To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.

×
fight_poverty

Protesters hold a sign that says, "Fight Poverty Not the Poor." (Photo: Jeremy Hogan/SOPA Images/LightRocket via Getty Images)

Direct Cash Transfers Lifted 28 Million Americans Out of Poverty During Pandemic

Nevertheless, 112 million people in the United States were still poor or one emergency away from being poor in 2021, showing how far we have left to go.

https://otherwords.org/census-data-proves-anti-poverty-measures-work/

The U.S. Census Bureau recently reported that poverty dropped notably in 2021. Amid a pandemic and widespread economic pain, this is a significant accomplishment.

There are three lessons here--about government programs, about how we measure poverty, and about how far we have left to go.

Poverty is a policy choice--and fortunately, we can make different choices.

First, these numbers show that government programs work. After Social Security, refundable tax credits like the expanded Child Tax Credit (CTC) and stimulus payments were the biggest contributors to reducing poverty.

Without them, over 20 million more people would have been poor last year. The expanded CTC alone lifted millions of children above the poverty line and reduced racial inequities among poor children.

These programs worked because they departed significantly from how anti-poverty programs have worked for the past 30 years. They provided direct cash transfers to recipients, without any work requirements or bureaucratic indignities.

Welfare rights organizers have been pushing for these changes for decades. This year, they were proven right.

But unfortunately, official federal poverty figures still conceal the true number of people who are struggling--and underestimate the scale of our responsibility to help them.

At just $31,000 for a family of four, the federal government's Supplemental Poverty Measure, or SPM, is far too low. That's less than half of the typical cost of living for a family this size in rural Mississippi, or just one-third for Chicago. And the official poverty measure, or OPM, is even lower.

I'm the policy director of the Poor People's Campaign, which defines poverty to include everyone living up to 200 percent of the SPM.

Using this measure, which is still less than median income, we counted 140 million people--or 43 percent of the country--who were poor or one emergency away from being poor before the pandemic. In 2021, this rate went down to about 34 percent, or 112 million people.

This is a significant decrease. But it means over a third of our nation has little to celebrate.

If poor people vote in the midterms like they did in 2020, we could make another leap towards ending the madness of widespread poverty in the midst of plenty.

In fact, the population living between 100 percent and 200 percent of the SPM threshold stayed basically the same between 2020 and 2021: nearly 90 million people, just one emergency away from poverty. If we only looked at the poverty rate, we would have missed them entirely.

That means we can and must do more. The expanded CTC expired in December 2021, and there has been no further discussion of reviving stimulus payments--even with the federal minimum wage at its lowest value in 66 years and the cost of living continuing to rise.

This is not to minimize the gains we've made. They just remind us that poverty is a policy choice--and fortunately, we can make different choices.

In 2020, there were over 80 million eligible poor and low-income voters. Fifty million of them voted in the presidential contest, accounting for a third of the electorate overall and even higher percentages in key states in the Midwest and South.

These voters share a common interest in securing healthcare, living wages, decent housing, and safe schools for their kids. If they could be organized to take action together--across race, religion, and other lines of division--we could advance the moral policies we need to fully address poverty.

"What's hurting me in Kentucky is hurting you in Alabama, in West Virginia, and across the nation," said Tayna Fogle, a leader in the Kentucky Poor People's Campaign, earlier this year.

"Can you imagine all the poor and the low-income people coming to the ballot box?" she asked. "What if we did everything we could to make sure that our vote counted? We could overturn this madness that's going on."

If poor people vote in the midterms like they did in 2020, we could make another leap towards ending the madness of widespread poverty in the midst of plenty.

Join Us: News for people demanding a better world


Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place.

We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference.

Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. Join with us today!

This column was distributed by OtherWords.
inequalitypovertyworkers

The U.S. Census Bureau recently reported that poverty dropped notably in 2021. Amid a pandemic and widespread economic pain, this is a significant accomplishment.

There are three lessons here--about government programs, about how we measure poverty, and about how far we have left to go.

Poverty is a policy choice--and fortunately, we can make different choices.

First, these numbers show that government programs work. After Social Security, refundable tax credits like the expanded Child Tax Credit (CTC) and stimulus payments were the biggest contributors to reducing poverty.

Without them, over 20 million more people would have been poor last year. The expanded CTC alone lifted millions of children above the poverty line and reduced racial inequities among poor children.

These programs worked because they departed significantly from how anti-poverty programs have worked for the past 30 years. They provided direct cash transfers to recipients, without any work requirements or bureaucratic indignities.

Welfare rights organizers have been pushing for these changes for decades. This year, they were proven right.

But unfortunately, official federal poverty figures still conceal the true number of people who are struggling--and underestimate the scale of our responsibility to help them.

At just $31,000 for a family of four, the federal government's Supplemental Poverty Measure, or SPM, is far too low. That's less than half of the typical cost of living for a family this size in rural Mississippi, or just one-third for Chicago. And the official poverty measure, or OPM, is even lower.

