SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Coal-as-Usual Could Push World 400 Percent Past Warming Threshold
Even without new plants, existing coal emissions on track for 150 percent warming past 2°C maximum, new analysis finds
Dec 01, 2015
Thousands of new coal-fired power plants being planned worldwide that, if built, would push the planet past its maximum 2degC warming threshold by 400 percent within 15 years, according to a new analysis released Tuesday.
Under a 2degC scenario, the potential 2,400 new plants, along with existing factories, are poised to generate enough greenhouse gases to soar past the warming threshold, breach global climate pledges (Intended Nationally Determined Contributions or INDCs), and "explode" climate mitigation costs for countries around the world, the research group Climate Action Tracker (CAT) announced at the COP21 climate summit in Paris.
"More than 100 countries are calling for the Paris agreement to reference warming limits of 1.5degC. Yet even electricity production from existing coal plants far exceed the range of such scenarios," said Bill Hare, CEO of the Climate Analytics think tank. In order to stay within the 2degC range, a "rapid decarbonization" of the energy sector is imperative, Hare said.
In fact, even if no new plants are built, emissions from existing coal plants would still be more than 150 percent higher than what is compatible with a 2degC pathway, CAT found in its analysis, The Coal Gap: planned coal-fired power plants inconsistent with 2 C and threaten achievement of INDCs (pdf).
World leaders are gathering in Paris over the next two weeks to finalize a global climate deal to lower emissions and invest in renewable energy, lest runaway global warming cause irreparable damage to the planet, particularly for developing nations and frontline communities.
Yet even with that critical goal in mind, eight countries and the European Union (EU) are planning to build more than 5 gigawatts (GW) of coal power, CAT said.
"There is a solution to this issue of too many coal plants on the books: cancel them."
--Pieter Van Breevoort, EcofysThat includes China, India, Indonesia, Japan, South Africa, South Korea, the Philippines, and Turkey. The U.S. was not included in the analysis because it only plans to expand coal capacity by 3.5GW.
In many emerging economies, coal power still represents the easiest short-term measure to meet increasing electricity demands. But it doesn't have to be that way. As countless researchers and climate advocates have long pointed out, a moratorium on coal and a new focus on clean power would transform the world's energy sector and reduce all associated costs--from investment and construction to the price of mitigating climate change.
"There is a solution to this issue of too many coal plants on the books: cancel them," said Pieter Van Breevoort of the climate policy consulting group Ecofys, which helped craft the CAT analysis. "Renewable energy and stricter pollution standards are making coal plants obsolete around the world, and the earlier a coal plant is taken out of the planning process, the less it will cost."
CAT researchers remained optimistic about the potential for renewable energy to overtake the fossil fuel industry.
"It is unlikely that all of these planned coal plants are going to be built, especially when low carbon alternatives are reaching price parity," said Markus Hagemann of NewClimate Institute. "If renewables take off as fast as is currently expected, many of these planned coal plants could be stranded investments or would have to operate under difficult financial circumstances."
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Nadia Prupis
Nadia Prupis is a former Common Dreams staff writer. She wrote on media policy for Truthout.org and has been published in New America Media and AlterNet. She graduated from UC Santa Barbara with a BA in English in 2008.
Thousands of new coal-fired power plants being planned worldwide that, if built, would push the planet past its maximum 2degC warming threshold by 400 percent within 15 years, according to a new analysis released Tuesday.
Under a 2degC scenario, the potential 2,400 new plants, along with existing factories, are poised to generate enough greenhouse gases to soar past the warming threshold, breach global climate pledges (Intended Nationally Determined Contributions or INDCs), and "explode" climate mitigation costs for countries around the world, the research group Climate Action Tracker (CAT) announced at the COP21 climate summit in Paris.
"More than 100 countries are calling for the Paris agreement to reference warming limits of 1.5degC. Yet even electricity production from existing coal plants far exceed the range of such scenarios," said Bill Hare, CEO of the Climate Analytics think tank. In order to stay within the 2degC range, a "rapid decarbonization" of the energy sector is imperative, Hare said.
In fact, even if no new plants are built, emissions from existing coal plants would still be more than 150 percent higher than what is compatible with a 2degC pathway, CAT found in its analysis, The Coal Gap: planned coal-fired power plants inconsistent with 2 C and threaten achievement of INDCs (pdf).
World leaders are gathering in Paris over the next two weeks to finalize a global climate deal to lower emissions and invest in renewable energy, lest runaway global warming cause irreparable damage to the planet, particularly for developing nations and frontline communities.
