Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel speaks to Marines stationed on Camp Pendleton, Calif., Aug. 12, 2014.
Aug 13, 2014
A week after President Barack Obama authorized airstrikes targeting Islamic militants in northern Iraq, the United States announced it was dispatching over 100 addition military advisers to the area in a sign of escalating operations.
Secretary of Defense Chuck Hagel said Monday that Obama authorized 130 new military "assessors," who arrived in the Kurdish capital of Erbil Monday. The New York Times reports that those additional forces bring the number of military personnel in the country to 1,000.
Hagel's announcement comes as thousands of people including many members of the Yazidi religious minority have fled Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS) militants and are trapped on Mount Sinjar, where they face what United Nations Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon described as an "especially harrowing" crisis. Hagel said that the "assessors" would "take a closer look and give a more in-depth assessment of where we can continue to help the Iraqis with what they're doing and the threats that they are now dealing with."
Though Hagel said that "this is not a combat boots-on-the-ground operation. We're not going to have that kind of operation," Firedoglake's DSWright writes that these incremental expansions of forces beg an important question. He writes that "sooner or later, these little contingents are going to add up to numbers that are hard to hide. What exactly is the threshold for 'boots on the ground' to be reached?"
Phyllis Bennis, foreign policy expert and fellow at the Institute for Policy Studies, toldDemocracy Now! Friday that increased military involvment "is going to put the U.S. in a situation where it's widely going to be blamed for the continuing rise of sectarianism," which she said "was put in place by the U.S. invasion of Iraq in 2003." She continued:
And in the region more broadly, it's going to be pointed out what hypocrisy it is, where the United States is arming Israel to kill Palestinians in Gaza. The language that President Obama used, that there are innocent people facing violations on a massive scale, that describes the situation of Palestinian civilians in Gaza. And yet, rather than providing humanitarian aid, demanding that Israel open the gates of Gaza, that it open the border crossings, the United States instead is sending more weapons and more money to buy more weapons and more ammunition for those Israeli attacks. So, the question of how the U.S. is going to be blamed for this is even wider because of the simultaneous crisis underway in Gaza.
As the Associated Press reports, the new military operations in Iraq have been met with "broad bipartisan support."
Why Your Ongoing Support Is Essential
Donald Trump’s attacks on democracy, justice, and a free press are escalating — putting everything we stand for at risk. We believe a better world is possible, but we can’t get there without your support. Common Dreams stands apart. We answer only to you — our readers, activists, and changemakers — not to billionaires or corporations. Our independence allows us to cover the vital stories that others won’t, spotlighting movements for peace, equality, and human rights. Right now, our work faces unprecedented challenges. Misinformation is spreading, journalists are under attack, and financial pressures are mounting. As a reader-supported, nonprofit newsroom, your support is crucial to keep this journalism alive. Whatever you can give — $10, $25, or $100 — helps us stay strong and responsive when the world needs us most. Together, we’ll continue to build the independent, courageous journalism our movement relies on. Thank you for being part of this community. |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
A week after President Barack Obama authorized airstrikes targeting Islamic militants in northern Iraq, the United States announced it was dispatching over 100 addition military advisers to the area in a sign of escalating operations.
Secretary of Defense Chuck Hagel said Monday that Obama authorized 130 new military "assessors," who arrived in the Kurdish capital of Erbil Monday. The New York Times reports that those additional forces bring the number of military personnel in the country to 1,000.
Hagel's announcement comes as thousands of people including many members of the Yazidi religious minority have fled Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS) militants and are trapped on Mount Sinjar, where they face what United Nations Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon described as an "especially harrowing" crisis. Hagel said that the "assessors" would "take a closer look and give a more in-depth assessment of where we can continue to help the Iraqis with what they're doing and the threats that they are now dealing with."
Though Hagel said that "this is not a combat boots-on-the-ground operation. We're not going to have that kind of operation," Firedoglake's DSWright writes that these incremental expansions of forces beg an important question. He writes that "sooner or later, these little contingents are going to add up to numbers that are hard to hide. What exactly is the threshold for 'boots on the ground' to be reached?"
Phyllis Bennis, foreign policy expert and fellow at the Institute for Policy Studies, toldDemocracy Now! Friday that increased military involvment "is going to put the U.S. in a situation where it's widely going to be blamed for the continuing rise of sectarianism," which she said "was put in place by the U.S. invasion of Iraq in 2003." She continued:
And in the region more broadly, it's going to be pointed out what hypocrisy it is, where the United States is arming Israel to kill Palestinians in Gaza. The language that President Obama used, that there are innocent people facing violations on a massive scale, that describes the situation of Palestinian civilians in Gaza. And yet, rather than providing humanitarian aid, demanding that Israel open the gates of Gaza, that it open the border crossings, the United States instead is sending more weapons and more money to buy more weapons and more ammunition for those Israeli attacks. So, the question of how the U.S. is going to be blamed for this is even wider because of the simultaneous crisis underway in Gaza.
As the Associated Press reports, the new military operations in Iraq have been met with "broad bipartisan support."
A week after President Barack Obama authorized airstrikes targeting Islamic militants in northern Iraq, the United States announced it was dispatching over 100 addition military advisers to the area in a sign of escalating operations.
Secretary of Defense Chuck Hagel said Monday that Obama authorized 130 new military "assessors," who arrived in the Kurdish capital of Erbil Monday. The New York Times reports that those additional forces bring the number of military personnel in the country to 1,000.
Hagel's announcement comes as thousands of people including many members of the Yazidi religious minority have fled Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS) militants and are trapped on Mount Sinjar, where they face what United Nations Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon described as an "especially harrowing" crisis. Hagel said that the "assessors" would "take a closer look and give a more in-depth assessment of where we can continue to help the Iraqis with what they're doing and the threats that they are now dealing with."
Though Hagel said that "this is not a combat boots-on-the-ground operation. We're not going to have that kind of operation," Firedoglake's DSWright writes that these incremental expansions of forces beg an important question. He writes that "sooner or later, these little contingents are going to add up to numbers that are hard to hide. What exactly is the threshold for 'boots on the ground' to be reached?"
Phyllis Bennis, foreign policy expert and fellow at the Institute for Policy Studies, toldDemocracy Now! Friday that increased military involvment "is going to put the U.S. in a situation where it's widely going to be blamed for the continuing rise of sectarianism," which she said "was put in place by the U.S. invasion of Iraq in 2003." She continued:
And in the region more broadly, it's going to be pointed out what hypocrisy it is, where the United States is arming Israel to kill Palestinians in Gaza. The language that President Obama used, that there are innocent people facing violations on a massive scale, that describes the situation of Palestinian civilians in Gaza. And yet, rather than providing humanitarian aid, demanding that Israel open the gates of Gaza, that it open the border crossings, the United States instead is sending more weapons and more money to buy more weapons and more ammunition for those Israeli attacks. So, the question of how the U.S. is going to be blamed for this is even wider because of the simultaneous crisis underway in Gaza.
As the Associated Press reports, the new military operations in Iraq have been met with "broad bipartisan support."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.