SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Battle Lines Form in California Over Ambitious Climate Change Bills
Environmental lawmakers face off with oil and gas industry over bills designed to crack down on emissions
Aug 28, 2015
California lawmakers are preparing to face off with the state's powerful fossil fuel industry in a battle over two potentially groundbreaking climate change bills.
The more contentious legislation, the Clean Energy and Pollution Reduction Act of 2015 (SB350), would increase California's share of electricity from renewable energy sources to 50 percent and reduce the state's use of oil in half by 2030. This would be equivalent to removing 36 million cars and trucks from the roads over the next 15 years. The legislation would be implemented through new technology and more efficient planning.
The second piece of legislation, the California Global Warming Solutions Act (SB32), would raise mandates for oil refineries and power companies, among other big polluters, to lower their greenhouse gas emissions.
Introduced by state Senate President Pro Tem Kevin de Leon, SB350 has received many endorsements from state lawmakers, including California Governor Jerry Brown, but has also faced opposition from oil and gas industry lobbyists.
"This is a fight worth having because it's a fight for our children's health; it's a fight for the economic future of the greatest state in the country."
--Kevin de Leon
Brown has indicated his eagerness to sign the bill, particularly in light of the state's unprecedented drought, now entering its fourth year. Recent scientific reports have revealed that this drought exacerbates climate change. In a statement last week, Brown said, "It's time for Republicans, foot-dragging corporations, and other deniers to wake up and take sensible action before it's too late."
However, those same corporations are pushing hard against SB350.
Fliers sent this week to California households by the Western States Petroleum Association (WSPA), which represents the fossil fuel industry, warn that the bill will implement "gas rationing to control when families can fill their tanks, surcharges on non-hybrid mini-vans and SUVs, penalties and fines for drivers who use too much gas," and other effects.
SB350 "is entirely different," said WSPA spokesperson Tupper Hull, unlike previous environmental bills. "It is an attempt to put oil companies out of business essentially."
But while the oil and gas industry spreads what lawmakers in Sacramento call a "doomsday" message, Berkeley-based energy consultant Bentham Paulos clarifies in a piece for Grist, "The problem? There is no such bill."
"Big Oil hates a California climate bill so much that it's telling outright lies about it," Paulos writes.
As de Leon told the Sacramento Bee last week, "The irony is they're scaring the very same people who are most harmed by the product, working-class folks. There is a perverseness to it," referring to the environmental impacts felt most deeply by low-income communities.
These dynamics set the stage for a likely volatile end to the state's legislative session, which will break on September 11, and draw battle lines over California's economic and environmental future.
The bill would represent "the first major victory of the political system over Big Oil."
--Brett Fleishman, 350.org
"WSPA is a powerful actor in our state capital, and they fight dirty," Brett Fleishman, senior analyst at climate advocacy group 350.org, told Common Dreams on Friday. Passing SB350 would represent "the first major victory of the political system over Big Oil."
"It would be a case study for state and federal governments," Fleishman added. "SB350 is a really important and strong step to take on climate change head-on."
However, as 350.org fracking campaign coordinator Linda Capato Jr. told Common Dreams, a strong step is still just a step--particularly in a state that faces opposition from a massive oil and gas industry.
"SB350 isn't doing enough to turn off the spigots," Capato Jr. said. "We need to step up even further. What are the industries that are causing climate change?.... Even if SB350 passes, we're still pulling [fossil fuels] out of the ground."
The bill "is one step, and it's a small step.... It's a step that we needed 20 years ago," she said.
Still, she said, the bill's impact could be far-reaching. "California leads the nation," Capato Jr. said. We have a very strong responsibility." A policy enacted in the state "will be replicated elsewhere."
As de Leon said at a recent press conference, "This is a fight worth having because it's a fight for our children's health, it's a fight for the economic future of the greatest state in the country. It is not hyperbole or overdramatization to say the world is watching very closely."
