SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
High-Speed Rail in the United States: Back on Track after 50 Years of Neglect
Aug 06, 2009
Long before he became president, Barack Obama
had a hankering for the TGV and other fast trains. "I am always jealous
about European trains," he told an audience during a visit to
Strasbourg last spring. "And I said to myself: why can't we have
high-speed rail?"
Well, maybe America can, although the full
flowering of the rail renaissance is unlikely to get under way while
Obama is still in the White House. With an initial infusion of $8bn,
set aside under the spring's economic stimulus plan, the Obama
administration is embarking on the most ambitious expansion of
passenger rail in 50 years, with the construction or upgrade of up to
10 routes from California through the midwest to Florida.
Apart
from California, none of the other routes envisaged would meet
international standards for high-speed trains. But rail advocates say
Obama has still taken an important first step towards the
transformation of US rail.
"It is not going to be probably as
good in the short term as what is currently in China, Japan and Europe,
but it doesn't have to be," said Earl Blumenauer, a Democratic
congressman from Oregon and deputy chairman of the House of
Representatives committee on global warming. "What is revolutionary is
that the US is starting to invest in higher-speed intercity networks.
This reverses 50 years of passenger rail neglect."
Passenger rail
reached its low point under George Bush, who sought to eliminate all
public funds for the Amtrak network. But the security queues at US
airports after the 9/11 attacks, and last summer's high petrol prices,
have spurred official and popular interest in reviving rail travel.
Last month, 40 states put forward 278 proposals for spending the $8bn
in stimulus funds.
Obama views transport as crucial in meeting
the US commitment to reduce America's greenhouse gas emissions. He has
budgeted an additional $1bn a year for rail over the next five years.
The House of Representatives added an additional $1.4bn. The next step
is a transportation bill now before Congress in which Democrats are
seeking $50bn for passenger rail over the next six years.
But the
initial $8bn will cover only a fraction of the costs of building a new
network. The proposals submitted last month together amount to $108bn.
"We can't build a high-speed rail network in the United States
for $8bn. What we can do is show the public that the $8bn has been
invested wisely and created tangible benefits," said Kevin Brubaker of
the Environmental Law and Policy Centre, an advocacy group.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Long before he became president, Barack Obama
had a hankering for the TGV and other fast trains. "I am always jealous
about European trains," he told an audience during a visit to
Strasbourg last spring. "And I said to myself: why can't we have
high-speed rail?"
Well, maybe America can, although the full
flowering of the rail renaissance is unlikely to get under way while
Obama is still in the White House. With an initial infusion of $8bn,
set aside under the spring's economic stimulus plan, the Obama
administration is embarking on the most ambitious expansion of
passenger rail in 50 years, with the construction or upgrade of up to
10 routes from California through the midwest to Florida.
Apart
from California, none of the other routes envisaged would meet
international standards for high-speed trains. But rail advocates say
Obama has still taken an important first step towards the
transformation of US rail.
"It is not going to be probably as
good in the short term as what is currently in China, Japan and Europe,
but it doesn't have to be," said Earl Blumenauer, a Democratic
congressman from Oregon and deputy chairman of the House of
Representatives committee on global warming. "What is revolutionary is
that the US is starting to invest in higher-speed intercity networks.
This reverses 50 years of passenger rail neglect."
Passenger rail
reached its low point under George Bush, who sought to eliminate all
public funds for the Amtrak network. But the security queues at US
airports after the 9/11 attacks, and last summer's high petrol prices,
have spurred official and popular interest in reviving rail travel.
Last month, 40 states put forward 278 proposals for spending the $8bn
in stimulus funds.
Obama views transport as crucial in meeting
the US commitment to reduce America's greenhouse gas emissions. He has
budgeted an additional $1bn a year for rail over the next five years.
The House of Representatives added an additional $1.4bn. The next step
is a transportation bill now before Congress in which Democrats are
seeking $50bn for passenger rail over the next six years.
But the
initial $8bn will cover only a fraction of the costs of building a new
network. The proposals submitted last month together amount to $108bn.
"We can't build a high-speed rail network in the United States
for $8bn. What we can do is show the public that the $8bn has been
invested wisely and created tangible benefits," said Kevin Brubaker of
the Environmental Law and Policy Centre, an advocacy group.
Long before he became president, Barack Obama
had a hankering for the TGV and other fast trains. "I am always jealous
about European trains," he told an audience during a visit to
Strasbourg last spring. "And I said to myself: why can't we have
high-speed rail?"
Well, maybe America can, although the full
flowering of the rail renaissance is unlikely to get under way while
Obama is still in the White House. With an initial infusion of $8bn,
set aside under the spring's economic stimulus plan, the Obama
administration is embarking on the most ambitious expansion of
passenger rail in 50 years, with the construction or upgrade of up to
10 routes from California through the midwest to Florida.
Apart
from California, none of the other routes envisaged would meet
international standards for high-speed trains. But rail advocates say
Obama has still taken an important first step towards the
transformation of US rail.
"It is not going to be probably as
good in the short term as what is currently in China, Japan and Europe,
but it doesn't have to be," said Earl Blumenauer, a Democratic
congressman from Oregon and deputy chairman of the House of
Representatives committee on global warming. "What is revolutionary is
that the US is starting to invest in higher-speed intercity networks.
This reverses 50 years of passenger rail neglect."
Passenger rail
reached its low point under George Bush, who sought to eliminate all
public funds for the Amtrak network. But the security queues at US
airports after the 9/11 attacks, and last summer's high petrol prices,
have spurred official and popular interest in reviving rail travel.
Last month, 40 states put forward 278 proposals for spending the $8bn
in stimulus funds.
Obama views transport as crucial in meeting
the US commitment to reduce America's greenhouse gas emissions. He has
budgeted an additional $1bn a year for rail over the next five years.
The House of Representatives added an additional $1.4bn. The next step
is a transportation bill now before Congress in which Democrats are
seeking $50bn for passenger rail over the next six years.
But the
initial $8bn will cover only a fraction of the costs of building a new
network. The proposals submitted last month together amount to $108bn.
"We can't build a high-speed rail network in the United States
for $8bn. What we can do is show the public that the $8bn has been
invested wisely and created tangible benefits," said Kevin Brubaker of
the Environmental Law and Policy Centre, an advocacy group.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.