SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
US Defense Secretary Robert Gates, pictured in October 2008.(AFP/Getty Images/File/Brendan Smialowski)
Lawyers for a British resident held at Guantanamo Bay have accused Robert Gates, the US defence secretary, of signing a "flagrantly false" affidavit to avoid having to disclose evidence of torture.
In a sworn affidavit to a district court in Washington, Gates says the US authorities have provided Binyam Mohamed's lawyers and the British government with all the information they possess relating to Mohamed's treatment while held in secret prisons. Gates declared his affidavit to be the truth "under penalty of perjury".
Lawyers for a British resident held at Guantanamo Bay have accused Robert Gates, the US defence secretary, of signing a "flagrantly false" affidavit to avoid having to disclose evidence of torture.
In a sworn affidavit to a district court in Washington, Gates says the US authorities have provided Binyam Mohamed's lawyers and the British government with all the information they possess relating to Mohamed's treatment while held in secret prisons. Gates declared his affidavit to be the truth "under penalty of perjury".
Clive Stafford Smith, Mohamed's lawyer and director of Reprieve, the charity that fights miscarriages of justice and human rights abuses, has told the court that Gates's affidavit is "flagrantly false". He has asked the court whether Gates was aware Mohamed was held incommunicado for three years in Pakistan, Morocco, Afghanistan and Guantanamo Bay. Stafford Smith says there seems to be only one explanation for the affidavit: the defence secretary has been "misadvised".
The claims refer to what US officials knew about Mohamed's treatment and where he was rendered to. They also refer to obligations under international law and US domestic law.
In a related development, lawyers for David Miliband, the foreign secretary, have rejected demands that documents in British hands that could prove the US was complicit in the torture should be disclosed to the media. In an unprecedented initiative, two British high court judges, Lord Justice Thomas and Mr Justice Lloyd Jones, invited the Guardian and other media to ask for the documents.
The moves are the latest in an increasingly bitter dispute over the fight to save Mohamed, 30, an Ethiopian national and British resident who faces a US military tribunal and the death penalty on unspecified terrorist charges.
Miliband's lawyers have told the high court that the media cannot see US documents that have been passed to the foreign secretary as their disclosure would cause "real damage" to national security.
They say the US has threatened to stop sharing intelligence with Britain if Miliband agrees to disclose the documents.
Â
Donald Trump’s attacks on democracy, justice, and a free press are escalating — putting everything we stand for at risk. We believe a better world is possible, but we can’t get there without your support. Common Dreams stands apart. We answer only to you — our readers, activists, and changemakers — not to billionaires or corporations. Our independence allows us to cover the vital stories that others won’t, spotlighting movements for peace, equality, and human rights. Right now, our work faces unprecedented challenges. Misinformation is spreading, journalists are under attack, and financial pressures are mounting. As a reader-supported, nonprofit newsroom, your support is crucial to keep this journalism alive. Whatever you can give — $10, $25, or $100 — helps us stay strong and responsive when the world needs us most. Together, we’ll continue to build the independent, courageous journalism our movement relies on. Thank you for being part of this community. |
Lawyers for a British resident held at Guantanamo Bay have accused Robert Gates, the US defence secretary, of signing a "flagrantly false" affidavit to avoid having to disclose evidence of torture.
In a sworn affidavit to a district court in Washington, Gates says the US authorities have provided Binyam Mohamed's lawyers and the British government with all the information they possess relating to Mohamed's treatment while held in secret prisons. Gates declared his affidavit to be the truth "under penalty of perjury".
Clive Stafford Smith, Mohamed's lawyer and director of Reprieve, the charity that fights miscarriages of justice and human rights abuses, has told the court that Gates's affidavit is "flagrantly false". He has asked the court whether Gates was aware Mohamed was held incommunicado for three years in Pakistan, Morocco, Afghanistan and Guantanamo Bay. Stafford Smith says there seems to be only one explanation for the affidavit: the defence secretary has been "misadvised".
The claims refer to what US officials knew about Mohamed's treatment and where he was rendered to. They also refer to obligations under international law and US domestic law.
In a related development, lawyers for David Miliband, the foreign secretary, have rejected demands that documents in British hands that could prove the US was complicit in the torture should be disclosed to the media. In an unprecedented initiative, two British high court judges, Lord Justice Thomas and Mr Justice Lloyd Jones, invited the Guardian and other media to ask for the documents.
The moves are the latest in an increasingly bitter dispute over the fight to save Mohamed, 30, an Ethiopian national and British resident who faces a US military tribunal and the death penalty on unspecified terrorist charges.
Miliband's lawyers have told the high court that the media cannot see US documents that have been passed to the foreign secretary as their disclosure would cause "real damage" to national security.
They say the US has threatened to stop sharing intelligence with Britain if Miliband agrees to disclose the documents.
Â
Lawyers for a British resident held at Guantanamo Bay have accused Robert Gates, the US defence secretary, of signing a "flagrantly false" affidavit to avoid having to disclose evidence of torture.
In a sworn affidavit to a district court in Washington, Gates says the US authorities have provided Binyam Mohamed's lawyers and the British government with all the information they possess relating to Mohamed's treatment while held in secret prisons. Gates declared his affidavit to be the truth "under penalty of perjury".
Clive Stafford Smith, Mohamed's lawyer and director of Reprieve, the charity that fights miscarriages of justice and human rights abuses, has told the court that Gates's affidavit is "flagrantly false". He has asked the court whether Gates was aware Mohamed was held incommunicado for three years in Pakistan, Morocco, Afghanistan and Guantanamo Bay. Stafford Smith says there seems to be only one explanation for the affidavit: the defence secretary has been "misadvised".
The claims refer to what US officials knew about Mohamed's treatment and where he was rendered to. They also refer to obligations under international law and US domestic law.
In a related development, lawyers for David Miliband, the foreign secretary, have rejected demands that documents in British hands that could prove the US was complicit in the torture should be disclosed to the media. In an unprecedented initiative, two British high court judges, Lord Justice Thomas and Mr Justice Lloyd Jones, invited the Guardian and other media to ask for the documents.
The moves are the latest in an increasingly bitter dispute over the fight to save Mohamed, 30, an Ethiopian national and British resident who faces a US military tribunal and the death penalty on unspecified terrorist charges.
Miliband's lawyers have told the high court that the media cannot see US documents that have been passed to the foreign secretary as their disclosure would cause "real damage" to national security.
They say the US has threatened to stop sharing intelligence with Britain if Miliband agrees to disclose the documents.
Â