

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
The Canadian Supreme Court ruled on Friday that adults of sound mind who are suffering intolerably, physically or psychologically, have the right to die by physician-assisted suicide.
In its unanimous ruling on Carter v. Canada, the court found that Canada's ban on assisted suicide "infringes the right to life, liberty and security of the person in a manner that is not in accordance with the principles of fundamental justice." Doctors have the ability to address whether a patient is mentally competent and capable of consent, and whether their condition is intolerable or can be abated, the decision stated.
The ruling is suspended for 12 months to give the federal government, provincial legislatures, and medical agencies time to draft new laws. Doctors who are unwilling to take part in the procedure will not be forced to comply.
"An individual's response to a grievous and irremediable medical condition is a matter critical to their dignity and autonomy," the court stated in its decision. "The prohibition denies people in this situation the right to make decisions concerning their bodily integrity and medical care and thus trenches on their liberty. And by leaving them to endure intolerable suffering, it impinges on their security of the person."
Affidavits from the case told the experiences of people who found themselves quickly succumbing to painful degenerative diseases like Huntington's and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS).
One witness, Gloria Taylor, who was wheelchair-bound and in constant pain within a year of being diagnosed with ALS, wrote a letter to the British Columbia Supreme Court in 2010 challenging the then-constitutional ban on physician-assisted suicide.
"My present quality of life is impaired by the fact that I am unable to say for certain that I will have the right to ask for physician-assisted dying when that 'enough is enough' moment arrives," Taylor wrote. "What I fear is a death that negates, as opposed to concludes, my life."
She concluded: "I do not want to die slowly, piece by piece. I do not want to waste away unconscious in a hospital bed. I do not want to die wracked with pain."
Taylor died of an infection in 2012.
One appellant in the case, Lee Carter, was forced to take her 89-year-old mother Kathleen to Switzerland, where physician-assisted suicide is legal, to help her die with dignity in the throes of a degenerative spinal disease.
The Supreme Court's decision on Friday means Canadians "have a choice to die with dignity in our own country, surrounded by friends and family," Carter told the Daily Globe and Mail, adding that the ruling honored her mother's memory. "We were elated. She got what she wanted."
Grace Pastine of British Columbia Civil Liberties Association, which brought the case, said Friday was "one incredible day."
"Physician-assisted dying is now recognized for what it is--a medical service that brings an end, for some individuals, to unbearable suffering," Pastine said.
Wanda Morris, CEO of Toronto-based right-to-death nonprofit Dying With Dignity, thanked the plaintiffs who filed the case and the physicians "who had the courage to go against their profession and stand up."
"I am so pleased that today the courts have dragged our laws into line with the values of Canadians, those values of compassion and autonomy we hold so dear," she said.
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
The Canadian Supreme Court ruled on Friday that adults of sound mind who are suffering intolerably, physically or psychologically, have the right to die by physician-assisted suicide.
In its unanimous ruling on Carter v. Canada, the court found that Canada's ban on assisted suicide "infringes the right to life, liberty and security of the person in a manner that is not in accordance with the principles of fundamental justice." Doctors have the ability to address whether a patient is mentally competent and capable of consent, and whether their condition is intolerable or can be abated, the decision stated.
The ruling is suspended for 12 months to give the federal government, provincial legislatures, and medical agencies time to draft new laws. Doctors who are unwilling to take part in the procedure will not be forced to comply.
"An individual's response to a grievous and irremediable medical condition is a matter critical to their dignity and autonomy," the court stated in its decision. "The prohibition denies people in this situation the right to make decisions concerning their bodily integrity and medical care and thus trenches on their liberty. And by leaving them to endure intolerable suffering, it impinges on their security of the person."
Affidavits from the case told the experiences of people who found themselves quickly succumbing to painful degenerative diseases like Huntington's and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS).
One witness, Gloria Taylor, who was wheelchair-bound and in constant pain within a year of being diagnosed with ALS, wrote a letter to the British Columbia Supreme Court in 2010 challenging the then-constitutional ban on physician-assisted suicide.
