SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Canadian CEOs Raking In Nearly 200 Times Average Worker's Pay
Top-paid executives took home average citizen's annual salary in less than a day, research found.
Jan 02, 2015
While Canada continues to trudge slowly out of its economic recession, top-paid corporate executives are raking in the benefits as the country's average workers struggle, a new study published Thursday by the Canadian Center for Policy Alternatives has found.
The study, Glory Days: CEO Pay in Canada Soaring to Pre-Recession Highs (pdf), analyzed the 2013 earnings of executives of the country's 240 publicly listed corporations, and found that their average compensation that year was $9.2 million--almost as high as their $10 million average salary in pre-recession 2007.
As the study notes, it is also 195 times more than the average Canadian citizen earns in a year and 237 times more than the average Canadian woman.
As the study's author Hugh Mackenzie discovered, the country's top 100 CEOs took home $47,358--an average citizen's yearly salary--in less than half a day.
"[B]y 11:41 a.m. on January 2, 2013--the second paid day and first working day of the year--the average top CEO had earned as much money as the average Canadian worker would make all year," the study states.
And that trend has extended into the new year. "By 11:41 a.m. today, just as most Canadians are getting ready for their lunch break on the first official work day of the year, the average of the 100 highest paid CEOs will have already pocketed what it takes the average Canadian an entire year, working full-time to earn," Mackenzie said on Thursday.
What's more, the total compensation of those executives, which amounts to $921 million, surpasses the reported government budgetary deficits for that same year in every province in Canada, apart from Ontario and Quebec.
But CEO compensation benefits extend beyond salary:
As high as executive pay is today, the published compensation data don't present the complete picture. A significant proportion of each CEO's reported pay is an estimate of the value of stock options granted during the year; a conservative estimate that does not capture the additional benefit in the favourable income tax treatment of options. Almost half of the 100 highest paid CEOs also have stratospheric pensions waiting for them when they retire. And most also profit handsomely from the dividends paid on the shares they own in the companies they work for.
The highest individual salary recorded in the study belongs to Gerald W. Schwartz, CEO of investment firm Onex Corporation. He took home more than $87.9 million. Russell Girling, head of TransCanada, received $8.7 million. And Richard E. Waugh, CEO of the Bank of Nova Scotia, got more than $11.2 million for a partial year.
The study comes as outrage over executive compensation continues to grow in the U.S. and Canada, with numerous reports published in the past year highlighting the massive wealth gaps that persist in the face of so-called "economic recoveries."
The answer to these problems, Mackenzie says, cannot be found in board rooms.
"It is increasingly clear that shareholders, working through their corporate board of directors, are having a limited impact on decisions related to corporate compensation," Mackenzie writes. "There are good reasons why this type of voluntary restraint cannot adequately address the problem of runaway CEO pay."
The most likely solution is by raising taxes on corporate salaries and limiting what companies can deduct for tax purposes, Mackenzie concludes. "Canada would benefit from closing the tax loophole that allows executives to pay half the income tax rate on proceeds from cashing in stock options by claiming that revenue as capital gains," he said Thursday. "The stock options held by the highest paid 100 CEOs in 2013 represent a tax break worth more than half a billion dollars."
The report concludes, "If we, as a society, have concluded that excessive pay is unacceptable, we should be able to claw back a greater portion of it."
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Nadia Prupis
Nadia Prupis is a former Common Dreams staff writer. She wrote on media policy for Truthout.org and has been published in New America Media and AlterNet. She graduated from UC Santa Barbara with a BA in English in 2008.
While Canada continues to trudge slowly out of its economic recession, top-paid corporate executives are raking in the benefits as the country's average workers struggle, a new study published Thursday by the Canadian Center for Policy Alternatives has found.
The study, Glory Days: CEO Pay in Canada Soaring to Pre-Recession Highs (pdf), analyzed the 2013 earnings of executives of the country's 240 publicly listed corporations, and found that their average compensation that year was $9.2 million--almost as high as their $10 million average salary in pre-recession 2007.
As the study notes, it is also 195 times more than the average Canadian citizen earns in a year and 237 times more than the average Canadian woman.
As the study's author Hugh Mackenzie discovered, the country's top 100 CEOs took home $47,358--an average citizen's yearly salary--in less than half a day.
"[B]y 11:41 a.m. on January 2, 2013--the second paid day and first working day of the year--the average top CEO had earned as much money as the average Canadian worker would make all year," the study states.
And that trend has extended into the new year. "By 11:41 a.m. today, just as most Canadians are getting ready for their lunch break on the first official work day of the year, the average of the 100 highest paid CEOs will have already pocketed what it takes the average Canadian an entire year, working full-time to earn," Mackenzie said on Thursday.
What's more, the total compensation of those executives, which amounts to $921 million, surpasses the reported government budgetary deficits for that same year in every province in Canada, apart from Ontario and Quebec.
