SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
A demonstrator holds a placard saying "My Body My Choice" as they gather at the Sample Gates at Indiana University to rally in support of womens reproductive rights, in Bloomington, Texas. (Photo: Jeremy Hogan/SOPA Images/LightRocket via Getty Images)
The impending doom of overturning Roe v Wade has sent shock waves through our society. For those of us old enough to remember when abortion was illegal (I am barely in that age group) a heavy sense of dread immediately settled across our backs.
If we love our country and if we love the women in our lives, especially our daughters, we will rise up to protect their lives and well-being.
All week I've been thinking about a moment from my past. In June of 1986, I went to New York to see my mother who was not well. One of the days I was there, I went down to Greenwich Village, my old stomping grounds. The village was preternaturally quiet, with many shops closed, so I walked east to see if I could figure out what was going on.
Masses of people were lining Fifth Avenue for Gay Pride. As I watched, the People with Aids Coalition came down the avenue, carrying a banner that stretched across the street. Every man with AIDS walking that day had a woman walking with them, a sister, a mother, a lesbian. Women stepped up to walk with young men who were suffering the illness, so they shouldn't have to walk alone. Great cheers erupted from the crowd as they walked by.
In the mid 1980's the Reagan Administration was ignoring the Aids Crisis. There was no help available for the people getting sick, no medical care, little or no research into the illness, it was called "the gay disease" and people said those sinners were getting what they deserved in a vituperative atmosphere.
This changed over time as more people were affected by the crisis. Celebrities such as Elizabeth Taylor spoke out, Rock Hudson died, other celebrities contracted AIDS from blood transfusions. The New York City arts community was decimated. Medical research that eventually began after protracted struggle and public outcry has had positive results not only for AIDS treatments, but for the current pandemic and for other terrible illnesses as well.
That day, when women walked with the young men who would not be around so much longer, was a watershed moment for me that I will never forget. I went home and told my mother about it, how moving it was, and in her incisive way she said, "So they shouldn't feel alone." This is what women do. They tend to others, they care-take, they step up so a vulnerable, suffering person is not alone. They clean up other people's mess, they teach the children, change the diapers, mop the floors. For all their labors they are still not paid a fair wage. Housework should be remunerated, healthcare should be provided to everyone, birth to death, education should be free, everyone has a right to a place to live and clean water. Such things would make women's lives easier and would be the hallmarks of a decent society, which sadly we are far from being.
I can see clearly the additional damage that will be done to our fractured, struggling society if in these "united states" women have different rights across the country. In itself, this will deepen the fractures in our country in a most terrible way. And as is being said by legal scholars, it is unlikely to stop here, more rights will be rolled back and much chaos, crisis and disaster will ensue.
In 1857, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that the Constitution was not meant to include American citizenship for people of African descent, free or not, in the Dred Scott case; the Civil War erupted a few years later and the second original sin of our nation, slavery, came to an end. The crisis of this moment is not dis-similar, we are facing a reality in which women will not have autonomous rights over our bodies, fifty years after a court ruling that said women do have autonomous rights over our bodies. This has nothing to do with fetal heart beats, it is not "pro-life," not when institutional power is used to wage wars, dropping bombs, killing children, maintaining the first original sin of genocide that afflicts our national character.
Children in our country go to bed hungry and wake up hungry daily, the intolerable is tolerated. And be reminded, every day across the globe, a woman or girl is killed by someone in her family every eleven minutes, which comes down to three women a day in the U.S. The intolerable is tolerated. This moment is about intentionally destroying the autonomy, the freedom of millions of women, as if our lives aren't hard enough.
What can we do?
Protest has already begun and likely will continue. It must be maintained, organize rolling protests so that a street presence is maintained daily and weekly across the country. Sit in at all congressional offices with the clear demand to pass the Women's Health Protection Act (failed in the Senate in 2021), not acts to abrogate our rights, as are ominously being readied by ill-meaning congress persons rubbing their gleeful hands together at the impending overturning of Roe v Wade.
This crisis was manufactured by hate-mongering ideologues who put themselves above the law enough to misuse their power by seizing the law-making apparatus to control the most private, personal decisions a person can make.
It was manufactured when Mitch McConnell did not allow a vote on an Obama Administration supreme court justice nominee and when he forced through a hasty vote on a last-minute nominee after Ruth Bader Ginsburg died just prior to the Biden Administration being sworn in.
