'A Better Option': Colorado Readies Ballot Battle for Single-Payer Solution
"It's time we get the insurance industry out of the driver's seat and put families in charge of their healthcare."
Will Colorado be the first state in the nation to successfully implement a single-payer healthcare system?
Voters in the Centennial State will decide next year, the secretary of state's office announced Monday, after confirming that proponents of universal coverage had gathered enough signatures to put the plan--dubbed 'ColoradoCare'--on the 2016 ballot.
"The ballot measure in Colorado, which will now be known as Amendment #69, is about much more than achieving healthcare justice. It is also about citizens coming together and using the democratic process to successfully achieve healthcare justice."
--Donna Smith, Health Care for All Colorado
"Colorado deserves a better option, and now they can vote on one," said state Sen. Irene Aguilar (D-Denver), a physician and lead proponent of the effort. "Health care costs continue to rise every year, hurting Coloradans' chances to get ahead. It's time we get the insurance industry out of the driver's seat and put families in charge of their health care."
According to the Denver Post:
Under the proposed system, people could still choose their medical providers, but the bills would be paid by ColoradoCare instead of private insurance companies.
To pay for state coverage, employers would pay 6.67 percent in payroll taxes and employees would kick in 3.33 percent, for a total of 10 percent of the payroll. Self-employed people would pay 10 percent of their net income. People who qualify for existing federal health programs could continue to receive the same benefits.
As noted by Al Jazeera America, "the campaign is expected to face intense opposition and could make for a heavily funded, highly visible debate over the viability of single-payer health care in a key swing state in the 2016 presidential election."
In fact, Democratic presidential candidate Bernie Sanders has already weighed in on the Colorado fight, telling the Colorado Independent last month: "Colorado could lead the nation in moving toward a system to ensure better health care for more people at less cost. In the richest nation on earth, we should make health care a right for all citizens. No one should go bankrupt or skip getting the care they need because they cannot afford it."
Sanders' home state of Vermont passed a publicly funded healthcare system in 2011. But three years later, the state disappointed local and national single-payer advocates by abandoning the plan, claiming it was too expensive.
Of Colorado's attempt, Forbes wrote that "coming so quickly on the heels of the failed effort in Vermont, it does signal increasing support for the model."
Furthermore, as Aguilar told Yes! Magazine in October, "Vermont's single-payer policy imploded because it was way too expensive for them. It's a small state. But we have the numbers."
Health Care for All Colorado executive director Donna Smith told Common Dreams on Tuesday that what happens in her state could have national implications because "we are not relying on the elected officials to advance universal healthcare."
"This may be a way for other states to learn from our work in Colorado and also pursue single-payer reform at the ballot as a way to overcome some of the political inertia that settles in when so many powerful, monied interests hold court over the legislative process," she explained. "We also have the opportunity to educate Coloradans and inoculate people against the anti-tax, anti-government agenda that seems to always be the battle cry of those who oppose single-payer, universal healthcare, or other social programs."
"The ballot measure in Colorado, which will now be known as Amendment #69, is about much more than achieving healthcare justice," Smith concluded. "It is also about citizens coming together and using the democratic process to successfully achieve healthcare justice."
Urgent. It's never been this bad.
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission from the outset was simple. To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It’s never been this bad out there. And it’s never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed and doing some of its best and most important work, the threats we face are intensifying. Right now, with just three days to go in our Spring Campaign, we're falling short of our make-or-break goal. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Can you make a gift right now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? There is no backup plan or rainy day fund. There is only you. —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Will Colorado be the first state in the nation to successfully implement a single-payer healthcare system?
Voters in the Centennial State will decide next year, the secretary of state's office announced Monday, after confirming that proponents of universal coverage had gathered enough signatures to put the plan--dubbed 'ColoradoCare'--on the 2016 ballot.
"The ballot measure in Colorado, which will now be known as Amendment #69, is about much more than achieving healthcare justice. It is also about citizens coming together and using the democratic process to successfully achieve healthcare justice."
--Donna Smith, Health Care for All Colorado
"Colorado deserves a better option, and now they can vote on one," said state Sen. Irene Aguilar (D-Denver), a physician and lead proponent of the effort. "Health care costs continue to rise every year, hurting Coloradans' chances to get ahead. It's time we get the insurance industry out of the driver's seat and put families in charge of their health care."
According to the Denver Post:
Under the proposed system, people could still choose their medical providers, but the bills would be paid by ColoradoCare instead of private insurance companies.
To pay for state coverage, employers would pay 6.67 percent in payroll taxes and employees would kick in 3.33 percent, for a total of 10 percent of the payroll. Self-employed people would pay 10 percent of their net income. People who qualify for existing federal health programs could continue to receive the same benefits.