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Nadia Prupis
Nadia Prupis is a former Common Dreams staff writer. She wrote on media policy for Truthout.org and has been published in New America Media and AlterNet. She graduated from UC Santa Barbara with a BA in English in 2008.
jerry brownrenewable energyenvironmentclean energybig oil350.orgcaliforniafossil fuel industryfossil fuelsclimate changegreenhouse gas emissions
California lawmakers are preparing to face off with the state's powerful fossil fuel industry in a battle over two potentially groundbreaking climate change bills.
The more contentious legislation, the Clean Energy and Pollution Reduction Act of 2015 (SB350), would increase California's share of electricity from renewable energy sources to 50 percent and reduce the state's use of oil in half by 2030. This would be equivalent to removing 36 million cars and trucks from the roads over the next 15 years. The legislation would be implemented through new technology and more efficient planning.
The second piece of legislation, the California Global Warming Solutions Act (SB32), would raise mandates for oil refineries and power companies, among other big polluters, to lower their greenhouse gas emissions.
Introduced by state Senate President Pro Tem Kevin de Leon, SB350 has received many endorsements from state lawmakers, including California Governor Jerry Brown, but has also faced opposition from oil and gas industry lobbyists.
"This is a fight worth having because it's a fight for our children's health; it's a fight for the economic future of the greatest state in the country."
--Kevin de Leon
Brown has indicated his eagerness to sign the bill, particularly in light of the state's unprecedented drought, now entering its fourth year. Recent scientific reports have revealed that this drought exacerbates climate change. In a statement last week, Brown said, "It's time for Republicans, foot-dragging corporations, and other deniers to wake up and take sensible action before it's too late."
However, those same corporations are pushing hard against SB350.
Fliers sent this week to California households by the Western States Petroleum Association (WSPA), which represents the fossil fuel industry, warn that the bill will implement "gas rationing to control when families can fill their tanks, surcharges on non-hybrid mini-vans and SUVs, penalties and fines for drivers who use too much gas," and other effects.
SB350 "is entirely different," said WSPA spokesperson Tupper Hull, unlike previous environmental bills. "It is an attempt to put oil companies out of business essentially."
But while the oil and gas industry spreads what lawmakers in Sacramento call a "doomsday" message, Berkeley-based energy consultant Bentham Paulos clarifies in a piece for Grist, "The problem? There is no such bill."
"Big Oil hates a California climate bill so much that it's telling outright lies about it," Paulos writes.
As de Leon told the Sacramento Bee last week, "The irony is they're scaring the very same people who are most harmed by the product, working-class folks. There is a perverseness to it," referring to the environmental impacts felt most deeply by low-income communities.
These dynamics set the stage for a likely volatile end to the state's legislative session, which will break on September 11, and draw battle lines over California's economic and environmental future.
The bill would represent "the first major victory of the political system over Big Oil."
--Brett Fleishman, 350.org
"WSPA is a powerful actor in our state capital, and they fight dirty," Brett Fleishman, senior analyst at climate advocacy group 350.org, told Common Dreams on Friday. Passing SB350 would represent "the first major victory of the political system over Big Oil."
"It would be a case study for state and federal governments," Fleishman added. "SB350 is a really important and strong step to take on climate change head-on."
However, as 350.org fracking campaign coordinator Linda Capato Jr. told Common Dreams, a strong step is still just a step--particularly in a state that faces opposition from a massive oil and gas industry.
"SB350 isn't doing enough to turn off the spigots," Capato Jr. said. "We need to step up even further. What are the industries that are causing climate change?.... Even if SB350 passes, we're still pulling [fossil fuels] out of the ground."
The bill "is one step, and it's a small step.... It's a step that we needed 20 years ago," she said.
Still, she said, the bill's impact could be far-reaching. "California leads the nation," Capato Jr. said. We have a very strong responsibility." A policy enacted in the state "will be replicated elsewhere."
As de Leon said at a recent press conference, "This is a fight worth having because it's a fight for our children's health, it's a fight for the economic future of the greatest state in the country. It is not hyperbole or overdramatization to say the world is watching very closely."