McConnell was just re-elected to the Senate. His actions as a senator do not fulfill his oath to support and defend the Constitution, his actions actually undermine the Constitution. The crisis brought about by his political machinations needs to made so hot for him that he is forced to resign. Do the same with Senator Collins. Constituents sent her hangers for her votes to confirm the lying, corrupt nominees Gorsuch and Kavanaugh (a justice who was disgustingly seated despite bearing a taint of sexual misconduct). Collins is not representing the interests of women in the state of Maine and should be forced out.
The justices who assumed their duties, having indicated in confirmation hearings that Roe v Wade is precedent and should not be over-turned yet now indicate they will vote to overturn it, should be tossed off the Court. They lied, apply some accountability.
Only a political climate of great enough outrage over such betrayals will suffice to achieve these necessary aims.
One more harkening back to U.S. history: in 1850, Congress passed the Fugitive Slave Act, creating a climate of terror. States that did not have slavery were forced to capture and return slaves, with extraordinary penalties imposed for abolitionists who were assisting escaped slaves. There were riots in Boston over the returning of captured slaves. Great writers and thinkers of the day, Henry David Thoreau, Ralph Waldo Emerson and Bronson Alcott (father of Louisa May) were abolitionists. The Thoreau and Alcott homes were stations on the Underground Railroad and after the Fugitive Slave Act was passed, Emerson provided the funds for escaping slaves to get to Canada, they did not back down in the face of state repression.
If we love our country and if we love the women in our lives, especially our daughters, we will rise up to protect their lives and well-being. Abortion is a matter of healthcare, a private, personal decision, and sometimes a medical necessity. Five ideological Supreme Court justices some of whom were placed on the court through a corrupt use of power, have no right and no mandate to interfere with, or destroy women's lives. It is inevitable that women will die if this decision is enacted. We cannot let it come to pass.
Donald Trump’s attacks on democracy, justice, and a free press are escalating — putting everything we stand for at risk. We believe a better world is possible, but we can’t get there without your support. Common Dreams stands apart. We answer only to you — our readers, activists, and changemakers — not to billionaires or corporations. Our independence allows us to cover the vital stories that others won’t, spotlighting movements for peace, equality, and human rights. Right now, our work faces unprecedented challenges. Misinformation is spreading, journalists are under attack, and financial pressures are mounting. As a reader-supported, nonprofit newsroom, your support is crucial to keep this journalism alive. Whatever you can give — $10, $25, or $100 — helps us stay strong and responsive when the world needs us most. Together, we’ll continue to build the independent, courageous journalism our movement relies on. Thank you for being part of this community. |
The impending doom of overturning Roe v Wade has sent shock waves through our society. For those of us old enough to remember when abortion was illegal (I am barely in that age group) a heavy sense of dread immediately settled across our backs.
If we love our country and if we love the women in our lives, especially our daughters, we will rise up to protect their lives and well-being.
All week I've been thinking about a moment from my past. In June of 1986, I went to New York to see my mother who was not well. One of the days I was there, I went down to Greenwich Village, my old stomping grounds. The village was preternaturally quiet, with many shops closed, so I walked east to see if I could figure out what was going on.
Masses of people were lining Fifth Avenue for Gay Pride. As I watched, the People with Aids Coalition came down the avenue, carrying a banner that stretched across the street. Every man with AIDS walking that day had a woman walking with them, a sister, a mother, a lesbian. Women stepped up to walk with young men who were suffering the illness, so they shouldn't have to walk alone. Great cheers erupted from the crowd as they walked by.
In the mid 1980's the Reagan Administration was ignoring the Aids Crisis. There was no help available for the people getting sick, no medical care, little or no research into the illness, it was called "the gay disease" and people said those sinners were getting what they deserved in a vituperative atmosphere.
This changed over time as more people were affected by the crisis. Celebrities such as Elizabeth Taylor spoke out, Rock Hudson died, other celebrities contracted AIDS from blood transfusions. The New York City arts community was decimated. Medical research that eventually began after protracted struggle and public outcry has had positive results not only for AIDS treatments, but for the current pandemic and for other terrible illnesses as well.
That day, when women walked with the young men who would not be around so much longer, was a watershed moment for me that I will never forget. I went home and told my mother about it, how moving it was, and in her incisive way she said, "So they shouldn't feel alone." This is what women do. They tend to others, they care-take, they step up so a vulnerable, suffering person is not alone. They clean up other people's mess, they teach the children, change the diapers, mop the floors. For all their labors they are still not paid a fair wage. Housework should be remunerated, healthcare should be provided to everyone, birth to death, education should be free, everyone has a right to a place to live and clean water. Such things would make women's lives easier and would be the hallmarks of a decent society, which sadly we are far from being.