Yet even with that critical goal in mind, eight countries and the European Union (EU) are planning to build more than 5 gigawatts (GW) of coal power, CAT said.
"There is a solution to this issue of too many coal plants on the books: cancel them."
--Pieter Van Breevoort, EcofysThat includes China, India, Indonesia, Japan, South Africa, South Korea, the Philippines, and Turkey. The U.S. was not included in the analysis because it only plans to expand coal capacity by 3.5GW.
In many emerging economies, coal power still represents the easiest short-term measure to meet increasing electricity demands. But it doesn't have to be that way. As countless researchers and climate advocates have long pointed out, a moratorium on coal and a new focus on clean power would transform the world's energy sector and reduce all associated costs--from investment and construction to the price of mitigating climate change.
"There is a solution to this issue of too many coal plants on the books: cancel them," said Pieter Van Breevoort of the climate policy consulting group Ecofys, which helped craft the CAT analysis. "Renewable energy and stricter pollution standards are making coal plants obsolete around the world, and the earlier a coal plant is taken out of the planning process, the less it will cost."
CAT researchers remained optimistic about the potential for renewable energy to overtake the fossil fuel industry.
"It is unlikely that all of these planned coal plants are going to be built, especially when low carbon alternatives are reaching price parity," said Markus Hagemann of NewClimate Institute. "If renewables take off as fast as is currently expected, many of these planned coal plants could be stranded investments or would have to operate under difficult financial circumstances."
Nadia Prupis
Nadia Prupis is a former Common Dreams staff writer. She wrote on media policy for Truthout.org and has been published in New America Media and AlterNet. She graduated from UC Santa Barbara with a BA in English in 2008.
Thousands of new coal-fired power plants being planned worldwide that, if built, would push the planet past its maximum 2degC warming threshold by 400 percent within 15 years, according to a new analysis released Tuesday.
Under a 2degC scenario, the potential 2,400 new plants, along with existing factories, are poised to generate enough greenhouse gases to soar past the warming threshold, breach global climate pledges (Intended Nationally Determined Contributions or INDCs), and "explode" climate mitigation costs for countries around the world, the research group Climate Action Tracker (CAT) announced at the COP21 climate summit in Paris.
"More than 100 countries are calling for the Paris agreement to reference warming limits of 1.5degC. Yet even electricity production from existing coal plants far exceed the range of such scenarios," said Bill Hare, CEO of the Climate Analytics think tank. In order to stay within the 2degC range, a "rapid decarbonization" of the energy sector is imperative, Hare said.
In fact, even if no new plants are built, emissions from existing coal plants would still be more than 150 percent higher than what is compatible with a 2degC pathway, CAT found in its analysis, The Coal Gap: planned coal-fired power plants inconsistent with 2 C and threaten achievement of INDCs (pdf).
World leaders are gathering in Paris over the next two weeks to finalize a global climate deal to lower emissions and invest in renewable energy, lest runaway global warming cause irreparable damage to the planet, particularly for developing nations and frontline communities.
Yet even with that critical goal in mind, eight countries and the European Union (EU) are planning to build more than 5 gigawatts (GW) of coal power, CAT said.
"There is a solution to this issue of too many coal plants on the books: cancel them."
--Pieter Van Breevoort, EcofysThat includes China, India, Indonesia, Japan, South Africa, South Korea, the Philippines, and Turkey. The U.S. was not included in the analysis because it only plans to expand coal capacity by 3.5GW.
In many emerging economies, coal power still represents the easiest short-term measure to meet increasing electricity demands. But it doesn't have to be that way. As countless researchers and climate advocates have long pointed out, a moratorium on coal and a new focus on clean power would transform the world's energy sector and reduce all associated costs--from investment and construction to the price of mitigating climate change.
"There is a solution to this issue of too many coal plants on the books: cancel them," said Pieter Van Breevoort of the climate policy consulting group Ecofys, which helped craft the CAT analysis. "Renewable energy and stricter pollution standards are making coal plants obsolete around the world, and the earlier a coal plant is taken out of the planning process, the less it will cost."
CAT researchers remained optimistic about the potential for renewable energy to overtake the fossil fuel industry.
"It is unlikely that all of these planned coal plants are going to be built, especially when low carbon alternatives are reaching price parity," said Markus Hagemann of NewClimate Institute. "If renewables take off as fast as is currently expected, many of these planned coal plants could be stranded investments or would have to operate under difficult financial circumstances."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.