Nadia Prupis
Nadia Prupis is a former Common Dreams staff writer. She wrote on media policy for Truthout.org and has been published in New America Media and AlterNet. She graduated from UC Santa Barbara with a BA in English in 2008.
California lawmakers are preparing to face off with the state's powerful fossil fuel industry in a battle over two potentially groundbreaking climate change bills.
The more contentious legislation, the Clean Energy and Pollution Reduction Act of 2015 (SB350), would increase California's share of electricity from renewable energy sources to 50 percent and reduce the state's use of oil in half by 2030. This would be equivalent to removing 36 million cars and trucks from the roads over the next 15 years. The legislation would be implemented through new technology and more efficient planning.
The second piece of legislation, the California Global Warming Solutions Act (SB32), would raise mandates for oil refineries and power companies, among other big polluters, to lower their greenhouse gas emissions.
Introduced by state Senate President Pro Tem Kevin de Leon, SB350 has received many endorsements from state lawmakers, including California Governor Jerry Brown, but has also faced opposition from oil and gas industry lobbyists.
"This is a fight worth having because it's a fight for our children's health; it's a fight for the economic future of the greatest state in the country."
--Kevin de Leon
Brown has indicated his eagerness to sign the bill, particularly in light of the state's unprecedented drought, now entering its fourth year. Recent scientific reports have revealed that this drought exacerbates climate change. In a statement last week, Brown said, "It's time for Republicans, foot-dragging corporations, and other deniers to wake up and take sensible action before it's too late."
However, those same corporations are pushing hard against SB350.
Fliers sent this week to California households by the Western States Petroleum Association (WSPA), which represents the fossil fuel industry, warn that the bill will implement "gas rationing to control when families can fill their tanks, surcharges on non-hybrid mini-vans and SUVs, penalties and fines for drivers who use too much gas," and other effects.
SB350 "is entirely different," said WSPA spokesperson Tupper Hull, unlike previous environmental bills. "It is an attempt to put oil companies out of business essentially."
But while the oil and gas industry spreads what lawmakers in Sacramento call a "doomsday" message, Berkeley-based energy consultant Bentham Paulos clarifies in a piece for Grist, "The problem? There is no such bill."
"Big Oil hates a California climate bill so much that it's telling outright lies about it," Paulos writes.
As de Leon told the Sacramento Bee last week, "The irony is they're scaring the very same people who are most harmed by the product, working-class folks. There is a perverseness to it," referring to the environmental impacts felt most deeply by low-income communities.
These dynamics set the stage for a likely volatile end to the state's legislative session, which will break on September 11, and draw battle lines over California's economic and environmental future.
The bill would represent "the first major victory of the political system over Big Oil."
--Brett Fleishman, 350.org
"WSPA is a powerful actor in our state capital, and they fight dirty," Brett Fleishman, senior analyst at climate advocacy group 350.org, told Common Dreams on Friday. Passing SB350 would represent "the first major victory of the political system over Big Oil."
"It would be a case study for state and federal governments," Fleishman added. "SB350 is a really important and strong step to take on climate change head-on."
However, as 350.org fracking campaign coordinator Linda Capato Jr. told Common Dreams, a strong step is still just a step--particularly in a state that faces opposition from a massive oil and gas industry.
"SB350 isn't doing enough to turn off the spigots," Capato Jr. said. "We need to step up even further. What are the industries that are causing climate change?.... Even if SB350 passes, we're still pulling [fossil fuels] out of the ground."
The bill "is one step, and it's a small step.... It's a step that we needed 20 years ago," she said.
Still, she said, the bill's impact could be far-reaching. "California leads the nation," Capato Jr. said. We have a very strong responsibility." A policy enacted in the state "will be replicated elsewhere."
As de Leon said at a recent press conference, "This is a fight worth having because it's a fight for our children's health, it's a fight for the economic future of the greatest state in the country. It is not hyperbole or overdramatization to say the world is watching very closely."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.