court in Washington, "It is not credible that BOP has no records pertaining to the visit of a team of its employees to a detention facility in Afghanistan between 2002 and 2004."
In fact, the bureau's involvement with the detention site was documented in the Senate Intelligence Committee's torture report, which was declassified in 2014, The suit states:
According to a senior interrogator quoted in the [Senate torture] report, one detainee [at COBALT] "as far as we could determine" had been chained to the wall in a standing position for 17 days. The CIA's chief of interrogations described COBALT as "the closest thing he has seen to a dungeon" and said that some of the detainees "literally looked like a dog that had been kenneled," shrinking away when their cell doors were opened. Another senior CIA official called the detention facility an "enhanced interrogation technique" in itself. At one point, the CIA Renditions Group concluded that COBALT's "baseline conditions" involved so much deprivation that any further deprivation would have limited impact on the agency's interrogations.
The Senate torture report states that given the CIA's lack of experience operating detention facilities, the agency decided to turn to Defendant DOJ--and, in particular, to the Federal Bureau of Prisons ("BOP")--to provide such specialized expertise.
It adds:
According to the Senate torture report, the BOP staff commented that they were "WOW'ed" by the profound sensory deprivation at COBALT. They told the CIA that in spite of this sensory deprivation, their collective assessment was that "the detainees were not being treated in humanely [sic]." Despite the use of buckets for human waste, they also concluded that the facility was "sanitary" and that guards "did not mistreat" the detainees.
"CIA officers remarked that the BOP's assistance improved day-to-day operations at COBALT and made it a 'more secure and safer working environment' for officers," the suit states.
"The bureau controls conditions for the 200,000 federal prisoners in the United States while teaching its methods to jails and state prisons around the country," Takei's statement continues. "We have to wonder why a team from that institution would give its approval to a place where prisoners are kept in solitary confinement in near-total darkness 24-7, shackled to the wall standing up, and with a bucket for human waste.
"We asked the Bureau of Prisons for any and all documents related to an official government trip taken halfway around the world, but they came up with nothing, not a single email," he continued. "Anyone who has traveled for work would agree that this is difficult to pull off without a paper trail, yet that's what the Bureau of Prisons would have us believe.
"This trip has been documented by the United States Senate. It's time to come clean," he stated.
"What business did the Bureau of Prisons have with a torture site in Afghanistan?"
So asks Carl Takei, staff attorney at the ACLU's National Prison Project, as his organization on Thursday filed suit against the federal Bureau of Prisons (BOP) over documents related to a visit to a CIA detention site code named COBALT.
The ACLU had sought, under a Freedom of Information Act request, records of BOP visits to and involvement with the torture site, but the human rights and civil liberties organization's request was denied, with the BOP saying no such records could be found.
That's highly unlikely, ACLU says.
As the group states in its complaint, filed in the U.S. District Court in Washington, "It is not credible that BOP has no records pertaining to the visit of a team of its employees to a detention facility in Afghanistan between 2002 and 2004."
In fact, the bureau's involvement with the detention site was documented in the Senate Intelligence Committee's torture report, which was declassified in 2014, The suit states:
According to a senior interrogator quoted in the [Senate torture] report, one detainee [at COBALT] "as far as we could determine" had been chained to the wall in a standing position for 17 days. The CIA's chief of interrogations described COBALT as "the closest thing he has seen to a dungeon" and said that some of the detainees "literally looked like a dog that had been kenneled," shrinking away when their cell doors were opened. Another senior CIA official called the detention facility an "enhanced interrogation technique" in itself. At one point, the CIA Renditions Group concluded that COBALT's "baseline conditions" involved so much deprivation that any further deprivation would have limited impact on the agency's interrogations.
The Senate torture report states that given the CIA's lack of experience operating detention facilities, the agency decided to turn to Defendant DOJ--and, in particular, to the Federal Bureau of Prisons ("BOP")--to provide such specialized expertise.
It adds:
According to the Senate torture report, the BOP staff commented that they were "WOW'ed" by the profound sensory deprivation at COBALT. They told the CIA that in spite of this sensory deprivation, their collective assessment was that "the detainees were not being treated in humanely [sic]." Despite the use of buckets for human waste, they also concluded that the facility was "sanitary" and that guards "did not mistreat" the detainees.
"CIA officers remarked that the BOP's assistance improved day-to-day operations at COBALT and made it a 'more secure and safer working environment' for officers," the suit states.
"The bureau controls conditions for the 200,000 federal prisoners in the United States while teaching its methods to jails and state prisons around the country," Takei's statement continues. "We have to wonder why a team from that institution would give its approval to a place where prisoners are kept in solitary confinement in near-total darkness 24-7, shackled to the wall standing up, and with a bucket for human waste.
"We asked the Bureau of Prisons for any and all documents related to an official government trip taken halfway around the world, but they came up with nothing, not a single email," he continued. "Anyone who has traveled for work would agree that this is difficult to pull off without a paper trail, yet that's what the Bureau of Prisons would have us believe.
"This trip has been documented by the United States Senate. It's time to come clean," he stated.