I'm the policy director of the Poor People's Campaign, which defines poverty to include everyone living up to 200 percent of the SPM.

Using this measure, which is still less than median income, we counted 140 million people--or 43 percent of the country--who were poor or one emergency away from being poor before the pandemic. In 2021, this rate went down to about 34 percent, or 112 million people.

This is a significant decrease. But it means over a third of our nation has little to celebrate.

If poor people vote in the midterms like they did in 2020, we could make another leap towards ending the madness of widespread poverty in the midst of plenty.

In fact, the population living between 100 percent and 200 percent of the SPM threshold stayed basically the same between 2020 and 2021: nearly 90 million people, just one emergency away from poverty. If we only looked at the poverty rate, we would have missed them entirely.

That means we can and must do more. The expanded CTC expired in December 2021, and there has been no further discussion of reviving stimulus payments--even with the federal minimum wage at its lowest value in 66 years and the cost of living continuing to rise.

This is not to minimize the gains we've made. They just remind us that poverty is a policy choice--and fortunately, we can make different choices.

In 2020, there were over 80 million eligible poor and low-income voters. Fifty million of them voted in the presidential contest, accounting for a third of the electorate overall and even higher percentages in key states in the Midwest and South.

These voters share a common interest in securing healthcare, living wages, decent housing, and safe schools for their kids. If they could be organized to take action together--across race, religion, and other lines of division--we could advance the moral policies we need to fully address poverty.

"What's hurting me in Kentucky is hurting you in Alabama, in West Virginia, and across the nation," said Tayna Fogle, a leader in the Kentucky Poor People's Campaign, earlier this year.

"Can you imagine all the poor and the low-income people coming to the ballot box?" she asked. "What if we did everything we could to make sure that our vote counted? We could overturn this madness that's going on."

If poor people vote in the midterms like they did in 2020, we could make another leap towards ending the madness of widespread poverty in the midst of plenty.

The U.S. Census Bureau recently reported that poverty dropped notably in 2021. Amid a pandemic and widespread economic pain, this is a significant accomplishment.

There are three lessons here--about government programs, about how we measure poverty, and about how far we have left to go.

Poverty is a policy choice--and fortunately, we can make different choices.

First, these numbers show that government programs work. After Social Security, refundable tax credits like the expanded Child Tax Credit (CTC) and stimulus payments were the biggest contributors to reducing poverty.

Without them, over 20 million more people would have been poor last year. The expanded CTC alone lifted millions of children above the poverty line and reduced racial inequities among poor children.

These programs worked because they departed significantly from how anti-poverty programs have worked for the past 30 years. They provided direct cash transfers to recipients, without any work requirements or bureaucratic indignities.

Welfare rights organizers have been pushing for these changes for decades. This year, they were proven right.

But unfortunately, official federal poverty figures still conceal the true number of people who are struggling--and underestimate the scale of our responsibility to help them.

At just $31,000 for a family of four, the federal government's Supplemental Poverty Measure, or SPM, is far too low. That's less than half of the typical cost of living for a family this size in rural Mississippi, or just one-third for Chicago. And the official poverty measure, or OPM, is even lower.

I'm the policy director of the Poor People's Campaign, which defines poverty to include everyone living up to 200 percent of the SPM.

Using this measure, which is still less than median income, we counted 140 million people--or 43 percent of the country--who were poor or one emergency away from being poor before the pandemic. In 2021, this rate went down to about 34 percent, or 112 million people.

This is a significant decrease. But it means over a third of our nation has little to celebrate.

If poor people vote in the midterms like they did in 2020, we could make another leap towards ending the madness of widespread poverty in the midst of plenty.

In fact, the population living between 100 percent and 200 percent of the SPM threshold stayed basically the same between 2020 and 2021: nearly 90 million people, just one emergency away from poverty. If we only looked at the poverty rate, we would have missed them entirely.

That means we can and must do more. The expanded CTC expired in December 2021, and there has been no further discussion of reviving stimulus payments--even with the federal minimum wage at its lowest value in 66 years and the cost of living continuing to rise.

This is not to minimize the gains we've made. They just remind us that poverty is a policy choice--and fortunately, we can make different choices.

In 2020, there were over 80 million eligible poor and low-income voters. Fifty million of them voted in the presidential contest, accounting for a third of the electorate overall and even higher percentages in key states in the Midwest and South.

These voters share a common interest in securing healthcare, living wages, decent housing, and safe schools for their kids. If they could be organized to take action together--across race, religion, and other lines of division--we could advance the moral policies we need to fully address poverty.

"What's hurting me in Kentucky is hurting you in Alabama, in West Virginia, and across the nation," said Tayna Fogle, a leader in the Kentucky Poor People's Campaign, earlier this year.

"Can you imagine all the poor and the low-income people coming to the ballot box?" she asked. "What if we did everything we could to make sure that our vote counted? We could overturn this madness that's going on."

If poor people vote in the midterms like they did in 2020, we could make another leap towards ending the madness of widespread poverty in the midst of plenty.

inequalitypovertyworkers