SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Rep. Pramila Jayapal (D-WA) speaks during a press conference advocating for the passage of the Protecting the Right to Organize (PRO) Act in the House of Representatives. The PRO Act would amend the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA) and is backed by the Communications Workers of America (CWA) and American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations (AFL-CIO) unions. (Photo by Samuel Corum/Getty Images)
Despite Fearmongering From Business Interests, the Pro Act Will Not Destroy the Gig Economy
The PRO Act would expand collective bargaining rights for workers. It would not force any worker to give up their gig or freelance work.
Mar 19, 2021
Lately, we have seen criticism of the Protecting the Right to Organize (PRO) Act centered on what the bill will mean for independent contractors and freelancers.
Despite the fearmongering by business interests and some freelancer groups, the PRO Act will not destroy the gig economy.
Here are three reasons why:
The PRO Act is about giving workers a voice, not taking away freedom.
The PRO Act would expand collective bargaining rights for workers. It would not force any worker to give up their gig or freelance work.
The Act would expand protections under the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA) to more workers. The NLRA is an 85-year-old law that protects workers' right to join together to form unions or to engage in concerted efforts to ensure better working conditions. When Congress passed the NLRA it was to "encourage collective bargaining, and to curtail certain private sector labor and management practices, which can harm the general welfare of workers, businesses, and the U.S. economy." The NLRA only covers "employees," so workers who are deemed independent contractors are not covered, which leads us to the next point.
The PRO Act is about making it harder for employers to misclassify workers as independent contractors, not ending the contractor designation.
The PRO Act would stop employers from misclassifying employees as independent contractors or freelancers in order to prevent workers from banding together or forming unions to negotiate for better pay and working conditions.
The Act would use a legal test, known as an "ABC" test, of three key criteria employers have to meet in order to prove a worker is truly an independent contractor. The criteria include:
"(A) the individual is free from control and direction in connection with the performance of the service, both under the contract for the performance of service and in fact;
"(B) the service is performed outside the usual course of the business of the employer; and
"(C) the individual is customarily engaged in an independently established trade, occupation, profession, or business of the same nature as that involved in the service performed."
The PRO Act does not change a worker's employment status that impacts state benefits like workers' compensation or unemployment.
The PRO Act would provide workers with the right to join unions and band together no matter where they live if they are deemed employees because the legislation would be federally regulated and enforced.
The Act would not impact rules or laws in states that determine whether workers are employees or independent contractors for the purposes of determining a workers' state income tax status or whether they're entitled to workers' compensation benefits or unemployment benefits.
The PRO Act's name says exactly what it does, nothing more, nothing less. It's about protecting the right to organize.
For additional resources on the PRO Act, check out:
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
© 2023 Economic Policy Institute
Eve Tahmincioglu
Eve Tahmincioglu joined EPI in January 2020. She is an award-winning business journalist and a seasoned communications professional. Her focus has been on making Corporate America more sustainability-focused, balancing profits and social purpose.
Lately, we have seen criticism of the Protecting the Right to Organize (PRO) Act centered on what the bill will mean for independent contractors and freelancers.
Despite the fearmongering by business interests and some freelancer groups, the PRO Act will not destroy the gig economy.
Here are three reasons why:
The PRO Act is about giving workers a voice, not taking away freedom.
The PRO Act would expand collective bargaining rights for workers. It would not force any worker to give up their gig or freelance work.
The Act would expand protections under the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA) to more workers. The NLRA is an 85-year-old law that protects workers' right to join together to form unions or to engage in concerted efforts to ensure better working conditions. When Congress passed the NLRA it was to "encourage collective bargaining, and to curtail certain private sector labor and management practices, which can harm the general welfare of workers, businesses, and the U.S. economy." The NLRA only covers "employees," so workers who are deemed independent contractors are not covered, which leads us to the next point.
The PRO Act is about making it harder for employers to misclassify workers as independent contractors, not ending the contractor designation.
The PRO Act would stop employers from misclassifying employees as independent contractors or freelancers in order to prevent workers from banding together or forming unions to negotiate for better pay and working conditions.
The Act would use a legal test, known as an "ABC" test, of three key criteria employers have to meet in order to prove a worker is truly an independent contractor. The criteria include:
"(A) the individual is free from control and direction in connection with the performance of the service, both under the contract for the performance of service and in fact;
"(B) the service is performed outside the usual course of the business of the employer; and
"(C) the individual is customarily engaged in an independently established trade, occupation, profession, or business of the same nature as that involved in the service performed."
The PRO Act does not change a worker's employment status that impacts state benefits like workers' compensation or unemployment.
The PRO Act would provide workers with the right to join unions and band together no matter where they live if they are deemed employees because the legislation would be federally regulated and enforced.
The Act would not impact rules or laws in states that determine whether workers are employees or independent contractors for the purposes of determining a workers' state income tax status or whether they're entitled to workers' compensation benefits or unemployment benefits.
The PRO Act's name says exactly what it does, nothing more, nothing less. It's about protecting the right to organize.
For additional resources on the PRO Act, check out:
Eve Tahmincioglu
Eve Tahmincioglu joined EPI in January 2020. She is an award-winning business journalist and a seasoned communications professional. Her focus has been on making Corporate America more sustainability-focused, balancing profits and social purpose.
Lately, we have seen criticism of the Protecting the Right to Organize (PRO) Act centered on what the bill will mean for independent contractors and freelancers.
Despite the fearmongering by business interests and some freelancer groups, the PRO Act will not destroy the gig economy.
Here are three reasons why:
The PRO Act is about giving workers a voice, not taking away freedom.
The PRO Act would expand collective bargaining rights for workers. It would not force any worker to give up their gig or freelance work.
The Act would expand protections under the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA) to more workers. The NLRA is an 85-year-old law that protects workers' right to join together to form unions or to engage in concerted efforts to ensure better working conditions. When Congress passed the NLRA it was to "encourage collective bargaining, and to curtail certain private sector labor and management practices, which can harm the general welfare of workers, businesses, and the U.S. economy." The NLRA only covers "employees," so workers who are deemed independent contractors are not covered, which leads us to the next point.
The PRO Act is about making it harder for employers to misclassify workers as independent contractors, not ending the contractor designation.
The PRO Act would stop employers from misclassifying employees as independent contractors or freelancers in order to prevent workers from banding together or forming unions to negotiate for better pay and working conditions.
The Act would use a legal test, known as an "ABC" test, of three key criteria employers have to meet in order to prove a worker is truly an independent contractor. The criteria include:
"(A) the individual is free from control and direction in connection with the performance of the service, both under the contract for the performance of service and in fact;
"(B) the service is performed outside the usual course of the business of the employer; and
"(C) the individual is customarily engaged in an independently established trade, occupation, profession, or business of the same nature as that involved in the service performed."
The PRO Act does not change a worker's employment status that impacts state benefits like workers' compensation or unemployment.
The PRO Act would provide workers with the right to join unions and band together no matter where they live if they are deemed employees because the legislation would be federally regulated and enforced.
The Act would not impact rules or laws in states that determine whether workers are employees or independent contractors for the purposes of determining a workers' state income tax status or whether they're entitled to workers' compensation benefits or unemployment benefits.
The PRO Act's name says exactly what it does, nothing more, nothing less. It's about protecting the right to organize.
For additional resources on the PRO Act, check out:
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.