But CEO compensation benefits extend beyond salary:
As high as executive pay is today, the published compensation data don't present the complete picture. A significant proportion of each CEO's reported pay is an estimate of the value of stock options granted during the year; a conservative estimate that does not capture the additional benefit in the favourable income tax treatment of options. Almost half of the 100 highest paid CEOs also have stratospheric pensions waiting for them when they retire. And most also profit handsomely from the dividends paid on the shares they own in the companies they work for.
The highest individual salary recorded in the study belongs to Gerald W. Schwartz, CEO of investment firm Onex Corporation. He took home more than $87.9 million. Russell Girling, head of TransCanada, received $8.7 million. And Richard E. Waugh, CEO of the Bank of Nova Scotia, got more than $11.2 million for a partial year.
The study comes as outrage over executive compensation continues to grow in the U.S. and Canada, with numerous reports published in the past year highlighting the massive wealth gaps that persist in the face of so-called "economic recoveries."
The answer to these problems, Mackenzie says, cannot be found in board rooms.
"It is increasingly clear that shareholders, working through their corporate board of directors, are having a limited impact on decisions related to corporate compensation," Mackenzie writes. "There are good reasons why this type of voluntary restraint cannot adequately address the problem of runaway CEO pay."
The most likely solution is by raising taxes on corporate salaries and limiting what companies can deduct for tax purposes, Mackenzie concludes. "Canada would benefit from closing the tax loophole that allows executives to pay half the income tax rate on proceeds from cashing in stock options by claiming that revenue as capital gains," he said Thursday. "The stock options held by the highest paid 100 CEOs in 2013 represent a tax break worth more than half a billion dollars."
The report concludes, "If we, as a society, have concluded that excessive pay is unacceptable, we should be able to claw back a greater portion of it."
Nadia Prupis
Nadia Prupis is a former Common Dreams staff writer. She wrote on media policy for Truthout.org and has been published in New America Media and AlterNet. She graduated from UC Santa Barbara with a BA in English in 2008.
While Canada continues to trudge slowly out of its economic recession, top-paid corporate executives are raking in the benefits as the country's average workers struggle, a new study published Thursday by the Canadian Center for Policy Alternatives has found.
The study, Glory Days: CEO Pay in Canada Soaring to Pre-Recession Highs (pdf), analyzed the 2013 earnings of executives of the country's 240 publicly listed corporations, and found that their average compensation that year was $9.2 million--almost as high as their $10 million average salary in pre-recession 2007.
As the study notes, it is also 195 times more than the average Canadian citizen earns in a year and 237 times more than the average Canadian woman.
As the study's author Hugh Mackenzie discovered, the country's top 100 CEOs took home $47,358--an average citizen's yearly salary--in less than half a day.
"[B]y 11:41 a.m. on January 2, 2013--the second paid day and first working day of the year--the average top CEO had earned as much money as the average Canadian worker would make all year," the study states.
And that trend has extended into the new year. "By 11:41 a.m. today, just as most Canadians are getting ready for their lunch break on the first official work day of the year, the average of the 100 highest paid CEOs will have already pocketed what it takes the average Canadian an entire year, working full-time to earn," Mackenzie said on Thursday.
What's more, the total compensation of those executives, which amounts to $921 million, surpasses the reported government budgetary deficits for that same year in every province in Canada, apart from Ontario and Quebec.
But CEO compensation benefits extend beyond salary:
As high as executive pay is today, the published compensation data don't present the complete picture. A significant proportion of each CEO's reported pay is an estimate of the value of stock options granted during the year; a conservative estimate that does not capture the additional benefit in the favourable income tax treatment of options. Almost half of the 100 highest paid CEOs also have stratospheric pensions waiting for them when they retire. And most also profit handsomely from the dividends paid on the shares they own in the companies they work for.
The highest individual salary recorded in the study belongs to Gerald W. Schwartz, CEO of investment firm Onex Corporation. He took home more than $87.9 million. Russell Girling, head of TransCanada, received $8.7 million. And Richard E. Waugh, CEO of the Bank of Nova Scotia, got more than $11.2 million for a partial year.
The study comes as outrage over executive compensation continues to grow in the U.S. and Canada, with numerous reports published in the past year highlighting the massive wealth gaps that persist in the face of so-called "economic recoveries."
The answer to these problems, Mackenzie says, cannot be found in board rooms.
"It is increasingly clear that shareholders, working through their corporate board of directors, are having a limited impact on decisions related to corporate compensation," Mackenzie writes. "There are good reasons why this type of voluntary restraint cannot adequately address the problem of runaway CEO pay."
The most likely solution is by raising taxes on corporate salaries and limiting what companies can deduct for tax purposes, Mackenzie concludes. "Canada would benefit from closing the tax loophole that allows executives to pay half the income tax rate on proceeds from cashing in stock options by claiming that revenue as capital gains," he said Thursday. "The stock options held by the highest paid 100 CEOs in 2013 represent a tax break worth more than half a billion dollars."
The report concludes, "If we, as a society, have concluded that excessive pay is unacceptable, we should be able to claw back a greater portion of it."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.