SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Selsun Blue is one of the products that lists trade secret for an ingredient. (Photo: Retoxx/cc/flickr)
Corporations' 'Trade Secrets' Trump Public Health
New database created to let consumers know if personal care products contain carcinogens, but 'trade secrets' claim lets companies skirt transparency
Jan 31, 2014
Corporate power seems to be thwarting the public's right to know if the personal care products they use contain potentially harmful ingredients.
As a result of the California Safe Cosmetics Act, the California Department of Public Health (CDPH) earlier this month rolled out a searchable database through which consumers could see if their personal care products contain carcinogens or reproductive toxins.
Yet an analysis of the database conducted by Women's Voices for the Earth, an organization working to eliminate the toxic chemicals that harm public health and communities, revealed this week that 22 companies are requesting trade secret status for nearly 1,500 products, exploiting a loophole that allows them to keep the ingredients hidden from consumers.
Consumers searching the database may see "trade secret" listed for an ingredient instead of a chemical, thereby preventing full disclosure.
One egregious example the analysis found was make-up and fragrance maker Shiseido, which claimed trade secret status on ingredients in almost 400 of their products. Indeed, if a user searches "trade secret" on the database, pages upon pages of Shiseido products appear.
Among the companies using the trade secret status are well-known names like the Colgate-Palmolive Company and the Dial Corporation, as well as the CHI Organics brand.
"Trade secret status should never be allowed to conceal harmful chemicals such as carcinogens or reproductive toxins from consumers," said Erin Switalski, Executive Director of Women's Voices for the Earth.
"We understand and respect the need for companies to have trade secret protections for the few select chemicals needed to a product's competitive advantage, but we do not believe that these business needs should ever trump public health," Switalski said.
The organization is urging consumers who use products made by the 22 companies to call them to ask why they are keeping this information from consumers.
__________________
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, The U.S. is on a fast track to authoritarianism like nothing I've ever seen. Meanwhile, corporate news outlets are utterly capitulating to Trump, twisting their coverage to avoid drawing his ire while lining up to stuff cash in his pockets. That's why I believe that Common Dreams is doing the best and most consequential reporting that we've ever done. Our small but mighty team is a progressive reporting powerhouse, covering the news every day that the corporate media never will. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. And to ignite change for the common good. Now here's the key piece that I want all our readers to understand: None of this would be possible without your financial support. That's not just some fundraising cliche. It's the absolute and literal truth. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. Will you donate now to help power the nonprofit, independent reporting of Common Dreams? Thank you for being a vital member of our community. Together, we can keep independent journalism alive when it’s needed most. - Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Corporate power seems to be thwarting the public's right to know if the personal care products they use contain potentially harmful ingredients.
As a result of the California Safe Cosmetics Act, the California Department of Public Health (CDPH) earlier this month rolled out a searchable database through which consumers could see if their personal care products contain carcinogens or reproductive toxins.
Yet an analysis of the database conducted by Women's Voices for the Earth, an organization working to eliminate the toxic chemicals that harm public health and communities, revealed this week that 22 companies are requesting trade secret status for nearly 1,500 products, exploiting a loophole that allows them to keep the ingredients hidden from consumers.
Consumers searching the database may see "trade secret" listed for an ingredient instead of a chemical, thereby preventing full disclosure.
One egregious example the analysis found was make-up and fragrance maker Shiseido, which claimed trade secret status on ingredients in almost 400 of their products. Indeed, if a user searches "trade secret" on the database, pages upon pages of Shiseido products appear.
Among the companies using the trade secret status are well-known names like the Colgate-Palmolive Company and the Dial Corporation, as well as the CHI Organics brand.
"Trade secret status should never be allowed to conceal harmful chemicals such as carcinogens or reproductive toxins from consumers," said Erin Switalski, Executive Director of Women's Voices for the Earth.
"We understand and respect the need for companies to have trade secret protections for the few select chemicals needed to a product's competitive advantage, but we do not believe that these business needs should ever trump public health," Switalski said.
The organization is urging consumers who use products made by the 22 companies to call them to ask why they are keeping this information from consumers.
__________________
Corporate power seems to be thwarting the public's right to know if the personal care products they use contain potentially harmful ingredients.
As a result of the California Safe Cosmetics Act, the California Department of Public Health (CDPH) earlier this month rolled out a searchable database through which consumers could see if their personal care products contain carcinogens or reproductive toxins.
Yet an analysis of the database conducted by Women's Voices for the Earth, an organization working to eliminate the toxic chemicals that harm public health and communities, revealed this week that 22 companies are requesting trade secret status for nearly 1,500 products, exploiting a loophole that allows them to keep the ingredients hidden from consumers.
Consumers searching the database may see "trade secret" listed for an ingredient instead of a chemical, thereby preventing full disclosure.
One egregious example the analysis found was make-up and fragrance maker Shiseido, which claimed trade secret status on ingredients in almost 400 of their products. Indeed, if a user searches "trade secret" on the database, pages upon pages of Shiseido products appear.
Among the companies using the trade secret status are well-known names like the Colgate-Palmolive Company and the Dial Corporation, as well as the CHI Organics brand.
"Trade secret status should never be allowed to conceal harmful chemicals such as carcinogens or reproductive toxins from consumers," said Erin Switalski, Executive Director of Women's Voices for the Earth.
"We understand and respect the need for companies to have trade secret protections for the few select chemicals needed to a product's competitive advantage, but we do not believe that these business needs should ever trump public health," Switalski said.
The organization is urging consumers who use products made by the 22 companies to call them to ask why they are keeping this information from consumers.
__________________
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.