SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
A still image from a video of a gender-reveal explosion in Arizona that caused more than $8 million in damages in 2017. (Photo: U.S. Forest Service)
Let 'Gender Reveal' Parties Burn
Even their creator says enough is enough. Let children discover themselves on their own terms.
Sep 18, 2020
The Georgia sun beat down on my uncle Dennis's front yard the day he cut my hair.
It was 2003, my Dad had been deployed to Iraq for half a year, and my mom had driven into town to pick up some groceries. Uncle Dennis grabbed me by the collar and drawled, "Your hair's getting too long, you look like a girl."
Before I could say anything, he'd put me down in a chair and buzzed away half of my hair. I cried.
"But if the news lately is any indication, we are more than willing to set the world on fire to enforce gender roles--literally."
I'm 28 now. I've lived as an out trans lesbian for more than five years. And I've never been able to get the taste of my sweat and tears from that hot August afternoon out of my mouth.
Why did my uncle feel within his rights to cut my hair? And why were other people willing to hurt me to "make me a man" over the years?
Where do we learn this cruelty toward gender-variant children? I don't know. But if the news lately is any indication, we are more than willing to set the world on fire to enforce gender roles--literally.
One of the multiple wildfires raging across the West was started by a "smoke-generating pyrotechnic device" at a gender reveal party. These Instagram-friendly parties typically use bright colors to announce the visible genitalia of an unborn baby to a family's community--pink for fetuses that seem to have vaginas, blue for fetuses that seem to have penises.
This isn't the first time that gender reveal parties have sparked catastrophe. In Iowa in 2019, a gender reveal device malfunctioned, exploded, and killed a woman with shrapnel. In 2018, a party in Australia ended when a car burst into flames. In 2017, a party in Arizona sparked a wildfire that caused more than $8 million in damages.
It's easy to focus on the silly extravagance of crop-dusting with dyed water and colorful smoke bombs--and there's good reason to warn against the public safety hazard these parties have become. But there's a more insidious dynamic at play which also merits condemnation.
"In this way, they are a repugnant refusal to acknowledge the existence of trans people."
There is simply no way to accurately predict what a baby's gender will be. Yet "gender-reveal" parties assume that a baby's gender can be accurately predicted from nothing but its visible genitalia.
In this way, they are a repugnant refusal to acknowledge the existence of trans people. They prepare an entire community to welcome the baby as a particular gender, and affirm that genitalia are appropriate criteria for enforcing a male or female gender onto the baby.
When I think of gender-reveal parties, I think back to my Uncle Dennis's porch. I think back to the casual assurance he had that I was definitely a boy, that boys look a certain way, and that he was doing right by me to forcibly cut my hair. I think back to all the times I was told to temper my natural lisp, to speak from my belly, to stop crying, to be a man.
When theorists insist that gender is a social construct, this is what they mean. We create gender, we enforce it on one another in social situations, we teach it to children. We reveal it to our community.
Gender reveal parties teach families and communities to expect that children will be cisgender. They also cause deadly accidents.
They're even despised by their creator, Jenna Karvunidis, a blogger whose own child turned out to be gender noncomforming. She now begs people to stop throwing the parties. "We don't need to get our joy by giving others pain," Karvunidis says.
It's past time we let them burn, and let our children discover themselves on their own terms.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
This column was distributed by OtherWords.
Robin Savannah Carver
Robin Savannah Carver is a development assistant at the Institute for Policy Studies.
The Georgia sun beat down on my uncle Dennis's front yard the day he cut my hair.
It was 2003, my Dad had been deployed to Iraq for half a year, and my mom had driven into town to pick up some groceries. Uncle Dennis grabbed me by the collar and drawled, "Your hair's getting too long, you look like a girl."
Before I could say anything, he'd put me down in a chair and buzzed away half of my hair. I cried.
"But if the news lately is any indication, we are more than willing to set the world on fire to enforce gender roles--literally."
I'm 28 now. I've lived as an out trans lesbian for more than five years. And I've never been able to get the taste of my sweat and tears from that hot August afternoon out of my mouth.
Why did my uncle feel within his rights to cut my hair? And why were other people willing to hurt me to "make me a man" over the years?
Where do we learn this cruelty toward gender-variant children? I don't know. But if the news lately is any indication, we are more than willing to set the world on fire to enforce gender roles--literally.
One of the multiple wildfires raging across the West was started by a "smoke-generating pyrotechnic device" at a gender reveal party. These Instagram-friendly parties typically use bright colors to announce the visible genitalia of an unborn baby to a family's community--pink for fetuses that seem to have vaginas, blue for fetuses that seem to have penises.