I can see clearly the additional damage that will be done to our fractured, struggling society if in these "united states" women have different rights across the country. In itself, this will deepen the fractures in our country in a most terrible way. And as is being said by legal scholars, it is unlikely to stop here, more rights will be rolled back and much chaos, crisis and disaster will ensue.
In 1857, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that the Constitution was not meant to include American citizenship for people of African descent, free or not, in the Dred Scott case; the Civil War erupted a few years later and the second original sin of our nation, slavery, came to an end. The crisis of this moment is not dis-similar, we are facing a reality in which women will not have autonomous rights over our bodies, fifty years after a court ruling that said women do have autonomous rights over our bodies. This has nothing to do with fetal heart beats, it is not "pro-life," not when institutional power is used to wage wars, dropping bombs, killing children, maintaining the first original sin of genocide that afflicts our national character.
Children in our country go to bed hungry and wake up hungry daily, the intolerable is tolerated. And be reminded, every day across the globe, a woman or girl is killed by someone in her family every eleven minutes, which comes down to three women a day in the U.S. The intolerable is tolerated. This moment is about intentionally destroying the autonomy, the freedom of millions of women, as if our lives aren't hard enough.
What can we do?
Protest has already begun and likely will continue. It must be maintained, organize rolling protests so that a street presence is maintained daily and weekly across the country. Sit in at all congressional offices with the clear demand to pass the Women's Health Protection Act (failed in the Senate in 2021), not acts to abrogate our rights, as are ominously being readied by ill-meaning congress persons rubbing their gleeful hands together at the impending overturning of Roe v Wade.
This crisis was manufactured by hate-mongering ideologues who put themselves above the law enough to misuse their power by seizing the law-making apparatus to control the most private, personal decisions a person can make.
It was manufactured when Mitch McConnell did not allow a vote on an Obama Administration supreme court justice nominee and when he forced through a hasty vote on a last-minute nominee after Ruth Bader Ginsburg died just prior to the Biden Administration being sworn in.
McConnell was just re-elected to the Senate. His actions as a senator do not fulfill his oath to support and defend the Constitution, his actions actually undermine the Constitution. The crisis brought about by his political machinations needs to made so hot for him that he is forced to resign. Do the same with Senator Collins. Constituents sent her hangers for her votes to confirm the lying, corrupt nominees Gorsuch and Kavanaugh (a justice who was disgustingly seated despite bearing a taint of sexual misconduct). Collins is not representing the interests of women in the state of Maine and should be forced out.
The justices who assumed their duties, having indicated in confirmation hearings that Roe v Wade is precedent and should not be over-turned yet now indicate they will vote to overturn it, should be tossed off the Court. They lied, apply some accountability.
Only a political climate of great enough outrage over such betrayals will suffice to achieve these necessary aims.
One more harkening back to U.S. history: in 1850, Congress passed the Fugitive Slave Act, creating a climate of terror. States that did not have slavery were forced to capture and return slaves, with extraordinary penalties imposed for abolitionists who were assisting escaped slaves. There were riots in Boston over the returning of captured slaves. Great writers and thinkers of the day, Henry David Thoreau, Ralph Waldo Emerson and Bronson Alcott (father of Louisa May) were abolitionists. The Thoreau and Alcott homes were stations on the Underground Railroad and after the Fugitive Slave Act was passed, Emerson provided the funds for escaping slaves to get to Canada, they did not back down in the face of state repression.
If we love our country and if we love the women in our lives, especially our daughters, we will rise up to protect their lives and well-being. Abortion is a matter of healthcare, a private, personal decision, and sometimes a medical necessity. Five ideological Supreme Court justices some of whom were placed on the court through a corrupt use of power, have no right and no mandate to interfere with, or destroy women's lives. It is inevitable that women will die if this decision is enacted. We cannot let it come to pass.
The impending doom of overturning Roe v Wade has sent shock waves through our society. For those of us old enough to remember when abortion was illegal (I am barely in that age group) a heavy sense of dread immediately settled across our backs.
If we love our country and if we love the women in our lives, especially our daughters, we will rise up to protect their lives and well-being.
All week I've been thinking about a moment from my past. In June of 1986, I went to New York to see my mother who was not well. One of the days I was there, I went down to Greenwich Village, my old stomping grounds. The village was preternaturally quiet, with many shops closed, so I walked east to see if I could figure out what was going on.
