SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Trump has relentlessly promoted the oil and fossil fuel industries at the expense of the environment. (Photo: Shutterstock)
The Good News About Trump's Very Bad Environment Speech
Even Trump now senses that the electorate wants a 2020 candidate who takes climate change seriously
Jul 11, 2019
It's hard to find the nuggets of good news in the media these days. Many people are so burnt out on the Trump news rollercoaster, which goes around the clock, changes frequently, and often shocks and outrages, that the least painful option is to skip the news entirely.
Here's some good news: Americans are starting to wake up about the climate crisis.
More than half of Americans believe human-caused climate change is happening. More than six in ten Americans disapprove of Trump's record on the climate. And while only 6 percent of Republicans see climate change as the single most important issue in the 2020 election, 27 percent of Democrats believe that it is.
It appears that the debate over the climate is shifting. Trump recently made an (awkward, cringey) speech about the environment, touting his own environmental record and falsely claiming -- lying, really -- that the U.S. is outperforming other nations in reducing greenhouse gas emissions.
For the record, the Trump administration stripped scientific climate data off government websites, pulled out of the Paris accord, and rolled back Obama-era fuel efficiency standards on vehicles.
Yet now he's out talking about his excellent record on the environment? I suppose it's good that he thinks he needs people to believe he has a good record there -- even if that's not a test he can pass by any measure.
In his speech, Trump expressed opposition to Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez's proposed Green New Deal, which aims to provide both good climate policy and economic stimulus together. But it's a notable shift that a man who previously referred to climate change as a "Chinese hoax" now feels the need to engage with a progressive plan to take it very seriously.
This does not indicate that Trump himself, or his administration, is ready to take the kind of action on climate that we need. But it does hint that the electorate will be looking for a candidate in 2020 who will.
The voluminous array of Democratic presidential candidates are now competing with one another on their climate platforms. Most support holding a debate devoted entirely to climate change. That energy could infect races for Congress, too.
It's unlikely that a zebra like Trump will change his stripes on climate at this point, but it is hopeful that the American people are demanding that leaders take action -- so much that Trump feels pressured to claim a successful environmental record.
And it's even more hopeful because we live in a democracy where we have the ability to elect leaders who can deliver on the issues we care about every two to four years -- if we make them.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
This column was distributed by OtherWords.
Jill Richardson
Jill Richardson is pursuing a PhD in sociology at UW-Madison, where she studies natural resources and the environment.
It's hard to find the nuggets of good news in the media these days. Many people are so burnt out on the Trump news rollercoaster, which goes around the clock, changes frequently, and often shocks and outrages, that the least painful option is to skip the news entirely.
Here's some good news: Americans are starting to wake up about the climate crisis.
More than half of Americans believe human-caused climate change is happening. More than six in ten Americans disapprove of Trump's record on the climate. And while only 6 percent of Republicans see climate change as the single most important issue in the 2020 election, 27 percent of Democrats believe that it is.
It appears that the debate over the climate is shifting. Trump recently made an (awkward, cringey) speech about the environment, touting his own environmental record and falsely claiming -- lying, really -- that the U.S. is outperforming other nations in reducing greenhouse gas emissions.
For the record, the Trump administration stripped scientific climate data off government websites, pulled out of the Paris accord, and rolled back Obama-era fuel efficiency standards on vehicles.
Yet now he's out talking about his excellent record on the environment? I suppose it's good that he thinks he needs people to believe he has a good record there -- even if that's not a test he can pass by any measure.
In his speech, Trump expressed opposition to Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez's proposed Green New Deal, which aims to provide both good climate policy and economic stimulus together. But it's a notable shift that a man who previously referred to climate change as a "Chinese hoax" now feels the need to engage with a progressive plan to take it very seriously.
This does not indicate that Trump himself, or his administration, is ready to take the kind of action on climate that we need. But it does hint that the electorate will be looking for a candidate in 2020 who will.
The voluminous array of Democratic presidential candidates are now competing with one another on their climate platforms. Most support holding a debate devoted entirely to climate change. That energy could infect races for Congress, too.
It's unlikely that a zebra like Trump will change his stripes on climate at this point, but it is hopeful that the American people are demanding that leaders take action -- so much that Trump feels pressured to claim a successful environmental record.
And it's even more hopeful because we live in a democracy where we have the ability to elect leaders who can deliver on the issues we care about every two to four years -- if we make them.
Jill Richardson
Jill Richardson is pursuing a PhD in sociology at UW-Madison, where she studies natural resources and the environment.
It's hard to find the nuggets of good news in the media these days. Many people are so burnt out on the Trump news rollercoaster, which goes around the clock, changes frequently, and often shocks and outrages, that the least painful option is to skip the news entirely.
Here's some good news: Americans are starting to wake up about the climate crisis.
More than half of Americans believe human-caused climate change is happening. More than six in ten Americans disapprove of Trump's record on the climate. And while only 6 percent of Republicans see climate change as the single most important issue in the 2020 election, 27 percent of Democrats believe that it is.
It appears that the debate over the climate is shifting. Trump recently made an (awkward, cringey) speech about the environment, touting his own environmental record and falsely claiming -- lying, really -- that the U.S. is outperforming other nations in reducing greenhouse gas emissions.
For the record, the Trump administration stripped scientific climate data off government websites, pulled out of the Paris accord, and rolled back Obama-era fuel efficiency standards on vehicles.
Yet now he's out talking about his excellent record on the environment? I suppose it's good that he thinks he needs people to believe he has a good record there -- even if that's not a test he can pass by any measure.
In his speech, Trump expressed opposition to Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez's proposed Green New Deal, which aims to provide both good climate policy and economic stimulus together. But it's a notable shift that a man who previously referred to climate change as a "Chinese hoax" now feels the need to engage with a progressive plan to take it very seriously.
This does not indicate that Trump himself, or his administration, is ready to take the kind of action on climate that we need. But it does hint that the electorate will be looking for a candidate in 2020 who will.
The voluminous array of Democratic presidential candidates are now competing with one another on their climate platforms. Most support holding a debate devoted entirely to climate change. That energy could infect races for Congress, too.
It's unlikely that a zebra like Trump will change his stripes on climate at this point, but it is hopeful that the American people are demanding that leaders take action -- so much that Trump feels pressured to claim a successful environmental record.
And it's even more hopeful because we live in a democracy where we have the ability to elect leaders who can deliver on the issues we care about every two to four years -- if we make them.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.