As noted by Al Jazeera America, "the campaign is expected to face intense opposition and could make for a heavily funded, highly visible debate over the viability of single-payer health care in a key swing state in the 2016 presidential election."
In fact, Democratic presidential candidate Bernie Sanders has already weighed in on the Colorado fight, telling the Colorado Independent last month: "Colorado could lead the nation in moving toward a system to ensure better health care for more people at less cost. In the richest nation on earth, we should make health care a right for all citizens. No one should go bankrupt or skip getting the care they need because they cannot afford it."
Sanders' home state of Vermont passed a publicly funded healthcare system in 2011. But three years later, the state disappointed local and national single-payer advocates by abandoning the plan, claiming it was too expensive.
Of Colorado's attempt, Forbes wrote that "coming so quickly on the heels of the failed effort in Vermont, it does signal increasing support for the model."
Furthermore, as Aguilar told Yes! Magazine in October, "Vermont's single-payer policy imploded because it was way too expensive for them. It's a small state. But we have the numbers."
Health Care for All Colorado executive director Donna Smith told Common Dreams on Tuesday that what happens in her state could have national implications because "we are not relying on the elected officials to advance universal healthcare."
"This may be a way for other states to learn from our work in Colorado and also pursue single-payer reform at the ballot as a way to overcome some of the political inertia that settles in when so many powerful, monied interests hold court over the legislative process," she explained. "We also have the opportunity to educate Coloradans and inoculate people against the anti-tax, anti-government agenda that seems to always be the battle cry of those who oppose single-payer, universal healthcare, or other social programs."
"The ballot measure in Colorado, which will now be known as Amendment #69, is about much more than achieving healthcare justice," Smith concluded. "It is also about citizens coming together and using the democratic process to successfully achieve healthcare justice."
Will Colorado be the first state in the nation to successfully implement a single-payer healthcare system?
Voters in the Centennial State will decide next year, the secretary of state's office announced Monday, after confirming that proponents of universal coverage had gathered enough signatures to put the plan--dubbed 'ColoradoCare'--on the 2016 ballot.
"The ballot measure in Colorado, which will now be known as Amendment #69, is about much more than achieving healthcare justice. It is also about citizens coming together and using the democratic process to successfully achieve healthcare justice."
--Donna Smith, Health Care for All Colorado
"Colorado deserves a better option, and now they can vote on one," said state Sen. Irene Aguilar (D-Denver), a physician and lead proponent of the effort. "Health care costs continue to rise every year, hurting Coloradans' chances to get ahead. It's time we get the insurance industry out of the driver's seat and put families in charge of their health care."
According to the Denver Post:
Under the proposed system, people could still choose their medical providers, but the bills would be paid by ColoradoCare instead of private insurance companies.
To pay for state coverage, employers would pay 6.67 percent in payroll taxes and employees would kick in 3.33 percent, for a total of 10 percent of the payroll. Self-employed people would pay 10 percent of their net income. People who qualify for existing federal health programs could continue to receive the same benefits.
As noted by Al Jazeera America, "the campaign is expected to face intense opposition and could make for a heavily funded, highly visible debate over the viability of single-payer health care in a key swing state in the 2016 presidential election."
In fact, Democratic presidential candidate Bernie Sanders has already weighed in on the Colorado fight, telling the Colorado Independent last month: "Colorado could lead the nation in moving toward a system to ensure better health care for more people at less cost. In the richest nation on earth, we should make health care a right for all citizens. No one should go bankrupt or skip getting the care they need because they cannot afford it."
Sanders' home state of Vermont passed a publicly funded healthcare system in 2011. But three years later, the state disappointed local and national single-payer advocates by abandoning the plan, claiming it was too expensive.
Of Colorado's attempt, Forbes wrote that "coming so quickly on the heels of the failed effort in Vermont, it does signal increasing support for the model."
Furthermore, as Aguilar told Yes! Magazine in October, "Vermont's single-payer policy imploded because it was way too expensive for them. It's a small state. But we have the numbers."
Health Care for All Colorado executive director Donna Smith told Common Dreams on Tuesday that what happens in her state could have national implications because "we are not relying on the elected officials to advance universal healthcare."
"This may be a way for other states to learn from our work in Colorado and also pursue single-payer reform at the ballot as a way to overcome some of the political inertia that settles in when so many powerful, monied interests hold court over the legislative process," she explained. "We also have the opportunity to educate Coloradans and inoculate people against the anti-tax, anti-government agenda that seems to always be the battle cry of those who oppose single-payer, universal healthcare, or other social programs."
"The ballot measure in Colorado, which will now be known as Amendment #69, is about much more than achieving healthcare justice," Smith concluded. "It is also about citizens coming together and using the democratic process to successfully achieve healthcare justice."