Masses of people were lining Fifth Avenue for Gay Pride. As I watched, the People with Aids Coalition came down the avenue, carrying a banner that stretched across the street. Every man with AIDS walking that day had a woman walking with them, a sister, a mother, a lesbian. Women stepped up to walk with young men who were suffering the illness, so they shouldn't have to walk alone. Great cheers erupted from the crowd as they walked by.
In the mid 1980's the Reagan Administration was ignoring the Aids Crisis. There was no help available for the people getting sick, no medical care, little or no research into the illness, it was called "the gay disease" and people said those sinners were getting what they deserved in a vituperative atmosphere.
This changed over time as more people were affected by the crisis. Celebrities such as Elizabeth Taylor spoke out, Rock Hudson died, other celebrities contracted AIDS from blood transfusions. The New York City arts community was decimated. Medical research that eventually began after protracted struggle and public outcry has had positive results not only for AIDS treatments, but for the current pandemic and for other terrible illnesses as well.
That day, when women walked with the young men who would not be around so much longer, was a watershed moment for me that I will never forget. I went home and told my mother about it, how moving it was, and in her incisive way she said, "So they shouldn't feel alone." This is what women do. They tend to others, they care-take, they step up so a vulnerable, suffering person is not alone. They clean up other people's mess, they teach the children, change the diapers, mop the floors. For all their labors they are still not paid a fair wage. Housework should be remunerated, healthcare should be provided to everyone, birth to death, education should be free, everyone has a right to a place to live and clean water. Such things would make women's lives easier and would be the hallmarks of a decent society, which sadly we are far from being.
I can see clearly the additional damage that will be done to our fractured, struggling society if in these "united states" women have different rights across the country. In itself, this will deepen the fractures in our country in a most terrible way. And as is being said by legal scholars, it is unlikely to stop here, more rights will be rolled back and much chaos, crisis and disaster will ensue.
In 1857, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that the Constitution was not meant to include American citizenship for people of African descent, free or not, in the Dred Scott case; the Civil War erupted a few years later and the second original sin of our nation, slavery, came to an end. The crisis of this moment is not dis-similar, we are facing a reality in which women will not have autonomous rights over our bodies, fifty years after a court ruling that said women do have autonomous rights over our bodies. This has nothing to do with fetal heart beats, it is not "pro-life," not when institutional power is used to wage wars, dropping bombs, killing children, maintaining the first original sin of genocide that afflicts our national character.
Children in our country go to bed hungry and wake up hungry daily, the intolerable is tolerated. And be reminded, every day across the globe, a woman or girl is killed by someone in her family every eleven minutes, which comes down to three women a day in the U.S. The intolerable is tolerated. This moment is about intentionally destroying the autonomy, the freedom of millions of women, as if our lives aren't hard enough.
What can we do?
Protest has already begun and likely will continue. It must be maintained, organize rolling protests so that a street presence is maintained daily and weekly across the country. Sit in at all congressional offices with the clear demand to pass the Women's Health Protection Act (failed in the Senate in 2021), not acts to abrogate our rights, as are ominously being readied by ill-meaning congress persons rubbing their gleeful hands together at the impending overturning of Roe v Wade.
This crisis was manufactured by hate-mongering ideologues who put themselves above the law enough to misuse their power by seizing the law-making apparatus to control the most private, personal decisions a person can make.
It was manufactured when Mitch McConnell did not allow a vote on an Obama Administration supreme court justice nominee and when he forced through a hasty vote on a last-minute nominee after Ruth Bader Ginsburg died just prior to the Biden Administration being sworn in.
McConnell was just re-elected to the Senate. His actions as a senator do not fulfill his oath to support and defend the Constitution, his actions actually undermine the Constitution. The crisis brought about by his political machinations needs to made so hot for him that he is forced to resign. Do the same with Senator Collins. Constituents sent her hangers for her votes to confirm the lying, corrupt nominees Gorsuch and Kavanaugh (a justice who was disgustingly seated despite bearing a taint of sexual misconduct). Collins is not representing the interests of women in the state of Maine and should be forced out.
The justices who assumed their duties, having indicated in confirmation hearings that Roe v Wade is precedent and should not be over-turned yet now indicate they will vote to overturn it, should be tossed off the Court. They lied, apply some accountability.
Only a political climate of great enough outrage over such betrayals will suffice to achieve these necessary aims.