This isn't the first time that gender reveal parties have sparked catastrophe. In Iowa in 2019, a gender reveal device malfunctioned, exploded, and killed a woman with shrapnel. In 2018, a party in Australia ended when a car burst into flames. In 2017, a party in Arizona sparked a wildfire that caused more than $8 million in damages.
It's easy to focus on the silly extravagance of crop-dusting with dyed water and colorful smoke bombs--and there's good reason to warn against the public safety hazard these parties have become. But there's a more insidious dynamic at play which also merits condemnation.
"In this way, they are a repugnant refusal to acknowledge the existence of trans people."
There is simply no way to accurately predict what a baby's gender will be. Yet "gender-reveal" parties assume that a baby's gender can be accurately predicted from nothing but its visible genitalia.
In this way, they are a repugnant refusal to acknowledge the existence of trans people. They prepare an entire community to welcome the baby as a particular gender, and affirm that genitalia are appropriate criteria for enforcing a male or female gender onto the baby.
When I think of gender-reveal parties, I think back to my Uncle Dennis's porch. I think back to the casual assurance he had that I was definitely a boy, that boys look a certain way, and that he was doing right by me to forcibly cut my hair. I think back to all the times I was told to temper my natural lisp, to speak from my belly, to stop crying, to be a man.
When theorists insist that gender is a social construct, this is what they mean. We create gender, we enforce it on one another in social situations, we teach it to children. We reveal it to our community.
Gender reveal parties teach families and communities to expect that children will be cisgender. They also cause deadly accidents.
They're even despised by their creator, Jenna Karvunidis, a blogger whose own child turned out to be gender noncomforming. She now begs people to stop throwing the parties. "We don't need to get our joy by giving others pain," Karvunidis says.
It's past time we let them burn, and let our children discover themselves on their own terms.
Robin Savannah Carver
Robin Savannah Carver is a development assistant at the Institute for Policy Studies.
The Georgia sun beat down on my uncle Dennis's front yard the day he cut my hair.
It was 2003, my Dad had been deployed to Iraq for half a year, and my mom had driven into town to pick up some groceries. Uncle Dennis grabbed me by the collar and drawled, "Your hair's getting too long, you look like a girl."
Before I could say anything, he'd put me down in a chair and buzzed away half of my hair. I cried.
"But if the news lately is any indication, we are more than willing to set the world on fire to enforce gender roles--literally."
I'm 28 now. I've lived as an out trans lesbian for more than five years. And I've never been able to get the taste of my sweat and tears from that hot August afternoon out of my mouth.
Why did my uncle feel within his rights to cut my hair? And why were other people willing to hurt me to "make me a man" over the years?
Where do we learn this cruelty toward gender-variant children? I don't know. But if the news lately is any indication, we are more than willing to set the world on fire to enforce gender roles--literally.
One of the multiple wildfires raging across the West was started by a "smoke-generating pyrotechnic device" at a gender reveal party. These Instagram-friendly parties typically use bright colors to announce the visible genitalia of an unborn baby to a family's community--pink for fetuses that seem to have vaginas, blue for fetuses that seem to have penises.
This isn't the first time that gender reveal parties have sparked catastrophe. In Iowa in 2019, a gender reveal device malfunctioned, exploded, and killed a woman with shrapnel. In 2018, a party in Australia ended when a car burst into flames. In 2017, a party in Arizona sparked a wildfire that caused more than $8 million in damages.
It's easy to focus on the silly extravagance of crop-dusting with dyed water and colorful smoke bombs--and there's good reason to warn against the public safety hazard these parties have become. But there's a more insidious dynamic at play which also merits condemnation.
"In this way, they are a repugnant refusal to acknowledge the existence of trans people."
There is simply no way to accurately predict what a baby's gender will be. Yet "gender-reveal" parties assume that a baby's gender can be accurately predicted from nothing but its visible genitalia.
In this way, they are a repugnant refusal to acknowledge the existence of trans people. They prepare an entire community to welcome the baby as a particular gender, and affirm that genitalia are appropriate criteria for enforcing a male or female gender onto the baby.
When I think of gender-reveal parties, I think back to my Uncle Dennis's porch. I think back to the casual assurance he had that I was definitely a boy, that boys look a certain way, and that he was doing right by me to forcibly cut my hair. I think back to all the times I was told to temper my natural lisp, to speak from my belly, to stop crying, to be a man.
When theorists insist that gender is a social construct, this is what they mean. We create gender, we enforce it on one another in social situations, we teach it to children. We reveal it to our community.
Gender reveal parties teach families and communities to expect that children will be cisgender. They also cause deadly accidents.
They're even despised by their creator, Jenna Karvunidis, a blogger whose own child turned out to be gender noncomforming. She now begs people to stop throwing the parties. "We don't need to get our joy by giving others pain," Karvunidis says.
It's past time we let them burn, and let our children discover themselves on their own terms.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.