

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
Providing yet another example of why higher education should be free across the U.S., a new Politico investigation reveals how the federal government's Parents PLUS lending program has much higher interest rates and fees and far fewer opportunities for loan forgiveness or reductions than even the regular student loans driving the nation's debt crisis.
"Parent PLUS was created in 1980 to provide small loans to help reasonably well-off families finance the American Dream of an undergraduate education," explains Politico journalist Michael Grunwald.
"But in an era of skyrocketing education costs, it has grown to look a lot like publicly funded predatory lending, providing almost any borrowers with almost unlimited cash to attend any school with almost no regard to their ability to repay," he writes. "Thirteen percent of undergraduates now rely on Parent PLUS, and many of their parents are falling into debt traps."
Grunwald details how the Parent PLUS loan program is--as observers put it--"deeply troubled and inherently flawed."
"The loans are almost impossible to discharge in bankruptcy, just like student loans, but they're ineligible for most of the income-based payment relief available for student loans," Grunwald writes. "Consumer advocates compare them to subprime mortgages before the bust, encouraging families to bite off more debt than they can chew -- except that Parent PLUS also has a government imprimatur."
And the problems go deeper than that, he says.
Parent PLUS loans feed into the "the college-industrial complex," Grunwald argues, "helping educators jack up their tuitions while pressuring parents to make up the difference with debt while doing nothing to ensure they're getting a real return on their investment. It enhances accessibility, but not really affordability, simply giving parents a way to punt the skyrocketing costs into the future."
Of course, this program is just one piece of a higher education financing system that is at best dysfunctional and at worst criminal--leading some to call for free higher education as a human right. As Astra Taylor and Ann Larson pointed out in an op-ed published Tuesday in the LA Times, "The government makes an obscene profit from the student loan program--an estimated $110 billion over the next decade."
Politico's investigation further illustrates what Demos senior policy analyst Mark Huelsman described in a Policyshop blog post last week as "the potential harm of a debt-based system of college financing."
It's not that loans can't be helpful, he continued, but just like with payday loans for cash-strapped workers, the federally-subsidized loan programs "aren't a cause, they're a symptom--of our inability to raise wages, provide affordable healthcare or housing, or generally broaden the social safety net in a way that prevents people from needing to borrow just to get by."
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Providing yet another example of why higher education should be free across the U.S., a new Politico investigation reveals how the federal government's Parents PLUS lending program has much higher interest rates and fees and far fewer opportunities for loan forgiveness or reductions than even the regular student loans driving the nation's debt crisis.
"Parent PLUS was created in 1980 to provide small loans to help reasonably well-off families finance the American Dream of an undergraduate education," explains Politico journalist Michael Grunwald.
"But in an era of skyrocketing education costs, it has grown to look a lot like publicly funded predatory lending, providing almost any borrowers with almost unlimited cash to attend any school with almost no regard to their ability to repay," he writes. "Thirteen percent of undergraduates now rely on Parent PLUS, and many of their parents are falling into debt traps."
Grunwald details how the Parent PLUS loan program is--as observers put it--"deeply troubled and inherently flawed."
"The loans are almost impossible to discharge in bankruptcy, just like student loans, but they're ineligible for most of the income-based payment relief available for student loans," Grunwald writes. "Consumer advocates compare them to subprime mortgages before the bust, encouraging families to bite off more debt than they can chew -- except that Parent PLUS also has a government imprimatur."
And the problems go deeper than that, he says.
Parent PLUS loans feed into the "the college-industrial complex," Grunwald argues, "helping educators jack up their tuitions while pressuring parents to make up the difference with debt while doing nothing to ensure they're getting a real return on their investment. It enhances accessibility, but not really affordability, simply giving parents a way to punt the skyrocketing costs into the future."
Of course, this program is just one piece of a higher education financing system that is at best dysfunctional and at worst criminal--leading some to call for free higher education as a human right. As Astra Taylor and Ann Larson pointed out in an op-ed published Tuesday in the LA Times, "The government makes an obscene profit from the student loan program--an estimated $110 billion over the next decade."
Politico's investigation further illustrates what Demos senior policy analyst Mark Huelsman described in a Policyshop blog post last week as "the potential harm of a debt-based system of college financing."
It's not that loans can't be helpful, he continued, but just like with payday loans for cash-strapped workers, the federally-subsidized loan programs "aren't a cause, they're a symptom--of our inability to raise wages, provide affordable healthcare or housing, or generally broaden the social safety net in a way that prevents people from needing to borrow just to get by."
Providing yet another example of why higher education should be free across the U.S., a new Politico investigation reveals how the federal government's Parents PLUS lending program has much higher interest rates and fees and far fewer opportunities for loan forgiveness or reductions than even the regular student loans driving the nation's debt crisis.
"Parent PLUS was created in 1980 to provide small loans to help reasonably well-off families finance the American Dream of an undergraduate education," explains Politico journalist Michael Grunwald.
"But in an era of skyrocketing education costs, it has grown to look a lot like publicly funded predatory lending, providing almost any borrowers with almost unlimited cash to attend any school with almost no regard to their ability to repay," he writes. "Thirteen percent of undergraduates now rely on Parent PLUS, and many of their parents are falling into debt traps."
Grunwald details how the Parent PLUS loan program is--as observers put it--"deeply troubled and inherently flawed."
"The loans are almost impossible to discharge in bankruptcy, just like student loans, but they're ineligible for most of the income-based payment relief available for student loans," Grunwald writes. "Consumer advocates compare them to subprime mortgages before the bust, encouraging families to bite off more debt than they can chew -- except that Parent PLUS also has a government imprimatur."
And the problems go deeper than that, he says.
Parent PLUS loans feed into the "the college-industrial complex," Grunwald argues, "helping educators jack up their tuitions while pressuring parents to make up the difference with debt while doing nothing to ensure they're getting a real return on their investment. It enhances accessibility, but not really affordability, simply giving parents a way to punt the skyrocketing costs into the future."
Of course, this program is just one piece of a higher education financing system that is at best dysfunctional and at worst criminal--leading some to call for free higher education as a human right. As Astra Taylor and Ann Larson pointed out in an op-ed published Tuesday in the LA Times, "The government makes an obscene profit from the student loan program--an estimated $110 billion over the next decade."
Politico's investigation further illustrates what Demos senior policy analyst Mark Huelsman described in a Policyshop blog post last week as "the potential harm of a debt-based system of college financing."
It's not that loans can't be helpful, he continued, but just like with payday loans for cash-strapped workers, the federally-subsidized loan programs "aren't a cause, they're a symptom--of our inability to raise wages, provide affordable healthcare or housing, or generally broaden the social safety net in a way that prevents people from needing to borrow just to get by."