A European starling takes a look at things from its perch in the Netherlands. (Photo: Bas Kers (NL)/cc/flickr)
Jul 10, 2014
A class of insecticides linked to the decline of bees may be even more ecologically damaging than previously thought, possibly causing declines in birds as well.
The new findings by researchers from the Netherlands were published Wednesday in the journal Nature.
The researchers looked at one neonicotinoid or "neonic" called imidacloprid, and found that where the concentrations of that insecticide were more than 20 nanograms per liter, bird populations dropped by 3.5 per cent on average annually.
"In ten years it's a 35% reduction in the local population, it's really huge," study co-author Hans de Kroon from Radboud University told BBC News. "It means the alarm bells are on straight away."
The scientists suspect that the imidacloprid builds up and can persist for years in the soil, killing insects that the birds depend on for food, therefore leading to their decline.
"Our results suggest that the impact of neonicotinoids on the natural environment is even more substantial than has recently been reported and is reminiscent of the effects of persistent insecticides in the past," the study reads.
The new study comes on the heels of an analysis by a global team of scientists which found "clear evidence" that neonics--the most widely used insecticides in the world--pose threats to bees, other pollinators, earthworms and ecosystems across the globe.
"Our study really makes the evidence complete that something is going on here," de Kroon told the Guardian. "We can't go on like this any more. It has to stop."
________________________
Why Your Ongoing Support Is Essential
Donald Trump’s attacks on democracy, justice, and a free press are escalating — putting everything we stand for at risk. We believe a better world is possible, but we can’t get there without your support. Common Dreams stands apart. We answer only to you — our readers, activists, and changemakers — not to billionaires or corporations. Our independence allows us to cover the vital stories that others won’t, spotlighting movements for peace, equality, and human rights. Right now, our work faces unprecedented challenges. Misinformation is spreading, journalists are under attack, and financial pressures are mounting. As a reader-supported, nonprofit newsroom, your support is crucial to keep this journalism alive. Whatever you can give — $10, $25, or $100 — helps us stay strong and responsive when the world needs us most. Together, we’ll continue to build the independent, courageous journalism our movement relies on. Thank you for being part of this community. |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
A class of insecticides linked to the decline of bees may be even more ecologically damaging than previously thought, possibly causing declines in birds as well.
The new findings by researchers from the Netherlands were published Wednesday in the journal Nature.
The researchers looked at one neonicotinoid or "neonic" called imidacloprid, and found that where the concentrations of that insecticide were more than 20 nanograms per liter, bird populations dropped by 3.5 per cent on average annually.
"In ten years it's a 35% reduction in the local population, it's really huge," study co-author Hans de Kroon from Radboud University told BBC News. "It means the alarm bells are on straight away."
The scientists suspect that the imidacloprid builds up and can persist for years in the soil, killing insects that the birds depend on for food, therefore leading to their decline.
"Our results suggest that the impact of neonicotinoids on the natural environment is even more substantial than has recently been reported and is reminiscent of the effects of persistent insecticides in the past," the study reads.
The new study comes on the heels of an analysis by a global team of scientists which found "clear evidence" that neonics--the most widely used insecticides in the world--pose threats to bees, other pollinators, earthworms and ecosystems across the globe.
"Our study really makes the evidence complete that something is going on here," de Kroon told the Guardian. "We can't go on like this any more. It has to stop."
________________________
A class of insecticides linked to the decline of bees may be even more ecologically damaging than previously thought, possibly causing declines in birds as well.
The new findings by researchers from the Netherlands were published Wednesday in the journal Nature.
The researchers looked at one neonicotinoid or "neonic" called imidacloprid, and found that where the concentrations of that insecticide were more than 20 nanograms per liter, bird populations dropped by 3.5 per cent on average annually.
"In ten years it's a 35% reduction in the local population, it's really huge," study co-author Hans de Kroon from Radboud University told BBC News. "It means the alarm bells are on straight away."
The scientists suspect that the imidacloprid builds up and can persist for years in the soil, killing insects that the birds depend on for food, therefore leading to their decline.
"Our results suggest that the impact of neonicotinoids on the natural environment is even more substantial than has recently been reported and is reminiscent of the effects of persistent insecticides in the past," the study reads.
The new study comes on the heels of an analysis by a global team of scientists which found "clear evidence" that neonics--the most widely used insecticides in the world--pose threats to bees, other pollinators, earthworms and ecosystems across the globe.
"Our study really makes the evidence complete that something is going on here," de Kroon told the Guardian. "We can't go on like this any more. It has to stop."
________________________
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.