"My present quality of life is impaired by the fact that I am unable to say for certain that I will have the right to ask for physician-assisted dying when that 'enough is enough' moment arrives," Taylor wrote. "What I fear is a death that negates, as opposed to concludes, my life."
She concluded: "I do not want to die slowly, piece by piece. I do not want to waste away unconscious in a hospital bed. I do not want to die wracked with pain."
Taylor died of an infection in 2012.
One appellant in the case, Lee Carter, was forced to take her 89-year-old mother Kathleen to Switzerland, where physician-assisted suicide is legal, to help her die with dignity in the throes of a degenerative spinal disease.
The Supreme Court's decision on Friday means Canadians "have a choice to die with dignity in our own country, surrounded by friends and family," Carter told the Daily Globe and Mail, adding that the ruling honored her mother's memory. "We were elated. She got what she wanted."
Grace Pastine of British Columbia Civil Liberties Association, which brought the case, said Friday was "one incredible day."
"Physician-assisted dying is now recognized for what it is--a medical service that brings an end, for some individuals, to unbearable suffering," Pastine said.
Wanda Morris, CEO of Toronto-based right-to-death nonprofit Dying With Dignity, thanked the plaintiffs who filed the case and the physicians "who had the courage to go against their profession and stand up."
"I am so pleased that today the courts have dragged our laws into line with the values of Canadians, those values of compassion and autonomy we hold so dear," she said.
The Canadian Supreme Court ruled on Friday that adults of sound mind who are suffering intolerably, physically or psychologically, have the right to die by physician-assisted suicide.
In its unanimous ruling on Carter v. Canada, the court found that Canada's ban on assisted suicide "infringes the right to life, liberty and security of the person in a manner that is not in accordance with the principles of fundamental justice." Doctors have the ability to address whether a patient is mentally competent and capable of consent, and whether their condition is intolerable or can be abated, the decision stated.
The ruling is suspended for 12 months to give the federal government, provincial legislatures, and medical agencies time to draft new laws. Doctors who are unwilling to take part in the procedure will not be forced to comply.
"An individual's response to a grievous and irremediable medical condition is a matter critical to their dignity and autonomy," the court stated in its decision. "The prohibition denies people in this situation the right to make decisions concerning their bodily integrity and medical care and thus trenches on their liberty. And by leaving them to endure intolerable suffering, it impinges on their security of the person."
Affidavits from the case told the experiences of people who found themselves quickly succumbing to painful degenerative diseases like Huntington's and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS).
One witness, Gloria Taylor, who was wheelchair-bound and in constant pain within a year of being diagnosed with ALS, wrote a letter to the British Columbia Supreme Court in 2010 challenging the then-constitutional ban on physician-assisted suicide.
"My present quality of life is impaired by the fact that I am unable to say for certain that I will have the right to ask for physician-assisted dying when that 'enough is enough' moment arrives," Taylor wrote. "What I fear is a death that negates, as opposed to concludes, my life."
She concluded: "I do not want to die slowly, piece by piece. I do not want to waste away unconscious in a hospital bed. I do not want to die wracked with pain."
Taylor died of an infection in 2012.
One appellant in the case, Lee Carter, was forced to take her 89-year-old mother Kathleen to Switzerland, where physician-assisted suicide is legal, to help her die with dignity in the throes of a degenerative spinal disease.
The Supreme Court's decision on Friday means Canadians "have a choice to die with dignity in our own country, surrounded by friends and family," Carter told the Daily Globe and Mail, adding that the ruling honored her mother's memory. "We were elated. She got what she wanted."
Grace Pastine of British Columbia Civil Liberties Association, which brought the case, said Friday was "one incredible day."
"Physician-assisted dying is now recognized for what it is--a medical service that brings an end, for some individuals, to unbearable suffering," Pastine said.
Wanda Morris, CEO of Toronto-based right-to-death nonprofit Dying With Dignity, thanked the plaintiffs who filed the case and the physicians "who had the courage to go against their profession and stand up."
"I am so pleased that today the courts have dragged our laws into line with the values of Canadians, those values of compassion and autonomy we hold so dear," she said.