One more harkening back to U.S. history: in 1850, Congress passed the Fugitive Slave Act, creating a climate of terror. States that did not have slavery were forced to capture and return slaves, with extraordinary penalties imposed for abolitionists who were assisting escaped slaves. There were riots in Boston over the returning of captured slaves. Great writers and thinkers of the day, Henry David Thoreau, Ralph Waldo Emerson and Bronson Alcott (father of Louisa May) were abolitionists. The Thoreau and Alcott homes were stations on the Underground Railroad and after the Fugitive Slave Act was passed, Emerson provided the funds for escaping slaves to get to Canada, they did not back down in the face of state repression.
If we love our country and if we love the women in our lives, especially our daughters, we will rise up to protect their lives and well-being. Abortion is a matter of healthcare, a private, personal decision, and sometimes a medical necessity. Five ideological Supreme Court justices some of whom were placed on the court through a corrupt use of power, have no right and no mandate to interfere with, or destroy women's lives. It is inevitable that women will die if this decision is enacted. We cannot let it come to pass.
"We've got the FBI patrolling the streets." said one protester. "We've got National Guard set up as a show of force. What's scarier is if we allow this."
Residents of Washington, DC over the weekend demonstrated against US President Donald Trump's deployment of the National Guard in their city.
As reported by NBC Washington, demonstrators gathered on Saturday at DuPont Circle and then marched to the White House to direct their anger at Trump for sending the National Guard to Washington DC, and for his efforts to take over the Metropolitan Police Department.
In an interview with NBC Washington, one protester said that it was important for the administration to see that residents weren't intimidated by the presence of military personnel roaming their streets.
"I know a lot of people are scared," the protester said. "We've got the FBI patrolling the streets. We've got National Guard set up as a show of force. What's scarier is if we allow this."
Saturday protests against the presence of the National Guard are expected to be a weekly occurrence, organizers told NBC Washington.
Hours after the march to the White House, other demonstrators began to gather at Union Station to protest the presence of the National Guard units there. Audio obtained by freelance journalist Andrew Leyden reveals that the National Guard decided to move their forces out of the area in reaction to what dispatchers called "growing demonstrations."
Even residents who didn't take part in formal demonstrations over the weekend managed to express their displeasure with the National Guard patrolling the city. According to The Washington Post, locals who spent a night on the town in the U Street neighborhood on Friday night made their unhappiness with law enforcement in the city very well known.
"At the sight of local and federal law enforcement throughout the night, people pooled on the sidewalk—watching, filming, booing," wrote the Post. "Such interactions played out again and again as the night drew on. Onlookers heckled the police as they did their job and applauded as officers left."
Trump last week ordered the National Guard into Washington, DC and tried to take control the Metropolitan Police, purportedly in order to reduce crime in the city. Statistics released earlier this year, however, showed a significant drop in crime in the nation's capital.
"Why not impose more sanctions on [Russia] and force them to agree to a cease-fire, instead of accepting that Putin won't agree to one?" asked NBC's Kristen Welker.
US Secretary of State Marco Rubio on Sunday was repeatedly put on the spot over the failure of US President Donald Trump to secure a cease-fire deal between Russia and Ukraine.
Rubio appeared on news programs across all major networks on Sunday morning and he was asked on all of them about Trump's summit with Russian President Vladimir Putin ending without any kind of agreement to end the conflict with Ukraine, which has now lasted for more than three years.
During an interview on ABC's "This Week," Rubio was grilled by Martha Raddatz about the purported "progress" being made toward bringing the war to a close. She also zeroed in on Trump's own statements saying that he wanted to see Russia agree to a cease-fire by the end of last week's summit.
"The president went in to that meeting saying he wanted a ceasefire, and there would be consequences if they didn't agree on a ceasefire in that meeting, and they didn't agree to a ceasefire," she said. "So where are the consequences?"
"That's not the aim of this," Rubio replied. "First of all..."
"The president said that was the aim!" Raddatz interjected.
"Yeah, but you're not going to reach a cease-fire or a peace agreement in a meeting in which only one side is represented," Rubio replied. "That's why it's important to bring both leaders together, that's the goal here."
RADDATZ: The president went in to that meeting saying he wanted a ceasefire and there would be consequences if they didn't agree on a ceasefire in that meeting, and they didn't agree to a ceasefire. So where are the consequences?
RUBIO: That's not the aim
RADDATZ: The president… pic.twitter.com/fuO9q1Y5ze
— Aaron Rupar (@atrupar) August 17, 2025
Rubio also made an appearance on CBS' "Face the Nation," where host Margaret Brennan similarly pressed him about the expectations Trump had set going into the summit.
"The president told those European leaders last week he wanted a ceasefire," she pointed out. "He went on television and said he would walk out of the meeting if Putin didn't agree to one, he said there would be severe consequences if he didn't agree to one. He said he'd walk out in two minutes—he spent three hours talking to Vladimir Putin and he did not get one. So there's mixed messages here."
"Our goal is not to stage some production for the world to say, 'Oh, how dramatic, he walked out,'" Rubio shot back. "Our goal is to have a peace agreement to end this war, OK? And obviously we felt, and I agreed, that there was enough progress, not a lot of progress, but enough progress made in those talks to allow us to move to the next phase."
Rubio then insisted that now was not the time to hit Russia with new sanctions, despite Trump's recent threats to do so, because it would end talks all together.
Brennan: The president told those European leaders last week he wanted a ceasefire. He went on television and said he would walk out of the meeting if Putin didn't agree to one, he said there would be severe consequences if he didn’t agree to one. He spent three hours talking to… pic.twitter.com/2WtuDH5Oii
— Acyn (@Acyn) August 17, 2025
During an appearance on NBC's "Meet the Press," host Kristen Welker asked Rubio about the "severe consequences" Trump had promised for Russia if it did not agree to a cease-fire.
"Why not impose more sanctions on [Russia] and force them to agree to a cease-fire, instead of accepting that Putin won't agree to one?" Welker asked.
"Well, first, that's something that I think a lot of people go around saying that I don't necessarily think is true," he replied. "I don't think new sanctions on Russia are going to force them to accept a cease-fire. They are already under severe sanctions... you can argue that could be a consequence of refusing to agree to a cease-fire or the end of hostilities."
He went on to say that he hoped the US would not be forced to put more sanctions on Russia "because that means peace talks failed."
WELKER: Why not impose more sanctions on Russia and force them to agree to a ceasefire, instead of accepting that Putin won't agree to one?
RUBIO: Well, I think that's something people go around saying that I don't necessarily think is true. I don't think new sanctions on Russia… pic.twitter.com/GoIucsrDmA
— Aaron Rupar (@atrupar) August 17, 2025
During the 2024 presidential campaign, Trump said that he could end the war between Russian and Ukraine within the span of a single day. In the seven months since his inauguration, the war has only gotten more intense as Russia has stepped up its daily attacks on Ukrainian cities and infrastructure.
"I had to protect my life and my family... my truck was shot three times," said the vehicle's driver.
A family in San Bernardino, California is in shock after masked federal agents opened fire on their truck.
As NBC Los Angeles reported, Customs and Border Protection (CPB) agents on Saturday morning surrounded the family's truck and demanded that its passengers exit the vehicle.
A video of the incident filmed from inside the truck showed the passengers asked the agents to provide identification, which they declined to do.
An agent was then heard demanding that the father, who had been driving the truck, get out of the vehicle. Seconds later, the agent started smashing the car's windows in an attempt to get inside the vehicle.
The father then hit the gas to try to escape, after which several shots could be heard as agents opened fire. Local news station KTLA reported that, after the father successfully fled the scene, he called local police and asked for help because "masked men" had opened fire on his truck.
Looks like, for the first time I'm aware of, masked agents opened fire today, in San Bernardino. Sources posted below: pic.twitter.com/eE1GMglECg
— Eric Levai (@ericlevai) August 17, 2025
A spokesperson for the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) defended the agents' actions in a statement to NBC Los Angeles.
"In the course of the incident the suspect drove his car at the officers and struck two CBP officers with his vehicle," they said. "Because of the subjects forcing a CBP officer to discharge his firearm in self-defense."
But the father, who only wished to be identified as "Francisco," pointed out that the agents refused to identify themselves and presented no warrants to justify the search of his truck.
"I had to protect my life and my family," he explained to NBC Los Angeles. "My truck was shot three times."
His son-in-law, who only wished to be identified as "Martin," was similarly critical of the agents' actions.
"Its just upsetting that it happened to us," he said. "I am glad my brother is okay, Pop is okay, but it's just not cool that [immigration enforcement officials are] able to do something like that."
According to KTLA, federal agents surrounded the family's house later that afternoon and demanded that the father come out so that he could be arrested. He refused, and agents eventually departed from the neighborhood without detaining him.
Local advocacy group Inland Coalition for Immigrant Justice said on its Instagram page that it was "mobilizing to provide legal support" for the family.